Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 85 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2373 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4201 Inferno 16-4 regional 1137 3-16 16% 16 WI
4202 MIAMI DIAMONDS 15-1s 1137 1-15 6% 15 FL
4203 Bravo 15-Vision 1137 5-31 14% 15 CA
4204 Unity 18-Boys gold eagles 1136 4-26 13% 18 MA
4205 AJV Boys 13 adidas 1135 3-28 10% 13 TX
4206 Na Hoku 18-1 1135 0-12 0% 18 HI
4207 Elevation 17-Timber boys 1135 0-10 0% 17 CO
4208 AFVBC 17 Bravo 1133 1-7 13% 17 CA
4209 NEVBC Boys 15-Blue 1133 1-19 5% 15 CT
4210 Shockwave 16-Gold 1133 0-13 0% 16 TX
4211 CLE SEL 18-White 1132 3-26 10% 18 OH
4212 Golden State 14-Combo 1132 3-38 7% 14 CA
4213 RVC 17-Boys regional 1132 0-24 0% 17 VA
4214 AZ LEGACY 15-Iron 1130 0-15 0% 15 AZ
4215 Ridgeland Reds 18 Ridgeland Reds- Boys 1129 0-10 0% 18 WI
4216 TVA Pine 18-White 1128 1-14 7% 18 CA
4217 630 Volleyball 12-Black 1125 1-16 6% 12 IL
4218 Platinum 17-Trevor 1124 1-17 6% 17 UT
4219 Ultimate B17 Silver 1124 4-25 14% 17 IL
4220 KIVA 17 KIVA Boys Grey 1123 3-20 13% 17 KY
4221 Starlings GH 18-1 boys 1123 5-27 15% 18 CT
4222 OPVC 16-Black 1123 4-28 13% 16 OH
4223 Emerald Rain Boys 18 E 1121 2-30 6% 18 WA
4224 Mamba 15 Gold 1121 6-29 17% 15 WI
4225 New Haven Juniors 18-Club 1120 3-31 8% 18 CT
4226 MVP Boys 13-Blue 1118 3-31 9% 13 WI
4227 Pipeline 14-Royal 1118 3-13 19% 14 IL
4228 GSL 16-Comp brittany 1116 1-24 4% 16 UT
4229 Chicago Elite B 17-Swoosh 1116 3-31 9% 17 IL
4230 Selected 18-S - black 1115 3-14 18% 18 NV
4231 CCVA 18 Steel 1112 1-24 4% 18 MD
4232 Mamba 15-Purple 1112 16-57 22% 15 WI
4233 K2 18-Local boys 1111 0-12 0% 18 TN
4234 Salt City Boys 18-Amelia 1109 3-28 10% 18 UT
4235 Legacy Boys 17-Black 1108 1-16 6% 17 NY
4236 Inferno 14-2 regional 1108 1-25 4% 14 WI
4237 Stockton Ace 16-1 1107 3-29 9% 16 CA
4238 Club Palatine Red 14 1104 3-12 20% 14 IL
4239 CEV 18-2 diamond boys 1104 2-20 9% 18 OH
4240 SC Legends 13-Gold 1103 0-29 0% 13 CA
4241 Idaho Strike 17-Black 1103 0-5 0% 17 ID
4242 Salt City Boys 16-S caden 1101 1-21 5% 16 UT
4243 MOVA UA 16-Gold - boys 1100 2-18 10% 16 MO
4244 Sidewinder 12-1 1100 0-23 0% 12 AZ
4245 OCVC 13 Slunks 1098 3-40 7% 13 CA
4246 Elevate 18-Boys 1098 0-13 0% 18 IL
4247 DuPage Elite B 17-United 1097 4-31 11% 17 IL
4248 Cincy Elite 13-1 1095 2-23 8% 13 OH
4249 WPVC Boys 14-Elite orange 1095 1-20 5% 14 FL
4250 Beaumont Volleyball Club 16 BBVC Blue 1094 3-21 13% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.