2025-2026 Season — Page 57 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2801 | Evolution 17 Elite | 1439 | 16-18 | 47% | 17 | CA |
| 2802 | LuMaDe Volleyball Club 15 LuMaDe Boys Yellow | 1439 | 1-7 | 13% | 15 | FL |
| 2803 | SAND BOYS 16 Gold | 1439 | 15-14 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 2804 | SMASH Boys 15-Lightning | 1439 | 18-23 | 44% | 15 | MA |
| 2805 | K Elites VBC B17 Navy | 1439 | 15-13 | 50% | 17 | MO |
| 2806 | Tropics Boys 18-S black | 1439 | 1-7 | 13% | 18 | FL |
| 2807 | NE Storm 18 Squall | 1439 | 21-20 | 49% | 18 | MA |
| 2808 | Power Volleyball 14 | 1438 | 12-19 | 39% | 14 | MO |
| 2809 | BIVC 17-B | 1438 | 3-5 | 38% | 17 | HI |
| 2810 | SPVB 14-Alpha | 1438 | 30-34 | 45% | 14 | IL |
| 2811 | LHS BVB 18-1 | 1438 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | GA |
| 2812 | Hot Shots 14-Regional - purple | 1438 | 6-7 | 38% | 14 | NY |
| 2813 | Tampa North Volleyball Club 15-4 | 1438 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | FL |
| 2814 | SJVBC Boys 18-Elite | 1438 | 4-19 | 17% | 18 | NJ |
| 2815 | NVC 16 | 1438 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | PA |
| 2816 | Legacy Volleyball Club 18-Premier anthony | 1438 | 8-10 | 44% | 18 | NY |
| 2817 | AZ LEGACY 16 CRIMSON | 1437 | 12-30 | 29% | 16 | AZ |
| 2818 | Weber Elite Volleyball Club 17 Kirt | 1437 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | UT |
| 2819 | Momentum 16-Yellow | 1437 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 2820 | SynergyForce 15-2 natl | 1437 | 25-40 | 38% | 15 | CA |
| 2821 | EXILE East 14 | 1437 | 7-11 | 39% | 14 | PA |
| 2822 | RVA 18-Nazca blue | 1437 | 24-33 | 42% | 18 | MD |
| 2823 | SMBC West 17 Premier | 1437 | 7-9 | 44% | 17 | CA |
| 2824 | White Cross Elite 16-Boys | 1437 | 4-6 | 40% | 16 | NC |
| 2825 | EnERgy 16-Boys | 1437 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | MN |
| 2826 | SF Elite 13-Jason | 1437 | 19-27 | 41% | 13 | CA |
| 2827 | Tool City 17-White | 1437 | 6-5 | 55% | 17 | PA |
| 2828 | Utah Synergy Boys 13 Green | 1437 | 2-7 | 18% | 13 | UT |
| 2829 | CUVC 16-2 boys | 1437 | 16-18 | 47% | 16 | NC |
| 2830 | 495 17-Orange | 1436 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | VA |
| 2831 | Elite Volleyball Clubs 18-1 | 1436 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | KY |
| 2832 | BAVC 15-2 joslin | 1436 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | CA |
| 2833 | Jellys 16-Boys | 1436 | 8-14 | 36% | 16 | FL |
| 2834 | 630 Volleyball 17-4 | 1436 | 35-23 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 2835 | Iowa One VBC 17-Skylight | 1436 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | IA |
| 2836 | South County 15-Mike | 1436 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | UT |
| 2837 | PREVAIL Boys 15-Platinum | 1436 | 6-9 | 40% | 15 | PA |
| 2838 | LOBOS BOYS 18 | 1436 | 6-7 | 46% | 18 | CO |
| 2839 | MOD B15-White | 1435 | 31-21 | 60% | 15 | IL |
| 2840 | Twisters Boys 16-1 | 1435 | 7-9 | 44% | 16 | CA |
| 2841 | A-10 Boys 16-Gray | 1435 | 22-28 | 44% | 16 | PA |
| 2842 | APXVB 17-Boys | 1435 | 10-12 | 45% | 17 | UT |
| 2843 | Premier Boys 18-Black | 1435 | 22-23 | 49% | 18 | TX |
| 2844 | RUSH 17-Red | 1434 | 11-42 | 21% | 17 | AZ |
| 2845 | SJVBC Boys 15-Red | 1434 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | NJ |
| 2846 | Sixpack Boys 16-Local 1 | 1434 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | NJ |
| 2847 | Volitude 16 Xian | 1434 | 15-10 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 2848 | PA ELITE 17-National | 1434 | 10-11 | 48% | 17 | PA |
| 2849 | Future 14-Elite | 1434 | 28-31 | 47% | 14 | IL |
| 2850 | The Takeover 18-1 | 1434 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.