Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 70 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3451 TK 17-Cowboys elite 1359 16-25 39% 17 GA
3452 Piedmont VBC 14-Sparta 1359 4-10 29% 14 NC
3453 Salt City Boys 16-S coleman 1359 11-13 46% 16 UT
3454 MVVC B 14-Premier 1359 4-11 27% 14 CA
3455 VOLTAGE 15-1 1358 5-12 29% 15 CO
3456 Split Mountain Volleyball Club 17 Split Mountain Mark & Grant 1358 0-4 0% 17 UT
3457 STVA Boys 16 Navy 1358 1-7 13% 16 TX
3458 OVA 14 Region 1358 7-13 35% 14 AZ
3459 Future 13-Elite 1358 18-23 44% 13 IL
3460 Velocity B16-Blue 1357 12-11 52% 16 IL
3461 Club 1 B 16-Blue 1357 22-22 50% 16 IL
3462 Monsters 18-Boys 1357 1-7 13% 18 MI
3463 Legacy Alaska 18-Apex 1357 0-8 0% 18 IL
3464 Mayhem 17-1 1357 10-10 50% 17 MA
3465 Red Rock Boys 16-2 tv 1356 15-29 34% 16 CA
3466 WPVC Boys 14-Elite black 1356 14-36 28% 14 FL
3467 Iowa Juniors NEXT 14-Pink 1356 0-4 0% 14 IA
3468 Ignite Volleyball 14 14 National Boys (SC) 1355 2-6 25% 14 CA
3469 United 16-Boys 1355 3-12 20% 16 AL
3470 A4 Volley 17-Chase 1355 0-0 0% 17 CA
3471 Adversity VBC 16-Black 1355 1-8 11% 16 IL
3472 HSJ 15-R 1354 0-6 0% 15 NY
3473 SG Elite 18 Select 1354 2-4 33% 18 CA
3474 KIVA 16-S-white 1354 1-4 20% 16 KY
3475 EXCEL 14-N white 1354 5-19 20% 14 TX
3476 Prime 18 Jags 1354 9-13 41% 18 CO
3477 LuMaDe 18-Boys blue 1354 0-0 0% 18 FL
3478 Ohana 16-National boys 1353 6-14 30% 16 IA
3479 NEVBC Boys 16-Blue 1353 7-17 29% 16 CT
3480 Volley Next 16-Local 1353 0-4 0% 16 IL
3481 DuPage Elite B 18-United 1352 16-19 46% 18 IL
3482 Juniors Volleyball Club-IL 17 Illinois Jr's B17/18's 1352 18-26 41% 17 IL
3483 Salt City Boys Highland Team Academy 16-Brett 1352 1-5 17% 16 UT
3484 Sixpack Boys 16-Local 2 1352 0-4 0% 16 NJ
3485 KVA 18-1 1351 0-5 0% 18 TX
3486 Coastal 15 Justin 1351 9-20 31% 15 VA
3487 VoltageVB Boys 17-18u 1351 12-18 40% 17 FL
3488 BG Lightning 18-Black 1351 11-13 46% 18 KY
3489 UNION 16-Grey 1351 1-4 20% 16 IN
3490 HEAT 14 Valley 1351 8-16 33% 14 CA
3491 MDJRS 12-Boys black 1351 0-0 0% 12 MD
3492 Velocity 219 18-1 1350 1-4 20% 18 IN
3493 Mintonette Sports 16-3 1350 9-23 28% 16 OH
3494 A5 Boys 18-Adam 1350 4-14 22% 18 GA
3495 Horizon VBC 18 18 Buzzard Rock 1350 0-4 0% 18 KY
3496 Highlands Performance VB 18-1 1349 1-6 14% 18 MO
3497 ProPlay 15 Phil 1349 9-24 27% 15 CA
3498 LVL UP 18-Regional - boys 1349 1-21 5% 18 AZ
3499 352 Elite VB 18-Royal 1349 1-3 25% 18 FL
3500 Aloha 15-1 gold 1348 17-30 36% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.