Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 60 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2951 JM 12-Pink 1428 0-2 0% 12
2952 SPVB B13 Elite 1428 28-28 49% 13 IL
2953 Hawaiian Style Boys 14 1428 3-6 33% 14 HI
2954 HEAT 16-Red 1428 1-4 20% 16 CA
2955 WI Juniors 11-Blue 1428 0-0 0% 11
2956 Monterey Bay 16-1 1428 1-4 20% 16 CA
2957 Madtown 10-1 regional 1428 0-0 0% 10
2958 TVC 17-1s 1427 16-17 48% 17 IN
2959 Absolute 12-Blue 1427 18-33 35% 12 CA
2960 SG Elite 17 Select 1427 7-8 47% 17 CA
2961 Bucaneros AVC 18 1427 6-10 38% 18
2962 United Volleyball Club 18-2 1427 2-4 33% 18 IL
2963 BVC 17-2 blitz 1427 2-3 40% 17 MD
2964 SVA Boys 14-S black 1426 9-18 32% 14 WA
2965 STVA Boys 18-1 raul 1426 23-29 44% 18 TX
2966 Tsunami Boys VBA 18-1 1426 9-13 41% 18 FL
2967 Dolphin VBC 12-Black boys 1426 0-0 0% 12
2968 Top Flight 18 Avengers 1426 10-12 45% 18 IL
2969 Ultimate 14-Jake 1426 8-3 73% 14 IL
2970 BAVC 17-4 boys 1426 11-17 39% 17 CA
2971 JVBC Boys 16-National 1426 0-5 0% 16 MN
2972 A-10 Boys 16-Gray 1426 22-28 44% 16 PA
2973 Bay Area Eagles 13-Oliver 1425 0-6 0% 13 CA
2974 OZP 18-Platinum 1425 1-3 25% 18
2975 T4 11-Nike 1425 1-3 25% 11
2976 Central Missouri VBC 16-1 1425 4-2 36% 16
2977 Atlantic Coast 16-2 1425 3-4 43% 16 VA
2978 Ta'ahine LV 12 1425 2-3 40% 12
2979 TORRI 18-1 1424 1-5 17% 18 PR
2980 Sideout 14-M - adalberto 1424 1-5 17% 14
2981 Ozark Boys 14 1424 8-10 44% 14 AR
2982 BAVC 17-4 emerald 1424 1-5 17% 17 CA
2983 Va Wave 14-Jaws 1424 11-11 50% 14 VA
2984 TKVBC 17-1 1424 4-5 44% 17 GA
2985 SLAM 17-1 1424 2-9 18% 17 MA
2986 Uno Boys 17 National 1424 31-34 48% 17 IL
2987 Yorktowne 18-White 1424 13-23 35% 18 PA
2988 LBVC 18-Kenton 1423 7-6 54% 18 CA
2989 Academy 16-E white 1423 26-28 48% 16 IN
2990 Sky High Adidas B13-1 1423 22-22 50% 13 IL
2991 COAST 14-Spring pat 1423 0-2 0% 14 CA
2992 KODA 18-Boys 1423 2-9 17% 18 NY
2993 DigThis! Ohana 12-Pink 1422 2-3 40% 12
2994 VoltageVB Boys 16-18u 1422 0-4 0% 16 FL
2995 SF Elite 13-Jason 1422 19-27 41% 13 CA
2996 RVA G10 Navy 1422 0-0 0% 10 WI
2997 SFVC 18-Red 1422 0-3 0% 18
2998 NYC Raptors 17-Black 1422 21-31 40% 17 NY
2999 HPSTL 12-White 1422 9-11 45% 12 MO
3000 LCVC B13-1 1422 14-29 33% 13
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.