Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 245 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12201 High Tide 14-Elite 1590 35-28 56% 14 FL
12202 MARIN 11-Black 1590 33-27 55% 11 CA
12203 iCrush 14-Black 1590 21-14 54% 14 TX
12204 SA Titans 17-1 1590 23-10 70% 17 TX
12205 Elevate 10u Blue 1590 4-1 80% 10 IL
12206 Viper 13-Hannah/marlee 1590 7-4 64% 13 CA
12207 UVA 16-S national black 1590 8-1 89% 16 LA
12208 Apex 16-Ultra 1590 4-1 80% 16 WA
12209 Skyline 13-Silver teresa 1590 28-21 53% 13 TX
12210 SP2VC 17-Blue 1590 27-15 64% 17 NC
12211 Garden Oaks 13-1 black 1590 9-3 75% 13 TX
12212 NITRO 16-White 1590 24-17 59% 16 TX
12213 Iron 15-Black 1590 11-4 73% 15 AL
12214 Husky 15-1 1590 5-2 71% 15 CT
12215 ID Peak 17-Bri 1590 4-4 50% 17 UT
12216 Carolina Vibe 16-Darryl 1590 17-9 65% 16 NC
12217 SPORTIME 14-Green 1590 12-9 57% 14 NY
12218 Prolink 14-Rachel 1590 37-31 54% 14 GA
12219 NPJ Portland 13-Black 1590 35-21 63% 13 OR
12220 Black Creek VBC 14-1 1590 25-17 60% 14 FL
12221 MW Blitz 16-1 1590 18-15 51% 16 KS
12222 MoCo Volleyball Club 13 MOCO Motion 1589 32-28 53% 13
12223 AP 13 Neon 1589 21-12 62% 13 TX
12224 Impact Vball Club 13 1589 9-5 56% 13 MO
12225 Vegas United G13-Black 1589 23-19 55% 13 NV
12226 AR SELECT 18-Ntl 1589 18-7 72% 18 AR
12227 Cleveland Wave Volleyball Club 14 CWAVE Elbert 1589 7-4 64% 14 OH
12228 Austin County 14-Red 1589 8-3 73% 14 TX
12229 Southernmost 14-Black 1589 8-3 73% 14 FL
12230 Lanier 17-National mary beth 1589 10-8 56% 17 GA
12231 FURY 16-Sarah 1589 5-7 42% 16 NJ
12232 NIVB 15-Black 1589 15-12 50% 15 MN
12233 JJVA Club 12-B 1589 14-10 58% 12 FL
12234 Playeras Isabela 14 1589 8-5 62% 14 PR
12235 Courthouse 14-Red 1589 19-10 63% 14 OR
12236 Shock 14-Ua spark 1589 24-15 62% 14 IL
12237 SA Empire 13-Royal 1589 19-12 59% 13 TX
12238 UPONTOP 15-S select 1589 30-21 59% 15 FL
12239 Lions Starved Rock 18-Red 1589 27-16 63% 18 IL
12240 VC United 17-1 premier 1589 25-12 68% 17 IL
12241 NPJ Portland 18 National 1589 24-21 53% 18 OR
12242 GP 12-Local black 1589 36-16 69% 12 FL
12243 APV 15-Regional black 1589 27-13 63% 15 TX
12244 VVC 18-R 1589 18-8 69% 18 WV
12245 Hometown Heat 14-Ember elite 1589 19-14 58% 14 WI
12246 GO Volley VBC 16-1 1589 2-13 13% 16 VA
12247 ESVC 15-Black 1589 20-19 51% 15 AL
12248 Spartan Volleyball 17 1589 9-2 69% 17 UT
12249 LIV 16-Adidas 1589 31-17 65% 16 LA
12250 Four1Nine Xtreme 15 15-Armentrout (OV) (10) 1589 3-1 75% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.