Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 81 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4001 BORINQUEN COQUI 13-2m 1252 0-9 0% 13 PR
4002 Northern Lights 16-B boys 1252 3-20 13% 16 MN
4003 Fr Challenge Elite 18-B royal 1251 3-11 21% 18 TX
4004 VC United 14-1 elite 1251 6-12 33% 14 IL
4005 JJVA Boys 16-C 1250 0-9 0% 16 FL
4006 Tropics Boys 14-Black 1250 3-22 12% 14 FL
4007 NC Coastal 16-Steve/piper 1250 0-10 0% 16 NC
4008 WGVA 18-Boys 1250 3-7 30% 18 GA
4009 AJAXVB Bend 16-1 gold 1250 1-13 7% 16 OR
4010 AFVBC 13 Apex 1250 5-23 18% 13 CA
4011 626VBC 18-Red 1250 0-8 0% 18 CA
4012 Atlanta Extreme 13 Alex 1250 0-5 0% 13 GA
4013 Platform 12-Black 1250 0-0 0% 12
4014 Epic United 17-White 1249 0-7 0% 17 IN
4015 SLAM 18-1 boys 1249 6-18 25% 18 MA
4016 Club Solano 17-B maroon 1248 7-27 21% 17 CA
4017 Next Level 18-1 1248 3-9 25% 18 CT
4018 Impact 14-Red 1248 2-13 13% 14 NV
4019 Fusion 16-Green 1247 18-34 35% 16 CA
4020 Buckeye Boys 16-Red 1247 10-29 26% 16 OH
4021 NYC Raptors 16-Purple 1247 5-13 28% 16 NY
4022 SVC 18-Boys 1247 2-20 9% 18 MO
4023 NYC Raptors 16-Black 1247 11-31 26% 16 NY
4024 SPVB 16-Echo 1246 6-11 35% 16 IL
4025 MOD B13-Black 1246 19-30 39% 13 IL
4026 SC Legends 15-Gold 1245 9-25 26% 15 CA
4027 OPVC 17-White 1244 8-27 23% 17 OH
4028 HRVC 18-Boys 1243 1-8 11% 18 NC
4029 K Elites VBC B14 Navy 1243 5-25 16% 14 MO
4030 Crown City 16 Knights 1243 7-18 28% 16 CA
4031 Sportime 17-Regional 1242 2-8 20% 17 NY
4032 NLVC 17 Wrath 1242 6-41 12% 17 TX
4033 SPVB B16 Select 1242 5-11 31% 16 IL
4034 OCVC 16-Black 1241 7-28 20% 16 CA
4035 Next 15-Black 1241 4-25 14% 15 OH
4036 HEAT 15 Valley 1241 4-19 17% 15 CA
4037 CVC 18-1 boys 1241 7-23 23% 18 MN
4038 LHV Boys 17-2 boom 1241 7-21 25% 17 MA
4039 MOD B13-White 1241 16-34 32% 13 IL
4040 Salt City Boys 18-Amelia 1241 0-7 0% 18 UT
4041 OCVC 14-Black 1240 15-28 35% 14 CA
4042 MVP Academy BOS 17-Blue 1240 2-16 11% 17 MA
4043 Sideout 17 Centryll 1239 1-11 8% 17 NJ
4044 Team Momentum B15 Navy 1239 4-43 9% 15 MO
4045 Boston United Boys 13-Select 1 1238 3-12 20% 13 MA
4046 CA Volley 15-Spring 1238 2-9 18% 15 CA
4047 NorthU 12-1 1238 1-8 11% 12 PA
4048 Inferno 15-2 select 1238 10-25 29% 15 WI
4049 Academy 18-Mt gray 1237 5-9 36% 18 IN
4050 Freeze 18-1 1237 1-9 10% 18 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.