Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 238 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11851 ECEVBC 15 Typhoon 1594 44-19 67% 15 MD
11852 Keweenaw VBC 16-2 1594 11-5 69% 16 WI
11853 RVC 12-2 red 1594 4-1 80% 12 WY
11854 WAVE 13-Asia 1594 26-18 59% 13 CA
11855 Advanced Ath 15-1 natl 1594 23-12 64% 15 TX
11856 OVA 12-Select 1594 11-6 65% 12 CA
11857 WF Waves 14-Claire 1594 31-22 58% 14 AL
11858 Eastside 14-A young 1594 8-7 53% 14 OH
11859 CNVKC Mizuno 16-Jordan 1594 16-8 67% 16 MO
11860 Aspire NW 16-1 empire beaverton 1594 4-4 50% 16 WA
11861 MAVS 816 15-1 1594 3-2 43% 15 KS
11862 Basin Bombers 14-2 1594 13-8 62% 14 OR
11863 Venom Volleyball Club 12-Black 1594 37-25 60% 12 AZ
11864 Topeka Fury 17-1 1594 13-10 57% 17 KS
11865 NNJ - Douglas 14 1594 11-5 69% 14 NV
11866 Stars 18 Taylor 1594 32-21 60% 18 SC
11867 IVC 16-National megan 1594 14-5 74% 16 TX
11868 Azalea 13-Jenna 1594 3-0 100% 13 FL
11869 United 12 GW 1594 13-6 68% 12 CO
11870 Matchbox 16-Premier 1594 9-5 64% 16 SD
11871 Miami Wave 13-Black 1594 19-9 68% 13 FL
11872 Loggers 18 1594 11-6 61% 18 MN
11873 Five:1 14-Blue 1594 27-20 57% 14 MI
11874 ROCK VBC 15-1 1594 19-10 66% 15 WI
11875 TNT 16-Lightning 1594 4-3 57% 16 MA
11876 Rise 18-1 1594 33-18 65% 18 OH
11877 DYNASTY 18-Blue 1594 27-24 53% 18 KS
11878 501 Volley 15-5 regional 1594 23-10 70% 15 AR
11879 AVBC 18-Lisa navy 1594 35-12 74% 18 TN
11880 Landshark 16-Black 1594 18-15 55% 16 KS
11881 Onslow Freedom 14 1594 9-2 82% 14 NC
11882 Surge 13-1 eb 1594 14-7 67% 13 AL
11883 Oasis 17-National 1594 36-24 60% 17 CA
11884 AV IMPACT 18-Smack 1594 23-15 61% 18 CA
11885 Reps Volleyball Club 15-Blue 1594 31-30 51% 15 KY
11886 Sonics 14-1 1594 12-3 57% 14 NY
11887 Lions Cityside 12-2 1594 22-20 52% 12 IL
11888 Independent 10-Semak 1594 3-1 75% 10 IN
11889 South Central NE 14-Red 1594 14-16 47% 14 NE
11890 WAVE 10-Jaalyn 1594 20-14 59% 10 CA
11891 Illini Elite 16-L pink 1594 12-4 75% 16 IL
11892 East Bay Volleyball Academy 18-Crimson 1594 21-19 53% 18 FL
11893 NWJRS 16-Platinum 1594 35-35 50% 16 WA
11894 Husky 13-Black 1594 25-17 60% 13 CT
11895 Actyve 12-Navy 1594 27-25 52% 12 CA
11896 Iowa Rockets 18-1 1594 25-19 57% 18 IA
11897 The Edge 13-Black (WA) 1594 5-3 63% 13 WA
11898 FTL 14-Nuclear i 1594 19-12 61% 14 FL
11899 IMUA 14-Mizuno elite 1594 19-16 54% 14 MI
11900 The St. James 16 Navy 1594 36-24 59% 16 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.