2025-2026 Season — Page 55 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2701 | MVP Academy BOS 18-Blue | 1454 | 6-13 | 32% | 18 | MA |
| 2702 | Emerald Coast 18-Jordan | 1453 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | FL |
| 2703 | Accuracy 15-2 champ | 1453 | 1-3 | 25% | 15 | NJ |
| 2704 | Haggan Volleyball Association B 18 | 1453 | 3-3 | 50% | 18 | |
| 2705 | Buckeye Boys 18-Red | 1453 | 25-18 | 58% | 18 | OH |
| 2706 | SOVBC 16 | 1453 | 5-12 | 29% | 16 | |
| 2707 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-3m | 1453 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | PR |
| 2708 | Eden Prairie Boys 18-2 | 1453 | 4-6 | 40% | 18 | MN |
| 2709 | Club W 14-Black | 1453 | 17-16 | 52% | 14 | WI |
| 2710 | Five Starz 14-Black | 1453 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 2711 | HPSTL 11-Royal | 1453 | 8-13 | 38% | 11 | MO |
| 2712 | 630 Volleyball 13-Black | 1453 | 11-7 | 61% | 13 | IL |
| 2713 | District VBC 16-1 redlands | 1452 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 2714 | TVS 12 Mykayla | 1452 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | |
| 2715 | BAVC 16-4 boys | 1452 | 18-13 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 2716 | KC United 16 Navy | 1452 | 17-17 | 50% | 16 | MO |
| 2717 | Sky High Adidas B18-1 | 1452 | 19-39 | 33% | 18 | IL |
| 2718 | Metro 12 East | 1452 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2719 | Warren Sixpack 15-3 | 1452 | 12-20 | 38% | 15 | NJ |
| 2720 | CHAOS BOYS 18U REGIONAL | 1452 | 10-11 | 48% | 18 | OR |
| 2721 | Stormbreaker 17 Prime | 1452 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 2722 | The Takeover 18-1 | 1452 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 2723 | EP 18-1 | 1452 | 5-10 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 2724 | 630 Volleyball 14-2 | 1452 | 30-48 | 38% | 14 | IL |
| 2725 | Boys JVBC 18-S | 1452 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | NJ |
| 2726 | RUVBC 14 Phoenix | 1451 | 13-17 | 43% | 14 | IL |
| 2727 | LAP 17-Male | 1451 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | |
| 2728 | Seaside VBC 14-Green | 1451 | 22-18 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 2729 | FORZA1 NORTH 13-One boys | 1451 | 10-23 | 30% | 13 | CA |
| 2730 | Oly Reign Boys U16 | 1451 | 10-10 | 50% | 16 | WA |
| 2731 | Rockland VBC 14-1 | 1451 | 10-10 | 50% | 14 | NY |
| 2732 | Coastal Velocity 18 | 1451 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | |
| 2733 | Infinity Royals 17-N | 1451 | 34-27 | 56% | 17 | MN |
| 2734 | MPV 17 Julie | 1451 | 10-16 | 38% | 17 | SC |
| 2735 | Tropics Boys 16-S black | 1451 | 4-15 | 21% | 16 | FL |
| 2736 | CAVC Boys 18-Power | 1451 | 12-16 | 43% | 18 | VA |
| 2737 | VOLTAGE 17-1 | 1451 | 6-10 | 38% | 17 | |
| 2738 | BRVC 18-1boys | 1451 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | PA |
| 2739 | 674 Manati 18-1 m yabo | 1451 | 1-2 | 33% | 18 | PR |
| 2740 | Ultimate B18-Blue | 1450 | 21-24 | 47% | 18 | IL |
| 2741 | NC Power & Sand 16-Black | 1450 | 4-6 | 40% | 16 | NC |
| 2742 | K Elites VBC B17 Navy | 1450 | 15-13 | 50% | 17 | MO |
| 2743 | RBV 18-50 | 1450 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 2744 | 1W B16 Elite | 1450 | 30-34 | 47% | 16 | WI |
| 2745 | MAVS 13-Red | 1450 | 11-10 | 52% | 13 | KS |
| 2746 | OVA 17 Region | 1450 | 3-18 | 14% | 17 | AZ |
| 2747 | Eclipse Mountain 14 | 1450 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | |
| 2748 | CSVC Boys 18-Black | 1450 | 5-7 | 42% | 18 | NY |
| 2749 | Pacific Rim 14-1 | 1450 | 19-30 | 39% | 14 | CA |
| 2750 | BAVC 16-3 aria | 1450 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.