Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 79 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3901 Slainte 17-Cobalt 1266 9-27 25% 17 CA
3902 Sumter VBC 17-Boys 1266 3-16 14% 17 SC
3903 Surge 15-1 1265 3-8 27% 15 FL
3904 InnovativeVC 16-1emanuel 1264 4-12 25% 16 PR
3905 Epic United 18-White 1264 10-26 28% 18 IL
3906 Jupiter Rising 14U 1264 0-8 0% 14 FL
3907 UVC 15-Damon/farhad 1264 11-30 27% 15 CA
3908 Academy 16-Mt - pogue 1264 1-8 11% 16 IN
3909 Sportime 16-Usa 1264 5-29 15% 16 NY
3910 Premier 14 Budokan 1264 4-18 18% 14 OH
3911 #951 Elite 16-Zach 1264 3-3 50% 16 CA
3912 RootsVBA 15-Blazegrove 1263 6-21 22% 15 MO
3913 MN Select Boys 12-1 1263 1-13 7% 12 MN
3914 MVA BOYS 14-S 1263 1-9 8% 14 MD
3915 MoCo Boys 18 Adidas 1263 4-15 21% 18 TX
3916 LIV 12-Royal 1263 9-38 19% 12 CA
3917 SCVC 14-Malia 1262 2-11 15% 14 CA
3918 Utah Synergy Boys 17 Black 1262 0-11 0% 17 UT
3919 Academy 17-R gray 1262 6-22 21% 17 IN
3920 Epic United 13-Red 1262 10-22 31% 13 IL
3921 FVBC 18-Boys red 1261 5-21 17% 18 MD
3922 Beach Cities 13-Onyx 1261 2-12 14% 13 CA
3923 STL Crossfire B 16 R1 1260 8-20 29% 16 MO
3924 Legacy Alaska 18-Black 1259 1-6 14% 18 IL
3925 Kali 18-Francisco 1259 3-7 30% 18 PR
3926 Velocity 219 17-1 1259 1-6 14% 17 IN
3927 FEVA 17-National boys 1259 7-26 21% 17 FL
3928 Generations vbc 18-1 1259 13-32 28% 18 MA
3929 Lunatics 17 1259 3-16 16% 17 UT
3930 I AM VBC Boys 12-2 1258 7-21 25% 12 WI
3931 Champion 18-Boys purple 1258 1-9 10% 18 NC
3932 JJVA Boys 16-C 1258 0-9 0% 16 FL
3933 630 Volleyball 16-5 1258 20-31 39% 16 IL
3934 NYC Raptors 16-Purple 1257 5-13 28% 16 NY
3935 495 17-Boys 1256 11-30 26% 17 VA
3936 KS Rise B18 1256 1-9 10% 18 KS
3937 Top Flight 16-Maverick 1256 11-28 28% 16 IL
3938 HAVC 13-Red 1256 16-28 36% 13 IL
3939 Palatine 14-Teal 1255 6-14 30% 14 IL
3940 WI Flight 16-B silver 1255 3-15 17% 16 WI
3941 A-10 Boys 16-Red 1255 3-13 19% 16 PA
3942 SC Legends 17-Gold 1255 2-9 18% 17 CA
3943 Tsunami Boys VBA 18-2 1254 1-11 8% 18 FL
3944 626VBC 18-Red 1254 0-8 0% 18 CA
3945 Infinity Royals 18-R 1253 9-21 30% 18 MN
3946 1W B18 Crimson 1253 4-24 14% 18 WI
3947 Jammers 18-Black boys 1253 2-9 18% 18 NC
3948 STVA 17-Navy boys 1252 8-21 28% 17 TX
3949 BORINQUEN COQUI 13-2m 1252 0-9 0% 13 PR
3950 Ignite Boys 16 Elite 1251 7-23 23% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.