Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 85 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4201 630 Volleyball 15-4 1170 14-38 27% 15 IL
4202 Silverback 17-1 1170 1-13 7% 17 CO
4203 Bravo 15-Vision 1169 5-31 14% 15 KY
4204 Balboa Bay 13-Red 1169 3-38 7% 13 CA
4205 Nfinity VBC 14-South bay 1169 7-30 19% 14 CA
4206 A4 Volley Boys 14-Purple 1169 5-24 17% 14 CA
4207 TDV Boys 18-2 1167 11-34 24% 18 OH
4208 Academy 13-R blue 1166 1-14 7% 13 IN
4209 Top Flight 16-Regional 1166 4-20 17% 16 IL
4210 Mintonette Sports 12-1 1166 2-23 8% 12 OH
4211 C229 18-1 1164 1-13 7% 18 GA
4212 FRVBC 18-Regional 1164 3-15 17% 18 CO
4213 Empowered B18-Red 1164 6-26 19% 18 IN
4214 SASVBC B 12-Jon 1164 1-16 6% 12 HI
4215 Pipeline 17-Royal 1162 11-24 31% 17 IL
4216 TVC 16-2 1161 3-12 20% 16 IN
4217 VC United 16-3 elite 1159 12-25 32% 16 IL
4218 RVC BYDL 14-Jump 1158 1-14 7% 14 VA
4219 LB Power 18-3 1155 4-14 22% 18 TX
4220 MOD B12 Gold 1155 9-42 18% 12 IL
4221 Temecula Viper Boys: 18-1 brian 1154 0-3 0% 18 CA
4222 Mo Mighty Piranhas 16-3 1154 0-7 0% 16
4223 Pipeline 17-White 1153 10-24 29% 17 IL
4224 Tsunami 14-1 1153 2-12 14% 14 GA
4225 H Skyline Boys 15-Black 1153 6-51 11% 15 TX
4226 Ultimate B15-Black 1153 9-28 24% 15 IL
4227 South Volley 16-Tali masc 1151 3-15 17% 16 PR
4228 Club 1 B 16-Gray 1151 9-35 20% 16 IL
4229 Beach Cities 17-Carbon 1150 0-7 0% 17 CA
4230 Blast 18 Blaze 1149 5-35 13% 18 PA
4231 RCVA Boys 16-Local blue 1148 0-12 0% 16 VA
4232 Ultimate B16 Silver 1147 5-23 18% 16 IL
4233 HPSTL 11-Orange 1145 0-19 0% 11 MO
4234 MKE Sting 16-4 1143 9-33 21% 16 WI
4235 MIAMI DIAMONDS 15-1s 1142 1-15 6% 15 FL
4236 Atlanta Extreme 18-Rob 1142 2-17 11% 18 GA
4237 WPVC Boys 17-Elite black 1142 6-40 13% 17 FL
4238 NEVBC Boys 16-Orange 1142 3-17 15% 16 CT
4239 JJVA Boys 18-A 1141 8-24 25% 18 FL
4240 Tsunami 18-2 1140 2-15 12% 18 GA
4241 MVVC YB 12 Tony 1140 0-17 0% 12 CA
4242 STARZ 15-Boys white 1139 3-26 10% 15 IL
4243 AJV Boys 13 adidas 1138 3-28 10% 13 TX
4244 495 14-Boys 1138 3-21 13% 14 MD
4245 AFVBC 17 Bravo 1137 1-7 13% 17 CA
4246 Unity 18-Boys gold eagles 1136 4-26 13% 18 MA
4247 RVC 17-Boys regional 1136 0-24 0% 17 VA
4248 Na Hoku 18-1 1136 0-12 0% 18 HI
4249 CLE SEL 18-White 1135 3-26 10% 18 OH
4250 LuMaDe Boys 16-Blue 1135 0-10 0% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.