Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 57 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2801 Evolution 17 Elite 1439 16-18 47% 17 CA
2802 LuMaDe Volleyball Club 15 LuMaDe Boys Yellow 1439 1-7 13% 15 FL
2803 SAND BOYS 16 Gold 1439 15-14 52% 16 CA
2804 SMASH Boys 15-Lightning 1439 18-23 44% 15 MA
2805 K Elites VBC B17 Navy 1439 15-13 50% 17 MO
2806 Tropics Boys 18-S black 1439 1-7 13% 18 FL
2807 NE Storm 18 Squall 1439 21-20 49% 18 MA
2808 Power Volleyball 14 1438 12-19 39% 14 MO
2809 BIVC 17-B 1438 3-5 38% 17 HI
2810 SPVB 14-Alpha 1438 30-34 45% 14 IL
2811 LHS BVB 18-1 1438 0-0 0% 18 GA
2812 Hot Shots 14-Regional - purple 1438 6-7 38% 14 NY
2813 Tampa North Volleyball Club 15-4 1438 0-0 0% 15 FL
2814 SJVBC Boys 18-Elite 1438 4-19 17% 18 NJ
2815 NVC 16 1438 1-3 25% 16 PA
2816 Legacy Volleyball Club 18-Premier anthony 1438 8-10 44% 18 NY
2817 AZ LEGACY 16 CRIMSON 1437 12-30 29% 16 AZ
2818 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 17 Kirt 1437 1-3 25% 17 UT
2819 Momentum 16-Yellow 1437 3-3 50% 16 OH
2820 SynergyForce 15-2 natl 1437 25-40 38% 15 CA
2821 EXILE East 14 1437 7-11 39% 14 PA
2822 RVA 18-Nazca blue 1437 24-33 42% 18 MD
2823 SMBC West 17 Premier 1437 7-9 44% 17 CA
2824 White Cross Elite 16-Boys 1437 4-6 40% 16 NC
2825 EnERgy 16-Boys 1437 9-6 60% 16 MN
2826 SF Elite 13-Jason 1437 19-27 41% 13 CA
2827 Tool City 17-White 1437 6-5 55% 17 PA
2828 Utah Synergy Boys 13 Green 1437 2-7 18% 13 UT
2829 CUVC 16-2 boys 1437 16-18 47% 16 NC
2830 495 17-Orange 1436 1-4 20% 17 VA
2831 Elite Volleyball Clubs 18-1 1436 2-4 33% 18 KY
2832 BAVC 15-2 joslin 1436 3-4 43% 15 CA
2833 Jellys 16-Boys 1436 8-14 36% 16 FL
2834 630 Volleyball 17-4 1436 35-23 60% 17 IL
2835 Iowa One VBC 17-Skylight 1436 2-5 29% 17 IA
2836 South County 15-Mike 1436 1-2 33% 15 UT
2837 PREVAIL Boys 15-Platinum 1436 6-9 40% 15 PA
2838 LOBOS BOYS 18 1436 6-7 46% 18 CO
2839 MOD B15-White 1435 31-21 60% 15 IL
2840 Twisters Boys 16-1 1435 7-9 44% 16 CA
2841 A-10 Boys 16-Gray 1435 22-28 44% 16 PA
2842 APXVB 17-Boys 1435 10-12 45% 17 UT
2843 Premier Boys 18-Black 1435 22-23 49% 18 TX
2844 RUSH 17-Red 1434 11-42 21% 17 AZ
2845 SJVBC Boys 15-Red 1434 2-5 29% 15 NJ
2846 Sixpack Boys 16-Local 1 1434 1-4 20% 16 NJ
2847 Volitude 16 Xian 1434 15-10 60% 16 CA
2848 PA ELITE 17-National 1434 10-11 48% 17 PA
2849 Future 14-Elite 1434 28-31 47% 14 IL
2850 The Takeover 18-1 1434 0-0 0% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.