2025-2026 Season — Page 54 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2651 | Vibe Boys 18-Dom | 1458 | 4-5 | 40% | 18 | CA |
| 2652 | Boiler Jrs 18-Black | 1457 | 9-6 | 60% | 18 | IN |
| 2653 | C-burg 18-Gray | 1457 | 0-2 | 0% | 18 | |
| 2654 | Volitude 16 Xian | 1457 | 15-10 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 2655 | Lions Boys 13-1 | 1457 | 9-5 | 60% | 13 | IL |
| 2656 | DCVA 12-2 | 1457 | 2-4 | 29% | 12 | NM |
| 2657 | NLVA 18-Joe | 1457 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | MO |
| 2658 | Absolute Zero BVC 14-Big macs | 1457 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | WA |
| 2659 | WVC 12-Green | 1457 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | CA |
| 2660 | Iowa Juniors NEXT 16-Pink | 1457 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | IA |
| 2661 | Shock 18-Ua lightning | 1457 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | IL |
| 2662 | Synergy Boys 16-Atlas | 1457 | 6-26 | 19% | 16 | CA |
| 2663 | TC 18 Gold | 1457 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | |
| 2664 | Train Up VB 18-1 | 1457 | 13-13 | 50% | 18 | NJ |
| 2665 | Rhythm 14 DT | 1457 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | |
| 2666 | CA Volley 17-Spring | 1457 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 2667 | CCVA 15 Navy | 1457 | 8-13 | 33% | 15 | MD |
| 2668 | Inferno 17-2 select | 1457 | 17-21 | 45% | 17 | WI |
| 2669 | MVVC B 12-Club | 1456 | 8-14 | 36% | 12 | CA |
| 2670 | NC GOLD VOLLEYBALL 15-3 | 1456 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | |
| 2671 | Sol Taino 15-1 | 1456 | 4-6 | 40% | 15 | PR |
| 2672 | WPVC Boys 16-Armour orange | 1456 | 24-39 | 38% | 16 | FL |
| 2673 | Kairos 18 Avera | 1456 | 10-10 | 50% | 18 | SD |
| 2674 | Carolina ICE 16-1 | 1456 | 18-25 | 42% | 16 | SC |
| 2675 | Wizard 16-B | 1456 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 2676 | FC United 12-Teal | 1456 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 2677 | Petite Elite 12 Heather | 1455 | 2-1 | 40% | 12 | |
| 2678 | Point Break VBC 17 Nick | 1455 | 8-8 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 2679 | MVP 14-Red | 1455 | 14-33 | 30% | 14 | MD |
| 2680 | Aspire 14 Rocket | 1455 | 20-18 | 53% | 14 | AZ |
| 2681 | Alliance 18-S tempo | 1455 | 18-15 | 50% | 18 | TN |
| 2682 | Team Rockstar 12-South bay | 1455 | 15-24 | 38% | 12 | CA |
| 2683 | EndMo Boys 18-1 | 1455 | 10-9 | 48% | 18 | PA |
| 2684 | Boys BSVBC 12-Black | 1455 | 17-16 | 52% | 12 | IL |
| 2685 | Annapolis 17-1 | 1455 | 0-7 | 0% | 17 | MD |
| 2686 | Aloha 16-1 gold | 1455 | 24-27 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 2687 | MOVA UA 12-White | 1455 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MO |
| 2688 | SBS 10U | 1455 | 5-6 | 36% | 10 | |
| 2689 | Hi Bred VBC 14 Elite | 1455 | 7-6 | 54% | 14 | HI |
| 2690 | Lomanview 12-Noris | 1455 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | |
| 2691 | Mamba 18-Purple | 1455 | 31-46 | 40% | 18 | WI |
| 2692 | MVP Academy BOS 18-Blue | 1454 | 6-13 | 32% | 18 | MA |
| 2693 | PO1NT Boys 18-S | 1454 | 5-8 | 33% | 18 | PA |
| 2694 | Hammerhead Boys 18-1 | 1454 | 9-10 | 47% | 18 | MN |
| 2695 | JJVA Boys 14 A | 1454 | 14-19 | 42% | 14 | FL |
| 2696 | Aaliyah/Peter 18-1 | 1454 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | |
| 2697 | Phoenix 16 Boss | 1454 | 16-21 | 43% | 16 | OH |
| 2698 | EVP Rush 14-1 | 1454 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | |
| 2699 | Auckland All-Stars Volleyball Arrows B 18 | 1454 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | |
| 2700 | BAVC Boys 18-1 | 1454 | 17-20 | 46% | 18 | OK |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.