2025-2026 Season — Page 69 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3401 | SMBC Shack 14 Premier | 1373 | 14-19 | 42% | 14 | CA |
| 3402 | SG Elite 16 Select | 1373 | 18-23 | 44% | 16 | CA |
| 3403 | TORRI 13-1 bebo | 1373 | 1-5 | 17% | 13 | PR |
| 3404 | HSJ 14-R - pink | 1373 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | |
| 3405 | HI BRED VBC 18-Elite | 1372 | 3-10 | 23% | 18 | HI |
| 3406 | Phoenix 16-1 | 1372 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | |
| 3407 | Legacy Boys 14 Elite | 1372 | 10-22 | 31% | 14 | MI |
| 3408 | Palatine 18-Black | 1372 | 3-7 | 30% | 18 | IL |
| 3409 | SI Wave 11-Boys | 1372 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 3410 | Stars 18-Pack | 1372 | 18-22 | 45% | 18 | SC |
| 3411 | Club 1 B 18-White | 1372 | 24-29 | 45% | 18 | IL |
| 3412 | Red Rock 17-Bri - redwood city | 1372 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 3413 | Sky High 14-Clark - spr | 1372 | 5-8 | 38% | 14 | IL |
| 3414 | Mayhem 17-1 | 1372 | 10-10 | 50% | 17 | KS |
| 3415 | UNO Boys 16-National | 1372 | 22-43 | 33% | 16 | IL |
| 3416 | Momentum 14-Orange | 1371 | 8-19 | 30% | 14 | OH |
| 3417 | Absolute Zero 18-Celsius | 1371 | 0-7 | 0% | 18 | WA |
| 3418 | Island Mixx 17-A | 1371 | 1-6 | 14% | 17 | |
| 3419 | Surge BOYS 16-Black | 1371 | 1-8 | 11% | 16 | PA |
| 3420 | Ichiban 15-Spartans | 1371 | 6-13 | 32% | 15 | GA |
| 3421 | Legacy Alaska 16-1 | 1370 | 0-7 | 0% | 16 | |
| 3422 | HEAT 12-Red | 1370 | 0-6 | 0% | 12 | CA |
| 3423 | Maverick 14 Payback | 1370 | 8-11 | 42% | 14 | AZ |
| 3424 | River City 11-Blue | 1370 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 3425 | IMUA UVC 16-Blk | 1370 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | CA |
| 3426 | Blue Royals 14 Elite | 1370 | 8-15 | 35% | 14 | WA |
| 3427 | Vibe 18-Premier | 1369 | 7-11 | 30% | 18 | CA |
| 3428 | Team Rockstar 13 Robbie | 1369 | 19-35 | 35% | 13 | CA |
| 3429 | Sol Taino 18 11 | 1369 | 0-3 | 0% | 18 | PR |
| 3430 | Upper Left 16-Boys | 1369 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | |
| 3431 | South County 14-Justin | 1369 | 0-10 | 0% | 14 | RI |
| 3432 | SKY 13-1 | 1369 | 8-18 | 31% | 13 | IL |
| 3433 | WAVE 15-Garrett | 1369 | 14-36 | 28% | 15 | CA |
| 3434 | CLE SEL 14-White | 1369 | 10-23 | 30% | 14 | OH |
| 3435 | REDLINE 18-Black boys | 1369 | 5-10 | 33% | 18 | TX |
| 3436 | Playeros Ponce 15 | 1369 | 1-5 | 17% | 15 | PR |
| 3437 | Academy 17-E white | 1369 | 23-31 | 43% | 17 | IN |
| 3438 | 630 Volleyball 17-6 | 1368 | 25-38 | 40% | 17 | IL |
| 3439 | Dinamite 15-1 | 1368 | 8-7 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 3440 | Phoenix 18 Brooks | 1368 | 9-23 | 28% | 18 | OH |
| 3441 | Vanguard 14-Silver kuebler | 1368 | 13-27 | 33% | 14 | OH |
| 3442 | Vegas Venom 18-2 | 1368 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | NV |
| 3443 | 495 17 | 1368 | 1-7 | 13% | 17 | MD |
| 3444 | SJVBC Boys 15-Black | 1368 | 5-18 | 22% | 15 | NJ |
| 3445 | NCVC 17 Mizuno | 1368 | 11-25 | 31% | 17 | CA |
| 3446 | RCVA 14 National | 1368 | 13-28 | 32% | 14 | VA |
| 3447 | Ku'e VBC 18-Pane'e | 1368 | 5-11 | 31% | 18 | WA |
| 3448 | Coastal 15 Justin | 1368 | 9-20 | 31% | 15 | MA |
| 3449 | MVC 16 | 1368 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | |
| 3450 | Playeras Isabela 17-1 | 1367 | 1-5 | 17% | 17 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.