Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 63 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3101 FAV 18 Iceman 1410 6-6 50% 18 CA
3102 SJVBC Boys 17-Black 1410 1-6 14% 17 NJ
3103 CEV 18-1 sapphire boys 1409 11-9 55% 18 OH
3104 Future 14-White 1409 12-12 50% 14 IL
3105 Top Flight Boys 14 1409 0-0 0% 14 IL
3106 Petite Elite 12 Stevi 1409 0-2 0% 12
3107 Legacy 18-National boys 1409 22-31 42% 18
3108 ACAD Boys 17-Orange 1409 9-21 30% 17 NY
3109 Impact 12-Erika 1409 1-4 20% 12 OR
3110 PSVA Houston 14-Boys 1409 2-4 33% 14
3111 CCVA 14 Premier 1408 8-15 35% 14 CA
3112 Cloud 18-1 1408 13-26 33% 18 WY
3113 CSTORM 13 Hurricanes 1408 9-13 41% 13 OH
3114 Academy 14-Mt - kaminski 1408 2-3 40% 14 IN
3115 Westside 18-Black 1408 2-5 29% 18 CA
3116 PV Boys 18-4 1407 12-12 50% 18 MA
3117 Kinnect 14-Forest 1407 13-21 38% 14 CA
3118 FORZA1 15 ONE 1407 7-14 33% 15 CA
3119 TC 18-1 gold chelsea 1407 12-20 38% 18 UT
3120 VEVA Boys 16-Blue 1407 5-19 18% 16 PA
3121 FRVBC 18 Club 1407 18-32 36% 18 CO
3122 EP 18-2 1407 7-8 47% 18 CA
3123 Maui Mana 18-Boys 1407 8-19 30% 18 HI
3124 Panther Boys 14-Black 1407 4-6 40% 14 CO
3125 Deleware Juniors 18-1 1407 0-5 0% 18 DE
3126 WPVC 12-Mini black 1406 0-4 0% 12 FL
3127 LuMaDe 16-Boys blue 1406 0-0 0% 16 FL
3128 Hot Shots 12-Regional 1406 0-3 0% 12 NY
3129 LHV 17-1 ubuntu 1406 10-12 45% 17 MA
3130 Manteca Flight 18-David 1406 2-8 20% 18 CA
3131 Reef VBC 15-Brad 1406 7-7 50% 15 CA
3132 Big Cat 15-Boys 1406 0-4 0% 15
3133 SNVF 12-Mount shuksan 1406 1-4 20% 12 WA
3134 WI Flight 16-B blue 1406 9-8 53% 16 WI
3135 ARSEL 12-1 andy 1405 1-5 17% 12 PR
3136 Velocity 18-2 regional 1405 1-4 20% 18 IL
3137 District VBC 16-Redlands 1405 0-0 0% 16 CA
3138 Lunatics 18U 1405 1-3 25% 18 UT
3139 KUIKAHI 14-Red roshambo 1405 15-27 36% 14 HI
3140 AZ Fear 18-Red 1405 4-7 36% 18 AZ
3141 MOD B13 Gold 1405 40-26 61% 13 IL
3142 TopFlight VBA 16-1 1405 6-6 50% 16 IL
3143 Eden Prairie Boys 16-1 1405 1-3 25% 16 MN
3144 AZ LEGACY 18-Iron 1404 5-5 50% 18 AZ
3145 Legacy Boys 18-Premier anthony 1404 10-16 38% 18 MI
3146 NVPUR 15-Oneill jose 1404 2-4 33% 15 PR
3147 Absolute Zero BVC 15-Mcribs 1404 1-4 20% 15 WA
3148 BAE 13-1 oliver 1404 0-7 0% 13 CA
3149 HAILI 12 1404 0-3 0% 12
3150 Cyclones Paramount 14-B 1404 24-20 51% 14 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.