Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 239 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11901 United 17-Bhm national 1594 23-20 53% 17 AL
11902 Storm 18-Adidas 1594 34-20 63% 18 AR
11903 TX Resilient 14 1594 18-6 75% 14 TX
11904 FC Elite 14-Hawks 1594 7-5 58% 14 WI
11905 YSVC 12 1594 12-5 71% 12 NC
11906 Lions Starved Rock 14-Ruby 1594 14-4 78% 14 IL
11907 NW Stars 12-Black 1594 7-2 78% 12 WI
11908 Hammerhead 13-1 1594 20-11 65% 13 MN
11909 Direction 13-Silver 1594 6-3 67% 13 NC
11910 Club Integrity 12-1 1594 25-13 66% 12 PA
11911 adidas DYNASTY 13-3 1594 4-1 80% 13 KS
11912 San Gabriel Elite Volleyball Club 13-Thunder 1594 26-14 65% 13 CA
11913 C1VB 13-Regional blue 1594 25-10 71% 13 SC
11914 RAGE 14-Devyn 1594 17-15 53% 14 CA
11915 SF Juniors 12-Black 1594 18-15 55% 12 CA
11916 Crossroads 12 1594 12-9 57% 12 TX
11917 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 15-1 1594 1-1 20% 15 KS
11918 Integrity 15-Intense red 1594 20-26 40% 15 PA
11919 SA Force 12 Darkside 1594 23-31 43% 12 TX
11920 360 16-Kaos red 1594 11-16 37% 16 TX
11921 SIVBC 13 Tempest 1594 23-33 41% 13 WA
11922 Peninsula Wild 13 Peninsula Wild Denali (AK) 1594 7-10 41% 13 AK
11923 BVC 13-1 blackout 1594 2-5 29% 13 DE
11924 CVC 16-BLUE 1594 19-36 35% 16 OH
11925 Ballhawks 16-1 1594 4-1 80% 16 ON
11926 MILTON EDGE 16 Milton Edge Storm 1594 6-3 67% 16
11927 Vollocity 17 Vollocity 1593 3-0 100% 17
11928 LBVC 14-1 1593 39-19 67% 14 LA
11929 Infinity South 17-1 1593 15-12 52% 17 LA
11930 KODA 16 Silver 1593 23-15 59% 16 NY
11931 New WAVE 15 Hurricane 1593 27-15 64% 15 IL
11932 Tribe 14-Summers 1593 7-2 78% 14 OH
11933 Roots 17-2 blue 1593 27-19 59% 17 TX
11934 FIVA 18-Daph 1593 17-5 77% 18 FL
11935 Thrive 13 Gold 1593 21-19 53% 13 CA
11936 Mountain1 16-2 tilda 1593 18-10 53% 16 MT
11937 Gulfside 14-Select 1593 43-21 67% 14 FL
11938 Kokoro Volleyball 15 Blk 1593 44-21 68% 15 MN
11939 Lady Strikers 13-Blue 1593 14-5 74% 13 CO
11940 RCVC 16-Raincity rush 1593 4-3 57% 16 WA
11941 HP 18-1 1593 19-20 49% 18 MI
11942 CEV Sapphire 13-1 1593 21-12 64% 13 OH
11943 GVA 14-White 1593 12-10 55% 14 PR
11944 BAVC 14-National elizabeth 1593 6-3 67% 14 CA
11945 TVA 15 Elite (WE) 1593 19-9 58% 15 NY
11946 I AM VBC 11-BLACK 1593 21-8 72% 11 WI
11947 WSRVC 13-Cole 1593 25-13 66% 13 WY
11948 Arsenal PR 10-1 1593 5-1 83% 10 PR
11949 Decatur Force 12 Aqua 1593 15-9 63% 12 IN
11950 Dayton Jrs 14-Blue 1593 29-21 58% 14 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.