2025-2026 Season — Page 78 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3851 | AZ LEGACY 13-Apex | 1290 | 2-10 | 17% | 13 | AZ |
| 3852 | Tsunami 16-2n james | 1290 | 1-7 | 13% | 16 | GA |
| 3853 | 626VBC 17-Red | 1290 | 6-10 | 38% | 17 | CA |
| 3854 | Sidewinder 14-1 | 1290 | 14-43 | 25% | 14 | AZ |
| 3855 | Ho'oikaika VBC 18 | 1290 | 1-7 | 13% | 18 | HI |
| 3856 | A4 Volley Boys 15-Keilan | 1290 | 4-13 | 24% | 15 | CA |
| 3857 | MOVA UA 14-Gold boys | 1290 | 8-20 | 27% | 14 | MO |
| 3858 | Downstate (B) 18-Red | 1290 | 8-20 | 29% | 18 | NY |
| 3859 | Southport B18-Black | 1289 | 10-22 | 31% | 18 | WI |
| 3860 | Vengeance 17-Robeson | 1289 | 10-20 | 33% | 17 | OH |
| 3861 | SynergyForce B 14-Black | 1289 | 2-15 | 12% | 14 | CA |
| 3862 | PO1NT Boys 16-S | 1289 | 2-11 | 14% | 16 | PA |
| 3863 | VoltageVB Boys 14-16u | 1289 | 5-28 | 15% | 14 | FL |
| 3864 | Sporting Albany Boys 18 | 1289 | 7-27 | 21% | 18 | NY |
| 3865 | Downstate (N-B) 17 Cobras | 1289 | 4-12 | 25% | 17 | NY |
| 3866 | ECVBA 18-2 crystal | 1288 | 4-14 | 22% | 18 | CA |
| 3867 | RAGE 16-Chris | 1288 | 1-9 | 10% | 16 | CA |
| 3868 | OVC B13 | 1287 | 9-21 | 30% | 13 | WI |
| 3869 | A-10 Boys 15-Gray | 1287 | 14-27 | 34% | 15 | PA |
| 3870 | K Elites VBC B16 Navy | 1287 | 15-35 | 29% | 16 | MO |
| 3871 | Church&Dodge 16 | 1287 | 4-14 | 22% | 16 | IL |
| 3872 | HI Bred VBC 17-Kane club | 1287 | 3-14 | 18% | 17 | HI |
| 3873 | SynergyForce B 13-Black | 1287 | 4-15 | 21% | 13 | CA |
| 3874 | SoCal VBC 15-Beacons | 1287 | 12-21 | 36% | 15 | CA |
| 3875 | NE Storm 17 Hail | 1286 | 3-13 | 19% | 17 | MA |
| 3876 | MOJO Volleyball Academy G16-1 | 1286 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 3877 | EP 16-1 | 1286 | 3-12 | 20% | 16 | CA |
| 3878 | Cicero Elite B 16-White | 1286 | 7-8 | 47% | 16 | IL |
| 3879 | Cincy Elite 16 Thompson | 1285 | 13-27 | 33% | 16 | OH |
| 3880 | MKE Sting 12-2 | 1285 | 9-24 | 27% | 12 | WI |
| 3881 | A4 Volley Boys 14-Troy | 1285 | 5-14 | 26% | 14 | CA |
| 3882 | Mamba 13-Black | 1285 | 10-24 | 29% | 13 | WI |
| 3883 | Red Rock Boys 18-Nick - walnut creek | 1285 | 1-9 | 10% | 18 | CA |
| 3884 | Manteca Flight 18-Mikaela | 1285 | 10-20 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 3885 | BVP 18 | 1284 | 2-10 | 17% | 18 | PA |
| 3886 | 630 Volleyball 14-Black | 1284 | 6-10 | 38% | 14 | IL |
| 3887 | Balboa Bay 12-Red | 1284 | 9-37 | 20% | 12 | CA |
| 3888 | Crow Creek 18 | 1284 | 2-8 | 20% | 18 | UT |
| 3889 | Club 1 B 16-White | 1284 | 17-28 | 38% | 16 | IL |
| 3890 | Champion 16-Boys | 1284 | 2-8 | 20% | 16 | NC |
| 3891 | Aspire 16 Spartans | 1283 | 14-39 | 26% | 16 | CA |
| 3892 | UNO Boys 14-Spring | 1283 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | IL |
| 3893 | SMASH Boys 14-Thunder | 1283 | 15-40 | 27% | 14 | MA |
| 3894 | Spike Milwaukee B13 | 1283 | 6-25 | 19% | 13 | WI |
| 3895 | Rimrock Ravens 18 | 1283 | 0-6 | 0% | 18 | |
| 3896 | RVA Boys 18 Shelly | 1283 | 19-42 | 31% | 18 | WI |
| 3897 | Webfoot 18-Boys elite | 1282 | 8-16 | 33% | 18 | OR |
| 3898 | Atlanta Extreme 16-Boys | 1282 | 2-10 | 17% | 16 | GA |
| 3899 | Panther Boys 16-Black | 1282 | 5-17 | 22% | 16 | CO |
| 3900 | L2 14-1 boys | 1282 | 5-23 | 18% | 14 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.