Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 68 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3351 Bayou Boys 17U 1374 0-5 0% 17 LA
3352 MVP Boys 14-Blue 1374 20-20 50% 14 WI
3353 TNT Boys 17-Blitz 1374 13-23 36% 17 PA
3354 CCVA 14 Navy 1374 3-9 23% 14 MD
3355 HI BRED VBC 18-Elite 1373 3-10 23% 18 HI
3356 Stormbreaker Volleyball Club Corporation 18-Prime 1373 1-8 11% 18 CA
3357 HSJ 14-R - pink 1373 0-3 0% 14 NY
3358 KUIKAHI 15-Red roshambo 1373 7-35 17% 15 HI
3359 NE Storm 17 Wildfire 1373 10-17 36% 17 MA
3360 Elite 18-Premier 1373 1-5 17% 18 MO
3361 Horseshoe 18-Redball 1373 2-7 18% 18 PA
3362 TORRI 13-1 bebo 1373 1-5 17% 13 PR
3363 Big Cat 11-Boys 1373 0-0 0% 11 IA
3364 UNO Boys 16-National 1372 22-43 33% 16 IL
3365 LHV Boys 16-2 hunters 1372 11-23 32% 16 MA
3366 Palatine 18-Black 1372 3-7 30% 18 IL
3367 Team Rockstar 13 Robbie 1372 19-35 35% 13 CA
3368 MVC 18 1372 15-21 42% 18 UT
3369 CSTORM 13 Hurricanes 1372 9-13 41% 13 OH
3370 Phoenix 16-1 1372 1-5 17% 16 FL
3371 Tala VBC 18-1 1372 2-3 40% 18 NV
3372 Blue Royals 14 Elite 1372 8-15 35% 14 WA
3373 Island Mixx 17-A 1371 1-6 14% 17 FL
3374 Paramount Volleyball Club 18-1 boys 1371 1-5 17% 18 VA
3375 South County 14-Justin 1371 0-10 0% 14 UT
3376 WAVE 15-Garrett 1371 14-36 28% 15 CA
3377 Legacy Alaska 16-1 1371 0-7 0% 16 IL
3378 Surge BOYS 16-Black 1371 1-8 11% 16 NJ
3379 Maverick 14 Payback 1371 8-11 42% 14 AZ
3380 Absolute Zero 18-Celsius 1371 0-7 0% 18 WA
3381 Legacy Boys 14 Elite 1371 10-22 31% 14 NY
3382 Ichiban 15-Spartans 1371 6-13 32% 15 GA
3383 IMUA UVC 16-Blk 1370 1-5 17% 16 CA
3384 Stars 18-Pack 1370 18-22 45% 18 SC
3385 Red Rock 17-Bri - redwood city 1370 4-4 50% 17 CA
3386 495 17 1370 1-7 13% 17 VA
3387 EnERgy 18-Boys 1369 6-10 38% 18 MN
3388 SI Wave 11-Boys 1369 0-0 0% 11 MO
3389 Sol Taino 18 11 1369 0-3 0% 18 PR
3390 SKY 13-1 1369 8-18 31% 13 OH
3391 Vegas Volley 17-Dinoco 1369 1-7 13% 17 NV
3392 So. PHX Rebels Boys 14-S 1369 3-9 25% 14 AZ
3393 Ultimate VBC-Chicago 13 UVC Matt (GL) 1369 2-3 40% 13 IL
3394 Playeros Ponce 15 1369 1-5 17% 15 PR
3395 Upper Left 16-Boys 1369 2-4 33% 16 WA
3396 Cyclones Boys 16-G 1368 32-37 46% 16 IL
3397 Kokoro Volleyball 18u 1368 17-29 37% 18 MN
3398 Dinamite 15-1 1368 8-7 53% 15 CA
3399 Dive 18-Orange 1367 5-8 38% 18 CO
3400 SynergyForce B 13-Gold 1367 13-32 29% 13 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.