Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 75 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3701 LuMaDe Boys 18-Blue 1316 2-8 20% 18 FL
3702 Lomanview 12-Orlando 1316 0-5 0% 12 PR
3703 RVA 17-Nazca blue 1315 10-34 23% 17 MD
3704 Lumber 18-Black team 1315 3-14 16% 18 NY
3705 Capital Sliders Volleyball Club 14-Cascade 1315 6-21 22% 14 NY
3706 Club 1 B 17-White 1315 17-28 38% 17 IL
3707 Top Flight 18-Nat black 1315 3-18 14% 18 NV
3708 Nativos de Caguas 16-U 1315 0-6 0% 16 PR
3709 VC United 16-2 elite 1314 9-30 23% 16 IL
3710 HVA 12-Young guns 1314 10-31 24% 12 TX
3711 NYC Raptors 18-Black 1314 16-31 34% 18 NY
3712 LHV Boys 18-3 thunder 1314 11-24 31% 18 MA
3713 Absolute 18 Gold 1313 15-23 39% 18 CA
3714 NYC Raptors 15-Black 1313 4-10 29% 15 NY
3715 Chaos Boys 16-Gold 1313 0-5 0% 16 OR
3716 Salt City Boys 18-Purple 1313 13-19 41% 18 UT
3717 Hot Shots 15 Regional 1313 1-12 6% 15 NY
3718 Weber Elite 12-Jamie 1312 2-8 20% 12 UT
3719 TALA BOYS 18 1312 3-12 20% 18 NV
3720 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 12 Lance 1312 0-6 0% 12 UT
3721 Adversity VBC 16-White 1312 7-5 58% 16 IL
3722 SG Elite 15 Prime 1312 4-13 24% 15 CA
3723 Salt City Boys Lindon Team Academy 13-Soni 1312 0-6 0% 13 UT
3724 NE Storm 18 Tornado 1311 13-24 33% 18 MA
3725 iSPIKE 14-1 boys 1311 0-5 0% 14 OR
3726 GSL 18-St george jeff 1311 11-16 41% 18 UT
3727 Stormbreaker 16-Titans 1311 1-5 17% 16 CA
3728 CBVC 17-Black 1311 16-34 32% 17 CA
3729 NOC 15-Green 1310 0-9 0% 15 CA
3730 Top Flight 14-Maverick 1310 19-26 42% 14 IL
3731 Sky High 13-Hein - spr 1310 4-8 33% 13 IL
3732 Prospects VBA 14-Select m 1310 1-5 17% 14 IL
3733 SMASH Boys 12-1 1309 2-7 22% 12 MA
3734 Guam Legacy 15 1309 4-6 40% 15 FL
3735 Southport B15-Blue 1309 22-43 34% 15 WI
3736 GSL 14-Sport kristen 1309 3-7 30% 14 UT
3737 PV Boys 16-2 1309 8-15 35% 16 MA
3738 Radiate 16-Black 1309 9-13 41% 16 UT
3739 Domination 18-Blue 1309 2-7 22% 18 MI
3740 26 NU Breed 18-B 1308 5-10 33% 18 CA
3741 ETVMR 17-5 1308 0-6 0% 17 PR
3742 Palatine 16-Grey 1308 6-9 40% 16 IL
3743 Enid IMPACT 18 Enid Impact Boys 1307 0-5 0% 18 OK
3744 417 Missouri Juniors 15-Red 1307 0-0 0% 15 MO
3745 Infinity Royals 16-L 1307 6-24 20% 16 MN
3746 AZ LEGACY 13-Apex 1307 2-10 17% 13 AZ
3747 Salt City Boys 17-Kylee 1307 9-23 28% 17 UT
3748 CCVA 15 Steel 1307 5-17 20% 15 MD
3749 STL Crossfire B 15 R1 1307 7-15 32% 15 MO
3750 RAGE 18-Tim 1306 10-24 29% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.