Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 240 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11951 CVC 17-Navy 1593 26-17 57% 17 ND
11952 ECVC 15-National - cheyenne 1593 12-9 57% 15 AL
11953 Apex 17-Aftershock 1593 4-1 80% 17 PA
11954 EVA 16-Gold 1593 25-14 64% 16 NJ
11955 MAVS 816 13-2 1593 4-1 67% 13 KS
11956 IVC 18 Nationals 1593 20-20 50% 18 AK
11957 SKY Elite 15 Gold 1593 17-12 59% 15 PA
11958 Goshen 10-Bieganski 1593 4-1 80% 10 IN
11959 L2 Volleyball Club 13-Tribeca 1593 6-2 75% 13 MI
11960 Katy Stars 16 National 1593 32-17 64% 16 TX
11961 kKrushers 13-1 1593 3-1 75% 13 PA
11962 Elite Vision 16-1 1593 28-12 70% 16 FL
11963 LC Elite 18-1 black 1593 14-8 64% 18 OR
11964 Boltz 12-Desert aces 1593 26-28 48% 12 AZ
11965 MAC 18-1 elite 1593 37-23 62% 18 OR
11966 FPVC 14-Ren 1593 15-14 52% 14 CA
11967 BVB 11 1593 8-3 62% 11 MN
11968 414 12-Green 1593 22-17 56% 12 WI
11969 EliteVBTC 12-Blue 1593 25-23 52% 12 OH
11970 EPFury 17-N 1593 23-25 48% 17 TX
11971 Club GSL 13-Elect - bree 1593 34-22 60% 13 UT
11972 Elite 15-National julio 1593 41-25 62% 15 FL
11973 ME 18-Black diamonds 1593 6-2 75% 18 CA
11974 Paramount VBC 17 Allorie 1593 35-36 49% 17 VA
11975 RIV 11-White 1593 6-3 67% 11 WY
11976 Iron 11-Black 1593 7-2 70% 11 AL
11977 MIDTN Volleyball 16 Silver 1593 28-15 62% 16 TN
11978 Cape Cod 14-Nikki 1593 13-8 62% 14 MA
11979 H Skyline 11-Silver 1593 8-5 62% 11 TX
11980 North Shore 14 1593 4-1 80% 14 HI
11981 CTX Juniors 13 Classic 1593 16-8 67% 13 TX
11982 Aspire NW 16-4 force 1593 28-10 74% 16 OR
11983 SIVA 15-White 1593 16-9 64% 15 ID
11984 Valley Evolution 12 1593 12-5 71% 12 TX
11985 Momentum 11-Gold 1593 33-20 62% 11 FL
11986 A5 13-5 ma 1593 18-9 67% 13 GA
11987 Red Rock 14-Devin hybrid - redwood city 1593 18-17 51% 14 CA
11988 NC Coastal 17-Ellen 1593 33-33 50% 17 NC
11989 EXCELL 16-1 haleigh navy 1593 35-27 56% 16 SC
11990 Stars 13-Melissa 1593 37-22 63% 13 SC
11991 Grayhound GVC 13-R 1593 4-1 80% 13 IA
11992 Crank It 15-Black sara 1593 34-18 65% 15 MI
11993 Eclipse Girls 14 1593 39-19 67% 14 CA
11994 VC Denver 17-Black 1593 33-27 55% 17 CO
11995 Invasion Volleyball Club 16-2 1593 5-1 83% 16 MO
11996 CC FORCE 13-2 crossfire 1593 18-12 58% 13 TX
11997 South County 14-Alyssa 1593 16-23 39% 14 UT
11998 IGNITE 17-BLUE 1593 19-24 44% 17 OH
11999 Stingers 12-G 1593 3-0 100% 12 IA
12000 RCVC 12-1 1593 11-2 85% 12 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.