Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 77 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3801 Uno Boys 18 Regional 1302 20-28 42% 18 IL
3802 Salt City Boys 18-Purple 1302 5-16 24% 18 UT
3803 Apex Boys VBC 18-1 1302 7-16 30% 18 TN
3804 VC United 18-3 elite 1302 13-26 33% 18 IL
3805 SPIKE SPORT 18-Hammer 1302 6-18 25% 18 TX
3806 Ho'oikaika VBC 16-1 1302 1-7 13% 16 HI
3807 Epic United 16-White 1301 18-21 46% 16 IN
3808 Balboa Bay 16-Green 1301 8-17 32% 16 CA
3809 Hot Shots 15 Regional 1301 1-12 6% 15 NY
3810 Club OAHO 14-B joseph 1301 6-15 29% 14 CA
3811 Fighting Angels 15-1 1301 2-3 40% 15
3812 APVA 18-Kayce/ashton 1301 8-17 32% 18 TN
3813 RootsVBA 16-Stormvale 1300 6-19 24% 16 KS
3814 Next 18-Royal 1300 15-31 33% 18 OH
3815 A2 14-Red 1300 12-37 24% 14 OH
3816 Tribe 15-B premier navy 1299 10-37 21% 15 FL
3817 WVVC 14-1 1299 6-20 23% 14 NJ
3818 CA Volley 16-1 1299 17-28 38% 16 CA
3819 C-Force VBC 18-Boys 1298 9-20 31% 18 TN
3820 Forza Boys 13-Black 1298 26-49 35% 13 IL
3821 Drive Boys 16-Blue 1298 26-41 39% 16 IL
3822 PAC 13 Boom 1298 13-30 30% 13 CA
3823 TKVBC 15-1 1297 0-9 0% 15 GA
3824 NC Coastal 18-Catarina 1297 2-10 17% 18 NC
3825 NSSC Boy's 12 Nike 1297 4-10 29% 12 MO
3826 603 United 18-Salem black 1297 6-12 30% 18 NH
3827 Gentlemen of Kiwi 14 1297 14-29 33% 14 FL
3828 Island Mixx 14-A 1297 0-6 0% 14
3829 Top Flight 14-Regional 1296 6-19 24% 14 IL
3830 CVC 17-1 1296 8-34 19% 17 OH
3831 NM Cactus VBC 14-2 1296 0-6 0% 14
3832 Auckland All-Stars Volleyball Bandits B 18 1295 1-6 14% 18
3833 HEAT 18 Valley 1295 5-18 22% 18 CA
3834 Kansas Krush 16-2 1295 3-5 27% 16
3835 Pipeline 15-Black 1295 16-21 43% 15 IL
3836 TOVC 16-Warriors mulero 1294 5-15 25% 16 PR
3837 Atlanta Extreme 18-Charles 1294 11-20 35% 18 GA
3838 Infinity Royals 16-L 1294 6-24 20% 16 MN
3839 Ignite Boys 16 Elite 1293 7-23 23% 16 AZ
3840 Club North Volleyball KC 18-1 1293 0-6 0% 18 MO
3841 Quicksets 18 Hype 1293 9-36 20% 18 HI
3842 KS Rise B18 1293 1-9 10% 18
3843 Evolution 13 Elite 1292 10-36 22% 13 CA
3844 MN Select 13-Maroon 1291 0-3 0% 13 MN
3845 Reef VBC 16 National 1291 7-25 22% 16 CA
3846 Salt City Boys 17-Kylee 1291 4-10 29% 17 UT
3847 Tribe 16-B premier navy 1291 5-15 25% 16 FL
3848 Pulse 14 Gabby 1291 7-12 37% 14 CA
3849 Prodigy VA Boys 16-Elite 1291 0-14 0% 16 NJ
3850 Apex 16-Regional boys 1291 2-13 13% 16 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.