Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 67 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3301 GOLDENBULLS 17-B white 1381 6-17 26% 17 FL
3302 Impact Boys 18-Red 1381 0-0 0% 18 NV
3303 Princeton 14-Boys 1381 3-14 18% 14 NJ
3304 MKE Sting 11-1 1380 8-18 31% 11 WI
3305 Austin Velocity Boys 14-1 1380 7-11 39% 14 TX
3306 Cascade 14-1 1380 1-3 25% 14 NY
3307 OPVC 14-Black 1380 13-24 35% 14 OH
3308 PVC Boys 12-1 1380 0-4 0% 12 NY
3309 Downstate 16-Cobras 1380 5-12 29% 16 NY
3310 Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Wht 1380 0-3 0% 14 NY
3311 SPVB 13-Black 1380 2-5 29% 13 IL
3312 SLAM 18-2 boys 1380 3-7 30% 18 MA
3313 HVA 16-Performance white-ruben 1379 7-19 27% 16 TX
3314 Wave Volleyball Club 14-1 1379 2-5 29% 14 CA
3315 Sky High 14-Clark - spr 1379 5-8 38% 14 IL
3316 SJVBC Boys 16-Elite 1378 3-16 16% 16 NJ
3317 674 Manati 15-2 m john 1378 0-3 0% 15 PR
3318 BVC 16u 1378 7-10 39% 16 NY
3319 Atlanta Extreme 16-Jayla 1378 8-20 29% 16 GA
3320 Butte Elite 18U 1378 10-12 45% 18 CA
3321 Austin Velocity Boys 16-1 1378 6-9 40% 16 TX
3322 SPVB 16-Foxtrot 1378 3-3 50% 16 IL
3323 Elevation 18-Regional b 1378 1-7 13% 18 CO
3324 OVC 16 Tsunami 1378 12-27 31% 16 VA
3325 Volleyball Academy Unlimited 16-2 1378 2-2 20% 16
3326 South County 17-Sarah boys 1378 4-6 40% 17 UT
3327 CCVA 17-Navy 1377 11-23 30% 17 MD
3328 TDV Boys 14-1 1377 8-11 42% 14 OH
3329 Vortex 18-Nick 1377 7-9 44% 18 UT
3330 Club W 13-Black 1377 7-6 54% 13 WI
3331 River City Jrs Boys 14 Navy 1377 1-5 17% 14 IA
3332 Panther Boys 14-1 1377 1-6 14% 14 CO
3333 CA Volley 16-Spring 1377 0-0 0% 16 CA
3334 Balboa Bay 16-Orange 1376 11-14 44% 16 CA
3335 A5 Boys 16-Tommy 1376 15-24 38% 16 GA
3336 SG Elite 16 Select 1376 18-23 44% 16 CA
3337 Vibe Boys 16-Cliff 1376 4-10 29% 16 VT
3338 ProPlay 16 Ray 1376 11-17 39% 16 CA
3339 Vegas Venom 18-2 1376 0-0 0% 18 NV
3340 CHAOS BOYS 16-1 national 1376 12-14 46% 16 OR
3341 Exile 17-Red 1376 8-14 36% 17 PA
3342 RVC BYDL 16-Grace 1375 5-10 33% 16
3343 VUVC 14-Black 1375 3-0 100% 14 CA
3344 NF 16 Crimson 1375 6-20 21% 16 NY
3345 Azuri Performance B15-1 1375 8-21 28% 15 WI
3346 Diablo Black 18-1 1375 13-16 45% 18 CA
3347 Aura 16-Boys 1375 10-17 37% 16 CA
3348 Tsunami 18-1 1375 13-13 50% 18 GA
3349 Chicago Elite B 18-Elite 1375 17-16 52% 18 IL
3350 NVPUR 14-Oneill j 1375 1-6 14% 14 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.