Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 69 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3401 Titan Premier 16 Percival 1367 4-11 27% 16 CA
3402 Academy 17-E white 1367 23-31 43% 17 IN
3403 SPVB B18 Select 1367 5-6 45% 18 IL
3404 AZ Legacy 18 Crimson 1367 21-32 40% 18 AZ
3405 GSA Boys 17 1367 3-11 21% 17 NJ
3406 Na Pua o Hina VBC 14-50 1367 1-4 20% 14 HI
3407 Playeras Isabela 17-1 1366 1-5 17% 17 PR
3408 Aspire 14-Ant man 1366 7-11 39% 14 AZ
3409 NCVC 17 Mizuno 1366 11-25 31% 17 CA
3410 O3 B18 1366 10-19 34% 18 MI
3411 CHAOS BOYS 18U GOLD 1366 7-15 32% 18 OR
3412 OPV BOYS 18 NATIONAL 1366 6-11 35% 18 OR
3413 MVVC YB 14 Trevor 1365 11-6 65% 14 CA
3414 Mt. Hood 18 Timberline 1365 9-11 45% 18 OR
3415 REDLINE 18-Black boys 1365 5-10 33% 18 MI
3416 Coastal 17-Chuck 1365 1-9 10% 17 VA
3417 CHAOS BOYS 14-Regional black 1365 0-4 0% 14 OR
3418 Mamba 14-Black 1365 18-24 43% 14 WI
3419 Pu'ukī VBC 16-80 1365 1-6 14% 16 HI
3420 Ku'e VBC 18-Pane'e 1365 5-11 31% 18 WA
3421 630 Volleyball 17-6 1364 25-38 40% 17 IL
3422 Pipeline 16-Blue 1364 17-16 52% 16 IL
3423 Phoenix 18 Brooks 1364 9-23 28% 18 OH
3424 Vanguard 14-Silver kuebler 1364 13-27 33% 14 OH
3425 Quicksets 16-Black 1364 14-29 33% 16 HI
3426 A5 Boys 14-Gary 1364 0-4 0% 14 GA
3427 Northland Static 18-1 1363 6-7 46% 18 MO
3428 AZ Fear 14-Blue 1363 7-12 37% 14 AZ
3429 SynergyForce 15-3 gold 1363 2-8 20% 15 CA
3430 Club GSL 15-Comp - brittany 1363 0-4 0% 15 UT
3431 SKY 12-1 1362 4-10 29% 12 OH
3432 SUSA 18 1362 7-11 32% 18 UT
3433 Flight Academy 13-S 1362 13-19 41% 13 OH
3434 Highlands 18-Behney 1362 2-11 15% 18 MO
3435 Velocity 15 National 1362 11-26 30% 15 PA
3436 CUZINS B 12 1362 0-5 0% 12 HI
3437 Flight Academy 12-S 1361 11-19 37% 12 OH
3438 MDJRS 14-Boys black 1361 10-28 25% 14 MD
3439 BANZAI BOYS 18 1361 8-18 31% 18 NE
3440 UVC 14-Danny 1361 3-6 33% 14 CA
3441 IDVB 14-Jenna 1360 8-15 35% 14 MI
3442 NIVB 13-Green 1360 1-2 33% 13 MN
3443 True North B 15-Green 1360 3-7 30% 15 MO
3444 Club 1 B 18-White 1360 24-29 45% 18 IL
3445 No Panic 16-Boys 1360 14-27 34% 16 VA
3446 Next Gen 18U Silver 1360 13-19 41% 18 MO
3447 Epic United 14-Red 1359 15-18 45% 14 IL
3448 Pacific Rim 15-1 1359 1-9 10% 15 CA
3449 FAV 16 Iceman 1359 11-16 41% 16 CA
3450 Vanguard 15-Silver matt 1359 12-17 41% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.