2025-2026 Season — Page 65 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3201 | Auckland All-Stars Volleyball Arrows B 18 | 1394 | 7-13 | 35% | 18 | HI |
| 3202 | Lightning 17 | 1393 | 7-13 | 35% | 17 | MN |
| 3203 | SPVB 17-Echo | 1393 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | IL |
| 3204 | LBVC 14-1 | 1393 | 12-10 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 3205 | Miami Diamonds 15-1 | 1393 | 0-4 | 0% | 15 | FL |
| 3206 | Hi Bred VBC 16 Elite | 1393 | 11-14 | 44% | 16 | HI |
| 3207 | NEPA Elite 14-Heat | 1393 | 5-9 | 33% | 14 | PA |
| 3208 | KIVA 17-B red | 1393 | 16-46 | 26% | 17 | KY |
| 3209 | Team'Sota 17 Premier | 1393 | 9-15 | 38% | 17 | MN |
| 3210 | Next Level 15-1 | 1393 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | MI |
| 3211 | Maverick 14 Fanboy | 1393 | 8-19 | 30% | 14 | AZ |
| 3212 | Cinci Attack 12-Red | 1392 | 5-10 | 33% | 12 | OH |
| 3213 | SSR 18-S | 1392 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | MN |
| 3214 | Mass Pats Boys 16-2 motivated | 1392 | 8-12 | 36% | 16 | MA |
| 3215 | Princeton 13-Boys | 1392 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | NJ |
| 3216 | FORZA1 NORTH 15-One boys | 1392 | 14-20 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 3217 | Sidewinder 14-2 | 1392 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 3218 | SERV 16 Beast | 1392 | 22-37 | 37% | 16 | VA |
| 3219 | BAVC Boys 14-1 | 1392 | 4-8 | 29% | 14 | OK |
| 3220 | AJAXVB 18-2 black | 1392 | 14-16 | 47% | 18 | OR |
| 3221 | SF Elite 18 Josie | 1391 | 20-28 | 42% | 18 | CA |
| 3222 | Forza Boys 15-Orange | 1391 | 39-50 | 44% | 15 | IL |
| 3223 | 630 Volleyball 13-Red | 1391 | 10-8 | 56% | 13 | IL |
| 3224 | Pacific Rim 18-2 | 1391 | 15-18 | 45% | 18 | CA |
| 3225 | BAVC 17-3 boys | 1391 | 9-20 | 31% | 17 | CA |
| 3226 | STARZ 15-Boys blue | 1391 | 13-18 | 42% | 15 | IL |
| 3227 | A-10 Boys 17-Red | 1391 | 21-30 | 41% | 17 | PA |
| 3228 | Absolute SubZero U15/U 16-Mcpops | 1391 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | WA |
| 3229 | FAV 18 Iceman | 1391 | 6-6 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 3230 | HAVC 17-Red | 1390 | 29-37 | 44% | 17 | IL |
| 3231 | IMUA UVC 12-Ua | 1390 | 2-10 | 17% | 12 | CA |
| 3232 | HVA 17-Performance blue | 1390 | 15-22 | 39% | 17 | TX |
| 3233 | Juggernaut 16-Naitonal 2 | 1390 | 15-30 | 33% | 16 | CO |
| 3234 | Forza 18-Black | 1390 | 1-4 | 17% | 18 | PA |
| 3235 | KeAloha 18-3 banzai | 1390 | 18-14 | 56% | 18 | IN |
| 3236 | C-burg 18-Blue | 1389 | 0-4 | 0% | 18 | PA |
| 3237 | TVA 14 | 1389 | 6-9 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 3238 | Manteca Flight 17-1 mikaela | 1389 | 1-9 | 10% | 17 | CA |
| 3239 | IDVB 15-Tristan | 1389 | 0-3 | 0% | 15 | MI |
| 3240 | Westside VBC 16-Black | 1388 | 17-17 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 3241 | 630 Volleyball 15-3 | 1388 | 29-40 | 42% | 15 | IL |
| 3242 | Underrated 14-S | 1387 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | NV |
| 3243 | Titan Premier 16 Stephen | 1387 | 9-13 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 3244 | GRV 16 | 1387 | 7-15 | 32% | 16 | MI |
| 3245 | Balboa Bay 16-Black | 1387 | 9-17 | 35% | 16 | CA |
| 3246 | Ballyhoo Boys 18-Black | 1387 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | PA |
| 3247 | MALULANI - M&M 12 | 1387 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | HI |
| 3248 | Utah Ice Volleyball Club 17 Utah Ice -Brin/Con | 1387 | 3-7 | 30% | 17 | UT |
| 3249 | MOD B15-Grey | 1387 | 28-26 | 52% | 15 | IL |
| 3250 | Miami Diamonds 18-S | 1387 | 3-1 | 75% | 18 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.