Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 60 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2951 Yorktowne 18-White 1422 13-23 35% 18 PA
2952 SLAM 17-1 1422 2-9 18% 17 MA
2953 RCVA 17-East coast blue 1422 12-35 26% 17 VA
2954 STVA Boys 18-1 raul 1422 23-29 44% 18 TX
2955 SynergyForce 16-2 natl 1422 35-40 47% 16 CA
2956 Manteca Flight 15-1 benni 1422 2-8 20% 15 CA
2957 HPSTL 12-White 1422 9-11 45% 12 MO
2958 RootsVBA 18-Thornstorm 1422 4-20 17% 18 MO
2959 Velocity B15-Red 1421 7-15 32% 15 IL
2960 Chargers Parkhill 18 Chargers Parkhill 1421 2-5 29% 18
2961 MiElite 16-Black 1421 14-15 48% 16 MI
2962 VoltageVB Boys 16-18u 1421 0-4 0% 16 FL
2963 Kinnect 14-Forest 1421 13-21 38% 14 CA
2964 Selected 18-S - bubba 1421 15-27 36% 18 NV
2965 United 18-Boys 1421 10-9 53% 18 AL
2966 Kings 18-1 1421 6-8 43% 18 OH
2967 DigThis! Ohana 13-Pink 1421 1-4 20% 13 NV
2968 BVC 17-2 blitz 1420 2-3 40% 17 DE
2969 Boys BSVBC 17-White 1420 6-7 46% 17 IL
2970 Sportime 14-Quogue 1420 1-2 33% 14 NY
2971 Central Missouri VBC 16-1 1420 4-2 36% 16 MO
2972 HVA 16-Boys eaglecanes 1420 3-11 21% 16 FL
2973 Alta 14 1420 13-9 59% 14 AZ
2974 NPJ Seattle 16-1 boys 1420 3-2 60% 16 WA
2975 Northern Lights 17-B boys 1420 12-13 48% 17 MN
2976 Sky High Adidas B13-1 1420 22-22 50% 13 IL
2977 KIVA 16-S-red 1420 2-3 40% 16 KY
2978 Top Flight Boys 14 1420 0-0 0% 14 IL
2979 Va Wave 14-Jaws 1420 11-11 50% 14 VA
2980 SG Elite 17 Select 1420 7-8 47% 17 CA
2981 Bucaneros AVC 18 1419 6-10 38% 18 PR
2982 Vortex 15-Mercedes 1419 4-8 33% 15 UT
2983 Apple Valley 14-S boys 1419 2-3 40% 14 MN
2984 KODA 18-Boys 1419 2-9 17% 18 NY
2985 Manteca Flight 18-Cash 1419 14-15 48% 18 CA
2986 High Performance STL 17-Boys 1419 0-7 0% 17 MO
2987 Upontop Boys 18-Elite 1419 15-37 29% 18 FL
2988 LBVC 18-Kenton 1419 7-6 54% 18 CA
2989 Guahan Boys 16-S 1419 2-4 33% 16 HI
2990 Pure Aloha 18-Kupa’a 1419 24-30 44% 18 HI
2991 Flight Academy 17-S 1418 8-24 25% 17 OH
2992 Southport 13-Blue 1418 4-4 50% 13 WI
2993 LHV Boys 15-1 eclipse 1418 17-22 44% 15 MA
2994 Johnston 18-Select 1418 0-2 0% 18 IA
2995 HSJ 14-R - purple 1418 1-3 25% 14 NY
2996 South County 15-Alex 1418 0-3 0% 15 UT
2997 Velocity 17-2 regional 1418 0-5 0% 17 AR
2998 NKYVC 12-1 cyclone 1418 4-7 36% 12 KY
2999 BEVBC 16-2 - brin 1418 2-5 29% 16 CA
3000 KRATOS Volley Academy 16 Spartans 1418 7-10 33% 16 CT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.