Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 62 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3051 Pulse 15 Justin 1416 18-18 50% 15 CA
3052 Tx Outlaws 12-Blue 1416 1-3 25% 12
3053 Boiler Jrs 16 Gold 1415 6-8 43% 16 IN
3054 CSVC 17 SKYLIGHT 1415 13-22 37% 17 NY
3055 Epic 17-1 1415 2-5 29% 17 CA
3056 MOD B15 Teal 1415 19-17 53% 15 IL
3057 HVA 18-Boys eaglecanes 1415 11-17 39% 18 FL
3058 RootsVBA 18-Thornstorm 1415 4-20 17% 18 KS
3059 Velocity 15-Regional 1415 0-5 0% 15 IL
3060 Red Rock 16-Harley - redwood city 1414 0-0 0% 16 CA
3061 K Elites VBC B16-Gray 1414 22-19 54% 16 MO
3062 OPVC 12-Black 1414 10-12 45% 12 OH
3063 SoCal VBC 18-Beacons 1414 0-0 0% 18 CA
3064 SVC 18 1414 0-5 0% 18 CA
3065 MiElite 18-Black 1414 18-19 49% 18 MI
3066 Lakes Boys 18U 1414 9-11 45% 18 MN
3067 VOLTAGE 18-Mark 1414 5-9 36% 18
3068 PV Boys 18-3 1414 12-18 40% 18 MA
3069 VRTXVB 16-Felicia 1414 0-7 0% 16
3070 AVO 18-1 1413 3-8 27% 18 VA
3071 BOLD Boys 10 11 1413 0-0 0% 11
3072 Future 15-White 1413 26-18 59% 15 IL
3073 WC Aces - 16-Clubs 1413 19-12 61% 16 IL
3074 River City Jrs 18-S boys 1413 7-15 32% 18 NE
3075 Atlanta Extreme 16-Jayla boys 1413 6-6 50% 16 GA
3076 OK.OK Dynamite 16-1 1413 5-4 45% 16
3077 Valor 18 Navy 1413 12-8 60% 18 TX
3078 Desert Sports 18-B 1413 0-0 0% 18
3079 MOVA UA 18-Gold boys 1413 14-23 38% 18 MO
3080 Aspire 14-Ninjas 1412 6-12 33% 14 CA
3081 GSA 16-Joel 1412 13-13 50% 16 NJ
3082 Johnston 18-Select 1412 0-2 0% 18 IA
3083 Rancho 17-Black 1412 4-10 29% 17 CA
3084 Ballyhoo Boys 18-Purple 1411 2-3 40% 18 PA
3085 Vegas Volley 18-1 1411 1-7 13% 18 NV
3086 FRVBC 16-2 boys 1411 9-15 38% 16 CO
3087 Golden State 16-Gold 1411 3-8 27% 16 CA
3088 Madison Elite 11-Teal 1411 0-0 0% 11
3089 KeAloha 18-3 banzai 1411 18-14 56% 18 IN
3090 Infinity Royals 16-R 1411 23-21 52% 16 MN
3091 SMBC Shack 16 Molten 1411 27-28 49% 16 CA
3092 MTRX 14-2 1411 5-7 42% 14 AZ
3093 CIA 18-White 1411 5-9 36% 18 IA
3094 PL Extreme Boys 14-1 1411 1-4 20% 14
3095 Velocity 16-2 regional 1410 0-5 0% 16 IL
3096 Pipeline 14-Blue 1410 18-14 56% 14 IL
3097 TNT Boys 14-Boom 1410 0-5 0% 14 PA
3098 HSJ 14-R - purple 1410 1-3 25% 14
3099 MoCo Boys 14-Adidas 1410 2-3 40% 14 MD
3100 Summit Volleyball Club 16-1 1410 2-5 29% 16 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.