Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 75 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3701 CNVKC Mizuno Boys 18-1 1323 0-5 0% 18 MO
3702 Balboa Bay 14-Black 1323 13-20 39% 14 CA
3703 FAV 15 Maverick 1323 4-18 18% 15 CA
3704 Vegas Venom 17 1323 0-5 0% 17 NV
3705 Philly Boys 14 1322 0-6 0% 14 PA
3706 TNT Boys 18-Rogue 1322 0-5 0% 18 PA
3707 Panther Boys 17-2 1322 0-7 0% 17 CO
3708 OPVC 16-Purple doug 1322 17-34 33% 16 OH
3709 Vengeance 18-Powell 1322 16-18 47% 18 OH
3710 WI Flight 18-B silver 1322 4-10 29% 18 WI
3711 Edge 18-Green 1322 4-15 21% 18 VA
3712 BAVC 14-2 boys 1322 8-30 21% 14 CA
3713 LIVBC Boys 16-Local 1322 0-5 0% 16
3714 Iowa Galaxy 14-1 1321 2-8 20% 14 IA
3715 SNVF 14-2 1321 1-5 17% 14 WA
3716 SMBC West 15-Molten a 1321 2-8 20% 15 CA
3717 I AM VBC Boys 14-1 1321 10-22 31% 14 WI
3718 Pursuit Boys 14 Elite 1321 7-21 25% 14 MO
3719 Academy 18-R silver 1321 12-16 43% 18 IN
3720 South County Juniors Boys 15-1 1321 7-18 28% 15 RI
3721 Fusion 14-Green 1320 21-23 48% 14 CA
3722 SVC 14-Ny boys 1320 4-11 24% 14 NY
3723 RUVBC 17 Rise 1320 18-34 35% 17 IL
3724 UVA 18-S boys 1320 7-19 27% 18 LA
3725 1W B15 Crimson 1320 2-21 9% 15 WI
3726 Illinois Jr's B16-2's 1320 21-22 49% 16 IL
3727 GSL 18-Comp ben 1319 2-6 25% 18 UT
3728 Outrigger 13-1 1319 5-14 26% 13 HI
3729 Exodus VBC 18-2 1319 0-0 0% 18 CA
3730 ProPlay 16-Filip 1319 2-11 15% 16 CA
3731 A4 Volley Boys 16-Aaron 1319 11-21 34% 16 CA
3732 Salt City Boys Lindon Team Academy 16-Nori 1318 0-6 0% 16 UT
3733 Cinci Attack 15 Gold 1318 24-36 40% 15 OH
3734 Premier 16 NovaBlast 1318 18-43 30% 16 OH
3735 Tribe 13-B premier cardinal 1317 8-13 38% 13 FL
3736 MAVS 16-White 1317 5-14 26% 16 KS
3737 NOC 15-Green 1317 0-9 0% 15 CA
3738 SC Elite 18-Blue-lizzie 1317 16-24 40% 18 SC
3739 Red Rock Boys 16-TV 1317 13-31 30% 16 CA
3740 Basin Bombers 18-2 1317 4-7 36% 18 OR
3741 KIVA 14-S-black 1317 0-5 0% 14 KY
3742 SC Legends 15-Nike 1317 8-35 19% 15 CA
3743 KPV 18-Black-emma 1317 9-16 36% 18 KY
3744 Elevation 14-Timber boys 1316 3-16 16% 14 CO
3745 Lumber 18-Black team 1316 3-14 16% 18 NY
3746 Lomanview 12-Orlando 1316 0-5 0% 12 PR
3747 E3 16-Excel 1316 8-22 27% 16 NM
3748 RVA 17-Nazca blue 1316 10-34 23% 17 MD
3749 DallasOne 14-Black 1316 11-26 30% 14 TX
3750 CSVC 14 CASCADE 1316 8-26 24% 14 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.