Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 72 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3551 ESA 16-1 1339 6-13 32% 16 NV
3552 True North Volleyball Academy 15-1 1339 0-6 0% 15 MO
3553 Kansas Rise VBC 18-1 1338 0-6 0% 18 KS
3554 ProPlay 16-Filip 1338 2-11 15% 16 CA
3555 CCVA 16 Steel 1338 8-15 31% 16 MD
3556 MVVC B 13-Club 1338 8-16 33% 13 CA
3557 OPVC 18-White 1338 11-22 33% 18 OH
3558 Absolute 16 Gold 1338 18-36 33% 16 CA
3559 DNA 13-Blue 1338 8-23 26% 13 FL
3560 NF 17 Crimson 1337 6-24 20% 17 NY
3561 Pipeline 18-Blue 1337 17-18 49% 18 IL
3562 MDVBC 16-1 1337 3-16 16% 16 FL
3563 Red Rock Boys 16 Alameda 1336 10-24 29% 16 CA
3564 Cyclones Chaparral 14-B 1336 54-48 51% 14 IL
3565 PalShore 16-2 1336 1-5 17% 16 SC
3566 Lomanview 14-1 omar 1336 0-6 0% 14 PR
3567 Royal Legends 14 Lions 1336 5-11 28% 14 PA
3568 Boys BSVBC 15-Blue 1335 7-9 44% 15 IL
3569 Weber Elite 18-Kirt 1335 0-4 0% 18 UT
3570 GSL 14-Elite - andy 1335 1-8 11% 14 UT
3571 Impact Boys 14U Red 1335 6-21 22% 14 NV
3572 Velocity 219 14-1 1335 5-10 33% 14 IN
3573 Stars 16 Hunt 1335 15-28 35% 16 SC
3574 AJV Boys 16 Helix 1334 9-26 26% 16 TX
3575 SCB 12-Salty mondo 1334 2-23 8% 12 UT
3576 RCVC 18-Boys 1334 3-7 30% 18 NC
3577 RVA Boys 14 Navy 1334 17-23 43% 14 WI
3578 Powrhaus 18-East 1334 8-11 42% 18 NC
3579 VRTXVB 16-Felicia 1334 1-17 6% 16 UT
3580 Roch PaceBootleggr 18-2 1334 11-17 34% 18 NY
3581 APEX1 17-A1BLACK 1334 4-10 29% 17 CA
3582 AJV Boys 18 Molten 1334 15-40 27% 18 TX
3583 MN Select Boys 14-Black 1334 13-24 35% 14 MN
3584 Lancheras Cataño 13 LANCHEROS - JOSE RAMOS (PU) 1334 3-7 30% 13 PR
3585 FEVA 17-Elite boys 1334 12-22 35% 17 FL
3586 CINCY EAST BOYS 16-1black 1333 14-21 40% 16 OH
3587 Chicago Elite B 16-Swoosh 1333 18-15 55% 16 IL
3588 SVC 14-Ny boys 1333 4-11 24% 14 NY
3589 Philly Boys 15 1333 0-7 0% 15 PA
3590 MAVS 12-Red 1332 2-14 13% 12 KS
3591 Vanguard 18-Silver byrd 1332 11-16 41% 18 OH
3592 BAVC 14-2 boys 1332 8-30 21% 14 CA
3593 Cincy Elite 17 Pomeroy 1332 25-32 44% 17 OH
3594 HVA 15-Performance blue 1332 14-28 33% 15 TX
3595 MAVS 14-White 1332 2-17 11% 14 KS
3596 TOVC 18-Angel pagan 1332 0-6 0% 18 PR
3597 Epic B16-Adidas 1331 9-18 33% 16 WI
3598 Squad VBC Boys 18 Elite 1331 4-15 21% 18 NV
3599 Balboa Bay 14-Black 1331 13-20 39% 14 CA
3600 Quicksets 17-Black 1331 6-21 22% 17 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.