Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 56 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2751 Train Up Sports Volleyball Academy 18 17B-TUSVA Nationals (GE) (4) 1447 2-3 40% 18 NJ
2752 VoltageVB Boys 14-15u 1447 0-3 0% 14 FL
2753 Send Me 17-1 1446 1-3 25% 17 AL
2754 Velocity 18-1 regional 1446 11-9 55% 18 PA
2755 Nfinity VBC 16-South bay 1446 19-20 49% 16 CA
2756 Sting VC 15-1 1446 11-23 32% 15 CA
2757 RUVBC 14 Phoenix 1446 13-17 43% 14 IL
2758 MORGAN HILL 17 1446 1-4 20% 17 CA
2759 Cinci Attack 16-White 1446 19-18 51% 16 OH
2760 540 VB 18-Boys national 1446 19-23 45% 18 VA
2761 AJV Boys 16 Molten 1446 17-39 30% 16 TX
2762 Va Wave 18 Jaws 1445 23-31 43% 18 VA
2763 SFVC 18-Blue 1445 1-2 33% 18 IL
2764 GSL 18-Elite kilie 1445 12-19 39% 18 UT
2765 Seaside 18-Green 1445 10-8 56% 18 CA
2766 SMBC West 14 Premier 1444 38-37 51% 14 CA
2767 Vengeance 16-Lawrence 1444 20-27 43% 16 OH
2768 Creole Big Apple 16-Boys 1444 11-12 48% 16 NY
2769 Seaside VBC 14-Green 1444 27-23 54% 14 CA
2770 MILOLI'I-KA'U 12 1444 2-3 40% 12 HI
2771 CSVC 15 PANTHERS 1444 13-13 50% 15 NY
2772 Miami United 17-Jj 1444 0-0 0% 17 FL
2773 ECVBA 16-1 daza 1444 8-11 42% 16 CA
2774 Academy 17-R silver 1443 16-15 52% 17 IN
2775 Stormbreaker 17 Titans 1443 0-0 0% 17 CA
2776 CPVC 14 1443 1-5 17% 14 CA
2777 Club Solano 16-Maroon 1442 12-23 34% 16 CA
2778 Vegas Volley 14 1442 2-3 40% 14 NV
2779 Freeze 17-1 1442 1-4 20% 17 PA
2780 Vortex Storm Boys 18 1442 8-8 50% 18 GA
2781 The St. James Boys 15-W 1442 8-14 36% 15 VA
2782 KOKUA BOYS 16-White 1442 5-7 42% 16 WA
2783 Meraki VB 18-2 1442 23-22 51% 18 NH
2784 Club GSL 16-Comp - olivia 1442 1-2 25% 16 UT
2785 PANA'EWA 12 1442 0-2 0% 12 HI
2786 Allatoona High School 18-2 1441 1-3 25% 18 GA
2787 St. George Aces 15-Gold 1441 1-6 14% 15 UT
2788 Bravo 16-Legion 1441 21-30 41% 16 CA
2789 Epic Boys VBC 17-1 1441 3-6 33% 17 CA
2790 Cinci Attack 17 Gold 1441 30-30 50% 17 OH
2791 A-10 Boys 14-Black 1440 5-9 36% 14 PA
2792 Long Island Fury Volleyball II Inc 15-1 1440 3-7 30% 15 NJ
2793 Triangle Boys 18-Blue 1440 12-19 39% 18 NC
2794 COA 18-BlueJays 1440 22-15 59% 18 IN
2795 EXILE East 17-6 1440 0-5 0% 17 PA
2796 OPVC 13-Purple 1440 18-31 37% 13 OH
2797 Ocean Bay 14 Surf 1440 9-14 39% 14 FL
2798 HSJ 16-R 1440 2-4 33% 16 NY
2799 SynergyForce B 14 Natl 1440 4-4 50% 14 CA
2800 NJ RONIN 17-Sword 1439 1-4 20% 17 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.