2025-2026 Season — Page 64 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3151 | Exodus 18-2 | 1404 | 1-6 | 14% | 18 | CA |
| 3152 | Apex 18-2 | 1404 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | MO |
| 3153 | Infinity Royals 18-L | 1404 | 13-16 | 45% | 18 | MN |
| 3154 | Elevation 14-Timberline boys | 1404 | 4-5 | 36% | 14 | CO |
| 3155 | PV Boys 17-2 | 1403 | 13-12 | 52% | 17 | MA |
| 3156 | AHS Volleyball 18-1 | 1403 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 3157 | Core 15-Elite | 1403 | 6-13 | 32% | 15 | CA |
| 3158 | AVO 18-Orange | 1403 | 4-6 | 40% | 18 | VA |
| 3159 | Sporting Albany Boys 15u | 1403 | 8-20 | 29% | 15 | NY |
| 3160 | Pipeline 18-3 | 1403 | 31-37 | 46% | 18 | IL |
| 3161 | The Edge 16-Black | 1403 | 20-27 | 43% | 16 | VA |
| 3162 | Cool City Select 11 | 1403 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 3163 | A-10 Boys 18-Gray | 1403 | 11-22 | 33% | 18 | PA |
| 3164 | Cloud 16-Boys | 1403 | 1-10 | 9% | 16 | WY |
| 3165 | GVA Boys 10-Gold | 1403 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | PR |
| 3166 | SVC Boys 18 | 1402 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | GA |
| 3167 | OneVA 18-1 boys | 1402 | 4-6 | 40% | 18 | KS |
| 3168 | Prodigy Boys 16-1 premier | 1402 | 11-13 | 46% | 16 | NY |
| 3169 | LI Fury 16-2 | 1402 | 11-15 | 42% | 16 | NY |
| 3170 | KC United 18-Red | 1402 | 4-9 | 31% | 18 | MO |
| 3171 | Impact Boys 14U Red | 1402 | 4-8 | 33% | 14 | OR |
| 3172 | XVP 18-Elite boys | 1402 | 11-19 | 37% | 18 | NC |
| 3173 | Elite 340 Boys 14-4 | 1402 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | |
| 3174 | Selected 18-S - bubba | 1402 | 12-22 | 35% | 18 | NV |
| 3175 | TopFlight 15-Alpha | 1401 | 0-4 | 0% | 15 | NV |
| 3176 | RCVA 16-National blue | 1401 | 20-37 | 35% | 16 | VA |
| 3177 | Austin Velocity Boys 14-1 | 1401 | 7-11 | 39% | 14 | TX |
| 3178 | Elevation 17-Timberline boys | 1401 | 14-26 | 35% | 17 | CO |
| 3179 | Big City M 16-Boys | 1401 | 9-15 | 38% | 16 | NY |
| 3180 | Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 14-Boys | 1401 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 3181 | AJAXVB 16-2 black | 1401 | 9-12 | 43% | 16 | OR |
| 3182 | Red Rock Boys 16 National | 1401 | 15-22 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 3183 | HVA 18-Performance blue | 1401 | 17-21 | 45% | 18 | TX |
| 3184 | Gigasa Elite 17-Black | 1401 | 7-16 | 30% | 17 | NJ |
| 3185 | 757 12-Black | 1401 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 3186 | Mass Pats Boys 16-2 motivated | 1401 | 8-12 | 36% | 16 | MA |
| 3187 | Ignite Boys 18 Elite | 1401 | 3-9 | 25% | 18 | AZ |
| 3188 | Kinnect 14-2 | 1400 | 0-5 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 3189 | MDJRS 12-Boys black | 1400 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MD |
| 3190 | Colorado Elite VBC 14 | 1400 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | CO |
| 3191 | Premier Boys 16 Crimson | 1400 | 16-30 | 35% | 16 | TX |
| 3192 | SF Elite 18 Josie | 1400 | 20-28 | 42% | 18 | CA |
| 3193 | Core 16 Elite | 1400 | 25-37 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 3194 | SSP Storm 18-Select | 1400 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | FL |
| 3195 | WildcatVBC 18 | 1400 | 9-10 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 3196 | AVA 16-Boys | 1400 | 19-32 | 37% | 16 | FL |
| 3197 | Sportime 14-3 | 1399 | 10-20 | 33% | 14 | NY |
| 3198 | MVP FL 16-Black | 1399 | 20-33 | 38% | 16 | FL |
| 3199 | Tyrants 16-Blue | 1399 | 18-33 | 35% | 16 | CA |
| 3200 | VVB 18-Steve l | 1399 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.