Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 70 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3451 SPVB B18 Select 1367 5-6 45% 18 IL
3452 IDVB 14-Jenna 1367 8-15 35% 14 ID
3453 Pu'ukī VBC 16-80 1367 1-6 14% 16
3454 Flight Academy 13-S 1367 13-19 41% 13 OH
3455 BG Lightning 18-Black 1367 11-13 46% 18 TX
3456 VUVC B16-WHITE 1367 12-13 48% 16 NV
3457 Balboa Bay 16-Orange 1367 11-14 44% 16 CA
3458 Flight Academy 12-S 1366 11-19 37% 12 OH
3459 Mt. Hood 18 Timberline 1366 9-11 45% 18 OR
3460 West Valley 15-1 1366 0-5 0% 15 CA
3461 Aspire 14-Ant man 1366 7-11 39% 14 AZ
3462 Vegas Volley 17-Dinoco 1366 1-7 13% 17 NV
3463 Cyclones Boys 16-G 1366 32-37 46% 16 IL
3464 SynergyForce 15-3 gold 1366 2-8 20% 15 CA
3465 CHAOS BOYS 18U GOLD 1366 7-15 32% 18 OR
3466 Pipeline 16-Blue 1365 17-16 52% 16 IL
3467 CHAOS BOYS 14-Regional black 1365 0-4 0% 14 OR
3468 SynergyForce B 13-Gold 1365 13-32 29% 13 CA
3469 O3 B18 1364 10-19 34% 18 MI
3470 WPVC Boys 14-Elite black 1364 14-36 28% 14 FL
3471 GSA Boys 17 1364 3-11 21% 17 NJ
3472 Highlands 18-Behney 1364 2-11 15% 18 PA
3473 Next Level 18-Boys 1364 0-4 0% 18 MN
3474 Dive 18-Orange 1364 5-8 38% 18 CO
3475 Mamba 14-Black 1364 18-24 43% 14 WI
3476 Prime 18 Jags 1363 9-13 41% 18 CO
3477 Piedmont VBC 14-Sparta 1363 4-10 29% 14 NC
3478 True North B 15-Green 1363 3-7 30% 15
3479 Northland Static 18-1 1363 6-7 46% 18 MO
3480 Quicksets 16-Black 1362 14-29 33% 16 HI
3481 Legacy Alaska 18-Apex 1362 0-8 0% 18
3482 AZ Fear 14-Blue 1362 7-12 37% 14 AZ
3483 LHV Boys 16-2 hunters 1362 11-23 32% 16 MA
3484 CUZINS B 12 1362 0-5 0% 12
3485 A4 Volley Boys 17-Chase 1361 0-0 0% 17 CA
3486 BANZAI BOYS 18 1361 8-18 31% 18 NE
3487 VOLTAGE 15-1 1360 5-12 29% 15
3488 LuMaDe 18-Boys blue 1360 0-0 0% 18 FL
3489 KVA 18-1 1360 0-5 0% 18
3490 AFVBC 15 Apex 1359 18-32 36% 15 CA
3491 TK 17-Cowboys elite 1359 16-25 39% 17 GA
3492 Future 13-Elite 1359 18-23 44% 13 IL
3493 Velocity 15 National 1359 11-26 30% 15 PA
3494 SG Elite 15 Prime 1359 4-13 24% 15 CA
3495 SPVB 13-Black 1359 2-5 29% 13 IL
3496 So. PHX Rebels Boys 14-S 1359 3-9 25% 14 AZ
3497 MVVC B 14-Premier 1359 4-11 27% 14 CA
3498 Next Gen 18U Silver 1359 13-19 41% 18 MO
3499 Epic United 14-Red 1359 15-18 45% 14 IN
3500 Club 1 B 16-Blue 1358 22-22 50% 16 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.