Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 59 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2901 Sideout 13 1433 2-4 33% 13
2902 SMBC West 17 Premier 1433 7-9 44% 17 CA
2903 Radiate 16-Black 1432 4-4 50% 16 UT
2904 Cinci Attack 17 Gold 1432 30-30 50% 17 OH
2905 Sixpack Boys 16-Local 1 1432 1-4 20% 16
2906 EXILE 16-Red 1432 9-14 39% 16 PA
2907 MOD B15-White 1432 31-21 60% 15 IL
2908 PARADOX 18U 1432 20-26 43% 18 TX
2909 Tstreet 14-Mari 1432 2-3 40% 14
2910 WPVC Boys 18-Armour silver 1432 19-17 53% 18 FL
2911 IMUA UVC 16-Ua 1432 25-32 44% 16 CA
2912 JJVA Boys 18-Black 1432 11-16 41% 18 FL
2913 West County 18-Blue 1431 11-11 50% 18 CA
2914 Power Volleyball 16-Black 1431 6-15 29% 16 TX
2915 Academy 18-R white 1431 12-14 46% 18 IN
2916 ACADEMY B 14 1431 1-3 20% 14
2917 Adversity South 17-Purple 1431 17-41 29% 17 IL
2918 HVA 16-Boys eaglecanes 1431 3-11 21% 16 FL
2919 Santa Fe Storm 13-2 alyssa 1431 2-4 25% 13
2920 GSL 16-Comp brittany 1431 1-6 14% 16 UT
2921 AZ LEGACY 16 CRIMSON 1431 12-30 29% 16 AZ
2922 CA Volley 12-1 1431 3-8 27% 12 CA
2923 VUVC B18-WHITE 1431 0-0 0% 18 NV
2924 Sky High Adidas B17-2 1431 25-24 51% 17 IL
2925 Ajax Bend 16-1 1431 2-4 33% 16 OR
2926 SEVA Boys 18-Juan 1430 4-6 40% 18 NC
2927 Titan Premier 16 Percival 1430 4-11 27% 16 CA
2928 SPORTIME 16-Lynbrook 2 1430 10-12 45% 16 NY
2929 SAND BOYS 16 Gold 1430 15-14 52% 16 CA
2930 Idaho Strike 16-Black 1430 13-13 50% 16 ID
2931 Absolute 12-Gold 1430 0-5 0% 12 CA
2932 HI Bred VBC 17-Kane elite 1430 12-19 39% 17 HI
2933 Juggernaut 17-Regional 1 1430 9-12 43% 17 CO
2934 United 18-Boys 1430 10-9 53% 18 AL
2935 A5 Calhoun 16-Navy 1430 7-6 54% 16 GA
2936 Westside VBC 16-Black 1430 17-17 50% 16 CA
2937 K Elites VBC B18 Navy 1430 20-24 43% 18 MO
2938 MVP BOS 17-Blue 1430 15-21 42% 17 MA
2939 Low Country 16 1430 10-13 43% 16 SC
2940 Maverick 13-Coyote 1430 6-6 50% 13 AZ
2941 EnERgy 12-Boys 1429 1-4 20% 12 IL
2942 MVA 14-Boys 1429 5-16 24% 14 SC
2943 SynergyForce 16-2 natl 1429 35-40 47% 16 CA
2944 Tropics Boys 14-S elite 1429 1-7 13% 14 FL
2945 TNT Boys 18-Knights 1429 6-7 43% 18 PA
2946 Salt City Boys Highland Team Acadmy 12-Emily 1429 1-5 17% 12 UT
2947 Elevate 14-1 1429 7-6 47% 14 TX
2948 CVA 18 1429 4-4 50% 18 CO
2949 MiElite 16-Black 1429 14-15 48% 16 MI
2950 Rancho 18-Blue 1428 1-6 14% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.