2025-2026 Season — Page 62 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3051 | TC 18-1 gold chelsea | 1413 | 15-25 | 38% | 18 | UT |
| 3052 | Gallant Volleyball Club 16 16 White | 1412 | 20-29 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 3053 | VRTXVB 18-Select - des | 1412 | 9-9 | 50% | 18 | UT |
| 3054 | Future 15-White | 1412 | 26-18 | 59% | 15 | IL |
| 3055 | Eden Prairie Boys 16-1 | 1411 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | MN |
| 3056 | Buckeye Volleyball Club 14-Premier | 1411 | 2-6 | 25% | 14 | OH |
| 3057 | Ballyhoo Boys 18-Purple | 1411 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | PA |
| 3058 | PV Boys 18-4 | 1411 | 12-12 | 50% | 18 | MA |
| 3059 | TNT Boys 14-Boom | 1411 | 0-5 | 0% | 14 | PA |
| 3060 | VRTXVB 13-Alta | 1411 | 5-5 | 50% | 13 | |
| 3061 | Crown City 18 Knights | 1411 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 3062 | MVP FL 16-Black | 1411 | 20-33 | 38% | 16 | FL |
| 3063 | BORINQUEN COQUI 16-3m | 1410 | 7-15 | 32% | 16 | PR |
| 3064 | SJVBC Boys 17-Black | 1410 | 1-6 | 14% | 17 | NJ |
| 3065 | Velocity 16-2 regional | 1410 | 0-5 | 0% | 16 | AR |
| 3066 | Cloud 18-1 | 1410 | 13-26 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 3067 | Pulse 15 Justin | 1410 | 18-18 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 3068 | MiElite 18-Black | 1410 | 18-19 | 49% | 18 | MI |
| 3069 | PSVA Houston 14-Boys | 1409 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | GA |
| 3070 | Sportime 14-3 | 1409 | 10-20 | 33% | 14 | NY |
| 3071 | TopFlight VBA 16-1 | 1409 | 6-6 | 50% | 16 | FL |
| 3072 | MoCo Boys 14-Adidas | 1409 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | TX |
| 3073 | Legacy 18-National boys | 1409 | 22-31 | 42% | 18 | MI |
| 3074 | FRVBC 18 Club | 1409 | 18-32 | 36% | 18 | CO |
| 3075 | Golden State 16-Gold | 1408 | 3-8 | 27% | 16 | CA |
| 3076 | Elevation 17-Timberline boys | 1408 | 14-26 | 35% | 17 | CO |
| 3077 | Vibe 17-Premier | 1408 | 10-13 | 40% | 17 | VT |
| 3078 | Valley Flames 18-1 | 1408 | 9-10 | 47% | 18 | TX |
| 3079 | APEX1 15-A1GREEN | 1408 | 14-17 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 3080 | Impact 12-Erika | 1408 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | MN |
| 3081 | Diablo Black 16-1 | 1408 | 15-28 | 35% | 16 | CA |
| 3082 | Manteca Flight 18-David | 1408 | 2-8 | 20% | 18 | CA |
| 3083 | MTRX 14-2 | 1408 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | AZ |
| 3084 | Reef VBC 15-Brad | 1408 | 7-7 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 3085 | Deleware Juniors 18-1 | 1408 | 0-5 | 0% | 18 | NJ |
| 3086 | MVC 16 | 1407 | 8-12 | 40% | 16 | UT |
| 3087 | GSA 16-Joel | 1407 | 13-13 | 50% | 16 | NJ |
| 3088 | Gallant Volleyball Club 18 18 White | 1407 | 18-28 | 39% | 18 | CA |
| 3089 | Top Flight 17-Nat black | 1407 | 0-7 | 0% | 17 | IL |
| 3090 | EP 18-2 | 1407 | 7-8 | 47% | 18 | MN |
| 3091 | Academy 14-Mt - kaminski | 1407 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | IN |
| 3092 | KUIKAHI 14-Red roshambo | 1407 | 15-27 | 36% | 14 | HI |
| 3093 | LuMaDe 16-Boys blue | 1406 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | FL |
| 3094 | SNVF 12-Mount shuksan | 1406 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | WA |
| 3095 | Apex 18-2 | 1405 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | VA |
| 3096 | Top Flight Volleyball Academy 17 Top Flight U17/18 Nat Black (SC) | 1405 | 1-6 | 14% | 17 | NV |
| 3097 | Velocity 18-2 regional | 1405 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | AR |
| 3098 | Red Rock Boys 18-TV | 1405 | 19-25 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 3099 | District VBC 16-Redlands | 1405 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 3100 | Legacy Volleyball Club 14-Premier | 1405 | 6-7 | 46% | 14 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.