2025-2026 Season — Page 81 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4001 | Sideout 17 Centryll | 1235 | 1-11 | 8% | 17 | NY |
| 4002 | MOD B13-White | 1235 | 16-34 | 32% | 13 | IL |
| 4003 | Freeze 18-1 | 1234 | 1-9 | 10% | 18 | PA |
| 4004 | Crown City 16 Knights | 1234 | 7-18 | 28% | 16 | CA |
| 4005 | SoCal VBC 14-Beacons | 1234 | 11-22 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 4006 | JNVBC 13-Boys | 1234 | 3-15 | 17% | 13 | IA |
| 4007 | Monterey Bay 17-1 | 1234 | 5-34 | 13% | 17 | CA |
| 4008 | Monument Volleyball 16 B16 MVB (CH) | 1233 | 4-26 | 13% | 16 | VA |
| 4009 | BG Lightning 16 Teal | 1233 | 7-19 | 27% | 16 | KY |
| 4010 | SMBC North 18 Elite | 1233 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 4011 | Princeton Volleyball Club 15-Blue boys | 1233 | 7-34 | 17% | 15 | NJ |
| 4012 | APEX1 17-A1GREEN | 1233 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 4013 | Ultimate 14-Kyle/trey | 1233 | 4-8 | 33% | 14 | IL |
| 4014 | NLVC 17 Wrath | 1232 | 6-41 | 12% | 17 | CT |
| 4015 | OPVC 17-White | 1232 | 8-27 | 23% | 17 | OH |
| 4016 | Miami United 15-Jenna | 1232 | 4-16 | 20% | 15 | FL |
| 4017 | WPVC Boys 16-Elite black | 1232 | 10-41 | 20% | 16 | FL |
| 4018 | Future 16-White | 1231 | 13-28 | 32% | 16 | IL |
| 4019 | HVA 14-Young guns blue | 1230 | 15-34 | 31% | 14 | TX |
| 4020 | Boston United Boys 13-Select | 1229 | 4-19 | 17% | 13 | MA |
| 4021 | APEX1 14-A1green | 1228 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 4022 | Next Level 18-1 | 1228 | 3-13 | 19% | 18 | MI |
| 4023 | Havoc 17 | 1228 | 3-7 | 30% | 17 | FL |
| 4024 | Maunalani 15-Char | 1228 | 1-14 | 7% | 15 | HI |
| 4025 | Synergy Boys 17-Artemis | 1228 | 8-32 | 20% | 17 | PA |
| 4026 | NorthU 12-1 | 1227 | 1-8 | 11% | 12 | PA |
| 4027 | Iowa Galaxy 16-1 | 1227 | 0-10 | 0% | 16 | IA |
| 4028 | West Edge Volleyball Club 17-Storm | 1227 | 3-32 | 9% | 17 | CA |
| 4029 | SG Elite 16 Prime | 1227 | 5-16 | 24% | 16 | CA |
| 4030 | Academy 18-Mt gray | 1227 | 5-9 | 36% | 18 | IN |
| 4031 | Beach Cities 14 Carbon | 1226 | 6-21 | 22% | 14 | CA |
| 4032 | Adversity VBC 14-Purple | 1226 | 7-12 | 37% | 14 | IL |
| 4033 | Triangle Boys 14-Blue | 1226 | 0-9 | 0% | 14 | NC |
| 4034 | Premier 17 Netburner | 1226 | 2-12 | 14% | 17 | OH |
| 4035 | Vengeance 17-Kaylor | 1225 | 8-24 | 25% | 17 | OH |
| 4036 | Ozark Boys 18-2 | 1224 | 3-14 | 18% | 18 | AR |
| 4037 | Eagan 14 | 1223 | 1-13 | 7% | 14 | MN |
| 4038 | PNW VBC 16-1 | 1222 | 1-9 | 10% | 16 | OR |
| 4039 | Cicero Elite B 18-White | 1222 | 4-12 | 25% | 18 | IL |
| 4040 | DuPage Elite B 16-United | 1221 | 9-24 | 27% | 16 | IL |
| 4041 | SLAM 15-1 boys | 1221 | 5-22 | 19% | 15 | MA |
| 4042 | Lumber 17-Red team | 1221 | 0-15 | 0% | 17 | NY |
| 4043 | Balboa Bay 12-Black | 1220 | 3-19 | 14% | 12 | CA |
| 4044 | Hot Shots 14-Regional - pink | 1220 | 0-10 | 0% | 14 | NY |
| 4045 | Apex NW 14-Ascent | 1219 | 0-9 | 0% | 14 | WA |
| 4046 | Oasis 15-Black | 1219 | 1-7 | 13% | 15 | CA |
| 4047 | Madison Starlings 14-Boys | 1219 | 5-20 | 20% | 14 | WI |
| 4048 | APEX1 15-A1white | 1218 | 2-11 | 15% | 15 | CA |
| 4049 | TopFlight VBA 15-1 | 1218 | 1-9 | 10% | 15 | FL |
| 4050 | Pulse VBC Boys 16-1 | 1218 | 10-26 | 28% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.