Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 65 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3201 Auckland All-Stars Volleyball Arrows B 18 1394 7-13 35% 18 HI
3202 Lightning 17 1393 7-13 35% 17 MN
3203 SPVB 17-Echo 1393 1-4 20% 17 IL
3204 LBVC 14-1 1393 12-10 55% 14 CA
3205 Miami Diamonds 15-1 1393 0-4 0% 15 FL
3206 Hi Bred VBC 16 Elite 1393 11-14 44% 16 HI
3207 NEPA Elite 14-Heat 1393 5-9 33% 14 PA
3208 KIVA 17-B red 1393 16-46 26% 17 KY
3209 Team'Sota 17 Premier 1393 9-15 38% 17 MN
3210 Next Level 15-1 1393 2-6 25% 15 MI
3211 Maverick 14 Fanboy 1393 8-19 30% 14 AZ
3212 Cinci Attack 12-Red 1392 5-10 33% 12 OH
3213 SSR 18-S 1392 2-3 40% 18 MN
3214 Mass Pats Boys 16-2 motivated 1392 8-12 36% 16 MA
3215 Princeton 13-Boys 1392 0-3 0% 13 NJ
3216 FORZA1 NORTH 15-One boys 1392 14-20 41% 15 CA
3217 Sidewinder 14-2 1392 6-6 50% 14 AZ
3218 SERV 16 Beast 1392 22-37 37% 16 VA
3219 BAVC Boys 14-1 1392 4-8 29% 14 OK
3220 AJAXVB 18-2 black 1392 14-16 47% 18 OR
3221 SF Elite 18 Josie 1391 20-28 42% 18 CA
3222 Forza Boys 15-Orange 1391 39-50 44% 15 IL
3223 630 Volleyball 13-Red 1391 10-8 56% 13 IL
3224 Pacific Rim 18-2 1391 15-18 45% 18 CA
3225 BAVC 17-3 boys 1391 9-20 31% 17 CA
3226 STARZ 15-Boys blue 1391 13-18 42% 15 IL
3227 A-10 Boys 17-Red 1391 21-30 41% 17 PA
3228 Absolute SubZero U15/U 16-Mcpops 1391 1-4 20% 16 WA
3229 FAV 18 Iceman 1391 6-6 50% 18 CA
3230 HAVC 17-Red 1390 29-37 44% 17 IL
3231 IMUA UVC 12-Ua 1390 2-10 17% 12 CA
3232 HVA 17-Performance blue 1390 15-22 39% 17 TX
3233 Juggernaut 16-Naitonal 2 1390 15-30 33% 16 CO
3234 Forza 18-Black 1390 1-4 17% 18 PA
3235 KeAloha 18-3 banzai 1390 18-14 56% 18 IN
3236 C-burg 18-Blue 1389 0-4 0% 18 PA
3237 TVA 14 1389 6-9 40% 14 CA
3238 Manteca Flight 17-1 mikaela 1389 1-9 10% 17 CA
3239 IDVB 15-Tristan 1389 0-3 0% 15 MI
3240 Westside VBC 16-Black 1388 17-17 50% 16 CA
3241 630 Volleyball 15-3 1388 29-40 42% 15 IL
3242 Underrated 14-S 1387 1-4 20% 14 NV
3243 Titan Premier 16 Stephen 1387 9-13 41% 16 CA
3244 GRV 16 1387 7-15 32% 16 MI
3245 Balboa Bay 16-Black 1387 9-17 35% 16 CA
3246 Ballyhoo Boys 18-Black 1387 1-4 20% 18 PA
3247 MALULANI - M&M 12 1387 0-4 0% 12 HI
3248 Utah Ice Volleyball Club 17 Utah Ice -Brin/Con 1387 3-7 30% 17 UT
3249 MOD B15-Grey 1387 28-26 52% 15 IL
3250 Miami Diamonds 18-S 1387 3-1 75% 18 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.