2025-2026 Season — Page 72 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3551 | ESA 16-1 | 1339 | 6-13 | 32% | 16 | NV |
| 3552 | True North Volleyball Academy 15-1 | 1339 | 0-6 | 0% | 15 | MO |
| 3553 | Kansas Rise VBC 18-1 | 1338 | 0-6 | 0% | 18 | KS |
| 3554 | ProPlay 16-Filip | 1338 | 2-11 | 15% | 16 | CA |
| 3555 | CCVA 16 Steel | 1338 | 8-15 | 31% | 16 | MD |
| 3556 | MVVC B 13-Club | 1338 | 8-16 | 33% | 13 | CA |
| 3557 | OPVC 18-White | 1338 | 11-22 | 33% | 18 | OH |
| 3558 | Absolute 16 Gold | 1338 | 18-36 | 33% | 16 | CA |
| 3559 | DNA 13-Blue | 1338 | 8-23 | 26% | 13 | FL |
| 3560 | NF 17 Crimson | 1337 | 6-24 | 20% | 17 | NY |
| 3561 | Pipeline 18-Blue | 1337 | 17-18 | 49% | 18 | IL |
| 3562 | MDVBC 16-1 | 1337 | 3-16 | 16% | 16 | FL |
| 3563 | Red Rock Boys 16 Alameda | 1336 | 10-24 | 29% | 16 | CA |
| 3564 | Cyclones Chaparral 14-B | 1336 | 54-48 | 51% | 14 | IL |
| 3565 | PalShore 16-2 | 1336 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | SC |
| 3566 | Lomanview 14-1 omar | 1336 | 0-6 | 0% | 14 | PR |
| 3567 | Royal Legends 14 Lions | 1336 | 5-11 | 28% | 14 | PA |
| 3568 | Boys BSVBC 15-Blue | 1335 | 7-9 | 44% | 15 | IL |
| 3569 | Weber Elite 18-Kirt | 1335 | 0-4 | 0% | 18 | UT |
| 3570 | GSL 14-Elite - andy | 1335 | 1-8 | 11% | 14 | UT |
| 3571 | Impact Boys 14U Red | 1335 | 6-21 | 22% | 14 | NV |
| 3572 | Velocity 219 14-1 | 1335 | 5-10 | 33% | 14 | IN |
| 3573 | Stars 16 Hunt | 1335 | 15-28 | 35% | 16 | SC |
| 3574 | AJV Boys 16 Helix | 1334 | 9-26 | 26% | 16 | TX |
| 3575 | SCB 12-Salty mondo | 1334 | 2-23 | 8% | 12 | UT |
| 3576 | RCVC 18-Boys | 1334 | 3-7 | 30% | 18 | NC |
| 3577 | RVA Boys 14 Navy | 1334 | 17-23 | 43% | 14 | WI |
| 3578 | Powrhaus 18-East | 1334 | 8-11 | 42% | 18 | NC |
| 3579 | VRTXVB 16-Felicia | 1334 | 1-17 | 6% | 16 | UT |
| 3580 | Roch PaceBootleggr 18-2 | 1334 | 11-17 | 34% | 18 | NY |
| 3581 | APEX1 17-A1BLACK | 1334 | 4-10 | 29% | 17 | CA |
| 3582 | AJV Boys 18 Molten | 1334 | 15-40 | 27% | 18 | TX |
| 3583 | MN Select Boys 14-Black | 1334 | 13-24 | 35% | 14 | MN |
| 3584 | Lancheras Cataño 13 LANCHEROS - JOSE RAMOS (PU) | 1334 | 3-7 | 30% | 13 | PR |
| 3585 | FEVA 17-Elite boys | 1334 | 12-22 | 35% | 17 | FL |
| 3586 | CINCY EAST BOYS 16-1black | 1333 | 14-21 | 40% | 16 | OH |
| 3587 | Chicago Elite B 16-Swoosh | 1333 | 18-15 | 55% | 16 | IL |
| 3588 | SVC 14-Ny boys | 1333 | 4-11 | 24% | 14 | NY |
| 3589 | Philly Boys 15 | 1333 | 0-7 | 0% | 15 | PA |
| 3590 | MAVS 12-Red | 1332 | 2-14 | 13% | 12 | KS |
| 3591 | Vanguard 18-Silver byrd | 1332 | 11-16 | 41% | 18 | OH |
| 3592 | BAVC 14-2 boys | 1332 | 8-30 | 21% | 14 | CA |
| 3593 | Cincy Elite 17 Pomeroy | 1332 | 25-32 | 44% | 17 | OH |
| 3594 | HVA 15-Performance blue | 1332 | 14-28 | 33% | 15 | TX |
| 3595 | MAVS 14-White | 1332 | 2-17 | 11% | 14 | KS |
| 3596 | TOVC 18-Angel pagan | 1332 | 0-6 | 0% | 18 | PR |
| 3597 | Epic B16-Adidas | 1331 | 9-18 | 33% | 16 | WI |
| 3598 | Squad VBC Boys 18 Elite | 1331 | 4-15 | 21% | 18 | NV |
| 3599 | Balboa Bay 14-Black | 1331 | 13-20 | 39% | 14 | CA |
| 3600 | Quicksets 17-Black | 1331 | 6-21 | 22% | 17 | HI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.