2025-2026 Season — Page 71 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3501 | HPSTL 10-Royal | 1348 | 1-5 | 17% | 10 | MO |
| 3502 | Blue Horses Volleyball Club 18 Blue Horses Navy | 1348 | 17-19 | 47% | 18 | KY |
| 3503 | WVVC 15-1 | 1347 | 13-31 | 30% | 15 | NY |
| 3504 | NCWVBC Boys 18-2 black | 1347 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | WA |
| 3505 | Illinois Jr's B18-2's | 1347 | 25-46 | 35% | 18 | IL |
| 3506 | Blue Royals 16 Elite | 1347 | 10-22 | 31% | 16 | WA |
| 3507 | EVA 16-2 | 1347 | 22-26 | 46% | 16 | IL |
| 3508 | Inferno 18-2 select | 1347 | 12-22 | 35% | 18 | WI |
| 3509 | Phoenix 18 Meehan | 1347 | 21-33 | 39% | 18 | OH |
| 3510 | Hawaiian Style Boys 18-Black | 1347 | 3-9 | 25% | 18 | HI |
| 3511 | OPV BOYS 16-National | 1347 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | OR |
| 3512 | Future 17-White | 1346 | 11-32 | 26% | 17 | IL |
| 3513 | EU BOYS 18-Gold | 1346 | 16-21 | 43% | 18 | IN |
| 3514 | FPVC 14-B power | 1346 | 2-8 | 20% | 14 | CA |
| 3515 | Spike Milwaukee 15-Brandon | 1346 | 11-21 | 34% | 15 | WI |
| 3516 | Legacy Boys 17 Regional | 1346 | 1-8 | 11% | 17 | NY |
| 3517 | Coastal 13-Brady | 1346 | 0-5 | 0% | 13 | VA |
| 3518 | Lunatics 18U | 1346 | 3-6 | 33% | 18 | UT |
| 3519 | AFVBC 15 Apex | 1346 | 18-32 | 36% | 15 | CA |
| 3520 | Manteca Flight 16-1 mikaela | 1345 | 0-10 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 3521 | EVA 18-2 | 1345 | 23-30 | 43% | 18 | IL |
| 3522 | Pipeline 18-White | 1345 | 16-20 | 44% | 18 | IL |
| 3523 | EP 14-1 | 1345 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | MN |
| 3524 | Iowa Juniors NEXT 16-Silver | 1345 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | IA |
| 3525 | PV Boys 17-3 | 1344 | 11-13 | 46% | 17 | MA |
| 3526 | RAGE 14-Wyatt | 1344 | 1-9 | 10% | 14 | CA |
| 3527 | Core 14-National | 1344 | 7-13 | 35% | 14 | CA |
| 3528 | IDVB 16-Nick | 1344 | 9-13 | 41% | 16 | MI |
| 3529 | CCVBC 16 | 1344 | 11-16 | 41% | 16 | WI |
| 3530 | SASVBC B 13-Brian | 1344 | 10-25 | 29% | 13 | HI |
| 3531 | AVA 14-Boys | 1344 | 16-28 | 36% | 14 | FL |
| 3532 | Stormbreaker 12 Titans | 1343 | 12-28 | 30% | 12 | CA |
| 3533 | AZ OUTLAWS VOLLEYBALL CLUB 16-2 | 1343 | 2-6 | 25% | 16 | AZ |
| 3534 | Sideout 18-Centryll | 1343 | 2-6 | 25% | 18 | MA |
| 3535 | TNT Boys 18-Gambit | 1343 | 3-13 | 19% | 18 | PA |
| 3536 | Meraki 17 | 1343 | 0-10 | 0% | 17 | NH |
| 3537 | Reach Fury 18-Ub | 1342 | 0-5 | 0% | 18 | PA |
| 3538 | The Lab 17-1 | 1342 | 5-13 | 28% | 17 | CO |
| 3539 | Ignite 14-Boys fury | 1342 | 8-14 | 36% | 14 | AZ |
| 3540 | MPV 15-Elite | 1341 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | UT |
| 3541 | Momentum 14-Orange | 1341 | 8-19 | 30% | 14 | OH |
| 3542 | Salt City Boys 18-Silver | 1341 | 2-7 | 22% | 18 | UT |
| 3543 | Iowa Galaxy 15-1 | 1341 | 0-10 | 0% | 15 | IA |
| 3544 | SJVBC Boys 15-Black | 1341 | 5-18 | 22% | 15 | NJ |
| 3545 | Lakas 18-S js | 1340 | 16-28 | 36% | 18 | CA |
| 3546 | LI Fury 14-1 | 1340 | 8-16 | 33% | 14 | NY |
| 3547 | Horseshoe 17-Boomer | 1340 | 0-5 | 0% | 17 | PA |
| 3548 | Adidas OPV BOYS 16 NTL | 1339 | 5-17 | 23% | 16 | OR |
| 3549 | Miami United 16-Benitez | 1339 | 7-13 | 35% | 16 | FL |
| 3550 | Northern Lights 14-2 boys | 1339 | 11-18 | 38% | 14 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.