Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 72 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3551 SUSA 18 1350 5-8 29% 18 UT
3552 Ohana 16-National boys 1350 6-14 30% 16 IA
3553 352 Elite VB 18-Royal 1349 1-3 25% 18 FL
3554 FPVC 14-B power 1349 2-8 20% 14 CA
3555 Manteca Flight 16-1 mikaela 1349 0-10 0% 16 CA
3556 EU BOYS 18-Gold 1349 16-21 43% 18 IN
3557 Hawaiian Style Boys 18-Black 1349 3-9 25% 18 HI
3558 OCVC 17-Black 1349 5-19 21% 17 CA
3559 Absolute 16 Gold 1349 18-36 33% 16 CA
3560 EVA 18-2 1349 23-30 43% 18 IL
3561 FC Elite 11-White 1349 0-0 0% 11
3562 EVA 16-2 1348 22-26 46% 16 IL
3563 HEAT 14 Valley 1348 8-16 33% 14 CA
3564 HPSTL 10-Royal 1348 1-5 17% 10 MO
3565 OPVC 18-White 1348 11-22 33% 18 OH
3566 Blue Royals 16 Elite 1348 10-22 31% 16 WA
3567 OPV BOYS 16-National 1347 3-3 50% 16 WA
3568 Cincy Elite 17 Pomeroy 1347 25-32 44% 17 OH
3569 PV Boys 17-3 1347 11-13 46% 17 MA
3570 Milwaukee Jr's 11-Silver 1347 0-0 0% 11
3571 Coastal 13-Brady 1347 0-5 0% 13 MA
3572 ProPlay 15 Phil 1346 9-24 27% 15 CA
3573 UVC 14-Danny 1346 3-6 33% 14 CA
3574 Future 17-White 1346 11-32 26% 17 IL
3575 Boys 16u Elite 1346 7-12 37% 16 ID
3576 Pipeline 15-Kassy 1346 12-31 28% 15 CA
3577 Pipeline 18-White 1346 16-20 44% 18 IL
3578 EP 14-1 1345 0-4 0% 14 CA
3579 CCVBC 16 1345 11-16 41% 16 CA
3580 Legacy Boys 17 Regional 1345 1-8 11% 17 MI
3581 Spike Milwaukee 15-Brandon 1344 11-21 34% 15 WI
3582 Royal Legends 14 Lions 1344 5-11 28% 14 PA
3583 Aloha 15-1 gold 1344 17-30 36% 15 CA
3584 TVS 12 Lizzie 1344 0-1 0% 12
3585 Iowa Juniors NEXT 16-Silver 1344 0-4 0% 16 IA
3586 Premier 14-2 white 1344 0-2 0% 14 AL
3587 STL Crossfire B 17 R1 1343 9-18 33% 17 MO
3588 NCWVBC Boys 18-2 black 1343 2-4 33% 18 WA
3589 IDVB 16-Nick 1343 9-13 41% 16 ID
3590 Phoenix 18 Meehan 1343 21-33 39% 18 OH
3591 Stormbreaker 12 Titans 1342 12-28 30% 12 CA
3592 Salt City Boys 18-S paul 1342 8-14 36% 18 UT
3593 Sideout 18-Centryll 1342 2-6 25% 18
3594 TNT Boys 18-Gambit 1342 3-13 19% 18 PA
3595 Salt City Boys Highland Team Academy 16-Brett 1342 1-5 17% 16 UT
3596 Velocity 219 14-1 1342 5-10 33% 14 IN
3597 Core 14-National 1342 7-13 35% 14 CA
3598 Roch PaceBootleggr 18-2 1341 11-17 34% 18 NY
3599 RVA 12-1 1341 0-0 0% 12 AZ
3600 RAGE 14-Wyatt 1341 1-9 10% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.