Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 56 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2751 Metrowest VBC 14-Sapphire 1450 1-4 20% 14
2752 Club MVP 16-2 1449 4-3 40% 16
2753 Send Me 17-1 1449 1-3 25% 17 AL
2754 GOLDENBULLS 16-B black 1449 4-7 36% 16 FL
2755 Westside VBC 17-Green 1449 8-9 47% 17 CA
2756 Kaizen Boys 12-Black 1449 7-8 44% 12 OK
2757 380 Devil Dogs VB 18-Bravo 1449 2-3 40% 18
2758 SMBC Shack 14-Molten 1449 5-5 50% 14 CA
2759 Sportime 15-3 1449 7-5 58% 15 NY
2760 AJV Boys 16 Molten 1449 17-39 30% 16 TX
2761 DJRVB 16-R 1449 9-5 64% 16 NV
2762 Southport 16-Black 1449 2-2 50% 16 WI
2763 MVC 14-Red 1449 7-6 54% 14
2764 MINOI 14-1 1449 4-6 40% 14 UT
2765 Boston United Boys 16-Select 1 1449 17-20 46% 16 MA
2766 Va Wave 18 Jaws 1448 23-31 43% 18 VA
2767 STL Crossfire 17-T1 1448 15-26 37% 17 MO
2768 Miami United 15-National danny 1448 25-36 41% 15 FL
2769 Cinci Attack 16-White 1448 19-18 51% 16 OH
2770 Boys 12-Bulosan 1448 0-0 0% 12 ID
2771 Pipeline 17-Blue 1448 18-17 49% 17 IL
2772 NPJ Seattle Boys 16-R 1448 15-11 58% 16 WA
2773 Flight Academy 16 1448 8-24 25% 16 OH
2774 JJVA Boys 14-C 1448 4-7 36% 14 FL
2775 TEMPO 11-1 1448 0-0 0% 11
2776 TUVA Boys 14-Prime 1448 4-6 40% 14 NC
2777 VoltageVB Boys 14-15u 1447 0-3 0% 14 FL
2778 Pure Aloha 17 Aiga 1447 15-26 37% 17 HI
2779 Bayou Boys 18u 1447 19-31 38% 18 LA
2780 Top Tier VC 17-1 1447 12-22 35% 17 NJ
2781 Big Wave Riders 16 1447 1-6 14% 16
2782 PREVAIL Boys 17-Pink 1447 2-8 20% 17 PA
2783 SynergyForce 15-2 natl 1447 25-40 38% 15 CA
2784 SG ELITE 16-Hype 1447 2-6 25% 16 CA
2785 PA ELITE 17-National 1447 10-11 48% 17 PA
2786 MVP 13-Black 1447 1-6 14% 13 MD
2787 IMPACT WHITE 12 1447 2-3 40% 12
2788 Red Rock Boys 16-Mikey - walnut creek 1447 6-9 40% 16 CA
2789 Pipeline 17-2 1446 16-50 24% 17 IL
2790 SMASH Boys 15-Lightning 1446 18-23 44% 15 MA
2791 Venom B17-Black 1446 8-21 28% 17 AZ
2792 Academy 17-R silver 1446 16-15 52% 17 IN
2793 BIVC 17-B 1446 3-5 38% 17 MN
2794 UVA 18 Jonah 1446 11-16 41% 18 CA
2795 TOVC 18-Warriors pagán 1446 6-7 46% 18 PR
2796 Weber Elite 17-Tim 1446 3-4 43% 17 UT
2797 540 VB 18-Boys national 1446 19-23 45% 18 VA
2798 Vortex Storm Boys 18 1445 8-8 50% 18
2799 MORGAN HILL 17 1445 1-4 20% 17 CA
2800 SFVC 18-Blue 1445 1-2 33% 18
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.