Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 58 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2851 NJ RONIN 17-Sword 1438 1-4 20% 17 NJ
2852 Power Volleyball 14 1438 12-19 39% 14 TX
2853 LOBOS BOYS 18 1438 6-7 46% 18 CO
2854 Momentum 16-Yellow 1438 3-3 50% 16 OH
2855 CUVC 16-2 boys 1438 16-18 47% 16 NC
2856 Legacy Boys 15-Premier 1438 6-9 40% 15 MI
2857 RVA 18-Nazca blue 1438 24-33 42% 18 MD
2858 NVC 16 1438 1-3 25% 16 MN
2859 MVP Academy BOS 17-Black 1437 9-18 33% 17 MA
2860 Evolution 17 Elite 1437 16-18 47% 17 CA
2861 VIBE 18 1437 19-21 48% 18 CA
2862 RCVA 17-East coast blue 1437 12-35 26% 17 VA
2863 495 17-Orange 1437 1-4 20% 17 MD
2864 White Cross Elite 16-Boys 1437 4-6 40% 16 NC
2865 Jellys 16-Boys 1436 8-14 36% 16 FL
2866 PVC Sandlot 17-Blue 1436 10-14 42% 17 PA
2867 GSL 16-Elite - ashlyn 1436 5-16 24% 16 UT
2868 949 B17-Black 1436 8-9 47% 17 CA
2869 630 Volleyball 17-4 1436 35-23 60% 17 IL
2870 Idaho Strike 18-Purple 1436 10-10 50% 18 ID
2871 Elite Volleyball Clubs 18-1 1436 2-4 33% 18 KS
2872 Seaside 14-Green 1436 5-5 50% 14 CA
2873 RUSH 17-Red 1436 11-42 21% 17 AZ
2874 Mintonette Sports 14-1 1436 13-18 42% 14 OH
2875 Slainte 18-Cobalt 1435 20-26 43% 18 CA
2876 Sportime 16-4 1435 13-25 34% 16 NY
2877 APEX1 15-A1GREEN 1435 14-17 45% 15 CA
2878 Delaware Juniors 18-A 1435 8-12 40% 18 DE
2879 SJVBC Boys 18-Elite 1435 4-19 17% 18 NJ
2880 Twisters Boys 16-1 1435 7-9 44% 16 TX
2881 PREVAIL Boys 15-Platinum 1435 6-9 40% 15 PA
2882 SJVBC Boys 15-Red 1435 2-5 29% 15 NJ
2883 SynergyForce B 14 Natl 1434 4-4 50% 14 CA
2884 Future 14-Elite 1434 28-31 47% 14 IL
2885 SNVF 13-Mount rainier 1434 13-18 42% 13 WA
2886 Creole Big Apple 16-Boys 1434 11-12 48% 16 NY
2887 Ohana 14-Regional 1434 1-3 25% 14 IA
2888 Kaizen Boys 13-Black 1434 15-19 44% 13 OK
2889 NYC Raptors 18-Purple 1434 18-17 51% 18 NY
2890 Lakas 14-Jm 1434 14-21 40% 14 CA
2891 630 Volleyball 18-4 1434 28-25 53% 18 IL
2892 Manteca Flight 18-Cash 1434 14-15 48% 18 CA
2893 Summit VC 16-1 boys 1434 2-5 29% 16 MO
2894 Orlando Gold 17-White 1433 19-21 48% 17 FL
2895 MVC 13-David 1433 12-12 50% 13 WI
2896 Tribe 15-B premier cardinal 1433 23-33 41% 15 FL
2897 Burl Elite 11-Orange 1433 0-0 0% 11
2898 BVP 16 1433 3-6 27% 16 PA
2899 BAVC 15-2 joslin 1433 3-4 43% 15 CA
2900 SFVC 16-Blue 1433 3-3 50% 16
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.