Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 68 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3351 Iowa Impact 16-3 premier 1379 0-4 0% 16 IA
3352 South County 17-Sarah boys 1379 4-6 40% 17 RI
3353 #951 Elite Boys 18-2 1378 7-8 47% 18 CA
3354 CHAOS BOYS 16-1 national 1378 12-14 46% 16 OR
3355 Diablo Black 18-1 1378 10-12 45% 18 CA
3356 674 Manati 15-2 m john 1378 0-3 0% 15 PR
3357 HVA 16-Performance white-ruben 1378 7-19 27% 16 TX
3358 SPVB 16-Foxtrot 1378 3-3 50% 16 IL
3359 Bravo 16-Falcon 1378 14-13 52% 16 KY
3360 Volleyball Academy Unlimited 16-2 1378 2-2 20% 16
3361 Beach Cities 17 Onyx 1378 6-8 43% 17 CA
3362 Boston United Boys 15-Select 1 1378 9-18 33% 15 MA
3363 Atlanta Extreme 16-Jayla 1378 8-20 29% 16 GA
3364 No Panic 12 Pasha 1378 0-0 0% 12 VA
3365 Dynamix 18-Black 1377 0-5 0% 18 VA
3366 SJVBC Boys 16-Elite 1377 3-16 16% 16 NJ
3367 River City Jrs Boys 14 Navy 1377 1-5 17% 14 NE
3368 TDV Boys 14-1 1377 8-11 42% 14 OH
3369 Downstate 16-Cobras 1377 5-12 29% 16 NY
3370 Club W 13-Black 1377 7-6 54% 13 WI
3371 CCVA 17-Navy 1377 11-23 30% 17 MD
3372 ARVC 18-Black adidas 1376 5-31 14% 18 NM
3373 Tsunami 18-1 1376 13-13 50% 18 GA
3374 MVC 18 1376 5-8 38% 18
3375 Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mcchickens 1376 1-4 20% 16 WA
3376 A5 Boys 16-Tommy 1375 15-24 38% 16 GA
3377 Aura 16-Boys 1375 10-17 37% 16
3378 Exile 17-Red 1375 8-14 36% 17 PA
3379 Princeton 14-Boys 1375 3-14 18% 14 NJ
3380 Kokoro Volleyball 18u 1375 17-29 37% 18 MN
3381 Panther Boys 14-1 1375 1-6 14% 14 CO
3382 VUVC 14-Black 1375 3-0 100% 14 NV
3383 Coastal 17-Chuck 1375 1-9 10% 17 VA
3384 GOLDENBULLS 17-B white 1375 6-17 26% 17 FL
3385 Stormbreaker 18-Prime 1375 1-8 11% 18 CA
3386 Vegas Volley Boys 17-1 1375 7-16 30% 17 NV
3387 NE Storm 17 Wildfire 1374 10-17 36% 17 MA
3388 Vibe Boys 16-Cliff 1374 4-10 29% 16 CA
3389 KUIKAHI 15-Red roshambo 1374 7-35 17% 15 HI
3390 Tala VBC 18-1 1374 2-3 40% 18 NV
3391 CCVA 14 Navy 1374 3-9 23% 14 MD
3392 Bayou Boys 17U 1374 0-5 0% 17 LA
3393 Elite 18-Premier 1374 1-5 17% 18 CA
3394 NVPUR 14-Oneill j 1374 1-6 14% 14 PR
3395 Azuri Performance B15-1 1374 8-21 28% 15 WI
3396 Na Pua o Hina VBC 14-50 1373 1-4 20% 14
3397 Big Cat 11-Boys 1373 0-0 0% 11
3398 SKY 12-1 1373 4-10 29% 12 IL
3399 AZ Legacy 18 Crimson 1373 21-32 40% 18 AZ
3400 MVP Boys 14-Blue 1373 20-20 50% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.