2025-2026 Season — Page 72 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3551 | SUSA 18 | 1350 | 5-8 | 29% | 18 | UT |
| 3552 | Ohana 16-National boys | 1350 | 6-14 | 30% | 16 | IA |
| 3553 | 352 Elite VB 18-Royal | 1349 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | FL |
| 3554 | FPVC 14-B power | 1349 | 2-8 | 20% | 14 | CA |
| 3555 | Manteca Flight 16-1 mikaela | 1349 | 0-10 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 3556 | EU BOYS 18-Gold | 1349 | 16-21 | 43% | 18 | IN |
| 3557 | Hawaiian Style Boys 18-Black | 1349 | 3-9 | 25% | 18 | HI |
| 3558 | OCVC 17-Black | 1349 | 5-19 | 21% | 17 | CA |
| 3559 | Absolute 16 Gold | 1349 | 18-36 | 33% | 16 | CA |
| 3560 | EVA 18-2 | 1349 | 23-30 | 43% | 18 | IL |
| 3561 | FC Elite 11-White | 1349 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 3562 | EVA 16-2 | 1348 | 22-26 | 46% | 16 | IL |
| 3563 | HEAT 14 Valley | 1348 | 8-16 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 3564 | HPSTL 10-Royal | 1348 | 1-5 | 17% | 10 | MO |
| 3565 | OPVC 18-White | 1348 | 11-22 | 33% | 18 | OH |
| 3566 | Blue Royals 16 Elite | 1348 | 10-22 | 31% | 16 | WA |
| 3567 | OPV BOYS 16-National | 1347 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | WA |
| 3568 | Cincy Elite 17 Pomeroy | 1347 | 25-32 | 44% | 17 | OH |
| 3569 | PV Boys 17-3 | 1347 | 11-13 | 46% | 17 | MA |
| 3570 | Milwaukee Jr's 11-Silver | 1347 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 3571 | Coastal 13-Brady | 1347 | 0-5 | 0% | 13 | MA |
| 3572 | ProPlay 15 Phil | 1346 | 9-24 | 27% | 15 | CA |
| 3573 | UVC 14-Danny | 1346 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 3574 | Future 17-White | 1346 | 11-32 | 26% | 17 | IL |
| 3575 | Boys 16u Elite | 1346 | 7-12 | 37% | 16 | ID |
| 3576 | Pipeline 15-Kassy | 1346 | 12-31 | 28% | 15 | CA |
| 3577 | Pipeline 18-White | 1346 | 16-20 | 44% | 18 | IL |
| 3578 | EP 14-1 | 1345 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 3579 | CCVBC 16 | 1345 | 11-16 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 3580 | Legacy Boys 17 Regional | 1345 | 1-8 | 11% | 17 | MI |
| 3581 | Spike Milwaukee 15-Brandon | 1344 | 11-21 | 34% | 15 | WI |
| 3582 | Royal Legends 14 Lions | 1344 | 5-11 | 28% | 14 | PA |
| 3583 | Aloha 15-1 gold | 1344 | 17-30 | 36% | 15 | CA |
| 3584 | TVS 12 Lizzie | 1344 | 0-1 | 0% | 12 | |
| 3585 | Iowa Juniors NEXT 16-Silver | 1344 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | IA |
| 3586 | Premier 14-2 white | 1344 | 0-2 | 0% | 14 | AL |
| 3587 | STL Crossfire B 17 R1 | 1343 | 9-18 | 33% | 17 | MO |
| 3588 | NCWVBC Boys 18-2 black | 1343 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | WA |
| 3589 | IDVB 16-Nick | 1343 | 9-13 | 41% | 16 | ID |
| 3590 | Phoenix 18 Meehan | 1343 | 21-33 | 39% | 18 | OH |
| 3591 | Stormbreaker 12 Titans | 1342 | 12-28 | 30% | 12 | CA |
| 3592 | Salt City Boys 18-S paul | 1342 | 8-14 | 36% | 18 | UT |
| 3593 | Sideout 18-Centryll | 1342 | 2-6 | 25% | 18 | |
| 3594 | TNT Boys 18-Gambit | 1342 | 3-13 | 19% | 18 | PA |
| 3595 | Salt City Boys Highland Team Academy 16-Brett | 1342 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | UT |
| 3596 | Velocity 219 14-1 | 1342 | 5-10 | 33% | 14 | IN |
| 3597 | Core 14-National | 1342 | 7-13 | 35% | 14 | CA |
| 3598 | Roch PaceBootleggr 18-2 | 1341 | 11-17 | 34% | 18 | NY |
| 3599 | RVA 12-1 | 1341 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | AZ |
| 3600 | RAGE 14-Wyatt | 1341 | 1-9 | 10% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.