2025-2026 Season — Page 59 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2901 | Sideout 13 | 1433 | 2-4 | 33% | 13 | |
| 2902 | SMBC West 17 Premier | 1433 | 7-9 | 44% | 17 | CA |
| 2903 | Radiate 16-Black | 1432 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | UT |
| 2904 | Cinci Attack 17 Gold | 1432 | 30-30 | 50% | 17 | OH |
| 2905 | Sixpack Boys 16-Local 1 | 1432 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | |
| 2906 | EXILE 16-Red | 1432 | 9-14 | 39% | 16 | PA |
| 2907 | MOD B15-White | 1432 | 31-21 | 60% | 15 | IL |
| 2908 | PARADOX 18U | 1432 | 20-26 | 43% | 18 | TX |
| 2909 | Tstreet 14-Mari | 1432 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | |
| 2910 | WPVC Boys 18-Armour silver | 1432 | 19-17 | 53% | 18 | FL |
| 2911 | IMUA UVC 16-Ua | 1432 | 25-32 | 44% | 16 | CA |
| 2912 | JJVA Boys 18-Black | 1432 | 11-16 | 41% | 18 | FL |
| 2913 | West County 18-Blue | 1431 | 11-11 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 2914 | Power Volleyball 16-Black | 1431 | 6-15 | 29% | 16 | TX |
| 2915 | Academy 18-R white | 1431 | 12-14 | 46% | 18 | IN |
| 2916 | ACADEMY B 14 | 1431 | 1-3 | 20% | 14 | |
| 2917 | Adversity South 17-Purple | 1431 | 17-41 | 29% | 17 | IL |
| 2918 | HVA 16-Boys eaglecanes | 1431 | 3-11 | 21% | 16 | FL |
| 2919 | Santa Fe Storm 13-2 alyssa | 1431 | 2-4 | 25% | 13 | |
| 2920 | GSL 16-Comp brittany | 1431 | 1-6 | 14% | 16 | UT |
| 2921 | AZ LEGACY 16 CRIMSON | 1431 | 12-30 | 29% | 16 | AZ |
| 2922 | CA Volley 12-1 | 1431 | 3-8 | 27% | 12 | CA |
| 2923 | VUVC B18-WHITE | 1431 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | NV |
| 2924 | Sky High Adidas B17-2 | 1431 | 25-24 | 51% | 17 | IL |
| 2925 | Ajax Bend 16-1 | 1431 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | OR |
| 2926 | SEVA Boys 18-Juan | 1430 | 4-6 | 40% | 18 | NC |
| 2927 | Titan Premier 16 Percival | 1430 | 4-11 | 27% | 16 | CA |
| 2928 | SPORTIME 16-Lynbrook 2 | 1430 | 10-12 | 45% | 16 | NY |
| 2929 | SAND BOYS 16 Gold | 1430 | 15-14 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 2930 | Idaho Strike 16-Black | 1430 | 13-13 | 50% | 16 | ID |
| 2931 | Absolute 12-Gold | 1430 | 0-5 | 0% | 12 | CA |
| 2932 | HI Bred VBC 17-Kane elite | 1430 | 12-19 | 39% | 17 | HI |
| 2933 | Juggernaut 17-Regional 1 | 1430 | 9-12 | 43% | 17 | CO |
| 2934 | United 18-Boys | 1430 | 10-9 | 53% | 18 | AL |
| 2935 | A5 Calhoun 16-Navy | 1430 | 7-6 | 54% | 16 | GA |
| 2936 | Westside VBC 16-Black | 1430 | 17-17 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 2937 | K Elites VBC B18 Navy | 1430 | 20-24 | 43% | 18 | MO |
| 2938 | MVP BOS 17-Blue | 1430 | 15-21 | 42% | 17 | MA |
| 2939 | Low Country 16 | 1430 | 10-13 | 43% | 16 | SC |
| 2940 | Maverick 13-Coyote | 1430 | 6-6 | 50% | 13 | AZ |
| 2941 | EnERgy 12-Boys | 1429 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | IL |
| 2942 | MVA 14-Boys | 1429 | 5-16 | 24% | 14 | SC |
| 2943 | SynergyForce 16-2 natl | 1429 | 35-40 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 2944 | Tropics Boys 14-S elite | 1429 | 1-7 | 13% | 14 | FL |
| 2945 | TNT Boys 18-Knights | 1429 | 6-7 | 43% | 18 | PA |
| 2946 | Salt City Boys Highland Team Acadmy 12-Emily | 1429 | 1-5 | 17% | 12 | UT |
| 2947 | Elevate 14-1 | 1429 | 7-6 | 47% | 14 | TX |
| 2948 | CVA 18 | 1429 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | CO |
| 2949 | MiElite 16-Black | 1429 | 14-15 | 48% | 16 | MI |
| 2950 | Rancho 18-Blue | 1428 | 1-6 | 14% | 18 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.