2025-2026 Season — Page 77 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3801 | TOVC 16-Warriors mulero | 1295 | 5-15 | 25% | 16 | PR |
| 3802 | NC Coastal 18-Catarina | 1295 | 2-10 | 17% | 18 | NC |
| 3803 | Club North Volleyball KC 18-1 | 1293 | 0-6 | 0% | 18 | MO |
| 3804 | C-Force VBC 18-Boys | 1293 | 9-20 | 31% | 18 | TN |
| 3805 | Evolution 13 Elite | 1293 | 10-36 | 22% | 13 | CA |
| 3806 | MPV 17-Tylin | 1293 | 4-20 | 17% | 17 | UT |
| 3807 | Tribe 16-B premier navy | 1292 | 5-15 | 25% | 16 | FL |
| 3808 | Prodigy VA Boys 16-Elite | 1292 | 0-14 | 0% | 16 | NJ |
| 3809 | MOVA UA 14-Gold boys | 1291 | 8-20 | 27% | 14 | MO |
| 3810 | 626VBC 17-Red | 1291 | 6-10 | 38% | 17 | CA |
| 3811 | Atlanta Extreme 18-Charles | 1291 | 11-20 | 35% | 18 | GA |
| 3812 | VoltageVB Boys 14-16u | 1291 | 5-28 | 15% | 14 | FL |
| 3813 | A4 Volley Boys 15-Keilan | 1290 | 4-13 | 24% | 15 | CA |
| 3814 | Forza Boys 13-Black | 1290 | 26-49 | 35% | 13 | IL |
| 3815 | Pulse 14 Gabby | 1289 | 7-12 | 37% | 14 | CA |
| 3816 | Panther Boys 16-Black | 1289 | 5-17 | 22% | 16 | CO |
| 3817 | PO1NT Boys 16-S | 1289 | 2-11 | 14% | 16 | OH |
| 3818 | SynergyForce B 14-Black | 1289 | 2-15 | 12% | 14 | CA |
| 3819 | SMBC North 16 Elite | 1289 | 23-43 | 35% | 16 | CA |
| 3820 | TC ELITE 18-Sonny | 1289 | 3-11 | 21% | 18 | LA |
| 3821 | SynergyForce B 13-Black | 1288 | 4-15 | 21% | 13 | CA |
| 3822 | Vengeance 17-Robeson | 1288 | 10-20 | 33% | 17 | OH |
| 3823 | A-10 Boys 15-Gray | 1288 | 14-27 | 34% | 15 | PA |
| 3824 | I AM VBC Boys 15-1 | 1288 | 8-20 | 29% | 15 | WI |
| 3825 | K Elites VBC B16 Navy | 1287 | 15-35 | 29% | 16 | MO |
| 3826 | HEAT 18 Valley | 1287 | 5-18 | 22% | 18 | CA |
| 3827 | OVC B13 | 1287 | 9-21 | 30% | 13 | WI |
| 3828 | 630 Volleyball 14-Black | 1287 | 6-10 | 38% | 14 | IL |
| 3829 | Cicero Elite B 16-White | 1286 | 7-8 | 47% | 16 | IL |
| 3830 | Webfoot 18-Boys elite | 1286 | 8-16 | 33% | 18 | OR |
| 3831 | MKE Sting 12-2 | 1286 | 9-24 | 27% | 12 | WI |
| 3832 | Mamba 13-Black | 1286 | 10-24 | 29% | 13 | WI |
| 3833 | EP 16-1 | 1286 | 3-12 | 20% | 16 | MN |
| 3834 | Church&Dodge 16 | 1285 | 4-14 | 22% | 16 | IL |
| 3835 | Club 1 B 16-White | 1285 | 17-28 | 38% | 16 | IL |
| 3836 | Rimrock Ravens 18 | 1285 | 0-6 | 0% | 18 | MT |
| 3837 | Ho'oikaika VBC 18 | 1285 | 1-7 | 13% | 18 | HI |
| 3838 | Cincy Elite 16 Thompson | 1285 | 13-27 | 33% | 16 | OH |
| 3839 | SLAM Volleyball Club 18-1 boys | 1284 | 5-13 | 28% | 18 | MA |
| 3840 | Champion 16-Boys | 1284 | 2-8 | 20% | 16 | NC |
| 3841 | SoCal VBC 15-Beacons | 1284 | 12-21 | 36% | 15 | CA |
| 3842 | RVA Boys 18 Shelly | 1284 | 19-42 | 31% | 18 | WI |
| 3843 | Balboa Bay 12-Red | 1283 | 9-37 | 20% | 12 | CA |
| 3844 | A4 Volley Boys 14-Troy | 1283 | 5-14 | 26% | 14 | CA |
| 3845 | Spike Milwaukee B13 | 1283 | 6-25 | 19% | 13 | WI |
| 3846 | Crow Creek 18 | 1283 | 2-8 | 20% | 18 | UT |
| 3847 | HI Bred VBC 17-Kane club | 1282 | 3-14 | 18% | 17 | HI |
| 3848 | JNVBC 14-Boys | 1282 | 3-15 | 17% | 14 | IA |
| 3849 | UNO Boys 14-Spring | 1282 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | IL |
| 3850 | Sidewinder 14-1 | 1282 | 14-43 | 25% | 14 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.