2025-2026 Season — Page 66 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3251 | Maverick 14 Fanboy | 1392 | 8-19 | 30% | 14 | AZ |
| 3252 | Cinci Attack 12-Red | 1392 | 5-10 | 33% | 12 | OH |
| 3253 | KVA 10-Kelly | 1392 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | |
| 3254 | Princeton 13-Boys | 1392 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | NJ |
| 3255 | Next Level 15-1 | 1392 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | MN |
| 3256 | BEVBC 16-2 - brin | 1391 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | CA |
| 3257 | FORZA1 NORTH 15-One boys | 1391 | 14-20 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 3258 | OVC 16 Tsunami | 1391 | 10-22 | 31% | 16 | VA |
| 3259 | AJAXVB 18-2 black | 1391 | 14-16 | 47% | 18 | OR |
| 3260 | Forza Boys 15-Orange | 1391 | 39-50 | 44% | 15 | IL |
| 3261 | STARZ 15-Boys blue | 1391 | 13-18 | 42% | 15 | IL |
| 3262 | NEPA Elite 14-Heat | 1391 | 5-9 | 33% | 14 | PA |
| 3263 | RVC BYDL 16-Grace | 1391 | 5-10 | 33% | 16 | VA |
| 3264 | Hi Bred VBC 16 Elite | 1391 | 11-14 | 44% | 16 | HI |
| 3265 | TNT Boys 17-Blitz | 1391 | 13-23 | 36% | 17 | PA |
| 3266 | IMUA UVC 12-Ua | 1391 | 2-10 | 17% | 12 | CA |
| 3267 | Butte Elite 18U | 1390 | 10-12 | 45% | 18 | CA |
| 3268 | Manteca Flight 17-1 mikaela | 1390 | 1-9 | 10% | 17 | CA |
| 3269 | Absolute SubZero U15/U 16-Mcpops | 1390 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | WA |
| 3270 | Chicago Elite B 18-Elite | 1390 | 17-16 | 52% | 18 | IL |
| 3271 | A-10 Boys 17-Red | 1390 | 21-30 | 41% | 17 | PA |
| 3272 | HEAT 14-Red | 1390 | 0-6 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 3273 | Forza 18-Black | 1390 | 1-4 | 17% | 18 | IL |
| 3274 | Squad VBC Boys 18 Elite | 1390 | 2-6 | 25% | 18 | NV |
| 3275 | WVVC 15-1 | 1389 | 13-26 | 33% | 15 | NJ |
| 3276 | Titan Premier 16 Stephen | 1389 | 9-13 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 3277 | TVA 14 | 1389 | 6-9 | 40% | 14 | |
| 3278 | MOD B15-Grey | 1389 | 28-26 | 52% | 15 | IL |
| 3279 | IDVB 15-Tristan | 1389 | 0-3 | 0% | 15 | ID |
| 3280 | Miami Diamonds 18-S | 1389 | 3-1 | 75% | 18 | FL |
| 3281 | GenX Volleyball 18 11 | 1389 | 0-4 | 0% | 11 | |
| 3282 | Sol Taino 18 10 | 1389 | 4-7 | 36% | 18 | PR |
| 3283 | BAVC Boys 14-1 | 1389 | 4-8 | 29% | 14 | OK |
| 3284 | HAVC 17-Red | 1389 | 29-37 | 44% | 17 | IL |
| 3285 | OPVC 14-Black | 1388 | 13-24 | 35% | 14 | OH |
| 3286 | 630 Volleyball 15-3 | 1388 | 29-40 | 42% | 15 | IL |
| 3287 | Lunatics 17 | 1388 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | UT |
| 3288 | C-burg 18-Blue | 1388 | 0-4 | 0% | 18 | |
| 3289 | Santa Fe Storm 14-2 daphne | 1388 | 1-5 | 14% | 14 | |
| 3290 | Powrhaus 16-West | 1388 | 7-23 | 23% | 16 | NC |
| 3291 | MALULANI - M&M 12 | 1387 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | |
| 3292 | GRV 16 | 1387 | 7-15 | 32% | 16 | MI |
| 3293 | Legends 15-3 bryan | 1387 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | PR |
| 3294 | Sky High 13-Hein - spr | 1387 | 4-8 | 33% | 13 | IL |
| 3295 | HVA 17-Performance blue | 1387 | 15-22 | 39% | 17 | TX |
| 3296 | ACEZ 18-White | 1387 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 3297 | Ballyhoo Boys 18-Black | 1387 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | PA |
| 3298 | ABC Apollo Boys 18-1 | 1387 | 8-10 | 44% | 18 | OR |
| 3299 | Team'Sota 18-2 national | 1387 | 23-40 | 37% | 18 | MN |
| 3300 | Underrated 14-S | 1387 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | NV |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.