Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 64 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3151 Colorado Elite VBC 14 1400 2-5 29% 14 CO
3152 Westside VBC 15-Green 1399 19-30 39% 15 CA
3153 AZ LEGACY 15-Crimson 1399 5-9 36% 15 AZ
3154 XVP 18-Elite boys 1399 11-19 37% 18 NC
3155 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 14 Ali 1399 0-3 0% 14 UT
3156 GVA Volleyball Academy 17-Black 1399 0-7 0% 17 PR
3157 Legends 18-3 soler 1399 4-10 29% 18 PR
3158 VVB 18-Steve l 1399 2-3 40% 18 GA
3159 MN Select Boys 18-Black 1399 17-15 53% 18 MN
3160 PVC Boys 14-1 1398 2-5 25% 14 NY
3161 SFVC 16-Red 1398 1-3 25% 16 IL
3162 Juggernaut 14-Regional 1 1398 8-14 35% 14 CO
3163 Core 16 Elite 1398 25-37 40% 16 CA
3164 NLVC 12-Boys 1398 0-0 0% 12 TX
3165 Sting Volleyball Club 18-1 1398 8-13 38% 18 CA
3166 Dinamite 16-EDGAR 1398 4-4 50% 16 CA
3167 Cincy Elite 17 Elite 1398 28-30 48% 17 OH
3168 Academy 16-Mt onyx 1398 7-7 50% 16 IN
3169 Tstreet 13-Omar 1398 1-4 20% 13 CA
3170 AZ LEGACY 18-Iron 1398 5-5 50% 18 AZ
3171 EVA Boys 17-1 1397 9-17 35% 17 NJ
3172 Excel 14-White boys 1397 0-0 0% 14 TX
3173 OMNI 14-3 power 1397 16-30 35% 14 CA
3174 Long Island Fury Volleyball II Inc 17-1 1397 2-9 18% 17 NJ
3175 Big Cat 15-Boys 1396 0-4 0% 15 IA
3176 C-burg 16 1396 0-3 0% 16 PA
3177 Legacy Boys 17 Elite 1396 11-17 39% 17 MI
3178 RVBC 14-1 1396 1-6 14% 14 PA
3179 United Volleyball Club 14-1 1396 2-4 33% 14 IL
3180 OneVA 18-1 boys 1396 4-6 40% 18 KS
3181 Beach Cities 14 Onyx 1396 11-18 38% 14 CA
3182 H Skyline Boys 17 Royal 1396 15-43 25% 17 TX
3183 Lakes Boys 16U 1396 7-13 35% 16 MN
3184 Core 15-Elite 1396 6-13 32% 15 CA
3185 787EV 18-Um mickey 1395 3-4 43% 18 PR
3186 Warren Sixpack 17-3 1395 21-22 49% 17 NJ
3187 Juggernaut 17-National 1 1395 21-21 50% 17 CO
3188 MVA 13-1 boys 1395 3-7 30% 13 SC
3189 MORGAN HILL 16-Black 1395 0-5 0% 16 CA
3190 Ignite Boys 18 Elite 1395 3-9 25% 18 CA
3191 Maui Mana 16-Boys 1395 6-11 35% 16 HI
3192 Haggan Volleyball Association B 16 1395 1-6 14% 16 HI
3193 AZ Fear 18-Red 1395 4-7 36% 18 AZ
3194 HVA 18-Performance blue 1395 17-21 45% 18 TX
3195 Avg Joe's 18-S 1394 1-9 10% 18 WI
3196 LBVC 16-Charles 1394 1-5 17% 16 PA
3197 SJVBC Boys 18-Black 1394 0-0 0% 18 NJ
3198 EXILE East 15 1394 6-17 26% 15 PA
3199 Set Above Volleyball Academy 18 Set Above Makoa 1394 11-21 34% 18 NY
3200 Valor 16 Navy 1394 10-24 29% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.