Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 66 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3251 ABC Apollo Boys 18-1 1387 8-10 44% 18 OR
3252 ARVC 18-Black adidas 1387 5-31 14% 18 NM
3253 ACEZ 18-White 1387 0-0 0% 18 CA
3254 Legends 15-3 bryan 1387 1-6 14% 15 PR
3255 Sting Volleyball Club 17-1 1386 6-14 30% 17 CA
3256 Powrhaus 16-West 1386 7-23 23% 16 NC
3257 Orlando Gold 14-Gold 1386 16-23 41% 14 FL
3258 Empowered B15-Black 1386 24-35 41% 15 IN
3259 Xtreme 17-National braulio 1386 3-8 27% 17 NJ
3260 SF Elite 12 Gurg 1386 10-19 34% 12 CA
3261 Team Colorado 17-Green 1385 4-9 31% 17 CO
3262 Kings Volleyball Club 12 Kings Volleyball Club 2 1385 6-14 30% 12 PA
3263 CUE 17-2 1385 1-4 20% 17
3264 Monument Volleyball 18 B18 MVB (CH) 1385 8-18 30% 18 VA
3265 HEAT 14-Red 1385 0-6 0% 14 CA
3266 BigSky 17-Challenger 1385 4-6 40% 17 FL
3267 NLVC 18 Escanor 1385 21-28 39% 18 CT
3268 Roots Volleyball Academy 15-1 1384 1-6 14% 15 TX
3269 Salt City Boys 18 Jordan 1384 16-19 46% 18 UT
3270 Team'Sota 18-2 national 1384 23-40 37% 18 MN
3271 MVP BOS 14-Black 1384 22-34 39% 14 MA
3272 Arlington Tiger Volleyball 17 Arlington Tiger Volleyball 1384 0-4 0% 17
3273 Academy Boys West 13-1 1384 22-40 35% 13 CA
3274 Lumber City VBC 16-1 1384 5-15 22% 16 NY
3275 630 Volleyball 17-5 1384 30-22 58% 17 IL
3276 Bravo 16-Falcon 1384 14-13 52% 16 CA
3277 Academy Boys West 16-2 1383 16-27 37% 16 CA
3278 LuMaDe Volleyball Club 17 LuMaDe Boys Blue 1383 2-6 25% 17 FL
3279 Sportime 17-Lynbrook 2 1383 9-19 32% 17 NY
3280 MVVC B 17-Saints 1383 0-10 0% 17 CA
3281 Big Wave Riders 18 1383 3-4 43% 18 MA
3282 PARADOX 14U 1383 11-14 44% 14 TX
3283 Cloud 16-Boys 1383 1-10 9% 16 CA
3284 TVA Vineyard 18-Gold 1382 7-14 33% 18 CA
3285 Vibe 18-Premier 1382 7-11 30% 18 VT
3286 Beach Cities 17 Onyx 1382 6-8 43% 17 CA
3287 #951 Elite Boys 18-2 1382 7-8 47% 18 CA
3288 MOD B17 Teal 1382 16-19 46% 17 IL
3289 Walton 18-2 1382 0-4 0% 18 GA
3290 Front Range Volleyball Club Inc 18-3 1382 2-6 25% 18 CO
3291 Vengeance 18-Papotto 1382 15-16 48% 18 OH
3292 Boston United Boys 15-Select 1 1382 9-18 33% 15 MA
3293 Club 1 B 16-Royal 1382 23-31 43% 16 IL
3294 Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mcchickens 1382 1-4 20% 16 WA
3295 Elevation 12-Peak boys 1382 4-9 31% 12 CO
3296 Pulse 16-Christian 1382 6-7 46% 16 CA
3297 BVA BOYS 14 1381 5-11 29% 14 NY
3298 ECVBA 18-Crystal 1381 0-0 0% 18 CA
3299 674 Manati 14-1 m indio 1381 0-3 0% 14 PR
3300 MOD B16-Grey 1381 32-25 56% 16 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.