2025-2026 Season — Page 59 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2901 | JJVA Boys 18-Black | 1428 | 11-16 | 41% | 18 | FL |
| 2902 | Dolphin VBC 12-Black boys | 1428 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | AL |
| 2903 | Kaizen Boys 13-Black | 1428 | 15-19 | 44% | 13 | OK |
| 2904 | Aaliyah/Peter 18-1 | 1428 | 7-21 | 25% | 18 | NV |
| 2905 | Sanger 12 | 1428 | 3-9 | 25% | 12 | CA |
| 2906 | Weber Elite 15-Ryan | 1428 | 6-9 | 40% | 15 | UT |
| 2907 | Eclipse Boys 14-Lunar | 1428 | 15-18 | 45% | 14 | CA |
| 2908 | TNT Boys 18-Knights | 1428 | 6-7 | 43% | 18 | PA |
| 2909 | Monterey Bay 16-1 | 1427 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | CA |
| 2910 | TVC 17-1s | 1427 | 16-17 | 48% | 17 | IN |
| 2911 | Crow Creek Volleyball 15 Lucas | 1427 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | ID |
| 2912 | T4 11-Nike | 1427 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | TX |
| 2913 | CJVA Boys 14-Onyx | 1427 | 10-16 | 38% | 14 | NJ |
| 2914 | Capital Sliders Volleyball Club 17-Skylight | 1427 | 11-17 | 39% | 17 | NY |
| 2915 | Future 14-White | 1427 | 12-12 | 50% | 14 | IL |
| 2916 | HI Bred VBC 17-Kane elite | 1427 | 12-19 | 39% | 17 | HI |
| 2917 | Sideout 14-M - adalberto | 1427 | 1-5 | 17% | 14 | PR |
| 2918 | BAVC 17-4 emerald | 1427 | 1-5 | 17% | 17 | CA |
| 2919 | Slainte 18-Cobalt | 1427 | 20-26 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 2920 | JVBC Boys 16-National | 1426 | 0-5 | 0% | 16 | MN |
| 2921 | Sky High Adidas B17-2 | 1426 | 25-24 | 51% | 17 | IL |
| 2922 | Ultimate 14-Jake | 1426 | 8-3 | 73% | 14 | IL |
| 2923 | NYC Raptors VBC 17-Black | 1426 | 21-24 | 47% | 17 | NY |
| 2924 | SCVC 16-Emma | 1425 | 14-13 | 52% | 16 | UT |
| 2925 | Tsunami Boys VBA 18-1 | 1425 | 9-13 | 41% | 18 | FL |
| 2926 | Uno Boys 17 National | 1425 | 31-34 | 48% | 17 | IL |
| 2927 | CVA 18 | 1425 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | PR |
| 2928 | MOD B17-Grey | 1425 | 34-21 | 62% | 17 | IL |
| 2929 | Academy 16-E white | 1425 | 26-28 | 48% | 16 | IN |
| 2930 | TORRI 18-1 | 1425 | 1-5 | 17% | 18 | PR |
| 2931 | Ozark Boys 14 | 1425 | 8-10 | 44% | 14 | AR |
| 2932 | Bay Area Eagles 13-Oliver | 1425 | 0-6 | 0% | 13 | CA |
| 2933 | Infinity Royals 16-R | 1424 | 23-21 | 52% | 16 | MN |
| 2934 | United Volleyball Club 18-2 | 1424 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | IL |
| 2935 | 380 Devil Dogs VB 18-Alpha | 1424 | 3-7 | 30% | 18 | IA |
| 2936 | Vegas Venom 18 | 1424 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | NV |
| 2937 | WI Flight 16-B blue | 1424 | 9-8 | 53% | 16 | WI |
| 2938 | TKVBC 17-1 | 1424 | 4-5 | 44% | 17 | GA |
| 2939 | District VBC 18 GOLD | 1424 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | CA |
| 2940 | IDVB 18-Elite | chip | 1424 | 13-18 | 42% | 18 | MI |
| 2941 | Atlantic Coast 16-2 | 1423 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | PA |
| 2942 | COAST 14-Spring pat | 1423 | 0-2 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 2943 | SVA Boys 14-S black | 1423 | 9-18 | 32% | 14 | CO |
| 2944 | Hawaiian Style Boys 14 | 1423 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | HI |
| 2945 | Absolute 12-Blue | 1423 | 18-33 | 35% | 12 | CA |
| 2946 | LCVC B13-1 | 1423 | 14-29 | 33% | 13 | CA |
| 2947 | SFVC 18-Red | 1422 | 0-3 | 0% | 18 | IL |
| 2948 | Red Rock Boys 16-Mikey - walnut creek | 1422 | 6-9 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 2949 | Mintonette Sports 14-1 | 1422 | 13-18 | 42% | 14 | OH |
| 2950 | Atlanta Extreme 16-Jayla boys | 1422 | 6-6 | 50% | 16 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.