Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 59 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2901 JJVA Boys 18-Black 1428 11-16 41% 18 FL
2902 Dolphin VBC 12-Black boys 1428 0-0 0% 12 AL
2903 Kaizen Boys 13-Black 1428 15-19 44% 13 OK
2904 Aaliyah/Peter 18-1 1428 7-21 25% 18 NV
2905 Sanger 12 1428 3-9 25% 12 CA
2906 Weber Elite 15-Ryan 1428 6-9 40% 15 UT
2907 Eclipse Boys 14-Lunar 1428 15-18 45% 14 CA
2908 TNT Boys 18-Knights 1428 6-7 43% 18 PA
2909 Monterey Bay 16-1 1427 1-4 20% 16 CA
2910 TVC 17-1s 1427 16-17 48% 17 IN
2911 Crow Creek Volleyball 15 Lucas 1427 2-3 40% 15 ID
2912 T4 11-Nike 1427 1-3 25% 11 TX
2913 CJVA Boys 14-Onyx 1427 10-16 38% 14 NJ
2914 Capital Sliders Volleyball Club 17-Skylight 1427 11-17 39% 17 NY
2915 Future 14-White 1427 12-12 50% 14 IL
2916 HI Bred VBC 17-Kane elite 1427 12-19 39% 17 HI
2917 Sideout 14-M - adalberto 1427 1-5 17% 14 PR
2918 BAVC 17-4 emerald 1427 1-5 17% 17 CA
2919 Slainte 18-Cobalt 1427 20-26 43% 18 CA
2920 JVBC Boys 16-National 1426 0-5 0% 16 MN
2921 Sky High Adidas B17-2 1426 25-24 51% 17 IL
2922 Ultimate 14-Jake 1426 8-3 73% 14 IL
2923 NYC Raptors VBC 17-Black 1426 21-24 47% 17 NY
2924 SCVC 16-Emma 1425 14-13 52% 16 UT
2925 Tsunami Boys VBA 18-1 1425 9-13 41% 18 FL
2926 Uno Boys 17 National 1425 31-34 48% 17 IL
2927 CVA 18 1425 4-4 50% 18 PR
2928 MOD B17-Grey 1425 34-21 62% 17 IL
2929 Academy 16-E white 1425 26-28 48% 16 IN
2930 TORRI 18-1 1425 1-5 17% 18 PR
2931 Ozark Boys 14 1425 8-10 44% 14 AR
2932 Bay Area Eagles 13-Oliver 1425 0-6 0% 13 CA
2933 Infinity Royals 16-R 1424 23-21 52% 16 MN
2934 United Volleyball Club 18-2 1424 2-4 33% 18 IL
2935 380 Devil Dogs VB 18-Alpha 1424 3-7 30% 18 IA
2936 Vegas Venom 18 1424 2-5 29% 18 NV
2937 WI Flight 16-B blue 1424 9-8 53% 16 WI
2938 TKVBC 17-1 1424 4-5 44% 17 GA
2939 District VBC 18 GOLD 1424 2-5 29% 18 CA
2940 IDVB 18-Elite | chip 1424 13-18 42% 18 MI
2941 Atlantic Coast 16-2 1423 3-4 43% 16 PA
2942 COAST 14-Spring pat 1423 0-2 0% 14 CA
2943 SVA Boys 14-S black 1423 9-18 32% 14 CO
2944 Hawaiian Style Boys 14 1423 3-6 33% 14 HI
2945 Absolute 12-Blue 1423 18-33 35% 12 CA
2946 LCVC B13-1 1423 14-29 33% 13 CA
2947 SFVC 18-Red 1422 0-3 0% 18 IL
2948 Red Rock Boys 16-Mikey - walnut creek 1422 6-9 40% 16 CA
2949 Mintonette Sports 14-1 1422 13-18 42% 14 OH
2950 Atlanta Extreme 16-Jayla boys 1422 6-6 50% 16 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.