Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 78 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3851 Red Rock Boys 18-Nick - walnut creek 1282 1-9 10% 18 CA
3852 HVA 16-Performance white-yari 1282 7-22 24% 16 TX
3853 Atlanta Extreme 16-Boys 1282 2-10 17% 16 GA
3854 L2 14-1 boys 1281 5-23 18% 14 MI
3855 Salt City Boys 16-Alex 1281 7-16 30% 16 UT
3856 FVP 12-Regional 1281 3-6 33% 12 WI
3857 Southport B18-Black 1281 10-22 31% 18 WI
3858 Pipeline 16-Royal 1280 15-18 45% 16 IL
3859 NRV Juniors 18 Performance Thunder (OD) 1280 0-5 0% 18 VA
3860 Lumber City VBC 15-1 1280 2-16 11% 15 NY
3861 Central Cal 13-Blue 1279 3-12 20% 13 CA
3862 Champion 14-Boys 1279 2-12 14% 14 NC
3863 NE Storm 17 Hail 1278 3-13 19% 17 MA
3864 VUVC B16-WHITE 1278 12-26 32% 16 NV
3865 Buckeye Volleyball Club 18-Premier billy 1278 0-7 0% 18 OH
3866 Manteca Flight 18-Mikaela 1278 10-20 33% 18 CA
3867 CCVA 12-1 1278 3-15 17% 12 CA
3868 BEVC Boys 18-1 1278 5-10 33% 18 SC
3869 ECVBA 18-2 crystal 1277 4-14 22% 18 CA
3870 BAVC 18-3 boys 1277 10-19 34% 18 CA
3871 Sportime 17-4 1276 8-27 23% 17 NY
3872 A5 14-2 gary 1276 1-12 8% 14 GA
3873 Pacific Rim 16-1 1276 8-36 18% 16 CA
3874 SMASH Boys 14-Thunder 1276 15-40 27% 14 MA
3875 EXCELL 17-1 anthony 1276 5-18 22% 17 SC
3876 EXILE 17-4 1275 0-7 0% 17 PA
3877 Touch 3 16 1274 7-15 32% 16 CA
3878 Volitude 14 Efe 1274 8-17 32% 14 CA
3879 LVC 16-Red 1274 2-15 12% 16 NY
3880 K2 14-Boys 1274 0-10 0% 14 TN
3881 Aspire 16 Spartans 1273 14-39 26% 16 CA
3882 Tribe 17-B premier cardinal 1272 13-35 27% 17 FL
3883 CPVC 16 1272 5-16 24% 16 CA
3884 RAGE 16-Chris 1272 1-9 10% 16 CA
3885 KIVA 16-S-black 1272 0-5 0% 16 KY
3886 NF 14-Crimson 1271 3-18 13% 14 NY
3887 Sportime 16-Regional 1271 2-9 18% 16 NY
3888 MDJRS 18-Boys yellow 1271 11-44 18% 18 MD
3889 NEVBC Boys 18-Blue 1270 4-19 17% 18 CT
3890 Sideout 16 Jansen 1270 4-21 16% 16 NY
3891 Northern Lights 18-W boys 1270 5-17 23% 18 MN
3892 Bravo 17-Fury 1270 3-7 30% 17 CA
3893 Boys BSVBC 15-Black 1270 7-37 16% 15 IL
3894 LBVC 15-Kenton 1269 7-27 21% 15 CA
3895 Sportime 18-Regional 1269 0-6 0% 18 NY
3896 BVP 18 1268 2-10 17% 18 PA
3897 IDVB 18-Reg | alex 1268 6-14 30% 18 MI
3898 Princeton 12-Boys 1267 1-9 10% 12 NJ
3899 Atlanta Extreme 18-Boys 1267 3-10 23% 18 GA
3900 Apex 16-Regional boys 1267 2-13 13% 16 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.