Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 57 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2801 A-10 Boys 14-Black 1445 5-9 36% 14 PA
2802 Club Solano 16-Maroon 1445 12-23 34% 16 CA
2803 Power Volleyball 16-Teal 1445 5-16 24% 16 TX
2804 Nfinity VBC 16-South bay 1445 19-20 49% 16 CA
2805 ECVBA 16-1 1445 12-14 46% 16 CA
2806 Triangle Boys 18-Blue 1445 12-19 39% 18 NC
2807 Vengeance 16-Lawrence 1445 20-27 43% 16 OH
2808 204 17-Gold 1444 1-4 20% 17
2809 MVVC B 16-Club 1444 12-12 50% 16 CA
2810 Jr Vikings 11-Blue 1444 0-0 0% 11
2811 MILOLI'I-KA'U 12 1444 2-3 40% 12
2812 CPVC 14 1443 1-5 17% 14 CA
2813 Stormbreaker 17 Titans 1443 0-0 0% 17 CA
2814 SVA 16-S ryan 1443 9-6 60% 16 WA
2815 Miami United 17-Jj 1443 0-0 0% 17 FL
2816 Premier Boys 18-Black 1443 22-23 49% 18 TX
2817 A'o a Koa Volleyball 13-B 1442 13-19 41% 13 HI
2818 ECVBA 16-1 daza 1442 8-11 42% 16 CA
2819 Vegas Volley 14 1442 2-3 40% 14 NV
2820 Miami Diamonds 16-1 1442 0-3 0% 16 FL
2821 Freeze 17-1 1442 1-4 20% 17 MN
2822 PANA'EWA 12 1442 0-2 0% 12
2823 OVC 16-2 1441 2-5 29% 16 VA
2824 OMNI 16-3 power 1441 20-27 43% 16 CA
2825 JM 12-White 1441 0-2 0% 12
2826 Allatoona High School 18-2 1441 1-3 25% 18
2827 Seaside 18-Green 1440 10-8 56% 18 CA
2828 Sanger 12 1440 3-9 25% 12 CA
2829 KOKUA BOYS 16-White 1440 5-7 42% 16 WA
2830 EXILE East 17-6 1440 0-5 0% 17 PA
2831 Diablo VBC 18-1 1440 3-4 43% 18 CA
2832 OPVC 13-Purple 1440 18-31 37% 13 OH
2833 JM 12-Grey 1440 0-1 0% 12
2834 RVC 12 Brian 1440 0-0 0% 12 VA
2835 Bravo 16-Legion 1439 21-30 41% 16 KY
2836 NE Storm 18 Squall 1439 21-20 49% 18 MA
2837 Iowa Heart 17-Black 1439 0-2 0% 17 IA
2838 CJVA Boys 14-Onyx 1439 10-16 38% 14 NJ
2839 SPVB 14-Alpha 1439 30-34 45% 14 IL
2840 HSJ 16-R 1439 2-4 33% 16
2841 Ocean Bay 14 Surf 1439 9-14 39% 14 FL
2842 Sportime 15-Lynbrook 1439 7-9 44% 15 NY
2843 ACAD Boys 14-Red 1439 2-5 29% 14 NY
2844 CSVC 15 PANTHERS 1439 13-13 50% 15 NY
2845 Tropics Boys 18-S black 1439 1-7 13% 18 FL
2846 Hot Shots 14-Regional - purple 1439 6-7 38% 14 NY
2847 The St. James Boys 15-W 1438 8-14 36% 15 VA
2848 LHS BVB 18-1 1438 0-0 0% 18
2849 COA 18-BlueJays 1438 22-15 59% 18 IN
2850 District VBC 18 GOLD 1438 2-5 29% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.