Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 61 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3001 PV Boys 18-3 1418 12-18 40% 18 MA
3002 SPVB B13 Elite 1418 28-28 49% 13 IL
3003 380 Devil Dogs VB 14 1418 0-2 0% 14 IA
3004 Aspire 14-Ninjas 1417 6-12 33% 14 CA
3005 Volitude 14 Ian 1417 19-24 44% 14 CA
3006 TVA Pine 18-Navy 1417 8-13 38% 18 CA
3007 Stormbreaker 14-Titans 1417 19-17 53% 14 CA
3008 HVA 18-Boys eaglecanes 1417 11-17 39% 18 FL
3009 The Academy Boiler Jrs 15-Lynbrook 1417 0-0 0% 15 IN
3010 VOLTAGE 18-Mark 1417 5-9 36% 18 CO
3011 All In Volleyball Academy 15-Boys 1417 17-20 46% 15 FL
3012 SoCal VBC 18-Beacons 1417 0-0 0% 18 CA
3013 ID Strike 16-Black 1417 13-14 48% 16 ID
3014 Pulse Volleyball Club 14-Cascade 1417 2-5 29% 14 CA
3015 Red Rock 16-Harley - redwood city 1416 0-0 0% 16 CA
3016 CCVA 14 Premier 1416 8-15 35% 14 CA
3017 FIVA BOYS 17-18s 1416 2-3 40% 17 FL
3018 MOD B15 Teal 1416 19-17 53% 15 IL
3019 Northern Lights 14-1 boys 1416 8-16 33% 14 MN
3020 Low Country 14 1416 3-7 30% 14 SC
3021 Balboa Bay 14-Red 1416 8-26 24% 14 CA
3022 UVA 16 Mon 1416 10-17 37% 16 CA
3023 Tx Outlaws 12-Blue 1416 1-3 25% 12 TX
3024 SPVB 16-Zulu 1416 2-3 40% 16 IL
3025 Top Flight 18 Avengers 1415 10-12 45% 18 IL
3026 Boiler Jrs 16 Gold 1415 6-8 43% 16 IN
3027 Velocity 15-Regional 1415 0-5 0% 15 AR
3028 MOVA UA 18-Gold boys 1415 14-23 38% 18 MO
3029 Delaware Juniors 18-A 1414 8-12 40% 18 PA
3030 AVO 18-1 1414 3-8 27% 18 NJ
3031 FRVBC 16-2 boys 1414 9-15 38% 16 CO
3032 Maui Mana 18-Boys 1414 8-19 30% 18 HI
3033 Idaho Strike 14-Black 1414 3-9 25% 14 ID
3034 KIVA 14-S-white 1414 1-4 20% 14 KY
3035 Impact Boys 15-Red steven 1414 14-29 33% 15 NV
3036 Idaho Strike 12-Black 1414 2-3 40% 12 ID
3037 Prodigy Boys 16-1 premier 1414 11-13 46% 16 NY
3038 MKE Sting 17-3 1414 25-30 45% 17 WI
3039 Rancho 17-Black 1414 4-10 29% 17 CA
3040 Lakes Boys 18U 1413 9-11 45% 18 MN
3041 Mountain Athletic Club 16 MAC Gold 1413 1-4 20% 16
3042 River City Jrs 18-S boys 1413 7-15 32% 18 IA
3043 WC Aces - 16-Clubs 1413 19-12 61% 16 IL
3044 OK.OK Dynamite 16-1 1413 5-4 45% 16 OK
3045 K Elites VBC B16-Gray 1413 22-19 54% 16 MO
3046 OPVC 12-Black 1413 10-12 45% 12 OH
3047 Desert Sports 18-B 1413 0-0 0% 18 CA
3048 Summit Volleyball Club 16-1 1413 2-5 29% 16 MO
3049 BOLD Boys 10 11 1413 0-0 0% 11 TN
3050 FORZA1 18 ONE 1413 9-10 47% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.