Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 61 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3001 Sportime 14-Quogue 1421 1-2 33% 14 NY
3002 Vibe 17-Premier 1421 10-13 40% 17 CA
3003 Diablo Black 16-1 1421 15-28 35% 16 CA
3004 JM 12 Silver 1421 0-2 0% 12
3005 DigThis! Ohana 13-Pink 1421 1-4 20% 13
3006 Northern Lights 17-B boys 1421 12-13 48% 17 MN
3007 WI Juniors 10-Blue 1421 0-0 0% 10
3008 Vegas Venom 18 1421 2-5 29% 18 NV
3009 Crown City 18 Knights 1420 0-0 0% 18 CA
3010 Idaho Strike 14-Black 1420 1-4 20% 14 ID
3011 Kings 18-1 1420 6-8 43% 18 OH
3012 Stormbreaker 14-Titans 1420 19-17 53% 14 CA
3013 IDVB 18-Elite | chip 1420 13-18 42% 18 ID
3014 Volitude 14 Ian 1420 19-24 44% 14 CA
3015 MOD B17-Grey 1420 34-21 62% 17 IL
3016 NPJ Seattle 16-1 boys 1420 3-2 60% 16 WA
3017 Velocity B15-Red 1420 7-15 32% 15 IL
3018 Red Rock Boys 18-TV 1419 19-25 43% 18 CA
3019 NKYVC 12-1 cyclone 1419 4-7 36% 12 KY
3020 KIVA 16-S-red 1419 2-3 40% 16 KY
3021 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-3m 1419 7-15 32% 16 PR
3022 Boys BSVBC 17-White 1419 6-7 46% 17 IL
3023 UVA 16 Mon 1419 10-17 37% 16 CA
3024 Elites 16-3 - summit 1419 1-4 20% 16
3025 Pure Aloha 18-Kupa’a 1419 24-30 44% 18 HI
3026 Guahan Boys 16-S 1419 2-4 33% 16
3027 Alta 14 1419 13-9 59% 14 AZ
3028 Apple Valley 14-S boys 1419 2-3 40% 14 MN
3029 Upontop Boys 18-Elite 1419 15-37 29% 18 FL
3030 KIVA 14-S-white 1418 1-4 20% 14 KY
3031 Southport 13-Blue 1418 4-4 50% 13 WI
3032 EnERgy 16-Boys 1418 9-6 60% 16 IL
3033 Team'Sota 17 Premier 1418 9-15 38% 17 MN
3034 Velocity 17-2 regional 1418 0-5 0% 17 IL
3035 Eclipse Boys 14-Lunar 1418 15-18 45% 14 CA
3036 380 Devil Dogs VB 14 1418 0-2 0% 14
3037 Meraki VB 18-2 1417 17-16 52% 18 NH
3038 Valley Flames 18-1 1417 9-10 47% 18 TX
3039 Flight Academy 17-S 1417 8-24 25% 17 OH
3040 Northern Lights 14-1 boys 1417 8-16 33% 14 MN
3041 MKE Sting 17-3 1417 25-30 45% 17 WI
3042 Sidewinder 14-2 1417 6-6 50% 14 AZ
3043 Tool City 17-White 1417 6-5 55% 17 PA
3044 ID Strike 16-Black 1417 13-14 48% 16 ID
3045 RVC 12 Ken 1417 0-0 0% 12 VA
3046 VRTXVB 18-Select - des 1417 6-8 43% 18
3047 TVA Pine 18-Navy 1417 8-13 38% 18 VA
3048 Low Country 14 1416 3-7 30% 14 SC
3049 SPVB 16-Zulu 1416 2-3 40% 16 IL
3050 FIVA BOYS 17-18s 1416 2-3 40% 17 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.