2025-2026 Season — Page 240 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11951 | CVC 17-Navy | 1593 | 26-17 | 57% | 17 | ND |
| 11952 | ECVC 15-National - cheyenne | 1593 | 12-9 | 57% | 15 | AL |
| 11953 | Apex 17-Aftershock | 1593 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | PA |
| 11954 | EVA 16-Gold | 1593 | 25-14 | 64% | 16 | NJ |
| 11955 | MAVS 816 13-2 | 1593 | 4-1 | 67% | 13 | KS |
| 11956 | IVC 18 Nationals | 1593 | 20-20 | 50% | 18 | AK |
| 11957 | SKY Elite 15 Gold | 1593 | 17-12 | 59% | 15 | PA |
| 11958 | Goshen 10-Bieganski | 1593 | 4-1 | 80% | 10 | IN |
| 11959 | L2 Volleyball Club 13-Tribeca | 1593 | 6-2 | 75% | 13 | MI |
| 11960 | Katy Stars 16 National | 1593 | 32-17 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 11961 | kKrushers 13-1 | 1593 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | PA |
| 11962 | Elite Vision 16-1 | 1593 | 28-12 | 70% | 16 | FL |
| 11963 | LC Elite 18-1 black | 1593 | 14-8 | 64% | 18 | OR |
| 11964 | Boltz 12-Desert aces | 1593 | 26-28 | 48% | 12 | AZ |
| 11965 | MAC 18-1 elite | 1593 | 37-23 | 62% | 18 | OR |
| 11966 | FPVC 14-Ren | 1593 | 15-14 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 11967 | BVB 11 | 1593 | 8-3 | 62% | 11 | MN |
| 11968 | 414 12-Green | 1593 | 22-17 | 56% | 12 | WI |
| 11969 | EliteVBTC 12-Blue | 1593 | 25-23 | 52% | 12 | OH |
| 11970 | EPFury 17-N | 1593 | 23-25 | 48% | 17 | TX |
| 11971 | Club GSL 13-Elect - bree | 1593 | 34-22 | 60% | 13 | UT |
| 11972 | Elite 15-National julio | 1593 | 41-25 | 62% | 15 | FL |
| 11973 | ME 18-Black diamonds | 1593 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | CA |
| 11974 | Paramount VBC 17 Allorie | 1593 | 35-36 | 49% | 17 | VA |
| 11975 | RIV 11-White | 1593 | 6-3 | 67% | 11 | WY |
| 11976 | Iron 11-Black | 1593 | 7-2 | 70% | 11 | AL |
| 11977 | MIDTN Volleyball 16 Silver | 1593 | 28-15 | 62% | 16 | TN |
| 11978 | Cape Cod 14-Nikki | 1593 | 13-8 | 62% | 14 | MA |
| 11979 | H Skyline 11-Silver | 1593 | 8-5 | 62% | 11 | TX |
| 11980 | North Shore 14 | 1593 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | HI |
| 11981 | CTX Juniors 13 Classic | 1593 | 16-8 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 11982 | Aspire NW 16-4 force | 1593 | 28-10 | 74% | 16 | OR |
| 11983 | SIVA 15-White | 1593 | 16-9 | 64% | 15 | ID |
| 11984 | Valley Evolution 12 | 1593 | 12-5 | 71% | 12 | TX |
| 11985 | Momentum 11-Gold | 1593 | 33-20 | 62% | 11 | FL |
| 11986 | A5 13-5 ma | 1593 | 18-9 | 67% | 13 | GA |
| 11987 | Red Rock 14-Devin hybrid - redwood city | 1593 | 18-17 | 51% | 14 | CA |
| 11988 | NC Coastal 17-Ellen | 1593 | 33-33 | 50% | 17 | NC |
| 11989 | EXCELL 16-1 haleigh navy | 1593 | 35-27 | 56% | 16 | SC |
| 11990 | Stars 13-Melissa | 1593 | 37-22 | 63% | 13 | SC |
| 11991 | Grayhound GVC 13-R | 1593 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | IA |
| 11992 | Crank It 15-Black sara | 1593 | 34-18 | 65% | 15 | MI |
| 11993 | Eclipse Girls 14 | 1593 | 39-19 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 11994 | VC Denver 17-Black | 1593 | 33-27 | 55% | 17 | CO |
| 11995 | Invasion Volleyball Club 16-2 | 1593 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | MO |
| 11996 | CC FORCE 13-2 crossfire | 1593 | 18-12 | 58% | 13 | TX |
| 11997 | South County 14-Alyssa | 1593 | 16-23 | 39% | 14 | UT |
| 11998 | IGNITE 17-BLUE | 1593 | 19-24 | 44% | 17 | OH |
| 11999 | Stingers 12-G | 1593 | 3-0 | 100% | 12 | IA |
| 12000 | RCVC 12-1 | 1593 | 11-2 | 85% | 12 | AL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.