2025-2026 Season — Page 61 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3001 | Sportime 14-Quogue | 1421 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | NY |
| 3002 | Vibe 17-Premier | 1421 | 10-13 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 3003 | Diablo Black 16-1 | 1421 | 15-28 | 35% | 16 | CA |
| 3004 | JM 12 Silver | 1421 | 0-2 | 0% | 12 | |
| 3005 | DigThis! Ohana 13-Pink | 1421 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | |
| 3006 | Northern Lights 17-B boys | 1421 | 12-13 | 48% | 17 | MN |
| 3007 | WI Juniors 10-Blue | 1421 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | |
| 3008 | Vegas Venom 18 | 1421 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | NV |
| 3009 | Crown City 18 Knights | 1420 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 3010 | Idaho Strike 14-Black | 1420 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | ID |
| 3011 | Kings 18-1 | 1420 | 6-8 | 43% | 18 | OH |
| 3012 | Stormbreaker 14-Titans | 1420 | 19-17 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 3013 | IDVB 18-Elite | chip | 1420 | 13-18 | 42% | 18 | ID |
| 3014 | Volitude 14 Ian | 1420 | 19-24 | 44% | 14 | CA |
| 3015 | MOD B17-Grey | 1420 | 34-21 | 62% | 17 | IL |
| 3016 | NPJ Seattle 16-1 boys | 1420 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | WA |
| 3017 | Velocity B15-Red | 1420 | 7-15 | 32% | 15 | IL |
| 3018 | Red Rock Boys 18-TV | 1419 | 19-25 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 3019 | NKYVC 12-1 cyclone | 1419 | 4-7 | 36% | 12 | KY |
| 3020 | KIVA 16-S-red | 1419 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | KY |
| 3021 | BORINQUEN COQUI 16-3m | 1419 | 7-15 | 32% | 16 | PR |
| 3022 | Boys BSVBC 17-White | 1419 | 6-7 | 46% | 17 | IL |
| 3023 | UVA 16 Mon | 1419 | 10-17 | 37% | 16 | CA |
| 3024 | Elites 16-3 - summit | 1419 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | |
| 3025 | Pure Aloha 18-Kupa’a | 1419 | 24-30 | 44% | 18 | HI |
| 3026 | Guahan Boys 16-S | 1419 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | |
| 3027 | Alta 14 | 1419 | 13-9 | 59% | 14 | AZ |
| 3028 | Apple Valley 14-S boys | 1419 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | MN |
| 3029 | Upontop Boys 18-Elite | 1419 | 15-37 | 29% | 18 | FL |
| 3030 | KIVA 14-S-white | 1418 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | KY |
| 3031 | Southport 13-Blue | 1418 | 4-4 | 50% | 13 | WI |
| 3032 | EnERgy 16-Boys | 1418 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | IL |
| 3033 | Team'Sota 17 Premier | 1418 | 9-15 | 38% | 17 | MN |
| 3034 | Velocity 17-2 regional | 1418 | 0-5 | 0% | 17 | IL |
| 3035 | Eclipse Boys 14-Lunar | 1418 | 15-18 | 45% | 14 | CA |
| 3036 | 380 Devil Dogs VB 14 | 1418 | 0-2 | 0% | 14 | |
| 3037 | Meraki VB 18-2 | 1417 | 17-16 | 52% | 18 | NH |
| 3038 | Valley Flames 18-1 | 1417 | 9-10 | 47% | 18 | TX |
| 3039 | Flight Academy 17-S | 1417 | 8-24 | 25% | 17 | OH |
| 3040 | Northern Lights 14-1 boys | 1417 | 8-16 | 33% | 14 | MN |
| 3041 | MKE Sting 17-3 | 1417 | 25-30 | 45% | 17 | WI |
| 3042 | Sidewinder 14-2 | 1417 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 3043 | Tool City 17-White | 1417 | 6-5 | 55% | 17 | PA |
| 3044 | ID Strike 16-Black | 1417 | 13-14 | 48% | 16 | ID |
| 3045 | RVC 12 Ken | 1417 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | VA |
| 3046 | VRTXVB 18-Select - des | 1417 | 6-8 | 43% | 18 | |
| 3047 | TVA Pine 18-Navy | 1417 | 8-13 | 38% | 18 | VA |
| 3048 | Low Country 14 | 1416 | 3-7 | 30% | 14 | SC |
| 3049 | SPVB 16-Zulu | 1416 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | IL |
| 3050 | FIVA BOYS 17-18s | 1416 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.