2025-2026 Season — Page 85 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4201 | Inferno 16-4 regional | 1137 | 3-16 | 16% | 16 | WI |
| 4202 | MIAMI DIAMONDS 15-1s | 1137 | 1-15 | 6% | 15 | FL |
| 4203 | Bravo 15-Vision | 1137 | 5-31 | 14% | 15 | CA |
| 4204 | Unity 18-Boys gold eagles | 1136 | 4-26 | 13% | 18 | MA |
| 4205 | AJV Boys 13 adidas | 1135 | 3-28 | 10% | 13 | TX |
| 4206 | Na Hoku 18-1 | 1135 | 0-12 | 0% | 18 | HI |
| 4207 | Elevation 17-Timber boys | 1135 | 0-10 | 0% | 17 | CO |
| 4208 | AFVBC 17 Bravo | 1133 | 1-7 | 13% | 17 | CA |
| 4209 | NEVBC Boys 15-Blue | 1133 | 1-19 | 5% | 15 | CT |
| 4210 | Shockwave 16-Gold | 1133 | 0-13 | 0% | 16 | TX |
| 4211 | CLE SEL 18-White | 1132 | 3-26 | 10% | 18 | OH |
| 4212 | Golden State 14-Combo | 1132 | 3-38 | 7% | 14 | CA |
| 4213 | RVC 17-Boys regional | 1132 | 0-24 | 0% | 17 | VA |
| 4214 | AZ LEGACY 15-Iron | 1130 | 0-15 | 0% | 15 | AZ |
| 4215 | Ridgeland Reds 18 Ridgeland Reds- Boys | 1129 | 0-10 | 0% | 18 | WI |
| 4216 | TVA Pine 18-White | 1128 | 1-14 | 7% | 18 | CA |
| 4217 | 630 Volleyball 12-Black | 1125 | 1-16 | 6% | 12 | IL |
| 4218 | Platinum 17-Trevor | 1124 | 1-17 | 6% | 17 | UT |
| 4219 | Ultimate B17 Silver | 1124 | 4-25 | 14% | 17 | IL |
| 4220 | KIVA 17 KIVA Boys Grey | 1123 | 3-20 | 13% | 17 | KY |
| 4221 | Starlings GH 18-1 boys | 1123 | 5-27 | 15% | 18 | CT |
| 4222 | OPVC 16-Black | 1123 | 4-28 | 13% | 16 | OH |
| 4223 | Emerald Rain Boys 18 E | 1121 | 2-30 | 6% | 18 | WA |
| 4224 | Mamba 15 Gold | 1121 | 6-29 | 17% | 15 | WI |
| 4225 | New Haven Juniors 18-Club | 1120 | 3-31 | 8% | 18 | CT |
| 4226 | MVP Boys 13-Blue | 1118 | 3-31 | 9% | 13 | WI |
| 4227 | Pipeline 14-Royal | 1118 | 3-13 | 19% | 14 | IL |
| 4228 | GSL 16-Comp brittany | 1116 | 1-24 | 4% | 16 | UT |
| 4229 | Chicago Elite B 17-Swoosh | 1116 | 3-31 | 9% | 17 | IL |
| 4230 | Selected 18-S - black | 1115 | 3-14 | 18% | 18 | NV |
| 4231 | CCVA 18 Steel | 1112 | 1-24 | 4% | 18 | MD |
| 4232 | Mamba 15-Purple | 1112 | 16-57 | 22% | 15 | WI |
| 4233 | K2 18-Local boys | 1111 | 0-12 | 0% | 18 | TN |
| 4234 | Salt City Boys 18-Amelia | 1109 | 3-28 | 10% | 18 | UT |
| 4235 | Legacy Boys 17-Black | 1108 | 1-16 | 6% | 17 | NY |
| 4236 | Inferno 14-2 regional | 1108 | 1-25 | 4% | 14 | WI |
| 4237 | Stockton Ace 16-1 | 1107 | 3-29 | 9% | 16 | CA |
| 4238 | Club Palatine Red 14 | 1104 | 3-12 | 20% | 14 | IL |
| 4239 | CEV 18-2 diamond boys | 1104 | 2-20 | 9% | 18 | OH |
| 4240 | SC Legends 13-Gold | 1103 | 0-29 | 0% | 13 | CA |
| 4241 | Idaho Strike 17-Black | 1103 | 0-5 | 0% | 17 | ID |
| 4242 | Salt City Boys 16-S caden | 1101 | 1-21 | 5% | 16 | UT |
| 4243 | MOVA UA 16-Gold - boys | 1100 | 2-18 | 10% | 16 | MO |
| 4244 | Sidewinder 12-1 | 1100 | 0-23 | 0% | 12 | AZ |
| 4245 | OCVC 13 Slunks | 1098 | 3-40 | 7% | 13 | CA |
| 4246 | Elevate 18-Boys | 1098 | 0-13 | 0% | 18 | IL |
| 4247 | DuPage Elite B 17-United | 1097 | 4-31 | 11% | 17 | IL |
| 4248 | Cincy Elite 13-1 | 1095 | 2-23 | 8% | 13 | OH |
| 4249 | WPVC Boys 14-Elite orange | 1095 | 1-20 | 5% | 14 | FL |
| 4250 | Beaumont Volleyball Club 16 BBVC Blue | 1094 | 3-21 | 13% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.