Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 71 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3501 HPSTL 10-Royal 1348 1-5 17% 10 MO
3502 Blue Horses Volleyball Club 18 Blue Horses Navy 1348 17-19 47% 18 KY
3503 WVVC 15-1 1347 13-31 30% 15 NY
3504 NCWVBC Boys 18-2 black 1347 2-4 33% 18 WA
3505 Illinois Jr's B18-2's 1347 25-46 35% 18 IL
3506 Blue Royals 16 Elite 1347 10-22 31% 16 WA
3507 EVA 16-2 1347 22-26 46% 16 IL
3508 Inferno 18-2 select 1347 12-22 35% 18 WI
3509 Phoenix 18 Meehan 1347 21-33 39% 18 OH
3510 Hawaiian Style Boys 18-Black 1347 3-9 25% 18 HI
3511 OPV BOYS 16-National 1347 3-3 50% 16 OR
3512 Future 17-White 1346 11-32 26% 17 IL
3513 EU BOYS 18-Gold 1346 16-21 43% 18 IN
3514 FPVC 14-B power 1346 2-8 20% 14 CA
3515 Spike Milwaukee 15-Brandon 1346 11-21 34% 15 WI
3516 Legacy Boys 17 Regional 1346 1-8 11% 17 NY
3517 Coastal 13-Brady 1346 0-5 0% 13 VA
3518 Lunatics 18U 1346 3-6 33% 18 UT
3519 AFVBC 15 Apex 1346 18-32 36% 15 CA
3520 Manteca Flight 16-1 mikaela 1345 0-10 0% 16 CA
3521 EVA 18-2 1345 23-30 43% 18 IL
3522 Pipeline 18-White 1345 16-20 44% 18 IL
3523 EP 14-1 1345 0-4 0% 14 MN
3524 Iowa Juniors NEXT 16-Silver 1345 0-4 0% 16 IA
3525 PV Boys 17-3 1344 11-13 46% 17 MA
3526 RAGE 14-Wyatt 1344 1-9 10% 14 CA
3527 Core 14-National 1344 7-13 35% 14 CA
3528 IDVB 16-Nick 1344 9-13 41% 16 MI
3529 CCVBC 16 1344 11-16 41% 16 WI
3530 SASVBC B 13-Brian 1344 10-25 29% 13 HI
3531 AVA 14-Boys 1344 16-28 36% 14 FL
3532 Stormbreaker 12 Titans 1343 12-28 30% 12 CA
3533 AZ OUTLAWS VOLLEYBALL CLUB 16-2 1343 2-6 25% 16 AZ
3534 Sideout 18-Centryll 1343 2-6 25% 18 MA
3535 TNT Boys 18-Gambit 1343 3-13 19% 18 PA
3536 Meraki 17 1343 0-10 0% 17 NH
3537 Reach Fury 18-Ub 1342 0-5 0% 18 PA
3538 The Lab 17-1 1342 5-13 28% 17 CO
3539 Ignite 14-Boys fury 1342 8-14 36% 14 AZ
3540 MPV 15-Elite 1341 1-6 14% 15 UT
3541 Momentum 14-Orange 1341 8-19 30% 14 OH
3542 Salt City Boys 18-Silver 1341 2-7 22% 18 UT
3543 Iowa Galaxy 15-1 1341 0-10 0% 15 IA
3544 SJVBC Boys 15-Black 1341 5-18 22% 15 NJ
3545 Lakas 18-S js 1340 16-28 36% 18 CA
3546 LI Fury 14-1 1340 8-16 33% 14 NY
3547 Horseshoe 17-Boomer 1340 0-5 0% 17 PA
3548 Adidas OPV BOYS 16 NTL 1339 5-17 23% 16 OR
3549 Miami United 16-Benitez 1339 7-13 35% 16 FL
3550 Northern Lights 14-2 boys 1339 11-18 38% 14 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.