Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 58 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2851 BVP 16 1434 3-6 27% 16 PA
2852 A'o a Koa Volleyball 13-B 1434 13-19 41% 13 HI
2853 Summit VC 16-1 boys 1434 2-5 29% 16 MO
2854 TOVC 18-Warriors pagán 1434 6-7 46% 18 PR
2855 DigThis! Ohana 12-Pink 1433 2-3 40% 12 NV
2856 ECVBA 16-1 1433 12-14 46% 16 CA
2857 Adversity South 17-Purple 1433 17-41 29% 17 IL
2858 SFVC 16-Blue 1433 3-3 50% 16 IL
2859 Salt City Boys Highland Team Acadmy 12-Emily 1433 1-5 17% 12 UT
2860 Power Volleyball 16-Black 1433 6-15 29% 16 MO
2861 BAVC 18-3 boys andy 1433 1-4 20% 18 CA
2862 Sideout 13 1433 2-4 33% 13 MA
2863 PVC Sandlot 17-Blue 1433 10-14 42% 17 PA
2864 MVC 13-David 1433 12-12 50% 13 WI
2865 Low Country 16 1432 10-13 43% 16 SC
2866 630 Volleyball 18-4 1432 28-25 53% 18 IL
2867 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 12 Jamie 1432 1-3 20% 12 UT
2868 EnERgy 12-Boys 1432 1-4 20% 12 MN
2869 PL Extreme Boys 14-1 1432 12-17 41% 14 MN
2870 NYC Raptors 18-Purple 1432 18-17 51% 18 NY
2871 Rancho 18-Blue 1432 1-6 14% 18 CA
2872 Tstreet 14-Mari 1432 2-3 40% 14 CA
2873 VIBE 18 1432 19-21 48% 18 VA
2874 BAVC 16-3 aria 1432 3-4 43% 16 CA
2875 Tribe 15-B premier cardinal 1432 23-33 41% 15 FL
2876 ACADEMY B 14 1431 1-3 20% 14 HI
2877 West County 18-Blue 1431 11-11 50% 18 CA
2878 IMUA UVC 16-Ua 1431 25-32 44% 16 CA
2879 EXILE 16-Red 1431 9-14 39% 16 PA
2880 Academy 18-R white 1431 12-14 46% 18 IN
2881 OMNI 16-3 power 1431 20-27 43% 16 CA
2882 Sportime 16-4 1431 13-25 34% 16 NY
2883 VRTXVB 18-Nick 1431 5-4 56% 18
2884 Ajax Bend 16-1 1431 2-4 33% 16 OR
2885 BAVC 17-4 boys 1431 11-17 39% 17 CA
2886 Elevate 14-1 1431 7-6 47% 14 IL
2887 Juggernaut 17-Regional 1 1431 9-12 43% 17 CO
2888 Lakas 14-Jm 1431 14-21 40% 14 CA
2889 SPORTIME 16-Lynbrook 2 1430 10-12 45% 16 NY
2890 PARADOX 18U 1430 20-26 43% 18 TX
2891 Absolute 12-Gold 1430 0-5 0% 12 CA
2892 Orlando Gold 17-White 1430 19-21 48% 17 FL
2893 WPVC Boys 18-Armour silver 1429 19-17 53% 18 FL
2894 MVA 14-Boys 1429 5-16 24% 14 SC
2895 Tropics Boys 14-S elite 1429 1-7 13% 14 FL
2896 SEVA Boys 18-Juan 1429 4-6 40% 18 NC
2897 CA Volley 12-1 1429 3-8 27% 12 CA
2898 380 Devil Dogs VB 18-Bravo 1429 2-3 40% 18 IA
2899 GSL 14-Comp jac/mike 1429 9-13 41% 14 UT
2900 SNVF 13-Mount rainier 1429 13-18 42% 13 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.