Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 84 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4151 Sidewinder 13-1 1198 0-12 0% 13 AZ
4152 Chicago Elite SS 14 1198 6-10 35% 14 IL
4153 AZ LEGACY 14-Crimson 1196 0-10 0% 14 AZ
4154 Beach Cities 16 Carbon 1196 6-23 21% 16 CA
4155 Sandhills 18-Rob 1195 6-24 20% 18 SC
4156 Husky 14.1 1194 4-20 17% 14 CT
4157 NOC 18-White 1194 0-0 0% 18 CA
4158 HAVC 16-White 1193 13-39 25% 16 IL
4159 Mamba 17 Gold 1193 20-55 27% 17 WI
4160 1W B14-Red 1192 1-11 8% 14 WI
4161 Eastview Lightning 14-1 boys 1192 0-10 0% 14
4162 Epic United 18-Blue 1191 1-14 7% 18 IN
4163 Future 14-Grey 1191 6-14 30% 14 IL
4164 MVP FL 14-Black 1190 6-35 15% 14 FL
4165 Red Rock Boys 17-Maile - walnut creek 1190 0-5 0% 17 CA
4166 Titan Premier 15 Misha 1190 6-31 16% 15 CA
4167 Forza Boys 16-Orange 1189 18-42 30% 16 IL
4168 FRVBC 18-Regional boys 1188 3-11 21% 18 CO
4169 Beach Cities 15-Carbon 1188 2-12 14% 15 CA
4170 UNION B14-Blue 1188 4-20 17% 14 IN
4171 Shockwave 18-Platinum 1187 1-12 8% 18 TX
4172 PVA Select 16-2 1186 0-6 0% 16
4173 Cape Coast 16 Freedom 1186 4-33 11% 16 FL
4174 Southport B17-Black 1184 4-24 14% 17 WI
4175 Cyclones DuPage 14-B 1184 4-15 21% 14 IL
4176 Boston United Boys 17-Select 1 1184 8-21 28% 17 MA
4177 NOC 14-Green 1184 3-14 18% 14 CA
4178 VUVC B18-GREY 1184 0-0 0% 18 NV
4179 BAE 13-1 u boys oliver 1183 3-20 13% 13 CA
4180 SMCJV 17U WHITE 1182 1-19 5% 17 MD
4181 PARADOX 17U 1182 9-38 19% 17 TX
4182 A2 16 Scarlet 1181 2-27 7% 16 OH
4183 CHAOS BOYS 17U REGIONAL 1181 2-17 11% 17 OR
4184 Touch 3 14 1181 3-20 13% 14 CA
4185 Uno Boys 13-Regional 1180 1-10 8% 13 IL
4186 Steel City 15-Black 1180 1-10 9% 15 PA
4187 SKSVBC 18-1 1179 0-8 0% 18 CA
4188 Fang 18-1 1178 1-2 33% 18 CA
4189 Academy 15-Mt silver 1178 0-13 0% 15 IN
4190 Meraki VB 17-2 1177 4-21 16% 17 NH
4191 Cincy Elite 12 Rush 1176 2-13 13% 12 OH
4192 RCVA Boys 14 Local 1176 1-14 7% 14 VA
4193 Sportime 13-1 1175 2-26 7% 13 NY
4194 Morgan Hill 17-1 1175 4-25 14% 17 CA
4195 Elevation 18-Regional boys 1175 3-12 20% 18 CO
4196 CSVC 14 SAWTEETH 1174 4-19 17% 14 NY
4197 Miami United 14-Kylee 1173 4-16 20% 14 FL
4198 Slainte 13-Platinum 1173 5-23 18% 13 CA
4199 Valley Flames 17-1 1172 1-20 5% 17 TX
4200 Chicago Elite B 15-Nike 1171 6-27 18% 15 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.