Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 74 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3651 Chicago Elite B 16-Swoosh 1333 18-15 55% 16 IL
3652 MAVS 14-White 1332 2-17 11% 14 KS
3653 Boston United Boys 13-Select 1332 1-7 13% 13 MA
3654 NLVC 16 Pride 1332 9-25 26% 16 TX
3655 513VB Boys 13-1 1332 8-19 30% 13 OH
3656 Boys BSVBC 11-Black 1331 3-11 21% 11 IL
3657 MDVBC 16-1 1331 3-13 19% 16 FL
3658 SPVB 18-Echo 1331 8-7 53% 18 IL
3659 Church&Dodge 13 1331 0-6 0% 13 IL
3660 MOD B14-Grey 1330 21-32 40% 14 IL
3661 MN Select Boys 14-Black 1330 13-24 35% 14 MN
3662 NF 17 Crimson 1330 6-24 20% 17 NY
3663 VC United 17-2 elite 1330 18-24 43% 17 IL
3664 SoCal VBC 15-Cardiff 1329 6-8 43% 15 CA
3665 380 Devil Dogs 18-Alpha 1329 0-5 0% 18 IA
3666 GSL 18-St george jeff 1329 5-11 31% 18 UT
3667 Ozark Boys 12 1329 0-0 0% 12 AR
3668 Club W 18-Silver 1329 32-39 45% 18 WI
3669 Battle 18-Red 1329 17-39 29% 18 VA
3670 TALA BOYS 18 1329 3-12 20% 18 NV
3671 HVA 15-Performance blue 1329 14-28 33% 15 TX
3672 OPVC 13-Black 1328 13-23 36% 13 OH
3673 IMUA UVC 15-Ua 1328 12-38 24% 15 CA
3674 Seaside 18-White 1328 5-12 29% 18 CA
3675 Sharks Boys 18-Silver 1328 6-8 43% 18
3676 Vandal 18 Alpha 1328 15-31 31% 18 NY
3677 NLVC 15-Boys 1327 3-11 21% 15 TX
3678 630 Volleyball 13-1 1327 26-33 44% 13 IL
3679 Panther Boys 17-Black 1327 4-13 24% 17 CO
3680 MOVA UA 12-Gold boys 1327 7-14 33% 12 MO
3681 K2 17-1 local boys 1327 4-16 20% 17 TN
3682 GSL 14-Elite - andy 1327 1-8 11% 14 UT
3683 Legacy Boys 16-National mikey 1326 4-7 36% 16 MI
3684 GSL 16-Comp olivia 1326 1-7 13% 16 UT
3685 A4 Volley Boys 16-Purple 1326 0-6 0% 16 CA
3686 NEVBC Boys 16-Blue 1326 7-17 29% 16 CT
3687 Phoenix 16-Boys 1326 3-7 30% 16 FL
3688 Absolute 18 Gold 1326 15-23 39% 18 CA
3689 Mass Pats Boys 18-2 synergy 1325 13-16 35% 18 MA
3690 CJVA Boys 15-Onyx 1325 2-16 11% 15 NJ
3691 Boston United Boys 18-Select 1 1325 10-24 29% 18 MA
3692 Braves CVC 17-Bleu 1325 0-8 0% 17
3693 EVA 16-1 1324 30-35 46% 16 IL
3694 Absolute Zero 17-Rankine 1324 5-10 33% 17 WA
3695 RCVA 15-East coast 1324 8-30 21% 15 VA
3696 Club 1 B 17-White 1324 17-28 38% 17 IL
3697 Palatine 16-White 1324 7-9 44% 16 IL
3698 LIKVBC Boys 16 1323 6-17 26% 16 NY
3699 LCVC 14-1 1323 4-10 29% 14
3700 Illinois Jr's B17-2's 1323 28-45 38% 17 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.