Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 77 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3801 TOVC 16-Warriors mulero 1295 5-15 25% 16 PR
3802 NC Coastal 18-Catarina 1295 2-10 17% 18 NC
3803 Club North Volleyball KC 18-1 1293 0-6 0% 18 MO
3804 C-Force VBC 18-Boys 1293 9-20 31% 18 TN
3805 Evolution 13 Elite 1293 10-36 22% 13 CA
3806 MPV 17-Tylin 1293 4-20 17% 17 UT
3807 Tribe 16-B premier navy 1292 5-15 25% 16 FL
3808 Prodigy VA Boys 16-Elite 1292 0-14 0% 16 NJ
3809 MOVA UA 14-Gold boys 1291 8-20 27% 14 MO
3810 626VBC 17-Red 1291 6-10 38% 17 CA
3811 Atlanta Extreme 18-Charles 1291 11-20 35% 18 GA
3812 VoltageVB Boys 14-16u 1291 5-28 15% 14 FL
3813 A4 Volley Boys 15-Keilan 1290 4-13 24% 15 CA
3814 Forza Boys 13-Black 1290 26-49 35% 13 IL
3815 Pulse 14 Gabby 1289 7-12 37% 14 CA
3816 Panther Boys 16-Black 1289 5-17 22% 16 CO
3817 PO1NT Boys 16-S 1289 2-11 14% 16 OH
3818 SynergyForce B 14-Black 1289 2-15 12% 14 CA
3819 SMBC North 16 Elite 1289 23-43 35% 16 CA
3820 TC ELITE 18-Sonny 1289 3-11 21% 18 LA
3821 SynergyForce B 13-Black 1288 4-15 21% 13 CA
3822 Vengeance 17-Robeson 1288 10-20 33% 17 OH
3823 A-10 Boys 15-Gray 1288 14-27 34% 15 PA
3824 I AM VBC Boys 15-1 1288 8-20 29% 15 WI
3825 K Elites VBC B16 Navy 1287 15-35 29% 16 MO
3826 HEAT 18 Valley 1287 5-18 22% 18 CA
3827 OVC B13 1287 9-21 30% 13 WI
3828 630 Volleyball 14-Black 1287 6-10 38% 14 IL
3829 Cicero Elite B 16-White 1286 7-8 47% 16 IL
3830 Webfoot 18-Boys elite 1286 8-16 33% 18 OR
3831 MKE Sting 12-2 1286 9-24 27% 12 WI
3832 Mamba 13-Black 1286 10-24 29% 13 WI
3833 EP 16-1 1286 3-12 20% 16 MN
3834 Church&Dodge 16 1285 4-14 22% 16 IL
3835 Club 1 B 16-White 1285 17-28 38% 16 IL
3836 Rimrock Ravens 18 1285 0-6 0% 18 MT
3837 Ho'oikaika VBC 18 1285 1-7 13% 18 HI
3838 Cincy Elite 16 Thompson 1285 13-27 33% 16 OH
3839 SLAM Volleyball Club 18-1 boys 1284 5-13 28% 18 MA
3840 Champion 16-Boys 1284 2-8 20% 16 NC
3841 SoCal VBC 15-Beacons 1284 12-21 36% 15 CA
3842 RVA Boys 18 Shelly 1284 19-42 31% 18 WI
3843 Balboa Bay 12-Red 1283 9-37 20% 12 CA
3844 A4 Volley Boys 14-Troy 1283 5-14 26% 14 CA
3845 Spike Milwaukee B13 1283 6-25 19% 13 WI
3846 Crow Creek 18 1283 2-8 20% 18 UT
3847 HI Bred VBC 17-Kane club 1282 3-14 18% 17 HI
3848 JNVBC 14-Boys 1282 3-15 17% 14 IA
3849 UNO Boys 14-Spring 1282 5-5 50% 14 IL
3850 Sidewinder 14-1 1282 14-43 25% 14 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.