Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 81 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4001 Sideout 17 Centryll 1235 1-11 8% 17 NY
4002 MOD B13-White 1235 16-34 32% 13 IL
4003 Freeze 18-1 1234 1-9 10% 18 PA
4004 Crown City 16 Knights 1234 7-18 28% 16 CA
4005 SoCal VBC 14-Beacons 1234 11-22 33% 14 CA
4006 JNVBC 13-Boys 1234 3-15 17% 13 IA
4007 Monterey Bay 17-1 1234 5-34 13% 17 CA
4008 Monument Volleyball 16 B16 MVB (CH) 1233 4-26 13% 16 VA
4009 BG Lightning 16 Teal 1233 7-19 27% 16 KY
4010 SMBC North 18 Elite 1233 0-0 0% 18 CA
4011 Princeton Volleyball Club 15-Blue boys 1233 7-34 17% 15 NJ
4012 APEX1 17-A1GREEN 1233 0-0 0% 17 CA
4013 Ultimate 14-Kyle/trey 1233 4-8 33% 14 IL
4014 NLVC 17 Wrath 1232 6-41 12% 17 CT
4015 OPVC 17-White 1232 8-27 23% 17 OH
4016 Miami United 15-Jenna 1232 4-16 20% 15 FL
4017 WPVC Boys 16-Elite black 1232 10-41 20% 16 FL
4018 Future 16-White 1231 13-28 32% 16 IL
4019 HVA 14-Young guns blue 1230 15-34 31% 14 TX
4020 Boston United Boys 13-Select 1229 4-19 17% 13 MA
4021 APEX1 14-A1green 1228 1-2 33% 14 CA
4022 Next Level 18-1 1228 3-13 19% 18 MI
4023 Havoc 17 1228 3-7 30% 17 FL
4024 Maunalani 15-Char 1228 1-14 7% 15 HI
4025 Synergy Boys 17-Artemis 1228 8-32 20% 17 PA
4026 NorthU 12-1 1227 1-8 11% 12 PA
4027 Iowa Galaxy 16-1 1227 0-10 0% 16 IA
4028 West Edge Volleyball Club 17-Storm 1227 3-32 9% 17 CA
4029 SG Elite 16 Prime 1227 5-16 24% 16 CA
4030 Academy 18-Mt gray 1227 5-9 36% 18 IN
4031 Beach Cities 14 Carbon 1226 6-21 22% 14 CA
4032 Adversity VBC 14-Purple 1226 7-12 37% 14 IL
4033 Triangle Boys 14-Blue 1226 0-9 0% 14 NC
4034 Premier 17 Netburner 1226 2-12 14% 17 OH
4035 Vengeance 17-Kaylor 1225 8-24 25% 17 OH
4036 Ozark Boys 18-2 1224 3-14 18% 18 AR
4037 Eagan 14 1223 1-13 7% 14 MN
4038 PNW VBC 16-1 1222 1-9 10% 16 OR
4039 Cicero Elite B 18-White 1222 4-12 25% 18 IL
4040 DuPage Elite B 16-United 1221 9-24 27% 16 IL
4041 SLAM 15-1 boys 1221 5-22 19% 15 MA
4042 Lumber 17-Red team 1221 0-15 0% 17 NY
4043 Balboa Bay 12-Black 1220 3-19 14% 12 CA
4044 Hot Shots 14-Regional - pink 1220 0-10 0% 14 NY
4045 Apex NW 14-Ascent 1219 0-9 0% 14 WA
4046 Oasis 15-Black 1219 1-7 13% 15 CA
4047 Madison Starlings 14-Boys 1219 5-20 20% 14 WI
4048 APEX1 15-A1white 1218 2-11 15% 15 CA
4049 TopFlight VBA 15-1 1218 1-9 10% 15 FL
4050 Pulse VBC Boys 16-1 1218 10-26 28% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.