Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 241 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12001 NMBVB 14-Daro 1593 5-0 100% 14 FL
12002 RYZE 16-1 premier natl 1593 21-9 70% 16
12003 Impact 13-Jos/lauren 1593 10-2 83% 13 MI
12004 Club Attack 14 Brantlea 1592 15-6 71% 14
12005 Lenawee Area Volleyball Association 15 LAVA 1592 22-6 79% 15
12006 HOT Volleyball Club 15 15U Elite 1592 15-7 68% 15 NY
12007 LES 15 Leiporshia 1592 17-7 61% 15 AL
12008 EAVC 15-1 1592 7-5 58% 15 UT
12009 JVB 15-White 1592 10-7 59% 15 MN
12010 Club North Volleyball KC 15-1 1592 4-1 67% 15 MO
12011 MiElite 15-Ns east 1592 24-12 67% 15 MI
12012 NW Stars 15-Black 1592 8-4 67% 15 WI
12013 TEXSTAR 15 1592 42-26 62% 15 TX
12014 Aztlan VC 16 Elias 1592 36-15 71% 16 CA
12015 Maunalani 16 1592 10-2 77% 16 HI
12016 MVSA 12 Vipers 1592 25-15 56% 12 MD
12017 Princeton 12-Black 1592 15-10 60% 12 NJ
12018 NIVB 12-Black 1592 18-16 53% 12 MN
12019 Metro Volleyball Club 14-Central 1592 37-20 65% 14 DC
12020 EMV 13-Metro ginny 1592 6-2 60% 13 TX
12021 Perfect 10 16 1592 8-2 80% 16 NC
12022 CorePVA 14 1592 10-7 59% 14 TX
12023 Genesis 17-Blue 1592 22-10 69% 17 TN
12024 Corpus Christi Storm 13 National 1592 24-19 53% 13 TX
12025 SA MAGIC 12 PREMIER 1592 22-23 49% 12 TX
12026 GCVC 14-Red 1592 18-11 62% 14 OH
12027 ClubCENTRAL 14-Black 1592 7-3 64% 14 SD
12028 OWV 12-Purple 1592 38-16 70% 12 FL
12029 DE.Club Net 16-1 1592 3-3 30% 16 AR
12030 Burns 17-1 1592 7-5 58% 17 AZ
12031 MVC 12-Thomsen 2 1592 4-0 100% 12 UT
12032 RJ'Z 17-S 1592 22-10 65% 17 IA
12033 AP 13-Wilco yellow 1592 29-13 69% 13 TX
12034 253 Elite 16-Ekahi 1592 36-30 55% 16 WA
12035 Club Momentum 13-Black 1592 4-1 80% 13 MN
12036 PITSTOP 12-99 1592 6-2 75% 12 CA
12037 Maroon Belles 14-Canace 1592 7-1 88% 14 CO
12038 Legacy Volleyball Club 14-Lesina 1592 7-2 78% 14 NY
12039 FSJ 14-3 regional plus 1592 18-9 67% 14 AR
12040 OCVC 17-Slunks 1592 21-33 39% 17 CA
12041 Reach Elite 11U Black 1592 35-19 65% 11 FL
12042 Alpha Omega Volleyball G17-2 1592 7-6 44% 17 MO
12043 Weimar Wranglers 11 1592 4-1 80% 11 TX
12044 Greater Cincinnati Volleyball Club 16 16-Mulvaney 1592 28-26 52% 16 OH
12045 Dallas Skyline 11-Silver 1592 3-4 43% 11 TX
12046 London Elite 16-Blue 1592 11-4 73% 16 OH
12047 X-Statics 16-S 1592 21-13 62% 16 CO
12048 LCJOVB 12-Black 1592 17-7 71% 12 MN
12049 New Pal VBC 14-1 branch 1592 9-3 75% 14 IN
12050 WVBA 18-Molten 1592 40-20 67% 18 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.