2025-2026 Season — Page 71 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3501 | DuPage Elite B 18-United | 1358 | 16-19 | 46% | 18 | IL |
| 3502 | Pacific Rim 15-1 | 1358 | 1-9 | 10% | 15 | CA |
| 3503 | STVA Boys 16 Navy | 1358 | 1-7 | 13% | 16 | TX |
| 3504 | WIZARD 14-B | 1358 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 3505 | OVA 14 Region | 1358 | 7-13 | 35% | 14 | AZ |
| 3506 | Velocity B16-Blue | 1357 | 12-11 | 52% | 16 | IL |
| 3507 | MVVC YB 14 Trevor | 1357 | 11-6 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 3508 | Volei 16-B | 1357 | 6-16 | 27% | 16 | VA |
| 3509 | Salt City Boys 16-Alex | 1357 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | UT |
| 3510 | A5 Boys 14-Gary | 1357 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | GA |
| 3511 | Vanguard 15-Silver matt | 1357 | 12-17 | 41% | 15 | OH |
| 3512 | Red Rock Boys 16-2 tv | 1356 | 15-29 | 34% | 16 | CA |
| 3513 | Lakas 18-S js | 1356 | 16-28 | 36% | 18 | CA |
| 3514 | Iowa Juniors NEXT 14-Pink | 1356 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | IA |
| 3515 | Freedom G16-2 | 1356 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 3516 | EXCEL 14-N white | 1356 | 5-19 | 20% | 14 | TX |
| 3517 | ESA 16-1 | 1356 | 6-13 | 32% | 16 | NV |
| 3518 | NL 18-1 boys | 1356 | 0-4 | 0% | 18 | MN |
| 3519 | NLVC 18-Boys | 1356 | 5-10 | 33% | 18 | TX |
| 3520 | Monsters 18-Boys | 1355 | 1-7 | 13% | 18 | MI |
| 3521 | VoltageVB Boys 17-18u | 1355 | 12-18 | 40% | 17 | FL |
| 3522 | OPV BOYS 18 NATIONAL | 1355 | 4-8 | 33% | 18 | WA |
| 3523 | KIVA 16-S-white | 1355 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | KY |
| 3524 | Academy Boys North 14-1 | 1355 | 12-23 | 34% | 14 | CA |
| 3525 | Westside VBC 18-Black | 1355 | 4-5 | 44% | 18 | CA |
| 3526 | NIVB 13-Green | 1355 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | |
| 3527 | United 16-Boys | 1354 | 3-12 | 20% | 16 | AL |
| 3528 | Legacy Boys 14-Premier | 1354 | 8-13 | 38% | 14 | MI |
| 3529 | HSJ 15-R | 1354 | 0-6 | 0% | 15 | |
| 3530 | Illinois Jr's B18-2's | 1354 | 25-46 | 35% | 18 | IL |
| 3531 | CCVA 16 Steel | 1354 | 8-15 | 31% | 16 | MD |
| 3532 | Mintonette Sports 16-3 | 1354 | 9-23 | 28% | 16 | OH |
| 3533 | Redline Zia VBC 13-1 | 1354 | 1-6 | 14% | 13 | |
| 3534 | Colorado Elite Boys 18 | 1354 | 3-7 | 30% | 18 | CO |
| 3535 | MW Shock 12-Sapphire | 1353 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 3536 | Adversity VBC 16-Black | 1353 | 1-8 | 11% | 16 | IL |
| 3537 | SG Elite 18 Select | 1353 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 3538 | LVL UP 18-Regional - boys | 1353 | 1-21 | 5% | 18 | AZ |
| 3539 | Volley Next 16-Local | 1353 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | MI |
| 3540 | Sixpack Boys 16-Local 2 | 1352 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | |
| 3541 | Aus Velocity Boys 14-1 | 1352 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | TX |
| 3542 | Highlands Performance VB 18-1 | 1352 | 1-6 | 14% | 18 | MO |
| 3543 | Future 12-Elite | 1352 | 14-28 | 33% | 12 | IL |
| 3544 | SASVBC B 13-Brian | 1352 | 10-25 | 29% | 13 | HI |
| 3545 | Velocity 219 18-1 | 1352 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | IN |
| 3546 | AVA 14-Boys | 1351 | 16-28 | 36% | 14 | FL |
| 3547 | UNION 16-Grey | 1351 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | IN |
| 3548 | A5 Boys 18-Adam | 1350 | 4-14 | 22% | 18 | GA |
| 3549 | Academy 12 | 1350 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | IN |
| 3550 | Inferno 18-2 select | 1350 | 12-22 | 35% | 18 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.