Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 82 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4051 Future 16-White 1236 13-28 32% 16 IL
4052 Empowered B16-Red 1236 6-21 22% 16 IN
4053 A4 Volley Boys 14-Black 1236 3-11 21% 14 CA
4054 TK 15-Scout premier 1236 1-14 7% 15 GA
4055 Ozark Boys 18-2 1235 3-14 18% 18 AR
4056 IDVB 16-Amir/scott 1235 7-21 25% 16 ID
4057 Monterey Bay 17-1 1234 5-34 13% 17 CA
4058 BG Lightning 16 Teal 1234 7-19 27% 16 TX
4059 BOYS 17-Luis 1234 2-8 20% 17 ID
4060 Utah Mojo 16 Competitive 1234 2-18 10% 16 UT
4061 JNVBC 13-Boys 1234 3-15 17% 13 IL
4062 HVA 14-Young guns blue 1234 15-34 31% 14 TX
4063 APEX1 17-A1GREEN 1233 0-0 0% 17 CA
4064 SMBC North 18 Elite 1233 0-0 0% 18 CA
4065 Petite Elite 10-Bess 1233 0-6 0% 10
4066 Ultimate 14-Kyle/trey 1233 4-8 33% 14 IL
4067 APEX1 14-A1green 1232 1-2 33% 14 CA
4068 Boys BSVBC 14-Blue 1232 8-22 27% 14 IL
4069 MOD B14 Teal 1232 16-35 31% 14 IL
4070 Cicero Elite B 18-White 1231 4-12 25% 18 IL
4071 Sportime 18-3 1231 5-29 15% 18 NY
4072 Miami United 15-Jenna 1230 4-16 20% 15 FL
4073 Princeton 15-Blue boys 1230 7-34 17% 15 NJ
4074 Roch PaceBootleggr 14-Gry 1230 0-10 0% 14 NY
4075 Vengeance 17-Kaylor 1229 8-24 25% 17 OH
4076 Havoc 17 1229 3-7 30% 17
4077 Maunalani 15-Char 1228 1-14 7% 15 HI
4078 Adversity VBC 14-Purple 1228 7-12 37% 14 IL
4079 West Edge 17 Storm 1228 3-32 9% 17 CA
4080 WPVC Boys 16-Elite black 1228 10-41 20% 16 FL
4081 RCVA Boys 16-Local black 1227 2-18 10% 16 VA
4082 Triangle Boys 14-Blue 1227 0-9 0% 14 NC
4083 Synergy Boys 17-Artemis 1226 8-32 20% 17 CA
4084 Iowa Galaxy 16-1 1226 0-10 0% 16 IA
4085 SPVB B17 Select 1226 1-10 9% 17 IL
4086 SoCal VBC 14-Beacons 1225 11-22 33% 14 CA
4087 Eagan 14 1223 1-13 7% 14 MN
4088 Lumber 17-Red team 1223 0-15 0% 17 NY
4089 Hot Shots 14-Regional - pink 1222 0-10 0% 14 NY
4090 PNW VBC 16-1 1222 1-9 10% 16 WA
4091 Apex NW 14-Ascent 1221 0-9 0% 14 WA
4092 Beach Cities 14 Carbon 1221 6-21 22% 14 CA
4093 MVP Academy BOS 16-Blue 1221 2-8 20% 16
4094 APEX1 15-A1white 1221 2-11 15% 15 CA
4095 Balboa Bay 12-Black 1220 3-19 14% 12 CA
4096 DuPage Elite B 16-United 1220 9-24 27% 16 IL
4097 SLAM 15-1 boys 1219 5-22 19% 15 MA
4098 Inspire CLE 18-1 1219 4-21 16% 18 OH
4099 Oasis 15-Black 1219 1-7 13% 15 CO
4100 Madison Starlings 14-Boys 1219 5-20 20% 14 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.