Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 65 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3201 Horseshoe 18-Redball 1399 2-7 18% 18 PA
3202 Dinamite 16-EDGAR 1399 4-4 50% 16 CA
3203 United Volleyball Club 14-1 1399 2-4 33% 14 IL
3204 630 Volleyball 13-Red 1399 10-8 56% 13 IL
3205 Legends 18-3 soler 1399 4-10 29% 18 PR
3206 NLVC 12-Boys 1398 0-0 0% 12 TX
3207 Academy 16-Mt onyx 1398 7-7 50% 16 IN
3208 Roots Volleyball Academy 16-1 1398 2-4 33% 16 TX
3209 Maui Mana 16-Boys 1398 6-11 35% 16 HI
3210 AJV Boys 14 adidas 1398 25-32 44% 14 TX
3211 SFVC 16-Red 1398 1-3 25% 16
3212 Oasis 14-Black 1398 11-9 55% 14 CO
3213 Tstreet 13-Omar 1398 1-4 20% 13
3214 MN Select Boys 18-Black 1398 17-15 53% 18 MN
3215 AZ LEGACY 15-Crimson 1398 5-9 36% 15 AZ
3216 SERV 16 Beast 1397 22-37 37% 16 VA
3217 PVC Boys 14-1 1397 2-5 25% 14 NY
3218 Beach Cities 14 Onyx 1397 11-18 38% 14 CA
3219 Juggernaut 14-Regional 1 1397 8-14 35% 14 CO
3220 MORGAN HILL 16-Black 1397 0-5 0% 16 CA
3221 RVBC 14-1 1397 1-6 14% 14
3222 H Skyline Boys 17 Royal 1397 15-43 25% 17 TX
3223 Excel 14-White boys 1397 0-0 0% 14 TX
3224 Warren Sixpack 17-3 1397 21-22 49% 17 NJ
3225 Lakes Boys 16U 1396 7-13 35% 16 MN
3226 Cincy Elite 17 Elite 1396 28-30 48% 17 OH
3227 LBVC 16-Charles 1396 1-5 17% 16 CA
3228 Lightning 17 1396 7-13 35% 17 NE
3229 MVA 13-1 boys 1396 3-7 30% 13 SC
3230 787EV 18-Um mickey 1395 3-4 43% 18 PR
3231 RVA 15-Boys nazca blue 1395 0-0 0% 15
3232 BAVC 17-3 boys 1394 9-20 31% 17 CA
3233 LBVC 14-1 1394 12-10 55% 14 CA
3234 EVA Boys 17-1 1394 9-17 35% 17 NJ
3235 Academy Boys West 16-2 1394 16-27 37% 16 CA
3236 OMNI 14-3 power 1394 16-30 35% 14 CA
3237 C-burg 16 1394 0-3 0% 16
3238 Xtreme 17-National braulio 1394 3-8 27% 17 NJ
3239 EXILE East 15 1394 6-17 26% 15 PA
3240 Avg Joe's 18-S 1394 1-9 10% 18 WI
3241 KIVA 17-B red 1393 16-46 26% 17 KY
3242 Miami Diamonds 15-1 1393 0-4 0% 15 FL
3243 Legacy Boys 17 Elite 1393 11-17 39% 17 MI
3244 Haggan Volleyball Association B 16 1393 1-6 14% 16
3245 SPVB 17-Echo 1393 1-4 20% 17 IL
3246 Orlando Gold 14-Gold 1393 16-23 41% 14 FL
3247 SJVBC Boys 18-Black 1393 0-0 0% 18 NJ
3248 Pacific Rim 18-2 1393 15-18 45% 18 CA
3249 SSR 18-S 1392 2-3 40% 18
3250 Valor 16 Navy 1392 10-24 29% 16 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.