Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 83 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4101 Premier 17 Netburner 1218 2-12 14% 17 OH
4102 Pulse VBC Boys 16-1 1218 10-26 28% 16 MI
4103 Momentum 15-Yellow 1218 9-41 18% 15 OH
4104 Flight Academy 16-2 1218 7-25 22% 16 OH
4105 Oly Reign Boys U14 1217 2-16 11% 14 WA
4106 Ultimate B13 Gold 1217 23-52 31% 13 IL
4107 Mintonette Sports 18-2 1216 10-24 29% 18 OH
4108 Outrigger 13-2 1216 2-11 15% 13 HI
4109 WPVC Boys 12-Elite black 1216 7-36 16% 12 FL
4110 Club W 17-Black 1216 6-22 21% 17 WI
4111 Mill City 16 Royal 1215 4-27 13% 16 MA
4112 RUSH 13-Black 1215 2-16 11% 13 AZ
4113 AVBC 18-Boys 1214 5-22 19% 18 FL
4114 Top Flight 17-Regional 1214 2-20 9% 17 IL
4115 HAVC 15-Black 1214 18-43 30% 15 IL
4116 Academy 15-R black 1214 6-23 21% 15 IN
4117 TopFlight VBA 15-1 1213 1-9 10% 15 IL
4118 Pulse 15-Jana 1213 1-13 7% 15 MI
4119 Club Palatine 15 Teal 1213 2-11 15% 15 IL
4120 Orlando Gold 15-Gold 1213 4-17 19% 15 FL
4121 Academy 17-Mt onyx 1213 0-9 0% 17 IN
4122 Tsunami VBA 18-2 boys 1212 4-7 36% 18 FL
4123 DallasOne 13-Black 1211 4-17 19% 13 TX
4124 Red Rock Boys 18 National 1211 9-36 20% 18 CA
4125 Ultimate B14-Black 1210 32-44 42% 14 IL
4126 Coastal 18-ISA 1210 4-23 15% 18 MA
4127 SA TRIBE 18-1 1210 13-34 28% 18 TX
4128 SUSA 17 1210 2-9 15% 17 UT
4129 Ka Ulukoa 16-Kari 1208 1-8 11% 16
4130 Pipeline 16-White 1207 12-22 35% 16 IL
4131 CCE 18-Udono 1207 4-15 20% 18 SC
4132 ESVBC 18-Boys inferno 1207 6-20 23% 18 MD
4133 Chicago Elite B 14-Nike 1206 7-22 24% 14 IL
4134 Mass Pats Boys 18-3 resilience 1206 4-15 17% 18 MA
4135 Jersey Volleyball Warriors 18-1 elite 1206 0-10 0% 18 NJ
4136 Ku'e VBC 18-Wurtz 1206 1-10 9% 18 WA
4137 Stormbreaker 18-Titans 1205 0-0 0% 18 CA
4138 O2VBC 15 1204 2-12 14% 15 NY
4139 Tribe 14-B premier cardinal 1204 2-17 11% 14 FL
4140 NOC 16-White 1204 2-4 33% 16 CA
4141 Azuri Performance B18-1 1204 5-18 22% 18 WI
4142 CHOSEN SPOT 16-Boys 1203 1-12 8% 16 NY
4143 No Panic 14-Boys pia 1201 1-12 8% 14 VA
4144 Future 12-White 1200 3-17 15% 12 IL
4145 SG Elite 18 Prime 1200 0-2 0% 18 CA
4146 Club 1 B 14-Royal 1199 9-31 23% 14 IL
4147 CEV 15-1 sapphire boys 1199 0-16 0% 15 OH
4148 NIVA Boys 17U 1198 5-26 16% 17 IN
4149 BBVC 16 1198 0-10 0% 16 CA
4150 MB Surf 12-Asics luke 1198 3-13 19% 12 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.