Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 66 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3251 Maverick 14 Fanboy 1392 8-19 30% 14 AZ
3252 Cinci Attack 12-Red 1392 5-10 33% 12 OH
3253 KVA 10-Kelly 1392 0-3 0% 10
3254 Princeton 13-Boys 1392 0-3 0% 13 NJ
3255 Next Level 15-1 1392 2-6 25% 15 MN
3256 BEVBC 16-2 - brin 1391 2-5 29% 16 CA
3257 FORZA1 NORTH 15-One boys 1391 14-20 41% 15 CA
3258 OVC 16 Tsunami 1391 10-22 31% 16 VA
3259 AJAXVB 18-2 black 1391 14-16 47% 18 OR
3260 Forza Boys 15-Orange 1391 39-50 44% 15 IL
3261 STARZ 15-Boys blue 1391 13-18 42% 15 IL
3262 NEPA Elite 14-Heat 1391 5-9 33% 14 PA
3263 RVC BYDL 16-Grace 1391 5-10 33% 16 VA
3264 Hi Bred VBC 16 Elite 1391 11-14 44% 16 HI
3265 TNT Boys 17-Blitz 1391 13-23 36% 17 PA
3266 IMUA UVC 12-Ua 1391 2-10 17% 12 CA
3267 Butte Elite 18U 1390 10-12 45% 18 CA
3268 Manteca Flight 17-1 mikaela 1390 1-9 10% 17 CA
3269 Absolute SubZero U15/U 16-Mcpops 1390 1-4 20% 16 WA
3270 Chicago Elite B 18-Elite 1390 17-16 52% 18 IL
3271 A-10 Boys 17-Red 1390 21-30 41% 17 PA
3272 HEAT 14-Red 1390 0-6 0% 14 CA
3273 Forza 18-Black 1390 1-4 17% 18 IL
3274 Squad VBC Boys 18 Elite 1390 2-6 25% 18 NV
3275 WVVC 15-1 1389 13-26 33% 15 NJ
3276 Titan Premier 16 Stephen 1389 9-13 41% 16 CA
3277 TVA 14 1389 6-9 40% 14
3278 MOD B15-Grey 1389 28-26 52% 15 IL
3279 IDVB 15-Tristan 1389 0-3 0% 15 ID
3280 Miami Diamonds 18-S 1389 3-1 75% 18 FL
3281 GenX Volleyball 18 11 1389 0-4 0% 11
3282 Sol Taino 18 10 1389 4-7 36% 18 PR
3283 BAVC Boys 14-1 1389 4-8 29% 14 OK
3284 HAVC 17-Red 1389 29-37 44% 17 IL
3285 OPVC 14-Black 1388 13-24 35% 14 OH
3286 630 Volleyball 15-3 1388 29-40 42% 15 IL
3287 Lunatics 17 1388 2-5 29% 17 UT
3288 C-burg 18-Blue 1388 0-4 0% 18
3289 Santa Fe Storm 14-2 daphne 1388 1-5 14% 14
3290 Powrhaus 16-West 1388 7-23 23% 16 NC
3291 MALULANI - M&M 12 1387 0-4 0% 12
3292 GRV 16 1387 7-15 32% 16 MI
3293 Legends 15-3 bryan 1387 1-6 14% 15 PR
3294 Sky High 13-Hein - spr 1387 4-8 33% 13 IL
3295 HVA 17-Performance blue 1387 15-22 39% 17 TX
3296 ACEZ 18-White 1387 0-0 0% 18
3297 Ballyhoo Boys 18-Black 1387 1-4 20% 18 PA
3298 ABC Apollo Boys 18-1 1387 8-10 44% 18 OR
3299 Team'Sota 18-2 national 1387 23-40 37% 18 MN
3300 Underrated 14-S 1387 1-4 20% 14 NV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.