Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 64 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3151 Exodus 18-2 1404 1-6 14% 18 CA
3152 Apex 18-2 1404 1-3 25% 18 MO
3153 Infinity Royals 18-L 1404 13-16 45% 18 MN
3154 Elevation 14-Timberline boys 1404 4-5 36% 14 CO
3155 PV Boys 17-2 1403 13-12 52% 17 MA
3156 AHS Volleyball 18-1 1403 0-0 0% 18
3157 Core 15-Elite 1403 6-13 32% 15 CA
3158 AVO 18-Orange 1403 4-6 40% 18 VA
3159 Sporting Albany Boys 15u 1403 8-20 29% 15 NY
3160 Pipeline 18-3 1403 31-37 46% 18 IL
3161 The Edge 16-Black 1403 20-27 43% 16 VA
3162 Cool City Select 11 1403 0-0 0% 11
3163 A-10 Boys 18-Gray 1403 11-22 33% 18 PA
3164 Cloud 16-Boys 1403 1-10 9% 16 WY
3165 GVA Boys 10-Gold 1403 0-3 0% 10 PR
3166 SVC Boys 18 1402 1-4 20% 18 GA
3167 OneVA 18-1 boys 1402 4-6 40% 18 KS
3168 Prodigy Boys 16-1 premier 1402 11-13 46% 16 NY
3169 LI Fury 16-2 1402 11-15 42% 16 NY
3170 KC United 18-Red 1402 4-9 31% 18 MO
3171 Impact Boys 14U Red 1402 4-8 33% 14 OR
3172 XVP 18-Elite boys 1402 11-19 37% 18 NC
3173 Elite 340 Boys 14-4 1402 6-5 55% 14
3174 Selected 18-S - bubba 1402 12-22 35% 18 NV
3175 TopFlight 15-Alpha 1401 0-4 0% 15 NV
3176 RCVA 16-National blue 1401 20-37 35% 16 VA
3177 Austin Velocity Boys 14-1 1401 7-11 39% 14 TX
3178 Elevation 17-Timberline boys 1401 14-26 35% 17 CO
3179 Big City M 16-Boys 1401 9-15 38% 16 NY
3180 Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 14-Boys 1401 0-0 0% 14
3181 AJAXVB 16-2 black 1401 9-12 43% 16 OR
3182 Red Rock Boys 16 National 1401 15-22 41% 16 CA
3183 HVA 18-Performance blue 1401 17-21 45% 18 TX
3184 Gigasa Elite 17-Black 1401 7-16 30% 17 NJ
3185 757 12-Black 1401 0-0 0% 12
3186 Mass Pats Boys 16-2 motivated 1401 8-12 36% 16 MA
3187 Ignite Boys 18 Elite 1401 3-9 25% 18 AZ
3188 Kinnect 14-2 1400 0-5 0% 14 CA
3189 MDJRS 12-Boys black 1400 0-0 0% 12 MD
3190 Colorado Elite VBC 14 1400 2-5 29% 14 CO
3191 Premier Boys 16 Crimson 1400 16-30 35% 16 TX
3192 SF Elite 18 Josie 1400 20-28 42% 18 CA
3193 Core 16 Elite 1400 25-37 40% 16 CA
3194 SSP Storm 18-Select 1400 8-7 53% 18 FL
3195 WildcatVBC 18 1400 9-10 47% 18 CA
3196 AVA 16-Boys 1400 19-32 37% 16 FL
3197 Sportime 14-3 1399 10-20 33% 14 NY
3198 MVP FL 16-Black 1399 20-33 38% 16 FL
3199 Tyrants 16-Blue 1399 18-33 35% 16 CA
3200 VVB 18-Steve l 1399 2-3 40% 18
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.