Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 249 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12401 AZ SKY 15-N2 1587 36-22 62% 15 AZ
12402 ECA 12 1587 4-1 80% 12 IN
12403 Clark Fork Juniors 14-1 1587 12-4 75% 14 WA
12404 Carvers of the Hills 13-1 1587 8-2 80% 13 WY
12405 ESVBC 12-Swoosh 1587 16-11 59% 12 IA
12406 Eastside 16-Bryan 1587 14-8 64% 16 NC
12407 MGA VBC 13-Stars 1587 21-10 68% 13 MA
12408 Academy 13 Crystal 1587 24-33 42% 13 NC
12409 ICA 14-Nationals 1587 20-17 54% 14 CA
12410 Ne Jrs 11-Black 1587 3-2 60% 11 NE
12411 Dallas Premier 11-Black 1587 3-4 43% 11 TX
12412 High Desert Elite 18-Elite 1587 23-28 45% 18 CO
12413 LevelOne Albany 16-2 1587 23-14 62% 16 OR
12414 Herederas 11-1 rickie 1587 4-0 100% 11 PR
12415 Club Apex 14-Grey 1587 35-14 71% 14 KY
12416 Active 18 Gretna 1587 20-9 69% 18 VA
12417 Monti Club JO 16-1 1587 30-15 67% 16 MN
12418 Burl Elite 12-Orange 1587 10-10 50% 12 WI
12419 BftSel 18 1587 21-10 68% 18 SC
12420 NASA 18-1 j-holly 1587 4-1 80% 18 AL
12421 Full Force 15-R 1587 4-1 80% 15 OH
12422 Maceteras Volleyball Club 15 MVC Black Liz 1587 5-2 71% 15 PR
12423 Laredo Unity 17-Elite 1587 18-7 72% 17 TX
12424 Ghost Elite 15 1587 37-19 66% 15 WY
12425 Integrity 15-Vinson 1587 4-1 80% 15 PA
12426 ICA 12-Anthony 1587 5-3 63% 12 HI
12427 Vail Peak 15 1587 26-21 55% 15 CO
12428 Lakeview 14-1 1587 4-1 80% 14 SD
12429 Top Caliber 16-Lexi 1587 19-19 50% 16 NC
12430 North Shore 13-1 1587 15-7 68% 13 NY
12431 CLBRK 12-1 1587 13-9 59% 12 WI
12432 EMV 15-Black maddy 1587 21-20 49% 15 TX
12433 NKYVC 14-3 typhoon 1587 27-23 54% 14 KY
12434 NCVC 15-Rush - national 1587 24-11 69% 15 NY
12435 Club 801 12-Regional heather 1587 12-21 31% 12 UT
12436 ATOM 18-Red 1587 30-24 56% 18 FL
12437 River City 12-Blue 1587 12-8 60% 12 WI
12438 DBQ ELITE 17 1587 7-3 70% 17 IA
12439 RockCity 10-R1 1587 5-1 83% 10 OH
12440 KIVA 10-Jill 1587 3-0 100% 10 KY
12441 AV IMPACT 13-Fernanda 1587 21-10 68% 13 CA
12442 Anthracite Attack 15-Black 1587 3-1 50% 15 PA
12443 Deacon Flames 12-White 1587 27-24 49% 12 ND
12444 Belusa United 18 Cyclones 1587 31-17 65% 18 IL
12445 TC ELITE 12-C 1587 4-1 80% 12 LA
12446 CGSV 12-Miller 1587 4-2 67% 12 OH
12447 SPVB 14-Blue 1587 31-20 61% 14 IL
12448 PIRATAS ADN 18-1 1587 3-3 50% 18 PR
12449 407 16-Blue 1587 36-39 48% 16 FL
12450 Latitude 41 Volleyball Club 13 13 Silver (OV) (15) 1587 5-1 83% 13 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.