Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 76 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3751 Chaos Boys 16-Gold 1315 0-5 0% 16 OR
3752 Squad VBC Boys 16 Elite 1315 8-8 50% 16 NV
3753 Nativos de Caguas 16-U 1315 0-6 0% 16 PR
3754 Salt City Boys 16-S shauna 1315 6-16 27% 16 UT
3755 VC United 16-2 elite 1314 9-30 23% 16 IL
3756 Salt City Boys Lindon Team Academy 13-Soni 1314 0-6 0% 13 UT
3757 Sportime 15-Regional 1314 0-6 0% 15 NY
3758 Top Flight 18-Nat black 1314 3-11 21% 18 NV
3759 Southport B15-Blue 1314 22-43 34% 15 WI
3760 LuMaDe Boys 18-Blue 1314 2-8 20% 18 FL
3761 LIKVBC BOYS 18 1314 7-22 24% 18 NY
3762 HVA 12-Young guns 1314 10-31 24% 12 TX
3763 Adversity VBC 16-White 1313 7-5 58% 16 IL
3764 LHV Boys 18-3 thunder 1312 11-24 31% 18 MA
3765 iSPIKE 14-1 boys 1312 0-5 0% 14 OR
3766 CBVC 17-Black 1311 16-34 32% 17 CA
3767 SMASH Boys 12-1 1311 2-7 22% 12 MA
3768 Top Flight 14-Maverick 1311 19-26 42% 14 IL
3769 NF 15 Crimson 1311 5-22 18% 15 NY
3770 NYC Raptors 18-Black 1310 16-31 34% 18 NY
3771 RAGE 18-Tim 1310 10-24 29% 18 CA
3772 26 NU Breed 18-B 1309 5-10 33% 18 CA
3773 LI Fury 14-1 1309 8-16 33% 14 NY
3774 ETVMR 17-5 1308 0-6 0% 17 PR
3775 Guam Legacy 15 1308 4-6 40% 15
3776 NVA 17-Boys luis 1308 3-21 13% 17 CA
3777 NE Storm 18 Tornado 1307 13-24 33% 18 MA
3778 Prospects VBA 14-Select m 1307 1-5 17% 14 IL
3779 MDJRS 12-Boys 1307 0-0 0% 12 MD
3780 CCVA 15 Steel 1307 5-17 20% 15 MD
3781 Palatine 16-Grey 1307 6-9 40% 16 IL
3782 Meraki VB 16-2 1307 4-18 17% 16 NH
3783 STL Crossfire B 15 R1 1307 7-15 32% 15 MO
3784 UVC 14-Luke 1305 3-7 30% 14 CA
3785 Stormbreaker 16-Titans 1305 1-5 17% 16 CA
3786 Southport B14-Blue 1305 18-25 42% 14 WI
3787 SynergyForce 15-3 silver 1305 1-8 11% 15 CA
3788 Domination 18-Blue 1305 2-7 22% 18 MO
3789 SVA Boys 14-S red 1305 1-6 14% 14 WA
3790 Fang 16-1 1305 2-7 22% 16 CA
3791 TC ELITE 18-Sonny 1304 3-11 21% 18 LA
3792 BORINQUEN COQUI 10-2m 1304 1-7 13% 10 PR
3793 NYC Raptors 15-Black 1304 4-10 29% 15 NY
3794 SoCal VBC 17-Cardiff 1303 2-6 25% 17 CA
3795 Forza Boys 17-Blk 1303 22-36 38% 17 IL
3796 GSA 14-1 1303 4-12 25% 14 NJ
3797 Academy 16-R gray 1303 9-16 36% 16 IN
3798 Hot Shots 16 Regional 1303 4-13 24% 16 NY
3799 SPIKE SPORT 18-Hammer 1302 6-18 25% 18 TX
3800 Ho'oikaika VBC 16-1 1302 1-7 13% 16 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.