Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 73 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3601 Vanguard 18-Silver byrd 1341 11-16 41% 18 OH
3602 RVA Boys 15U 1341 12-31 28% 15 MD
3603 Reach Fury 18-Ub 1341 0-5 0% 18
3604 Ignite 14-Boys fury 1340 8-14 36% 14 AZ
3605 NecTr 18-Jen 1340 1-4 20% 18 NV
3606 Red Rock Boys 16 Alameda 1340 10-24 29% 16 CA
3607 Pipeline 18-Blue 1340 17-18 49% 18 IL
3608 Horseshoe 17-Boomer 1340 0-5 0% 17 PA
3609 MVVC B 13-Club 1340 8-16 33% 13 CA
3610 Meraki 17 1340 0-10 0% 17
3611 1W 10-Red 1340 0-0 0% 10 WI
3612 Coastal 18 Elliott 1339 10-22 31% 18 MA
3613 Adidas OPV BOYS 16 NTL 1339 5-17 23% 16 OR
3614 Momentum 18-Yellow 1339 8-14 36% 18 OH
3615 MDJRS 14-Boys black 1339 10-28 25% 14 MD
3616 Northern Lights 14-2 boys 1339 11-18 38% 14 MN
3617 Iowa Galaxy 15-1 1339 0-10 0% 15 IA
3618 Stars 16 Hunt 1339 15-28 35% 16 SC
3619 Coastal 14 Jody 1338 7-20 26% 14 MA
3620 DNA 13-Blue 1338 8-23 26% 13 FL
3621 NecTr 17-Jen 1338 2-13 13% 17 NV
3622 AJV Boys 18 Molten 1338 15-40 27% 18 TX
3623 TOVC 18-Angel pagan 1338 0-6 0% 18 PR
3624 Kansas Rise VBC 18-1 1338 0-6 0% 18 KS
3625 Boys 18u Elite 1337 1-6 14% 18 ID
3626 PalShore 16-2 1337 1-5 17% 16 MI
3627 Quicksets 17-Black 1337 6-21 22% 17 HI
3628 Yorktowne 18 Shamrocks 1337 4-12 22% 18 PA
3629 SBVC Boys 16 Premier 1336 10-20 33% 16 CA
3630 Santa Fe Storm 14-3 heather 1336 1-6 13% 14
3631 True North Volleyball Academy 15-1 1336 0-6 0% 15 MO
3632 FEVA 17-Elite boys 1336 12-22 35% 17 FL
3633 Powrhaus 18-East 1336 8-11 42% 18 NC
3634 RVA Boys 14 Navy 1335 17-23 43% 14 WI
3635 Kinnect 16-Ocean 1335 0-5 0% 16 CA
3636 Lomanview 14-1 omar 1335 0-6 0% 14 PR
3637 Boys BSVBC 15-Blue 1335 7-9 44% 15 IL
3638 RCVC 18-Boys 1335 3-7 30% 18 NC
3639 The Lab 17-1 1334 5-13 28% 17 CO
3640 AJV Boys 16 Helix 1334 9-26 26% 16 TX
3641 APEX1 17-A1BLACK 1334 4-10 29% 17 CA
3642 FORZA1 18 ONE 1334 0-0 0% 18 CA
3643 CINCY EAST BOYS 16-1black 1333 14-21 40% 16 OH
3644 MAVS 12-Red 1333 2-14 13% 12 KS
3645 Westside VBC 15-Green 1333 11-25 31% 15 CA
3646 Philly Boys 15 1333 0-7 0% 15 PA
3647 Sixpack Boys 15-Local 1333 0-5 0% 15
3648 Epic B16-Adidas 1333 9-18 33% 16 WI
3649 Bravo 18-Bolt 1333 5-11 31% 18 KY
3650 Miami United 16-Benitez 1333 7-13 35% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.