2025-2026 Season — Page 65 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3201 | Horseshoe 18-Redball | 1399 | 2-7 | 18% | 18 | PA |
| 3202 | Dinamite 16-EDGAR | 1399 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 3203 | United Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1399 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | IL |
| 3204 | 630 Volleyball 13-Red | 1399 | 10-8 | 56% | 13 | IL |
| 3205 | Legends 18-3 soler | 1399 | 4-10 | 29% | 18 | PR |
| 3206 | NLVC 12-Boys | 1398 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 3207 | Academy 16-Mt onyx | 1398 | 7-7 | 50% | 16 | IN |
| 3208 | Roots Volleyball Academy 16-1 | 1398 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | TX |
| 3209 | Maui Mana 16-Boys | 1398 | 6-11 | 35% | 16 | HI |
| 3210 | AJV Boys 14 adidas | 1398 | 25-32 | 44% | 14 | TX |
| 3211 | SFVC 16-Red | 1398 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | |
| 3212 | Oasis 14-Black | 1398 | 11-9 | 55% | 14 | CO |
| 3213 | Tstreet 13-Omar | 1398 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | |
| 3214 | MN Select Boys 18-Black | 1398 | 17-15 | 53% | 18 | MN |
| 3215 | AZ LEGACY 15-Crimson | 1398 | 5-9 | 36% | 15 | AZ |
| 3216 | SERV 16 Beast | 1397 | 22-37 | 37% | 16 | VA |
| 3217 | PVC Boys 14-1 | 1397 | 2-5 | 25% | 14 | NY |
| 3218 | Beach Cities 14 Onyx | 1397 | 11-18 | 38% | 14 | CA |
| 3219 | Juggernaut 14-Regional 1 | 1397 | 8-14 | 35% | 14 | CO |
| 3220 | MORGAN HILL 16-Black | 1397 | 0-5 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 3221 | RVBC 14-1 | 1397 | 1-6 | 14% | 14 | |
| 3222 | H Skyline Boys 17 Royal | 1397 | 15-43 | 25% | 17 | TX |
| 3223 | Excel 14-White boys | 1397 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | TX |
| 3224 | Warren Sixpack 17-3 | 1397 | 21-22 | 49% | 17 | NJ |
| 3225 | Lakes Boys 16U | 1396 | 7-13 | 35% | 16 | MN |
| 3226 | Cincy Elite 17 Elite | 1396 | 28-30 | 48% | 17 | OH |
| 3227 | LBVC 16-Charles | 1396 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | CA |
| 3228 | Lightning 17 | 1396 | 7-13 | 35% | 17 | NE |
| 3229 | MVA 13-1 boys | 1396 | 3-7 | 30% | 13 | SC |
| 3230 | 787EV 18-Um mickey | 1395 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | PR |
| 3231 | RVA 15-Boys nazca blue | 1395 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | |
| 3232 | BAVC 17-3 boys | 1394 | 9-20 | 31% | 17 | CA |
| 3233 | LBVC 14-1 | 1394 | 12-10 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 3234 | EVA Boys 17-1 | 1394 | 9-17 | 35% | 17 | NJ |
| 3235 | Academy Boys West 16-2 | 1394 | 16-27 | 37% | 16 | CA |
| 3236 | OMNI 14-3 power | 1394 | 16-30 | 35% | 14 | CA |
| 3237 | C-burg 16 | 1394 | 0-3 | 0% | 16 | |
| 3238 | Xtreme 17-National braulio | 1394 | 3-8 | 27% | 17 | NJ |
| 3239 | EXILE East 15 | 1394 | 6-17 | 26% | 15 | PA |
| 3240 | Avg Joe's 18-S | 1394 | 1-9 | 10% | 18 | WI |
| 3241 | KIVA 17-B red | 1393 | 16-46 | 26% | 17 | KY |
| 3242 | Miami Diamonds 15-1 | 1393 | 0-4 | 0% | 15 | FL |
| 3243 | Legacy Boys 17 Elite | 1393 | 11-17 | 39% | 17 | MI |
| 3244 | Haggan Volleyball Association B 16 | 1393 | 1-6 | 14% | 16 | |
| 3245 | SPVB 17-Echo | 1393 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | IL |
| 3246 | Orlando Gold 14-Gold | 1393 | 16-23 | 41% | 14 | FL |
| 3247 | SJVBC Boys 18-Black | 1393 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | NJ |
| 3248 | Pacific Rim 18-2 | 1393 | 15-18 | 45% | 18 | CA |
| 3249 | SSR 18-S | 1392 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | |
| 3250 | Valor 16 Navy | 1392 | 10-24 | 29% | 16 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.