Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 69 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3401 SMBC Shack 14 Premier 1373 14-19 42% 14 CA
3402 SG Elite 16 Select 1373 18-23 44% 16 CA
3403 TORRI 13-1 bebo 1373 1-5 17% 13 PR
3404 HSJ 14-R - pink 1373 0-3 0% 14
3405 HI BRED VBC 18-Elite 1372 3-10 23% 18 HI
3406 Phoenix 16-1 1372 1-5 17% 16
3407 Legacy Boys 14 Elite 1372 10-22 31% 14 MI
3408 Palatine 18-Black 1372 3-7 30% 18 IL
3409 SI Wave 11-Boys 1372 0-0 0% 11
3410 Stars 18-Pack 1372 18-22 45% 18 SC
3411 Club 1 B 18-White 1372 24-29 45% 18 IL
3412 Red Rock 17-Bri - redwood city 1372 4-4 50% 17 CA
3413 Sky High 14-Clark - spr 1372 5-8 38% 14 IL
3414 Mayhem 17-1 1372 10-10 50% 17 KS
3415 UNO Boys 16-National 1372 22-43 33% 16 IL
3416 Momentum 14-Orange 1371 8-19 30% 14 OH
3417 Absolute Zero 18-Celsius 1371 0-7 0% 18 WA
3418 Island Mixx 17-A 1371 1-6 14% 17
3419 Surge BOYS 16-Black 1371 1-8 11% 16 PA
3420 Ichiban 15-Spartans 1371 6-13 32% 15 GA
3421 Legacy Alaska 16-1 1370 0-7 0% 16
3422 HEAT 12-Red 1370 0-6 0% 12 CA
3423 Maverick 14 Payback 1370 8-11 42% 14 AZ
3424 River City 11-Blue 1370 0-0 0% 11
3425 IMUA UVC 16-Blk 1370 1-5 17% 16 CA
3426 Blue Royals 14 Elite 1370 8-15 35% 14 WA
3427 Vibe 18-Premier 1369 7-11 30% 18 CA
3428 Team Rockstar 13 Robbie 1369 19-35 35% 13 CA
3429 Sol Taino 18 11 1369 0-3 0% 18 PR
3430 Upper Left 16-Boys 1369 2-4 33% 16
3431 South County 14-Justin 1369 0-10 0% 14 RI
3432 SKY 13-1 1369 8-18 31% 13 IL
3433 WAVE 15-Garrett 1369 14-36 28% 15 CA
3434 CLE SEL 14-White 1369 10-23 30% 14 OH
3435 REDLINE 18-Black boys 1369 5-10 33% 18 TX
3436 Playeros Ponce 15 1369 1-5 17% 15 PR
3437 Academy 17-E white 1369 23-31 43% 17 IN
3438 630 Volleyball 17-6 1368 25-38 40% 17 IL
3439 Dinamite 15-1 1368 8-7 53% 15 CA
3440 Phoenix 18 Brooks 1368 9-23 28% 18 OH
3441 Vanguard 14-Silver kuebler 1368 13-27 33% 14 OH
3442 Vegas Venom 18-2 1368 0-0 0% 18 NV
3443 495 17 1368 1-7 13% 17 MD
3444 SJVBC Boys 15-Black 1368 5-18 22% 15 NJ
3445 NCVC 17 Mizuno 1368 11-25 31% 17 CA
3446 RCVA 14 National 1368 13-28 32% 14 VA
3447 Ku'e VBC 18-Pane'e 1368 5-11 31% 18 WA
3448 Coastal 15 Justin 1368 9-20 31% 15 MA
3449 MVC 16 1368 2-5 29% 16
3450 Playeras Isabela 17-1 1367 1-5 17% 17 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.