Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 73 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3601 Boys BSVBC 11-Black 1331 3-11 21% 11 IL
3602 MOD B14-Grey 1330 21-32 40% 14 IL
3603 Church&Dodge 13 1330 0-6 0% 13 IL
3604 Future 12-Elite 1330 14-28 33% 12 IL
3605 Momentum 18-Yellow 1330 8-14 36% 18 OH
3606 Seaside 18-White 1330 5-12 29% 18 CA
3607 MPV 15-Kendra 1330 4-9 31% 15 UT
3608 K Elites VBC B18 Navy 1329 26-42 37% 18 MO
3609 NLVC 16 Pride 1329 9-25 26% 16 CT
3610 K2 17-1 local boys 1329 4-16 20% 17 TN
3611 Salt City Boys Lindon Team Academy 16-Nori 1329 0-6 0% 16 UT
3612 Falcons 17 1329 4-9 31% 17
3613 Ozark Boys 12 1329 0-0 0% 12 AR
3614 OPVC 16-Purple doug 1329 17-34 33% 16 OH
3615 RVA Boys 15U 1329 12-31 28% 15 MD
3616 Coastal 14 Jody 1329 7-20 26% 14 VA
3617 Bravo 18-Bolt 1329 5-11 31% 18 CA
3618 SoCal VBC 15-Cardiff 1328 6-8 43% 15 CA
3619 513VB Boys 13-1 1328 8-19 30% 13 OH
3620 CNVKC Mizuno Boys 18-1 1328 0-5 0% 18 MO
3621 Sharks Boys 18-Silver 1328 6-8 43% 18 AL
3622 Pipeline 15-Kassy 1327 12-31 28% 15 CA
3623 Pursuit Boys 14 Elite 1327 7-21 25% 14 MO
3624 MOVA UA 12-Gold boys 1327 7-14 33% 12 MO
3625 Yorktowne 18 Shamrocks 1326 4-12 22% 18 PA
3626 Phoenix 16-Boys 1326 3-7 30% 16 FL
3627 Legacy Boys 16-National mikey 1326 4-7 36% 16 NY
3628 Coastal 18 Elliott 1326 10-22 31% 18 VA
3629 SPVB 18-Echo 1326 8-7 53% 18 IL
3630 Panther Boys 17-Black 1326 4-13 24% 17 CO
3631 Club W 18-Silver 1326 32-39 45% 18 WI
3632 NLVC 18-Boys 1326 5-14 26% 18 MI
3633 VC United 17-2 elite 1326 18-24 43% 17 IL
3634 A4 Volley Boys 16-Purple 1325 0-6 0% 16 CA
3635 Absolute Zero 17-Rankine 1325 5-10 33% 17 WA
3636 Weber Elite 12-Lance 1325 0-5 0% 12 UT
3637 Braves CVC 17-Bleu 1325 0-8 0% 17 FL
3638 A4 Volley Boys 16-Aaron 1324 11-21 34% 16 CA
3639 NecTr 17-Jen 1324 2-13 13% 17 NV
3640 Panther Boys 17-2 1324 0-7 0% 17 CO
3641 CJVA Boys 15-Onyx 1324 2-16 11% 15 NJ
3642 LCVC 14-1 1324 4-10 29% 14 NV
3643 Boston United Boys 18-Select 1 1324 10-24 29% 18 MA
3644 UVC 14-Luke 1324 3-7 30% 14 CA
3645 LIVBC Boys 16-Local 1324 0-5 0% 16 NJ
3646 Sixpack Boys 15-Local 1324 0-5 0% 15 NJ
3647 SBVC Boys 16 Premier 1324 10-20 33% 16 CA
3648 Illinois Jr's B17-2's 1324 28-45 38% 17 IL
3649 SMBC West 15-Molten a 1323 2-8 20% 15 CA
3650 Battle 18-Red 1323 17-39 29% 18 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.