2025-2026 Season — Page 58 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2851 | NJ RONIN 17-Sword | 1438 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | NJ |
| 2852 | Power Volleyball 14 | 1438 | 12-19 | 39% | 14 | TX |
| 2853 | LOBOS BOYS 18 | 1438 | 6-7 | 46% | 18 | CO |
| 2854 | Momentum 16-Yellow | 1438 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 2855 | CUVC 16-2 boys | 1438 | 16-18 | 47% | 16 | NC |
| 2856 | Legacy Boys 15-Premier | 1438 | 6-9 | 40% | 15 | MI |
| 2857 | RVA 18-Nazca blue | 1438 | 24-33 | 42% | 18 | MD |
| 2858 | NVC 16 | 1438 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | MN |
| 2859 | MVP Academy BOS 17-Black | 1437 | 9-18 | 33% | 17 | MA |
| 2860 | Evolution 17 Elite | 1437 | 16-18 | 47% | 17 | CA |
| 2861 | VIBE 18 | 1437 | 19-21 | 48% | 18 | CA |
| 2862 | RCVA 17-East coast blue | 1437 | 12-35 | 26% | 17 | VA |
| 2863 | 495 17-Orange | 1437 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | MD |
| 2864 | White Cross Elite 16-Boys | 1437 | 4-6 | 40% | 16 | NC |
| 2865 | Jellys 16-Boys | 1436 | 8-14 | 36% | 16 | FL |
| 2866 | PVC Sandlot 17-Blue | 1436 | 10-14 | 42% | 17 | PA |
| 2867 | GSL 16-Elite - ashlyn | 1436 | 5-16 | 24% | 16 | UT |
| 2868 | 949 B17-Black | 1436 | 8-9 | 47% | 17 | CA |
| 2869 | 630 Volleyball 17-4 | 1436 | 35-23 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 2870 | Idaho Strike 18-Purple | 1436 | 10-10 | 50% | 18 | ID |
| 2871 | Elite Volleyball Clubs 18-1 | 1436 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | KS |
| 2872 | Seaside 14-Green | 1436 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2873 | RUSH 17-Red | 1436 | 11-42 | 21% | 17 | AZ |
| 2874 | Mintonette Sports 14-1 | 1436 | 13-18 | 42% | 14 | OH |
| 2875 | Slainte 18-Cobalt | 1435 | 20-26 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 2876 | Sportime 16-4 | 1435 | 13-25 | 34% | 16 | NY |
| 2877 | APEX1 15-A1GREEN | 1435 | 14-17 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 2878 | Delaware Juniors 18-A | 1435 | 8-12 | 40% | 18 | DE |
| 2879 | SJVBC Boys 18-Elite | 1435 | 4-19 | 17% | 18 | NJ |
| 2880 | Twisters Boys 16-1 | 1435 | 7-9 | 44% | 16 | TX |
| 2881 | PREVAIL Boys 15-Platinum | 1435 | 6-9 | 40% | 15 | PA |
| 2882 | SJVBC Boys 15-Red | 1435 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | NJ |
| 2883 | SynergyForce B 14 Natl | 1434 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2884 | Future 14-Elite | 1434 | 28-31 | 47% | 14 | IL |
| 2885 | SNVF 13-Mount rainier | 1434 | 13-18 | 42% | 13 | WA |
| 2886 | Creole Big Apple 16-Boys | 1434 | 11-12 | 48% | 16 | NY |
| 2887 | Ohana 14-Regional | 1434 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | IA |
| 2888 | Kaizen Boys 13-Black | 1434 | 15-19 | 44% | 13 | OK |
| 2889 | NYC Raptors 18-Purple | 1434 | 18-17 | 51% | 18 | NY |
| 2890 | Lakas 14-Jm | 1434 | 14-21 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 2891 | 630 Volleyball 18-4 | 1434 | 28-25 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 2892 | Manteca Flight 18-Cash | 1434 | 14-15 | 48% | 18 | CA |
| 2893 | Summit VC 16-1 boys | 1434 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | MO |
| 2894 | Orlando Gold 17-White | 1433 | 19-21 | 48% | 17 | FL |
| 2895 | MVC 13-David | 1433 | 12-12 | 50% | 13 | WI |
| 2896 | Tribe 15-B premier cardinal | 1433 | 23-33 | 41% | 15 | FL |
| 2897 | Burl Elite 11-Orange | 1433 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 2898 | BVP 16 | 1433 | 3-6 | 27% | 16 | PA |
| 2899 | BAVC 15-2 joslin | 1433 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | CA |
| 2900 | SFVC 16-Blue | 1433 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.