Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 67 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3301 BBVC Black 17 1386 2-8 20% 17 NV
3302 Lumber City VBC 16-1 1386 5-15 22% 16 NY
3303 Empowered B15-Black 1385 24-35 41% 15 IN
3304 LHV 15-1 eclipse 1385 7-12 37% 15 MA
3305 Elevation 18-Regional b 1385 1-7 13% 18 CO
3306 630 Volleyball 17-5 1385 30-22 58% 17 IL
3307 SF Elite 12 Gurg 1385 10-19 34% 12 CA
3308 BigSky 17-Challenger 1385 4-6 40% 17
3309 SNIPERS VBC 18-1 1385 4-7 36% 18 NV
3310 TVA Vineyard 18-Gold 1384 7-14 33% 18 VA
3311 Balboa Bay 16-Black 1384 9-17 35% 16 CA
3312 MVP BOS 14-Black 1384 22-34 39% 14 MA
3313 NLVC 18 Escanor 1384 21-28 39% 18 TX
3314 PARADOX 14U 1384 11-14 44% 14 TX
3315 Team Colorado 17-Green 1383 4-9 31% 17 CO
3316 NecTr 16-Tony 1383 2-5 29% 16 NV
3317 BVA BOYS 14 1383 5-11 29% 14 NY
3318 Club 1 B 16-Royal 1383 23-31 43% 16 IL
3319 Vengeance 18-Papotto 1383 15-16 48% 18 OH
3320 No Panic 16-Boys 1383 14-27 34% 16 VA
3321 Sportime 17-Lynbrook 2 1383 9-19 32% 17 NY
3322 Balboa Bay 14-Red 1383 8-26 24% 14 CA
3323 Academy Boys West 13-1 1383 22-40 35% 13 CA
3324 Salt City Boys 18 Jordan 1383 7-8 47% 18 UT
3325 Austin Velocity Boys 16-1 1382 6-9 40% 16 TX
3326 Juggernaut 17-National 1 1382 21-21 50% 17 CO
3327 CA Volley 16-Spring 1382 0-0 0% 16 CA
3328 Elevation 12-Peak boys 1382 4-9 31% 12 CO
3329 Roots Volleyball Academy 15-1 1382 1-6 14% 15 TX
3330 Walton 18-2 1382 0-4 0% 18
3331 MEVC 12 American 1382 0-0 0% 12
3332 674 Manati 14-1 m indio 1381 0-3 0% 14 PR
3333 ProPlay 16 Ray 1381 11-17 39% 16 CA
3334 ECVBA 18-Crystal 1381 0-0 0% 18 CA
3335 BVC 16u 1381 7-10 39% 16 NY
3336 PVC Boys 12-1 1381 0-4 0% 12 NY
3337 Impact Boys 18-Red 1381 0-0 0% 18 OR
3338 MVVC B 17-Saints 1381 0-10 0% 17 CA
3339 MOD B16-Grey 1380 32-25 56% 16 IL
3340 MKE Sting 11-1 1380 8-18 31% 11 WI
3341 NF 16 Crimson 1380 6-20 21% 16 NY
3342 MOD B17 Teal 1380 16-19 46% 17 IL
3343 Big Wave Riders 18 1380 3-4 43% 18
3344 EnERgy 18-Boys 1380 6-10 38% 18 IL
3345 Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Wht 1380 0-3 0% 14 NY
3346 Pulse 16-Christian 1380 6-7 46% 16 MI
3347 SLAM 18-2 boys 1380 3-7 30% 18 MA
3348 Juggernaut 16-Naitonal 2 1380 15-30 33% 16 CO
3349 Cascade 14-1 1379 1-3 25% 14
3350 FAV 16 Iceman 1379 11-16 41% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.