Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 74 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3651 NF 15 Crimson 1323 5-22 18% 15 NY
3652 OPVC 13-Black 1323 13-23 36% 13 OH
3653 Fusion 14-Green 1323 21-23 48% 14 CA
3654 1W B15 Crimson 1322 2-21 9% 15 WI
3655 South County Juniors Boys 15-1 1322 7-18 28% 15 RI
3656 Salt City Boys 18-S paul 1322 15-22 41% 18 UT
3657 Edge 18-Green 1322 4-15 21% 18 VA
3658 TNT Boys 18-Rogue 1322 0-5 0% 18 PA
3659 WI Flight 18-B silver 1322 4-10 29% 18 WI
3660 Mass Pats Boys 18-2 synergy 1322 13-16 35% 18 MA
3661 Philly Boys 14 1322 0-6 0% 14 PA
3662 Palatine 16-White 1322 7-9 44% 16 IL
3663 E3 16-Excel 1322 8-22 27% 16 NM
3664 SNVF 14-2 1322 1-5 17% 14 WA
3665 STL Crossfire B 17 R1 1321 9-18 33% 17 MO
3666 EVA 16-1 1321 30-35 46% 16 IL
3667 LIKVBC Boys 16 1321 6-17 26% 16 NY
3668 RUVBC 17 Rise 1321 18-34 35% 17 IL
3669 Westside VBC 18-Black 1321 6-10 38% 18 CA
3670 Vandal 18 Alpha 1321 15-31 31% 18 NY
3671 SC Legends 15-Nike 1321 8-35 19% 15 CA
3672 Squad VBC Boys 16 Elite 1321 16-24 40% 16 NV
3673 Elevation 14-Timber boys 1320 3-16 16% 14 CO
3674 Iowa Galaxy 14-1 1320 2-8 20% 14 IA
3675 NLVC 15-Boys 1320 4-14 22% 15 MI
3676 Illinois Jr's B16-2's 1320 21-22 49% 16 IL
3677 I AM VBC Boys 14-1 1320 10-22 31% 14 WI
3678 Cinci Attack 15 Gold 1320 24-36 40% 15 OH
3679 Volei 16-B 1320 6-16 27% 16 VA
3680 Sportime 15-Regional 1320 0-6 0% 15 NY
3681 Vegas Venom 17 1320 0-5 0% 17 NV
3682 Outrigger 13-1 1319 5-14 26% 13 HI
3683 Red Rock Boys 16-TV 1319 13-31 30% 16 CA
3684 RCVA 15-East coast 1319 8-30 21% 15 VA
3685 Downstate Juniors VBC 18-Red 1319 6-16 27% 18 NY
3686 Tribe 13-B premier cardinal 1318 8-13 38% 13 FL
3687 Vengeance 18-Powell 1318 16-18 47% 18 OH
3688 Premier 16 NovaBlast 1318 18-43 30% 16 OH
3689 UVA 18-S boys 1318 7-19 27% 18 LA
3690 IMUA UVC 15-Ua 1318 12-38 24% 15 CA
3691 Salt City Boys 16-S shauna 1317 13-26 33% 16 UT
3692 SC Elite 18-Blue-lizzie 1317 16-24 40% 18 SC
3693 630 Volleyball 13-1 1317 26-33 44% 13 IL
3694 Exodus VBC 18-2 1317 1-6 14% 18 CA
3695 Basin Bombers 18-2 1317 4-7 36% 18 OR
3696 DallasOne 14-Black 1317 11-26 30% 14 TX
3697 MAVS 16-White 1317 5-14 26% 16 KS
3698 MVP BOS 17-Blue 1316 17-37 31% 17 MA
3699 KIVA 14-S-black 1316 0-5 0% 14 KY
3700 CLE SEL 14-White 1316 10-23 30% 14 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.