2025-2026 Season — Page 74 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3651 | Chicago Elite B 16-Swoosh | 1333 | 18-15 | 55% | 16 | IL |
| 3652 | MAVS 14-White | 1332 | 2-17 | 11% | 14 | KS |
| 3653 | Boston United Boys 13-Select | 1332 | 1-7 | 13% | 13 | MA |
| 3654 | NLVC 16 Pride | 1332 | 9-25 | 26% | 16 | TX |
| 3655 | 513VB Boys 13-1 | 1332 | 8-19 | 30% | 13 | OH |
| 3656 | Boys BSVBC 11-Black | 1331 | 3-11 | 21% | 11 | IL |
| 3657 | MDVBC 16-1 | 1331 | 3-13 | 19% | 16 | FL |
| 3658 | SPVB 18-Echo | 1331 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | IL |
| 3659 | Church&Dodge 13 | 1331 | 0-6 | 0% | 13 | IL |
| 3660 | MOD B14-Grey | 1330 | 21-32 | 40% | 14 | IL |
| 3661 | MN Select Boys 14-Black | 1330 | 13-24 | 35% | 14 | MN |
| 3662 | NF 17 Crimson | 1330 | 6-24 | 20% | 17 | NY |
| 3663 | VC United 17-2 elite | 1330 | 18-24 | 43% | 17 | IL |
| 3664 | SoCal VBC 15-Cardiff | 1329 | 6-8 | 43% | 15 | CA |
| 3665 | 380 Devil Dogs 18-Alpha | 1329 | 0-5 | 0% | 18 | IA |
| 3666 | GSL 18-St george jeff | 1329 | 5-11 | 31% | 18 | UT |
| 3667 | Ozark Boys 12 | 1329 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | AR |
| 3668 | Club W 18-Silver | 1329 | 32-39 | 45% | 18 | WI |
| 3669 | Battle 18-Red | 1329 | 17-39 | 29% | 18 | VA |
| 3670 | TALA BOYS 18 | 1329 | 3-12 | 20% | 18 | NV |
| 3671 | HVA 15-Performance blue | 1329 | 14-28 | 33% | 15 | TX |
| 3672 | OPVC 13-Black | 1328 | 13-23 | 36% | 13 | OH |
| 3673 | IMUA UVC 15-Ua | 1328 | 12-38 | 24% | 15 | CA |
| 3674 | Seaside 18-White | 1328 | 5-12 | 29% | 18 | CA |
| 3675 | Sharks Boys 18-Silver | 1328 | 6-8 | 43% | 18 | |
| 3676 | Vandal 18 Alpha | 1328 | 15-31 | 31% | 18 | NY |
| 3677 | NLVC 15-Boys | 1327 | 3-11 | 21% | 15 | TX |
| 3678 | 630 Volleyball 13-1 | 1327 | 26-33 | 44% | 13 | IL |
| 3679 | Panther Boys 17-Black | 1327 | 4-13 | 24% | 17 | CO |
| 3680 | MOVA UA 12-Gold boys | 1327 | 7-14 | 33% | 12 | MO |
| 3681 | K2 17-1 local boys | 1327 | 4-16 | 20% | 17 | TN |
| 3682 | GSL 14-Elite - andy | 1327 | 1-8 | 11% | 14 | UT |
| 3683 | Legacy Boys 16-National mikey | 1326 | 4-7 | 36% | 16 | MI |
| 3684 | GSL 16-Comp olivia | 1326 | 1-7 | 13% | 16 | UT |
| 3685 | A4 Volley Boys 16-Purple | 1326 | 0-6 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 3686 | NEVBC Boys 16-Blue | 1326 | 7-17 | 29% | 16 | CT |
| 3687 | Phoenix 16-Boys | 1326 | 3-7 | 30% | 16 | FL |
| 3688 | Absolute 18 Gold | 1326 | 15-23 | 39% | 18 | CA |
| 3689 | Mass Pats Boys 18-2 synergy | 1325 | 13-16 | 35% | 18 | MA |
| 3690 | CJVA Boys 15-Onyx | 1325 | 2-16 | 11% | 15 | NJ |
| 3691 | Boston United Boys 18-Select 1 | 1325 | 10-24 | 29% | 18 | MA |
| 3692 | Braves CVC 17-Bleu | 1325 | 0-8 | 0% | 17 | |
| 3693 | EVA 16-1 | 1324 | 30-35 | 46% | 16 | IL |
| 3694 | Absolute Zero 17-Rankine | 1324 | 5-10 | 33% | 17 | WA |
| 3695 | RCVA 15-East coast | 1324 | 8-30 | 21% | 15 | VA |
| 3696 | Club 1 B 17-White | 1324 | 17-28 | 38% | 17 | IL |
| 3697 | Palatine 16-White | 1324 | 7-9 | 44% | 16 | IL |
| 3698 | LIKVBC Boys 16 | 1323 | 6-17 | 26% | 16 | NY |
| 3699 | LCVC 14-1 | 1323 | 4-10 | 29% | 14 | |
| 3700 | Illinois Jr's B17-2's | 1323 | 28-45 | 38% | 17 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.