Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 55 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2701 MVP Academy BOS 18-Blue 1454 6-13 32% 18 MA
2702 Emerald Coast 18-Jordan 1453 2-3 40% 18 FL
2703 Accuracy 15-2 champ 1453 1-3 25% 15 NJ
2704 Haggan Volleyball Association B 18 1453 3-3 50% 18
2705 Buckeye Boys 18-Red 1453 25-18 58% 18 OH
2706 SOVBC 16 1453 5-12 29% 16
2707 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-3m 1453 2-3 40% 12 PR
2708 Eden Prairie Boys 18-2 1453 4-6 40% 18 MN
2709 Club W 14-Black 1453 17-16 52% 14 WI
2710 Five Starz 14-Black 1453 2-3 40% 14 CA
2711 HPSTL 11-Royal 1453 8-13 38% 11 MO
2712 630 Volleyball 13-Black 1453 11-7 61% 13 IL
2713 District VBC 16-1 redlands 1452 6-5 55% 16 CA
2714 TVS 12 Mykayla 1452 2-2 50% 12
2715 BAVC 16-4 boys 1452 18-13 58% 16 CA
2716 KC United 16 Navy 1452 17-17 50% 16 MO
2717 Sky High Adidas B18-1 1452 19-39 33% 18 IL
2718 Metro 12 East 1452 0-0 0% 12
2719 Warren Sixpack 15-3 1452 12-20 38% 15 NJ
2720 CHAOS BOYS 18U REGIONAL 1452 10-11 48% 18 OR
2721 Stormbreaker 17 Prime 1452 0-0 0% 17 CA
2722 The Takeover 18-1 1452 0-0 0% 18
2723 EP 18-1 1452 5-10 33% 18 CA
2724 630 Volleyball 14-2 1452 30-48 38% 14 IL
2725 Boys JVBC 18-S 1452 1-4 20% 18 NJ
2726 RUVBC 14 Phoenix 1451 13-17 43% 14 IL
2727 LAP 17-Male 1451 5-5 50% 17
2728 Seaside VBC 14-Green 1451 22-18 55% 14 CA
2729 FORZA1 NORTH 13-One boys 1451 10-23 30% 13 CA
2730 Oly Reign Boys U16 1451 10-10 50% 16 WA
2731 Rockland VBC 14-1 1451 10-10 50% 14 NY
2732 Coastal Velocity 18 1451 6-4 60% 18
2733 Infinity Royals 17-N 1451 34-27 56% 17 MN
2734 MPV 17 Julie 1451 10-16 38% 17 SC
2735 Tropics Boys 16-S black 1451 4-15 21% 16 FL
2736 CAVC Boys 18-Power 1451 12-16 43% 18 VA
2737 VOLTAGE 17-1 1451 6-10 38% 17
2738 BRVC 18-1boys 1451 2-3 40% 18 PA
2739 674 Manati 18-1 m yabo 1451 1-2 33% 18 PR
2740 Ultimate B18-Blue 1450 21-24 47% 18 IL
2741 NC Power & Sand 16-Black 1450 4-6 40% 16 NC
2742 K Elites VBC B17 Navy 1450 15-13 50% 17 MO
2743 RBV 18-50 1450 0-0 0% 18
2744 1W B16 Elite 1450 30-34 47% 16 WI
2745 MAVS 13-Red 1450 11-10 52% 13 KS
2746 OVA 17 Region 1450 3-18 14% 17 AZ
2747 Eclipse Mountain 14 1450 3-4 43% 14
2748 CSVC Boys 18-Black 1450 5-7 42% 18 NY
2749 Pacific Rim 14-1 1450 19-30 39% 14 CA
2750 BAVC 16-3 aria 1450 3-4 43% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.