2025-2026 Season — Page 67 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3301 | BBVC Black 17 | 1386 | 2-8 | 20% | 17 | NV |
| 3302 | Lumber City VBC 16-1 | 1386 | 5-15 | 22% | 16 | NY |
| 3303 | Empowered B15-Black | 1385 | 24-35 | 41% | 15 | IN |
| 3304 | LHV 15-1 eclipse | 1385 | 7-12 | 37% | 15 | MA |
| 3305 | Elevation 18-Regional b | 1385 | 1-7 | 13% | 18 | CO |
| 3306 | 630 Volleyball 17-5 | 1385 | 30-22 | 58% | 17 | IL |
| 3307 | SF Elite 12 Gurg | 1385 | 10-19 | 34% | 12 | CA |
| 3308 | BigSky 17-Challenger | 1385 | 4-6 | 40% | 17 | |
| 3309 | SNIPERS VBC 18-1 | 1385 | 4-7 | 36% | 18 | NV |
| 3310 | TVA Vineyard 18-Gold | 1384 | 7-14 | 33% | 18 | VA |
| 3311 | Balboa Bay 16-Black | 1384 | 9-17 | 35% | 16 | CA |
| 3312 | MVP BOS 14-Black | 1384 | 22-34 | 39% | 14 | MA |
| 3313 | NLVC 18 Escanor | 1384 | 21-28 | 39% | 18 | TX |
| 3314 | PARADOX 14U | 1384 | 11-14 | 44% | 14 | TX |
| 3315 | Team Colorado 17-Green | 1383 | 4-9 | 31% | 17 | CO |
| 3316 | NecTr 16-Tony | 1383 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | NV |
| 3317 | BVA BOYS 14 | 1383 | 5-11 | 29% | 14 | NY |
| 3318 | Club 1 B 16-Royal | 1383 | 23-31 | 43% | 16 | IL |
| 3319 | Vengeance 18-Papotto | 1383 | 15-16 | 48% | 18 | OH |
| 3320 | No Panic 16-Boys | 1383 | 14-27 | 34% | 16 | VA |
| 3321 | Sportime 17-Lynbrook 2 | 1383 | 9-19 | 32% | 17 | NY |
| 3322 | Balboa Bay 14-Red | 1383 | 8-26 | 24% | 14 | CA |
| 3323 | Academy Boys West 13-1 | 1383 | 22-40 | 35% | 13 | CA |
| 3324 | Salt City Boys 18 Jordan | 1383 | 7-8 | 47% | 18 | UT |
| 3325 | Austin Velocity Boys 16-1 | 1382 | 6-9 | 40% | 16 | TX |
| 3326 | Juggernaut 17-National 1 | 1382 | 21-21 | 50% | 17 | CO |
| 3327 | CA Volley 16-Spring | 1382 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 3328 | Elevation 12-Peak boys | 1382 | 4-9 | 31% | 12 | CO |
| 3329 | Roots Volleyball Academy 15-1 | 1382 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | TX |
| 3330 | Walton 18-2 | 1382 | 0-4 | 0% | 18 | |
| 3331 | MEVC 12 American | 1382 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 3332 | 674 Manati 14-1 m indio | 1381 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | PR |
| 3333 | ProPlay 16 Ray | 1381 | 11-17 | 39% | 16 | CA |
| 3334 | ECVBA 18-Crystal | 1381 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 3335 | BVC 16u | 1381 | 7-10 | 39% | 16 | NY |
| 3336 | PVC Boys 12-1 | 1381 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | NY |
| 3337 | Impact Boys 18-Red | 1381 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | OR |
| 3338 | MVVC B 17-Saints | 1381 | 0-10 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 3339 | MOD B16-Grey | 1380 | 32-25 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 3340 | MKE Sting 11-1 | 1380 | 8-18 | 31% | 11 | WI |
| 3341 | NF 16 Crimson | 1380 | 6-20 | 21% | 16 | NY |
| 3342 | MOD B17 Teal | 1380 | 16-19 | 46% | 17 | IL |
| 3343 | Big Wave Riders 18 | 1380 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | |
| 3344 | EnERgy 18-Boys | 1380 | 6-10 | 38% | 18 | IL |
| 3345 | Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Wht | 1380 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | NY |
| 3346 | Pulse 16-Christian | 1380 | 6-7 | 46% | 16 | MI |
| 3347 | SLAM 18-2 boys | 1380 | 3-7 | 30% | 18 | MA |
| 3348 | Juggernaut 16-Naitonal 2 | 1380 | 15-30 | 33% | 16 | CO |
| 3349 | Cascade 14-1 | 1379 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | |
| 3350 | FAV 16 Iceman | 1379 | 11-16 | 41% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.