Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 71 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3501 DuPage Elite B 18-United 1358 16-19 46% 18 IL
3502 Pacific Rim 15-1 1358 1-9 10% 15 CA
3503 STVA Boys 16 Navy 1358 1-7 13% 16 TX
3504 WIZARD 14-B 1358 0-0 0% 14
3505 OVA 14 Region 1358 7-13 35% 14 AZ
3506 Velocity B16-Blue 1357 12-11 52% 16 IL
3507 MVVC YB 14 Trevor 1357 11-6 65% 14 CA
3508 Volei 16-B 1357 6-16 27% 16 VA
3509 Salt City Boys 16-Alex 1357 2-5 29% 16 UT
3510 A5 Boys 14-Gary 1357 0-4 0% 14 GA
3511 Vanguard 15-Silver matt 1357 12-17 41% 15 OH
3512 Red Rock Boys 16-2 tv 1356 15-29 34% 16 CA
3513 Lakas 18-S js 1356 16-28 36% 18 CA
3514 Iowa Juniors NEXT 14-Pink 1356 0-4 0% 14 IA
3515 Freedom G16-2 1356 0-0 0% 16
3516 EXCEL 14-N white 1356 5-19 20% 14 TX
3517 ESA 16-1 1356 6-13 32% 16 NV
3518 NL 18-1 boys 1356 0-4 0% 18 MN
3519 NLVC 18-Boys 1356 5-10 33% 18 TX
3520 Monsters 18-Boys 1355 1-7 13% 18 MI
3521 VoltageVB Boys 17-18u 1355 12-18 40% 17 FL
3522 OPV BOYS 18 NATIONAL 1355 4-8 33% 18 WA
3523 KIVA 16-S-white 1355 1-4 20% 16 KY
3524 Academy Boys North 14-1 1355 12-23 34% 14 CA
3525 Westside VBC 18-Black 1355 4-5 44% 18 CA
3526 NIVB 13-Green 1355 1-2 33% 13
3527 United 16-Boys 1354 3-12 20% 16 AL
3528 Legacy Boys 14-Premier 1354 8-13 38% 14 MI
3529 HSJ 15-R 1354 0-6 0% 15
3530 Illinois Jr's B18-2's 1354 25-46 35% 18 IL
3531 CCVA 16 Steel 1354 8-15 31% 16 MD
3532 Mintonette Sports 16-3 1354 9-23 28% 16 OH
3533 Redline Zia VBC 13-1 1354 1-6 14% 13
3534 Colorado Elite Boys 18 1354 3-7 30% 18 CO
3535 MW Shock 12-Sapphire 1353 0-0 0% 12
3536 Adversity VBC 16-Black 1353 1-8 11% 16 IL
3537 SG Elite 18 Select 1353 2-4 33% 18 CA
3538 LVL UP 18-Regional - boys 1353 1-21 5% 18 AZ
3539 Volley Next 16-Local 1353 0-4 0% 16 MI
3540 Sixpack Boys 16-Local 2 1352 0-4 0% 16
3541 Aus Velocity Boys 14-1 1352 0-0 0% 14 TX
3542 Highlands Performance VB 18-1 1352 1-6 14% 18 MO
3543 Future 12-Elite 1352 14-28 33% 12 IL
3544 SASVBC B 13-Brian 1352 10-25 29% 13 HI
3545 Velocity 219 18-1 1352 1-4 20% 18 IN
3546 AVA 14-Boys 1351 16-28 36% 14 FL
3547 UNION 16-Grey 1351 1-4 20% 16 IN
3548 A5 Boys 18-Adam 1350 4-14 22% 18 GA
3549 Academy 12 1350 0-4 0% 12 IN
3550 Inferno 18-2 select 1350 12-22 35% 18 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.