2025-2026 Season — Page 56 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2751 | Train Up Sports Volleyball Academy 18 17B-TUSVA Nationals (GE) (4) | 1447 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | NJ |
| 2752 | VoltageVB Boys 14-15u | 1447 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | FL |
| 2753 | Send Me 17-1 | 1446 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | AL |
| 2754 | Velocity 18-1 regional | 1446 | 11-9 | 55% | 18 | PA |
| 2755 | Nfinity VBC 16-South bay | 1446 | 19-20 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 2756 | Sting VC 15-1 | 1446 | 11-23 | 32% | 15 | CA |
| 2757 | RUVBC 14 Phoenix | 1446 | 13-17 | 43% | 14 | IL |
| 2758 | MORGAN HILL 17 | 1446 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | CA |
| 2759 | Cinci Attack 16-White | 1446 | 19-18 | 51% | 16 | OH |
| 2760 | 540 VB 18-Boys national | 1446 | 19-23 | 45% | 18 | VA |
| 2761 | AJV Boys 16 Molten | 1446 | 17-39 | 30% | 16 | TX |
| 2762 | Va Wave 18 Jaws | 1445 | 23-31 | 43% | 18 | VA |
| 2763 | SFVC 18-Blue | 1445 | 1-2 | 33% | 18 | IL |
| 2764 | GSL 18-Elite kilie | 1445 | 12-19 | 39% | 18 | UT |
| 2765 | Seaside 18-Green | 1445 | 10-8 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 2766 | SMBC West 14 Premier | 1444 | 38-37 | 51% | 14 | CA |
| 2767 | Vengeance 16-Lawrence | 1444 | 20-27 | 43% | 16 | OH |
| 2768 | Creole Big Apple 16-Boys | 1444 | 11-12 | 48% | 16 | NY |
| 2769 | Seaside VBC 14-Green | 1444 | 27-23 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 2770 | MILOLI'I-KA'U 12 | 1444 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | HI |
| 2771 | CSVC 15 PANTHERS | 1444 | 13-13 | 50% | 15 | NY |
| 2772 | Miami United 17-Jj | 1444 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | FL |
| 2773 | ECVBA 16-1 daza | 1444 | 8-11 | 42% | 16 | CA |
| 2774 | Academy 17-R silver | 1443 | 16-15 | 52% | 17 | IN |
| 2775 | Stormbreaker 17 Titans | 1443 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 2776 | CPVC 14 | 1443 | 1-5 | 17% | 14 | CA |
| 2777 | Club Solano 16-Maroon | 1442 | 12-23 | 34% | 16 | CA |
| 2778 | Vegas Volley 14 | 1442 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | NV |
| 2779 | Freeze 17-1 | 1442 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | PA |
| 2780 | Vortex Storm Boys 18 | 1442 | 8-8 | 50% | 18 | GA |
| 2781 | The St. James Boys 15-W | 1442 | 8-14 | 36% | 15 | VA |
| 2782 | KOKUA BOYS 16-White | 1442 | 5-7 | 42% | 16 | WA |
| 2783 | Meraki VB 18-2 | 1442 | 23-22 | 51% | 18 | NH |
| 2784 | Club GSL 16-Comp - olivia | 1442 | 1-2 | 25% | 16 | UT |
| 2785 | PANA'EWA 12 | 1442 | 0-2 | 0% | 12 | HI |
| 2786 | Allatoona High School 18-2 | 1441 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | GA |
| 2787 | St. George Aces 15-Gold | 1441 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | UT |
| 2788 | Bravo 16-Legion | 1441 | 21-30 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 2789 | Epic Boys VBC 17-1 | 1441 | 3-6 | 33% | 17 | CA |
| 2790 | Cinci Attack 17 Gold | 1441 | 30-30 | 50% | 17 | OH |
| 2791 | A-10 Boys 14-Black | 1440 | 5-9 | 36% | 14 | PA |
| 2792 | Long Island Fury Volleyball II Inc 15-1 | 1440 | 3-7 | 30% | 15 | NJ |
| 2793 | Triangle Boys 18-Blue | 1440 | 12-19 | 39% | 18 | NC |
| 2794 | COA 18-BlueJays | 1440 | 22-15 | 59% | 18 | IN |
| 2795 | EXILE East 17-6 | 1440 | 0-5 | 0% | 17 | PA |
| 2796 | OPVC 13-Purple | 1440 | 18-31 | 37% | 13 | OH |
| 2797 | Ocean Bay 14 Surf | 1440 | 9-14 | 39% | 14 | FL |
| 2798 | HSJ 16-R | 1440 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | NY |
| 2799 | SynergyForce B 14 Natl | 1440 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2800 | NJ RONIN 17-Sword | 1439 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | NJ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.