2025-2026 Season — Page 84 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4151 | Sidewinder 13-1 | 1198 | 0-12 | 0% | 13 | AZ |
| 4152 | Chicago Elite SS 14 | 1198 | 6-10 | 35% | 14 | IL |
| 4153 | AZ LEGACY 14-Crimson | 1196 | 0-10 | 0% | 14 | AZ |
| 4154 | Beach Cities 16 Carbon | 1196 | 6-23 | 21% | 16 | CA |
| 4155 | Sandhills 18-Rob | 1195 | 6-24 | 20% | 18 | SC |
| 4156 | Husky 14.1 | 1194 | 4-20 | 17% | 14 | CT |
| 4157 | NOC 18-White | 1194 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 4158 | HAVC 16-White | 1193 | 13-39 | 25% | 16 | IL |
| 4159 | Mamba 17 Gold | 1193 | 20-55 | 27% | 17 | WI |
| 4160 | 1W B14-Red | 1192 | 1-11 | 8% | 14 | WI |
| 4161 | Eastview Lightning 14-1 boys | 1192 | 0-10 | 0% | 14 | |
| 4162 | Epic United 18-Blue | 1191 | 1-14 | 7% | 18 | IN |
| 4163 | Future 14-Grey | 1191 | 6-14 | 30% | 14 | IL |
| 4164 | MVP FL 14-Black | 1190 | 6-35 | 15% | 14 | FL |
| 4165 | Red Rock Boys 17-Maile - walnut creek | 1190 | 0-5 | 0% | 17 | CA |
| 4166 | Titan Premier 15 Misha | 1190 | 6-31 | 16% | 15 | CA |
| 4167 | Forza Boys 16-Orange | 1189 | 18-42 | 30% | 16 | IL |
| 4168 | FRVBC 18-Regional boys | 1188 | 3-11 | 21% | 18 | CO |
| 4169 | Beach Cities 15-Carbon | 1188 | 2-12 | 14% | 15 | CA |
| 4170 | UNION B14-Blue | 1188 | 4-20 | 17% | 14 | IN |
| 4171 | Shockwave 18-Platinum | 1187 | 1-12 | 8% | 18 | TX |
| 4172 | PVA Select 16-2 | 1186 | 0-6 | 0% | 16 | |
| 4173 | Cape Coast 16 Freedom | 1186 | 4-33 | 11% | 16 | FL |
| 4174 | Southport B17-Black | 1184 | 4-24 | 14% | 17 | WI |
| 4175 | Cyclones DuPage 14-B | 1184 | 4-15 | 21% | 14 | IL |
| 4176 | Boston United Boys 17-Select 1 | 1184 | 8-21 | 28% | 17 | MA |
| 4177 | NOC 14-Green | 1184 | 3-14 | 18% | 14 | CA |
| 4178 | VUVC B18-GREY | 1184 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | NV |
| 4179 | BAE 13-1 u boys oliver | 1183 | 3-20 | 13% | 13 | CA |
| 4180 | SMCJV 17U WHITE | 1182 | 1-19 | 5% | 17 | MD |
| 4181 | PARADOX 17U | 1182 | 9-38 | 19% | 17 | TX |
| 4182 | A2 16 Scarlet | 1181 | 2-27 | 7% | 16 | OH |
| 4183 | CHAOS BOYS 17U REGIONAL | 1181 | 2-17 | 11% | 17 | OR |
| 4184 | Touch 3 14 | 1181 | 3-20 | 13% | 14 | CA |
| 4185 | Uno Boys 13-Regional | 1180 | 1-10 | 8% | 13 | IL |
| 4186 | Steel City 15-Black | 1180 | 1-10 | 9% | 15 | PA |
| 4187 | SKSVBC 18-1 | 1179 | 0-8 | 0% | 18 | CA |
| 4188 | Fang 18-1 | 1178 | 1-2 | 33% | 18 | CA |
| 4189 | Academy 15-Mt silver | 1178 | 0-13 | 0% | 15 | IN |
| 4190 | Meraki VB 17-2 | 1177 | 4-21 | 16% | 17 | NH |
| 4191 | Cincy Elite 12 Rush | 1176 | 2-13 | 13% | 12 | OH |
| 4192 | RCVA Boys 14 Local | 1176 | 1-14 | 7% | 14 | VA |
| 4193 | Sportime 13-1 | 1175 | 2-26 | 7% | 13 | NY |
| 4194 | Morgan Hill 17-1 | 1175 | 4-25 | 14% | 17 | CA |
| 4195 | Elevation 18-Regional boys | 1175 | 3-12 | 20% | 18 | CO |
| 4196 | CSVC 14 SAWTEETH | 1174 | 4-19 | 17% | 14 | NY |
| 4197 | Miami United 14-Kylee | 1173 | 4-16 | 20% | 14 | FL |
| 4198 | Slainte 13-Platinum | 1173 | 5-23 | 18% | 13 | CA |
| 4199 | Valley Flames 17-1 | 1172 | 1-20 | 5% | 17 | TX |
| 4200 | Chicago Elite B 15-Nike | 1171 | 6-27 | 18% | 15 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.