Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 80 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3951 Sumter VBC 17-Boys 1266 3-16 14% 17 SC
3952 LIV 12-Royal 1266 9-38 19% 12 CA
3953 Sportime 16-Regional 1265 2-9 18% 16 NY
3954 Champion 18-Boys purple 1264 1-9 10% 18 NC
3955 Kokoro Volleyball 17u 1264 10-34 23% 17 MN
3956 Vegas United B 18-Grey 1264 1-14 7% 18 NV
3957 Academy 17-R gray 1264 6-22 21% 17 IN
3958 Surge 15-1 1264 3-8 27% 15 PA
3959 Academy 16-Mt - pogue 1263 1-8 11% 16 IN
3960 Epic United 13-Red 1263 10-22 31% 13 IN
3961 Slainte 17-Cobalt 1263 9-27 25% 17 CA
3962 Jupiter Rising 14U 1263 0-8 0% 14
3963 MoCo Boys 18 Adidas 1262 4-15 21% 18 MD
3964 Platinum 17-Trevor 1262 0-7 0% 17 UT
3965 MVP BOS 16-Blue 1262 5-29 15% 16 MA
3966 InnovativeVC 16-1emanuel 1262 4-12 25% 16 PR
3967 RootsVBA 15-Blazegrove 1262 6-21 22% 15 KS
3968 Kali 18-Francisco 1261 3-7 30% 18 PR
3969 FEVA 17-National boys 1261 7-26 21% 17 FL
3970 Velocity 219 17-1 1261 1-6 14% 17 IN
3971 HAVC 13-Red 1261 16-28 36% 13 IL
3972 WVC Boy's 17-Green 1260 5-21 19% 17 CA
3973 STL Crossfire B 16 R1 1260 8-20 29% 16 MO
3974 Beach Cities 13-Onyx 1260 2-12 14% 13 CA
3975 Academy 17-R midnight 1259 3-20 13% 17 IN
3976 Sideout 16 Jansen 1259 4-21 16% 16 NJ
3977 Generations vbc 18-1 1258 13-32 28% 18 MA
3978 1W B18 Crimson 1258 4-24 14% 18 WI
3979 Infinity Royals 18-R 1258 9-21 30% 18 MN
3980 Jammers 18-Black boys 1258 2-9 18% 18 NC
3981 Chicago Elite B 18 Nike 1258 6-18 25% 18 IL
3982 630 Volleyball 16-5 1258 20-31 39% 16 IL
3983 SC Legends 17-Gold 1257 2-9 18% 17 CA
3984 Beach Cities 15 Onyx 1257 10-30 25% 15 CA
3985 Red Rock Boys 16-Peter - walnut creek 1257 5-11 31% 16 CA
3986 MN Select Boys 12-1 1257 1-13 7% 12 MN
3987 A-10 Boys 16-Red 1257 3-13 19% 16 PA
3988 I AM VBC Boys 12-2 1256 7-21 25% 12 WI
3989 Sportime 16-Usa 1256 5-29 15% 16 NY
3990 Top Flight 16-Maverick 1256 11-28 28% 16 IL
3991 RockCity 16-1 1255 7-32 18% 16 OH
3992 #951 Elite 16-Zach 1255 3-3 50% 16 CA
3993 3N1 FVC Purple 13 1255 0-7 0% 13
3994 Palatine 14-Teal 1255 6-14 30% 14 IL
3995 Tsunami Boys VBA 18-2 1254 1-11 8% 18 FL
3996 Legacy Alaska 18-Black 1254 1-6 14% 18
3997 SynergyForce B 18-Gold 1253 13-35 27% 18 CA
3998 WI Flight 16-B silver 1253 3-15 17% 16 WI
3999 STVA 17-Navy boys 1253 8-21 28% 17 TX
4000 VUVC 15-White 1252 4-10 29% 15 NV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.