Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 62 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3051 TC 18-1 gold chelsea 1413 15-25 38% 18 UT
3052 Gallant Volleyball Club 16 16 White 1412 20-29 41% 16 CA
3053 VRTXVB 18-Select - des 1412 9-9 50% 18 UT
3054 Future 15-White 1412 26-18 59% 15 IL
3055 Eden Prairie Boys 16-1 1411 1-3 25% 16 MN
3056 Buckeye Volleyball Club 14-Premier 1411 2-6 25% 14 OH
3057 Ballyhoo Boys 18-Purple 1411 2-3 40% 18 PA
3058 PV Boys 18-4 1411 12-12 50% 18 MA
3059 TNT Boys 14-Boom 1411 0-5 0% 14 PA
3060 VRTXVB 13-Alta 1411 5-5 50% 13
3061 Crown City 18 Knights 1411 0-0 0% 18 CA
3062 MVP FL 16-Black 1411 20-33 38% 16 FL
3063 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-3m 1410 7-15 32% 16 PR
3064 SJVBC Boys 17-Black 1410 1-6 14% 17 NJ
3065 Velocity 16-2 regional 1410 0-5 0% 16 AR
3066 Cloud 18-1 1410 13-26 33% 18 CA
3067 Pulse 15 Justin 1410 18-18 50% 15 CA
3068 MiElite 18-Black 1410 18-19 49% 18 MI
3069 PSVA Houston 14-Boys 1409 2-4 33% 14 GA
3070 Sportime 14-3 1409 10-20 33% 14 NY
3071 TopFlight VBA 16-1 1409 6-6 50% 16 FL
3072 MoCo Boys 14-Adidas 1409 2-3 40% 14 TX
3073 Legacy 18-National boys 1409 22-31 42% 18 MI
3074 FRVBC 18 Club 1409 18-32 36% 18 CO
3075 Golden State 16-Gold 1408 3-8 27% 16 CA
3076 Elevation 17-Timberline boys 1408 14-26 35% 17 CO
3077 Vibe 17-Premier 1408 10-13 40% 17 VT
3078 Valley Flames 18-1 1408 9-10 47% 18 TX
3079 APEX1 15-A1GREEN 1408 14-17 45% 15 CA
3080 Impact 12-Erika 1408 1-4 20% 12 MN
3081 Diablo Black 16-1 1408 15-28 35% 16 CA
3082 Manteca Flight 18-David 1408 2-8 20% 18 CA
3083 MTRX 14-2 1408 5-7 42% 14 AZ
3084 Reef VBC 15-Brad 1408 7-7 50% 15 CA
3085 Deleware Juniors 18-1 1408 0-5 0% 18 NJ
3086 MVC 16 1407 8-12 40% 16 UT
3087 GSA 16-Joel 1407 13-13 50% 16 NJ
3088 Gallant Volleyball Club 18 18 White 1407 18-28 39% 18 CA
3089 Top Flight 17-Nat black 1407 0-7 0% 17 IL
3090 EP 18-2 1407 7-8 47% 18 MN
3091 Academy 14-Mt - kaminski 1407 2-3 40% 14 IN
3092 KUIKAHI 14-Red roshambo 1407 15-27 36% 14 HI
3093 LuMaDe 16-Boys blue 1406 0-0 0% 16 FL
3094 SNVF 12-Mount shuksan 1406 1-4 20% 12 WA
3095 Apex 18-2 1405 1-3 25% 18 VA
3096 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 17 Top Flight U17/18 Nat Black (SC) 1405 1-6 14% 17 NV
3097 Velocity 18-2 regional 1405 1-4 20% 18 AR
3098 Red Rock Boys 18-TV 1405 19-25 43% 18 CA
3099 District VBC 16-Redlands 1405 0-0 0% 16 CA
3100 Legacy Volleyball Club 14-Premier 1405 6-7 46% 14 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.