2025-2026 Season — Page 57 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2801 | A-10 Boys 14-Black | 1445 | 5-9 | 36% | 14 | PA |
| 2802 | Club Solano 16-Maroon | 1445 | 12-23 | 34% | 16 | CA |
| 2803 | Power Volleyball 16-Teal | 1445 | 5-16 | 24% | 16 | TX |
| 2804 | Nfinity VBC 16-South bay | 1445 | 19-20 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 2805 | ECVBA 16-1 | 1445 | 12-14 | 46% | 16 | CA |
| 2806 | Triangle Boys 18-Blue | 1445 | 12-19 | 39% | 18 | NC |
| 2807 | Vengeance 16-Lawrence | 1445 | 20-27 | 43% | 16 | OH |
| 2808 | 204 17-Gold | 1444 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | |
| 2809 | MVVC B 16-Club | 1444 | 12-12 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 2810 | Jr Vikings 11-Blue | 1444 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | |
| 2811 | MILOLI'I-KA'U 12 | 1444 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | |
| 2812 | CPVC 14 | 1443 | 1-5 | 17% | 14 | CA |
| 2813 | Stormbreaker 17 Titans | 1443 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 2814 | SVA 16-S ryan | 1443 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | WA |
| 2815 | Miami United 17-Jj | 1443 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | FL |
| 2816 | Premier Boys 18-Black | 1443 | 22-23 | 49% | 18 | TX |
| 2817 | A'o a Koa Volleyball 13-B | 1442 | 13-19 | 41% | 13 | HI |
| 2818 | ECVBA 16-1 daza | 1442 | 8-11 | 42% | 16 | CA |
| 2819 | Vegas Volley 14 | 1442 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | NV |
| 2820 | Miami Diamonds 16-1 | 1442 | 0-3 | 0% | 16 | FL |
| 2821 | Freeze 17-1 | 1442 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | MN |
| 2822 | PANA'EWA 12 | 1442 | 0-2 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2823 | OVC 16-2 | 1441 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | VA |
| 2824 | OMNI 16-3 power | 1441 | 20-27 | 43% | 16 | CA |
| 2825 | JM 12-White | 1441 | 0-2 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2826 | Allatoona High School 18-2 | 1441 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | |
| 2827 | Seaside 18-Green | 1440 | 10-8 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 2828 | Sanger 12 | 1440 | 3-9 | 25% | 12 | CA |
| 2829 | KOKUA BOYS 16-White | 1440 | 5-7 | 42% | 16 | WA |
| 2830 | EXILE East 17-6 | 1440 | 0-5 | 0% | 17 | PA |
| 2831 | Diablo VBC 18-1 | 1440 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 2832 | OPVC 13-Purple | 1440 | 18-31 | 37% | 13 | OH |
| 2833 | JM 12-Grey | 1440 | 0-1 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2834 | RVC 12 Brian | 1440 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | VA |
| 2835 | Bravo 16-Legion | 1439 | 21-30 | 41% | 16 | KY |
| 2836 | NE Storm 18 Squall | 1439 | 21-20 | 49% | 18 | MA |
| 2837 | Iowa Heart 17-Black | 1439 | 0-2 | 0% | 17 | IA |
| 2838 | CJVA Boys 14-Onyx | 1439 | 10-16 | 38% | 14 | NJ |
| 2839 | SPVB 14-Alpha | 1439 | 30-34 | 45% | 14 | IL |
| 2840 | HSJ 16-R | 1439 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | |
| 2841 | Ocean Bay 14 Surf | 1439 | 9-14 | 39% | 14 | FL |
| 2842 | Sportime 15-Lynbrook | 1439 | 7-9 | 44% | 15 | NY |
| 2843 | ACAD Boys 14-Red | 1439 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | NY |
| 2844 | CSVC 15 PANTHERS | 1439 | 13-13 | 50% | 15 | NY |
| 2845 | Tropics Boys 18-S black | 1439 | 1-7 | 13% | 18 | FL |
| 2846 | Hot Shots 14-Regional - purple | 1439 | 6-7 | 38% | 14 | NY |
| 2847 | The St. James Boys 15-W | 1438 | 8-14 | 36% | 15 | VA |
| 2848 | LHS BVB 18-1 | 1438 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 2849 | COA 18-BlueJays | 1438 | 22-15 | 59% | 18 | IN |
| 2850 | District VBC 18 GOLD | 1438 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.