Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 78 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3851 AZ LEGACY 13-Apex 1290 2-10 17% 13 AZ
3852 Tsunami 16-2n james 1290 1-7 13% 16 GA
3853 626VBC 17-Red 1290 6-10 38% 17 CA
3854 Sidewinder 14-1 1290 14-43 25% 14 AZ
3855 Ho'oikaika VBC 18 1290 1-7 13% 18 HI
3856 A4 Volley Boys 15-Keilan 1290 4-13 24% 15 CA
3857 MOVA UA 14-Gold boys 1290 8-20 27% 14 MO
3858 Downstate (B) 18-Red 1290 8-20 29% 18 NY
3859 Southport B18-Black 1289 10-22 31% 18 WI
3860 Vengeance 17-Robeson 1289 10-20 33% 17 OH
3861 SynergyForce B 14-Black 1289 2-15 12% 14 CA
3862 PO1NT Boys 16-S 1289 2-11 14% 16 PA
3863 VoltageVB Boys 14-16u 1289 5-28 15% 14 FL
3864 Sporting Albany Boys 18 1289 7-27 21% 18 NY
3865 Downstate (N-B) 17 Cobras 1289 4-12 25% 17 NY
3866 ECVBA 18-2 crystal 1288 4-14 22% 18 CA
3867 RAGE 16-Chris 1288 1-9 10% 16 CA
3868 OVC B13 1287 9-21 30% 13 WI
3869 A-10 Boys 15-Gray 1287 14-27 34% 15 PA
3870 K Elites VBC B16 Navy 1287 15-35 29% 16 MO
3871 Church&Dodge 16 1287 4-14 22% 16 IL
3872 HI Bred VBC 17-Kane club 1287 3-14 18% 17 HI
3873 SynergyForce B 13-Black 1287 4-15 21% 13 CA
3874 SoCal VBC 15-Beacons 1287 12-21 36% 15 CA
3875 NE Storm 17 Hail 1286 3-13 19% 17 MA
3876 MOJO Volleyball Academy G16-1 1286 0-0 0% 16
3877 EP 16-1 1286 3-12 20% 16 CA
3878 Cicero Elite B 16-White 1286 7-8 47% 16 IL
3879 Cincy Elite 16 Thompson 1285 13-27 33% 16 OH
3880 MKE Sting 12-2 1285 9-24 27% 12 WI
3881 A4 Volley Boys 14-Troy 1285 5-14 26% 14 CA
3882 Mamba 13-Black 1285 10-24 29% 13 WI
3883 Red Rock Boys 18-Nick - walnut creek 1285 1-9 10% 18 CA
3884 Manteca Flight 18-Mikaela 1285 10-20 33% 18 CA
3885 BVP 18 1284 2-10 17% 18 PA
3886 630 Volleyball 14-Black 1284 6-10 38% 14 IL
3887 Balboa Bay 12-Red 1284 9-37 20% 12 CA
3888 Crow Creek 18 1284 2-8 20% 18 UT
3889 Club 1 B 16-White 1284 17-28 38% 16 IL
3890 Champion 16-Boys 1284 2-8 20% 16 NC
3891 Aspire 16 Spartans 1283 14-39 26% 16 CA
3892 UNO Boys 14-Spring 1283 5-5 50% 14 IL
3893 SMASH Boys 14-Thunder 1283 15-40 27% 14 MA
3894 Spike Milwaukee B13 1283 6-25 19% 13 WI
3895 Rimrock Ravens 18 1283 0-6 0% 18
3896 RVA Boys 18 Shelly 1283 19-42 31% 18 WI
3897 Webfoot 18-Boys elite 1282 8-16 33% 18 OR
3898 Atlanta Extreme 16-Boys 1282 2-10 17% 16 GA
3899 Panther Boys 16-Black 1282 5-17 22% 16 CO
3900 L2 14-1 boys 1282 5-23 18% 14 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.