Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 79 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3901 HVA 16-Performance white-yari 1281 7-22 24% 16 TX
3902 FVP 12-Regional 1281 3-6 33% 12 WI
3903 Princeton 12-Boys 1281 1-9 10% 12 NJ
3904 JNVBC 14-Boys 1280 3-15 17% 14 IL
3905 Pipeline 16-Royal 1280 15-18 45% 16 IL
3906 BAVC 18-3 boys 1280 10-19 34% 18 CA
3907 SG Elite 16 Prime 1280 5-16 24% 16 CA
3908 Central Cal 13-Blue 1279 3-12 20% 13 CA
3909 Epic United 18-White 1279 10-26 28% 18 IN
3910 Apex Boys VBC 18-2 1279 6-14 30% 18 TN
3911 Champion 14-Boys 1279 2-12 14% 14 NC
3912 I AM VBC Boys 15-1 1279 8-20 29% 15 WI
3913 MDJRS 18-Boys yellow 1278 11-44 18% 18 MD
3914 Pacific Rim 16-1 1278 8-36 18% 16 CA
3915 CCVA 12-1 1278 3-15 17% 12 CA
3916 Lumber City VBC 15-1 1278 2-16 11% 15 NY
3917 Atlanta Extreme 18-Boys 1277 3-10 23% 18 GA
3918 BEVC Boys 18-1 1277 5-10 33% 18 SC
3919 A5 14-2 gary 1276 1-12 8% 14 GA
3920 Impact Boys 15-Red steven 1276 4-16 20% 15 NV
3921 Sportime 17-4 1276 8-27 23% 17 NY
3922 Salt City Boys 16-S caden 1275 0-7 0% 16 UT
3923 CPVC 16 1275 5-16 24% 16 CA
3924 EXCELL 17-1 anthony 1275 5-18 22% 17 SC
3925 LVC 16-Red 1275 2-15 12% 16 NY
3926 K2 14-Boys 1274 0-10 0% 14 TN
3927 EXILE 17-4 1274 0-7 0% 17 PA
3928 PV Boys 16-2 1274 8-15 35% 16 MA
3929 Touch 3 16 1274 7-15 32% 16 CA
3930 WVC 12-Black 1273 0-0 0% 12 CA
3931 Tribe 17-B premier cardinal 1272 13-35 27% 17 FL
3932 NF 14-Crimson 1272 3-18 13% 14 NY
3933 UVC 15-Damon/farhad 1272 11-30 27% 15 CA
3934 NEVBC Boys 18-Blue 1272 4-19 17% 18 CT
3935 Blast 16 Pyro 1271 11-30 27% 16 PA
3936 Vegas United B 16-White 1271 0-13 0% 16 NV
3937 Volitude 14 Efe 1270 8-17 32% 14 CA
3938 Northern Lights 18-W boys 1270 5-17 23% 18 MN
3939 KIVA 16-S-black 1270 0-5 0% 16 KY
3940 Bravo 17-Fury 1269 3-7 30% 17 KY
3941 Premier 14 Budokan 1269 4-18 18% 14 OH
3942 LBVC 15-Kenton 1269 7-27 21% 15 CA
3943 Santa Fe Storm 13-3 bianca 1268 0-7 0% 13
3944 495 17-Boys 1268 11-30 26% 17 MD
3945 MVA BOYS 14-S 1267 1-9 8% 14 MD
3946 Sportime 18-Regional 1267 0-6 0% 18 NY
3947 IDVB 18-Reg | alex 1267 6-14 30% 18 ID
3948 Boys BSVBC 15-Black 1267 7-37 16% 15 IL
3949 FVBC 18-Boys red 1266 5-21 17% 18 MD
3950 Academy 18-Mt - mccann 1266 2-7 22% 18 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.