Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 82 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4051 Oly Reign Boys U14 1217 2-16 11% 14 WA
4052 WPVC Boys 12-Elite black 1217 7-36 16% 12 FL
4053 SPVB B17 Select 1217 1-10 9% 17 IL
4054 HAVC 15-Black 1217 18-43 30% 15 IL
4055 AVBC 18-Boys 1217 5-22 19% 18 FL
4056 Flight Academy 16-2 1216 7-25 22% 16 OH
4057 Outrigger 13-2 1216 2-11 15% 13 HI
4058 RCVA Boys 16-Local black 1216 2-18 10% 16 VA
4059 Momentum 15-Yellow 1215 9-41 18% 15 OH
4060 RUSH 13-Black 1215 2-16 11% 13 AZ
4061 NOC 16-White 1215 2-4 33% 16 CA
4062 Aspire Volleyball Club 14 Aspire Alyssa 1214 2-10 17% 14 AZ
4063 Academy 15-R black 1214 6-23 21% 15 IN
4064 Club Palatine 15 Teal 1214 2-11 15% 15 IL
4065 Club W 17-Black 1213 6-22 21% 17 WI
4066 Pulse 15-Jana 1213 1-13 7% 15 CA
4067 Inspire CLE 18-1 1213 4-21 16% 18 OH
4068 Academy 17-Mt onyx 1211 0-9 0% 17 IN
4069 Ultimate B14-Black 1210 32-44 42% 14 IL
4070 DallasOne 13-Black 1208 4-17 19% 13 TX
4071 CCE 18-Udono 1208 4-15 20% 18 SC
4072 SA TRIBE 18-1 1208 13-34 28% 18 TX
4073 O2VBC 15 1208 2-12 14% 15 NY
4074 Pipeline 16-White 1207 12-22 35% 16 IL
4075 Chicago Elite B 14-Nike 1207 7-22 24% 14 IL
4076 Mintonette Sports 18-2 1207 10-24 29% 18 OH
4077 Ku'e VBC 18-Wurtz 1207 1-10 9% 18 WA
4078 CHOSEN SPOT 16-Boys 1207 1-12 8% 16 NY
4079 Azuri Performance B18-1 1206 5-18 22% 18 WI
4080 Mass Pats Boys 18-3 resilience 1206 4-15 17% 18 MA
4081 Chicago Elite SS 14 1206 6-10 35% 14 IL
4082 Tribe 14-B premier cardinal 1205 2-17 11% 14 FL
4083 CVC 18-1 boys 1204 7-23 23% 18 MN
4084 ESVBC 18-Boys inferno 1204 6-20 23% 18 IA
4085 Beach Cities 16 Carbon 1204 6-23 21% 16 CA
4086 Future 12-White 1203 3-17 15% 12 IL
4087 Red Rock Boys 18 National 1202 9-36 20% 18 CA
4088 Sidewinder 13-1 1200 0-12 0% 13 AZ
4089 CEV 15-1 sapphire boys 1200 0-16 0% 15 OH
4090 Club 1 B 14-Royal 1199 9-31 23% 14 IL
4091 MB Surf 12-Asics luke 1198 3-13 19% 12 CA
4092 Sportime 13-1 1198 2-26 7% 13 NY
4093 Stormbreaker 18-Titans 1198 0-0 0% 18 CA
4094 Orlando Gold 15-Gold 1197 4-17 19% 15 FL
4095 SUSA 17 1197 2-16 10% 17 UT
4096 SG Elite 18 Prime 1197 0-2 0% 18 CA
4097 AZ LEGACY 14-Crimson 1197 0-10 0% 14 AZ
4098 NOC Athletics Club 18-White 1196 0-0 0% 18 CA
4099 Jersey Volleyball Warriors 18-1 elite 1196 0-10 0% 18 NJ
4100 BBVC 16 1195 0-10 0% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.