2025-2026 Season — Page 62 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3051 | Pulse 15 Justin | 1416 | 18-18 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 3052 | Tx Outlaws 12-Blue | 1416 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | |
| 3053 | Boiler Jrs 16 Gold | 1415 | 6-8 | 43% | 16 | IN |
| 3054 | CSVC 17 SKYLIGHT | 1415 | 13-22 | 37% | 17 | NY |
| 3055 | Epic 17-1 | 1415 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | CA |
| 3056 | MOD B15 Teal | 1415 | 19-17 | 53% | 15 | IL |
| 3057 | HVA 18-Boys eaglecanes | 1415 | 11-17 | 39% | 18 | FL |
| 3058 | RootsVBA 18-Thornstorm | 1415 | 4-20 | 17% | 18 | KS |
| 3059 | Velocity 15-Regional | 1415 | 0-5 | 0% | 15 | IL |
| 3060 | Red Rock 16-Harley - redwood city | 1414 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 3061 | K Elites VBC B16-Gray | 1414 | 22-19 | 54% | 16 | MO |
| 3062 | OPVC 12-Black | 1414 | 10-12 | 45% | 12 | OH |
| 3063 | SoCal VBC 18-Beacons | 1414 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 3064 | SVC 18 | 1414 | 0-5 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 3065 | MiElite 18-Black | 1414 | 18-19 | 49% | 18 | MI |
| 3066 | Lakes Boys 18U | 1414 | 9-11 | 45% | 18 | MN |
| 3067 | VOLTAGE 18-Mark | 1414 | 5-9 | 36% | 18 | |
| 3068 | PV Boys 18-3 | 1414 | 12-18 | 40% | 18 | MA |
| 3069 | VRTXVB 16-Felicia | 1414 | 0-7 | 0% | 16 | |
| 3070 | AVO 18-1 | 1413 | 3-8 | 27% | 18 | VA |
| 3071 | BOLD Boys 10 11 | 1413 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 3072 | Future 15-White | 1413 | 26-18 | 59% | 15 | IL |
| 3073 | WC Aces - 16-Clubs | 1413 | 19-12 | 61% | 16 | IL |
| 3074 | River City Jrs 18-S boys | 1413 | 7-15 | 32% | 18 | NE |
| 3075 | Atlanta Extreme 16-Jayla boys | 1413 | 6-6 | 50% | 16 | GA |
| 3076 | OK.OK Dynamite 16-1 | 1413 | 5-4 | 45% | 16 | |
| 3077 | Valor 18 Navy | 1413 | 12-8 | 60% | 18 | TX |
| 3078 | Desert Sports 18-B | 1413 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 3079 | MOVA UA 18-Gold boys | 1413 | 14-23 | 38% | 18 | MO |
| 3080 | Aspire 14-Ninjas | 1412 | 6-12 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 3081 | GSA 16-Joel | 1412 | 13-13 | 50% | 16 | NJ |
| 3082 | Johnston 18-Select | 1412 | 0-2 | 0% | 18 | IA |
| 3083 | Rancho 17-Black | 1412 | 4-10 | 29% | 17 | CA |
| 3084 | Ballyhoo Boys 18-Purple | 1411 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | PA |
| 3085 | Vegas Volley 18-1 | 1411 | 1-7 | 13% | 18 | NV |
| 3086 | FRVBC 16-2 boys | 1411 | 9-15 | 38% | 16 | CO |
| 3087 | Golden State 16-Gold | 1411 | 3-8 | 27% | 16 | CA |
| 3088 | Madison Elite 11-Teal | 1411 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 3089 | KeAloha 18-3 banzai | 1411 | 18-14 | 56% | 18 | IN |
| 3090 | Infinity Royals 16-R | 1411 | 23-21 | 52% | 16 | MN |
| 3091 | SMBC Shack 16 Molten | 1411 | 27-28 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 3092 | MTRX 14-2 | 1411 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | AZ |
| 3093 | CIA 18-White | 1411 | 5-9 | 36% | 18 | IA |
| 3094 | PL Extreme Boys 14-1 | 1411 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | |
| 3095 | Velocity 16-2 regional | 1410 | 0-5 | 0% | 16 | IL |
| 3096 | Pipeline 14-Blue | 1410 | 18-14 | 56% | 14 | IL |
| 3097 | TNT Boys 14-Boom | 1410 | 0-5 | 0% | 14 | PA |
| 3098 | HSJ 14-R - purple | 1410 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | |
| 3099 | MoCo Boys 14-Adidas | 1410 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | MD |
| 3100 | Summit Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1410 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.