Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 55 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2701 Big Wave Riders 16 1450 1-6 14% 16 MA
2702 RBV 18-50 1450 0-0 0% 18 GA
2703 630 Volleyball 13-Black 1450 11-7 61% 13 IL
2704 SMBC Shack 14-Molten 1450 5-5 50% 14 CA
2705 VRTXVB 15-Mercedes 1450 6-9 40% 15 UT
2706 Alpha Omega Boys 14-1 1449 7-14 33% 14 MO
2707 Venom B17-Black 1449 8-21 28% 17 AZ
2708 EXCEL 12-White 1449 2-3 40% 12 TX
2709 NC Power & Sand 16-Black 1449 4-6 40% 16 NC
2710 WPVC Boys 16-Armour orange 1449 24-39 38% 16 FL
2711 Southport 16-Black 1449 2-2 50% 16 WI
2712 Shock 18-Ua lightning 1449 6-4 60% 18 IL
2713 Boiler Jrs 18-Black 1449 9-6 60% 18 IN
2714 EP 18-1 1449 5-10 33% 18 MN
2715 Flight Academy 16 1449 8-24 25% 16 OH
2716 DJRVB 16-R 1449 9-5 64% 16 IN
2717 Maverick 13-Coyote 1449 6-6 50% 13 AZ
2718 Lancheras Cataño 15 LANCHEROS - JOSE R 1449 0-3 0% 15 PR
2719 Miami United 15-National danny 1448 25-36 41% 15 FL
2720 NPJ Seattle Boys 16-R 1448 15-11 58% 16 WA
2721 CAVC Boys 18-Power 1448 12-16 43% 18 VA
2722 Bayou Boys 18u 1448 19-31 38% 18 LA
2723 TUVA Boys 14-Prime 1448 4-6 40% 14 NC
2724 Boys JVBC 18-S 1448 1-4 20% 18 NJ
2725 Sky High Adidas B18-1 1448 19-39 33% 18 IL
2726 Absolute Zero BVC 14-Big macs 1448 2-3 40% 14 WA
2727 KRATOS Volley Academy 17 WolfPack 1448 13-13 43% 17 CT
2728 No Touch 18 No Touch Black (6) 1448 1-2 33% 18 FL
2729 BAVC Boys 18-1 1448 17-20 46% 18 OK
2730 JJVA Boys 14-C 1448 4-7 36% 14 FL
2731 Pipeline 17-Blue 1448 18-17 49% 17 IL
2732 Split Mountain Volleyball Club 15 Split Mountain Mark & Grant 1448 1-2 25% 15 UT
2733 Upper Valleyball Club 18-Nike 1448 2-4 33% 18 WA
2734 Boys 12-Bulosan 1448 0-0 0% 12 IN
2735 3N1 Family Volleyball Club 18 3N1 Boys (PS) 1447 9-8 53% 18 WA
2736 IMPACT WHITE 12 1447 2-3 40% 12 HI
2737 Oasis Volleyball Academy 16-Boys 1447 4-4 50% 16 AZ
2738 Top Tier VC 17-1 1447 12-22 35% 17 NJ
2739 MVP 13-Black 1447 1-6 14% 13 MD
2740 UVA 18 Jonah 1447 11-16 41% 18 CA
2741 SG ELITE 16-Hype 1447 2-6 25% 16 CA
2742 RVC Boom 17 1447 12-13 48% 17 TX
2743 Power Volleyball 16-Teal 1447 5-16 24% 16 MO
2744 AZ Fear 14-White 1447 6-6 50% 14 AZ
2745 STL Crossfire 17-T1 1447 15-26 37% 17 MO
2746 Husky Volleyball 18-3 1447 15-17 47% 18 CT
2747 Eden Prairie Boys 18-2 1447 4-6 40% 18 MN
2748 PREVAIL Boys 17-Pink 1447 2-8 20% 17 PA
2749 District VBC 16-1 redlands 1447 6-5 55% 16 CA
2750 Warren Sixpack 15-3 1447 12-20 38% 15 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.