2025-2026 Season — Page 80 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3951 | Kokoro Volleyball 17u | 1251 | 10-34 | 23% | 17 | MN |
| 3952 | Apex Boys VBC 18-2 | 1251 | 6-14 | 30% | 18 | TN |
| 3953 | Fusion 16-Green | 1250 | 18-34 | 35% | 16 | CA |
| 3954 | Beach Cities 15 Onyx | 1250 | 10-30 | 25% | 15 | CA |
| 3955 | Chicago Elite B 18 Nike | 1250 | 6-18 | 25% | 18 | IL |
| 3956 | AFVBC 13 Apex | 1250 | 5-23 | 18% | 13 | CA |
| 3957 | WGVA 18-Boys | 1250 | 3-7 | 30% | 18 | GA |
| 3958 | VUVC 15-White | 1250 | 4-10 | 29% | 15 | CA |
| 3959 | Academy 18-Mt - mccann | 1250 | 2-7 | 22% | 18 | IN |
| 3960 | NC Coastal 16-Steve/piper | 1249 | 0-10 | 0% | 16 | NC |
| 3961 | AJAXVB Bend 16-1 gold | 1249 | 1-13 | 7% | 16 | OR |
| 3962 | VC United 14-1 elite | 1249 | 6-12 | 33% | 14 | IL |
| 3963 | Tropics Boys 14-Black | 1249 | 3-22 | 12% | 14 | FL |
| 3964 | GSL 14-Comp kimber | 1248 | 2-12 | 14% | 14 | UT |
| 3965 | GSL 16-Comp olivia s | 1248 | 1-10 | 9% | 16 | UT |
| 3966 | Red Rock Boys 16-Peter - walnut creek | 1248 | 5-11 | 31% | 16 | CA |
| 3967 | Buckeye Boys 16-Red | 1247 | 10-29 | 26% | 16 | OH |
| 3968 | Club Solano 17-B maroon | 1247 | 7-27 | 21% | 17 | CA |
| 3969 | WVC Boy's 17-Green | 1246 | 5-21 | 19% | 17 | VA |
| 3970 | Fr Challenge Elite 18-B royal | 1246 | 3-11 | 21% | 18 | TX |
| 3971 | SPVB 16-Echo | 1245 | 6-11 | 35% | 16 | IL |
| 3972 | Epic United 17-White | 1245 | 0-7 | 0% | 17 | IL |
| 3973 | Sportime 17-Regional | 1244 | 2-8 | 20% | 17 | NY |
| 3974 | Northern Lights 16-B boys | 1244 | 3-20 | 13% | 16 | MN |
| 3975 | K Elites VBC B14 Navy | 1244 | 5-25 | 16% | 14 | MO |
| 3976 | NYC Raptors 16-Black | 1244 | 11-31 | 26% | 16 | NY |
| 3977 | SVC 18-Boys | 1243 | 2-20 | 9% | 18 | MO |
| 3978 | SPORTIME VBC 18-3 | 1242 | 3-23 | 12% | 18 | NY |
| 3979 | SPVB B16 Select | 1242 | 5-11 | 31% | 16 | IL |
| 3980 | HRVC 18-Boys | 1242 | 1-8 | 11% | 18 | NC |
| 3981 | SC Legends 15-Gold | 1241 | 9-25 | 26% | 15 | CA |
| 3982 | RockCity 16-1 | 1241 | 7-32 | 18% | 16 | OH |
| 3983 | Next 15-Black | 1241 | 4-25 | 14% | 15 | OH |
| 3984 | SynergyForce B 18-Gold | 1241 | 13-35 | 27% | 18 | CA |
| 3985 | OCVC 14-Black | 1241 | 15-28 | 35% | 14 | CA |
| 3986 | Team Momentum B15 Navy | 1240 | 4-43 | 9% | 15 | MO |
| 3987 | BOYS 17-Luis | 1240 | 2-8 | 20% | 17 | FL |
| 3988 | Inferno 15-2 select | 1239 | 10-25 | 29% | 15 | WI |
| 3989 | LHV Boys 17-2 boom | 1238 | 7-21 | 25% | 17 | MA |
| 3990 | MOD B14 Teal | 1238 | 16-35 | 31% | 14 | IL |
| 3991 | MOD B13-Black | 1238 | 19-30 | 39% | 13 | IL |
| 3992 | CA Volley 15-Spring | 1237 | 2-9 | 18% | 15 | CA |
| 3993 | IDVB 16-Amir/scott | 1237 | 7-21 | 25% | 16 | MI |
| 3994 | OCVC 16-Black | 1237 | 7-28 | 20% | 16 | CA |
| 3995 | Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Gry | 1237 | 0-10 | 0% | 14 | NY |
| 3996 | Empowered B16-Red | 1236 | 6-21 | 22% | 16 | IN |
| 3997 | HEAT 15 Valley | 1236 | 4-19 | 17% | 15 | CA |
| 3998 | A4 Volley Boys 14-Black | 1236 | 3-11 | 21% | 14 | CA |
| 3999 | TK 15-Scout premier | 1236 | 1-14 | 7% | 15 | GA |
| 4000 | Boys BSVBC 14-Blue | 1235 | 8-22 | 27% | 14 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.