2025-2026 Season — Page 66 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3251 | ABC Apollo Boys 18-1 | 1387 | 8-10 | 44% | 18 | OR |
| 3252 | ARVC 18-Black adidas | 1387 | 5-31 | 14% | 18 | NM |
| 3253 | ACEZ 18-White | 1387 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 3254 | Legends 15-3 bryan | 1387 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | PR |
| 3255 | Sting Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1386 | 6-14 | 30% | 17 | CA |
| 3256 | Powrhaus 16-West | 1386 | 7-23 | 23% | 16 | NC |
| 3257 | Orlando Gold 14-Gold | 1386 | 16-23 | 41% | 14 | FL |
| 3258 | Empowered B15-Black | 1386 | 24-35 | 41% | 15 | IN |
| 3259 | Xtreme 17-National braulio | 1386 | 3-8 | 27% | 17 | NJ |
| 3260 | SF Elite 12 Gurg | 1386 | 10-19 | 34% | 12 | CA |
| 3261 | Team Colorado 17-Green | 1385 | 4-9 | 31% | 17 | CO |
| 3262 | Kings Volleyball Club 12 Kings Volleyball Club 2 | 1385 | 6-14 | 30% | 12 | PA |
| 3263 | CUE 17-2 | 1385 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | |
| 3264 | Monument Volleyball 18 B18 MVB (CH) | 1385 | 8-18 | 30% | 18 | VA |
| 3265 | HEAT 14-Red | 1385 | 0-6 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 3266 | BigSky 17-Challenger | 1385 | 4-6 | 40% | 17 | FL |
| 3267 | NLVC 18 Escanor | 1385 | 21-28 | 39% | 18 | CT |
| 3268 | Roots Volleyball Academy 15-1 | 1384 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | TX |
| 3269 | Salt City Boys 18 Jordan | 1384 | 16-19 | 46% | 18 | UT |
| 3270 | Team'Sota 18-2 national | 1384 | 23-40 | 37% | 18 | MN |
| 3271 | MVP BOS 14-Black | 1384 | 22-34 | 39% | 14 | MA |
| 3272 | Arlington Tiger Volleyball 17 Arlington Tiger Volleyball | 1384 | 0-4 | 0% | 17 | |
| 3273 | Academy Boys West 13-1 | 1384 | 22-40 | 35% | 13 | CA |
| 3274 | Lumber City VBC 16-1 | 1384 | 5-15 | 22% | 16 | NY |
| 3275 | 630 Volleyball 17-5 | 1384 | 30-22 | 58% | 17 | IL |
| 3276 | Bravo 16-Falcon | 1384 | 14-13 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 3277 | Academy Boys West 16-2 | 1383 | 16-27 | 37% | 16 | CA |
| 3278 | LuMaDe Volleyball Club 17 LuMaDe Boys Blue | 1383 | 2-6 | 25% | 17 | FL |
| 3279 | Sportime 17-Lynbrook 2 | 1383 | 9-19 | 32% | 17 | NY |
| 3280 | MVVC B 17-Saints | 1383 | 0-10 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 3281 | Big Wave Riders 18 | 1383 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | MA |
| 3282 | PARADOX 14U | 1383 | 11-14 | 44% | 14 | TX |
| 3283 | Cloud 16-Boys | 1383 | 1-10 | 9% | 16 | CA |
| 3284 | TVA Vineyard 18-Gold | 1382 | 7-14 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 3285 | Vibe 18-Premier | 1382 | 7-11 | 30% | 18 | VT |
| 3286 | Beach Cities 17 Onyx | 1382 | 6-8 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 3287 | #951 Elite Boys 18-2 | 1382 | 7-8 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 3288 | MOD B17 Teal | 1382 | 16-19 | 46% | 17 | IL |
| 3289 | Walton 18-2 | 1382 | 0-4 | 0% | 18 | GA |
| 3290 | Front Range Volleyball Club Inc 18-3 | 1382 | 2-6 | 25% | 18 | CO |
| 3291 | Vengeance 18-Papotto | 1382 | 15-16 | 48% | 18 | OH |
| 3292 | Boston United Boys 15-Select 1 | 1382 | 9-18 | 33% | 15 | MA |
| 3293 | Club 1 B 16-Royal | 1382 | 23-31 | 43% | 16 | IL |
| 3294 | Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mcchickens | 1382 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | WA |
| 3295 | Elevation 12-Peak boys | 1382 | 4-9 | 31% | 12 | CO |
| 3296 | Pulse 16-Christian | 1382 | 6-7 | 46% | 16 | CA |
| 3297 | BVA BOYS 14 | 1381 | 5-11 | 29% | 14 | NY |
| 3298 | ECVBA 18-Crystal | 1381 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 3299 | 674 Manati 14-1 m indio | 1381 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | PR |
| 3300 | MOD B16-Grey | 1381 | 32-25 | 56% | 16 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.