Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 83 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4101 Tsunami VBA 18-2 boys 1195 4-7 36% 18 FL
4102 Utah Synergy Boys 16 White 1195 3-12 20% 16 UT
4103 MVP BOS 16-Blue 1194 7-37 16% 16 MA
4104 HAVC 16-White 1194 13-39 25% 16 IL
4105 Husky 14.1 1194 4-20 17% 14 CT
4106 Sandhills 18-Rob 1192 6-24 20% 18 NC
4107 Eastview Lightning 14-1 boys 1192 0-10 0% 14 MN
4108 1W B14-Red 1192 1-11 8% 14 WI
4109 NIVA Boys 17U 1191 5-26 16% 17 IN
4110 BAE 13-1 u boys oliver 1191 3-20 13% 13 CA
4111 MVP FL 14-Black 1191 6-35 15% 14 FL
4112 Mamba 17 Gold 1191 20-55 27% 17 WI
4113 Shockwave 18-Platinum 1190 1-12 8% 18 TX
4114 PVA Select 16-2 1190 0-6 0% 16 KS
4115 FRVBC 18-Regional boys 1189 3-11 21% 18 CO
4116 Red Rock Boys 17-Maile - walnut creek 1189 0-5 0% 17 CA
4117 Coastal 18-ISA 1189 4-23 15% 18 VA
4118 Touch 3 14 1188 3-20 13% 14 CA
4119 SMCJV 17U WHITE 1187 1-19 5% 17 MD
4120 Forza Boys 16-Orange 1187 18-42 30% 16 IL
4121 Slainte 13-Platinum 1187 5-23 18% 13 CA
4122 Cape Coast 16 Freedom 1187 4-33 11% 16 FL
4123 NOC 14-Green 1186 3-14 18% 14 CA
4124 Titan Premier 15 Misha 1186 6-31 16% 15 CA
4125 Southport B17-Black 1186 4-24 14% 17 WI
4126 Epic United 18-Blue 1184 1-14 7% 18 IL
4127 Beach Cities 15-Carbon 1183 2-12 14% 15 CA
4128 PARADOX 17U 1183 9-38 19% 17 TX
4129 CHAOS BOYS 17U REGIONAL 1182 2-17 11% 17 OR
4130 GSL 18-Comp ben 1182 5-22 19% 18 UT
4131 A2 16 Scarlet 1181 2-27 7% 16 OH
4132 UNION B14-Blue 1181 4-20 17% 14 IN
4133 Academy 17-R midnight 1180 3-20 13% 17 IN
4134 Steel City 15-Black 1180 1-10 9% 15 PA
4135 Boston United Boys 17-Select 1 1180 8-21 28% 17 MA
4136 Fang 18-1 1179 1-2 33% 18 CA
4137 CSVC 14 SAWTEETH 1179 4-19 17% 14 NY
4138 SKSVBC 18-1 1179 0-8 0% 18 PA
4139 Top Flight 17-Regional 1178 2-27 7% 17 IL
4140 Academy 15-Mt silver 1178 0-13 0% 15 IN
4141 Ultimate B13 Gold 1177 22-55 29% 13 IL
4142 Morgan Hill 17-1 1177 4-25 14% 17 CA
4143 Cincy Elite 12 Rush 1176 2-13 13% 12 OH
4144 Uno Boys 13-Regional 1176 1-10 8% 13 IL
4145 Elevation 18-Regional boys 1175 3-12 20% 18 CO
4146 Meraki VB 17-2 1175 4-21 16% 17 NH
4147 Miami United 14-Kylee 1173 4-16 20% 14 FL
4148 Chicago Elite B 15-Nike 1172 6-27 18% 15 IL
4149 630 Volleyball 15-4 1171 14-38 27% 15 IL
4150 Valley Flames 17-1 1170 1-20 5% 17 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.