Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 54 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2651 Vibe Boys 18-Dom 1458 4-5 40% 18 CA
2652 Boiler Jrs 18-Black 1457 9-6 60% 18 IN
2653 C-burg 18-Gray 1457 0-2 0% 18
2654 Volitude 16 Xian 1457 15-10 60% 16 CA
2655 Lions Boys 13-1 1457 9-5 60% 13 IL
2656 DCVA 12-2 1457 2-4 29% 12 NM
2657 NLVA 18-Joe 1457 3-5 38% 18 MO
2658 Absolute Zero BVC 14-Big macs 1457 2-3 40% 14 WA
2659 WVC 12-Green 1457 0-0 0% 12 CA
2660 Iowa Juniors NEXT 16-Pink 1457 2-3 40% 16 IA
2661 Shock 18-Ua lightning 1457 6-4 60% 18 IL
2662 Synergy Boys 16-Atlas 1457 6-26 19% 16 CA
2663 TC 18 Gold 1457 8-7 53% 18
2664 Train Up VB 18-1 1457 13-13 50% 18 NJ
2665 Rhythm 14 DT 1457 3-2 60% 14
2666 CA Volley 17-Spring 1457 0-0 0% 17 CA
2667 CCVA 15 Navy 1457 8-13 33% 15 MD
2668 Inferno 17-2 select 1457 17-21 45% 17 WI
2669 MVVC B 12-Club 1456 8-14 36% 12 CA
2670 NC GOLD VOLLEYBALL 15-3 1456 3-5 38% 15
2671 Sol Taino 15-1 1456 4-6 40% 15 PR
2672 WPVC Boys 16-Armour orange 1456 24-39 38% 16 FL
2673 Kairos 18 Avera 1456 10-10 50% 18 SD
2674 Carolina ICE 16-1 1456 18-25 42% 16 SC
2675 Wizard 16-B 1456 0-0 0% 16
2676 FC United 12-Teal 1456 0-0 0% 12
2677 Petite Elite 12 Heather 1455 2-1 40% 12
2678 Point Break VBC 17 Nick 1455 8-8 50% 17 CA
2679 MVP 14-Red 1455 14-33 30% 14 MD
2680 Aspire 14 Rocket 1455 20-18 53% 14 AZ
2681 Alliance 18-S tempo 1455 18-15 50% 18 TN
2682 Team Rockstar 12-South bay 1455 15-24 38% 12 CA
2683 EndMo Boys 18-1 1455 10-9 48% 18 PA
2684 Boys BSVBC 12-Black 1455 17-16 52% 12 IL
2685 Annapolis 17-1 1455 0-7 0% 17 MD
2686 Aloha 16-1 gold 1455 24-27 47% 16 CA
2687 MOVA UA 12-White 1455 0-0 0% 12 MO
2688 SBS 10U 1455 5-6 36% 10
2689 Hi Bred VBC 14 Elite 1455 7-6 54% 14 HI
2690 Lomanview 12-Noris 1455 2-3 40% 12
2691 Mamba 18-Purple 1455 31-46 40% 18 WI
2692 MVP Academy BOS 18-Blue 1454 6-13 32% 18 MA
2693 PO1NT Boys 18-S 1454 5-8 33% 18 PA
2694 Hammerhead Boys 18-1 1454 9-10 47% 18 MN
2695 JJVA Boys 14 A 1454 14-19 42% 14 FL
2696 Aaliyah/Peter 18-1 1454 2-3 40% 18
2697 Phoenix 16 Boss 1454 16-21 43% 16 OH
2698 EVP Rush 14-1 1454 2-3 40% 14
2699 Auckland All-Stars Volleyball Arrows B 18 1454 3-4 43% 18
2700 BAVC Boys 18-1 1454 17-20 46% 18 OK
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.