Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 54 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2651 PO1NT Boys 18-S 1454 5-8 33% 18 OH
2652 Infinity Royals 17-N 1454 34-27 56% 17 MN
2653 MVVC B 12-Club 1454 8-14 36% 12 CA
2654 Vegas Volley Boys 18-1 1453 15-26 37% 18 NV
2655 Send Me 17-Fabio 1453 2-3 40% 17 AL
2656 CHAOS BOYS 18U REGIONAL 1453 10-11 48% 18 OR
2657 HPSTL 11-Royal 1453 8-13 38% 11 MO
2658 1W B16 Elite 1453 30-34 47% 16 WI
2659 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-3m 1453 2-3 40% 12 PR
2660 Club 1 B 14-Skronkstrong 1453 23-25 48% 14 IL
2661 Hammerhead Boys 18-1 1453 9-10 47% 18 MN
2662 CCVA 15 Navy 1453 8-13 33% 15 MD
2663 Prescott Peregrines Volleyball Club 16 PrescottPeregrines Flight 1453 0-3 0% 16 AZ
2664 Kairos 18 Avera 1453 10-10 50% 18 SD
2665 Average Joes 18 B-18s 1453 0-5 0% 18 WI
2666 Buckeye Boys 18-Red 1452 25-18 58% 18 OH
2667 Tropics Boys 16-S black 1452 4-15 21% 16 FL
2668 SPORTIME VBC 14-2 1452 9-10 47% 14 NY
2669 Stormbreaker 17 Prime 1452 0-0 0% 17 CA
2670 Idaho Strike 18-Purple 1452 14-13 52% 18 ID
2671 Accuracy 15-2 champ 1452 1-3 25% 15 NJ
2672 No Panic 17-Boys 1452 28-25 51% 17 VA
2673 Vegas Volley 17-1 1452 12-24 33% 17 NV
2674 JJVA Boys 14 A 1452 14-19 42% 14 FL
2675 Pure Aloha 17 Aiga 1452 15-26 37% 17 HI
2676 Emerald Coast 18-Jordan 1452 2-3 40% 18 AL
2677 KC United 16 Navy 1452 17-17 50% 16 MO
2678 Sky High 18-Clark 1452 15-10 60% 18 IL
2679 BAVC 16-4 boys 1451 18-13 58% 16 CA
2680 Flight 15-S 1451 12-22 35% 15 UT
2681 SOVBC 16 1451 5-12 29% 16 NJ
2682 Ultimate B18-Blue 1451 21-24 47% 18 IL
2683 674 Manati 18-1 m yabo 1451 1-2 33% 18 PR
2684 LAP 17-Male 1451 5-5 50% 17 FL
2685 204 17-Gold 1451 1-4 20% 17
2686 949 B17-Black 1451 8-9 47% 17 CA
2687 MAVS 13-Red 1451 11-10 52% 13 KS
2688 BRVC 18-1boys 1451 2-3 40% 18 PA
2689 FORZA1 NORTH 13-One boys 1451 10-23 30% 13 CA
2690 Oly Reign Boys U16 1451 10-10 50% 16 WA
2691 KVA 17 Wolfpack (NE) 1451 2-8 20% 17 HI
2692 Club GSL 14-Comp - kimber 1451 2-2 50% 14 UT
2693 CSVC Boys 18-Black 1451 5-7 42% 18 NY
2694 SVA 16-S ryan 1451 9-6 60% 16 CO
2695 Kaizen Boys 12-Black 1450 7-8 44% 12 OK
2696 OVA 17 Region 1450 3-18 14% 17 AZ
2697 Rancho 15-Black 1450 11-12 48% 15 CA
2698 Weber Elite 17-Tim 1450 17-17 50% 17 UT
2699 MPV 18-Brynn 1450 8-11 42% 18 UT
2700 Team Rockstar 12-South bay 1450 15-24 38% 12 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.