Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 86 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4251 Inferno 16-4 regional 1135 3-16 16% 16 WI
4252 AZ LEGACY 15-Iron 1135 0-15 0% 15 AZ
4253 NEVBC Boys 15-Blue 1133 1-19 5% 15 CT
4254 Ultimate B17 Silver 1133 4-25 14% 17 IL
4255 Elevation 17-Timber boys 1132 0-10 0% 17 CO
4256 Shockwave 16-Gold 1132 0-13 0% 16 TX
4257 Golden State 14-Combo 1130 3-38 7% 14 CA
4258 TVA Pine 18-White 1128 1-14 7% 18 VA
4259 Legacy Boys 18-Premier billy 1127 2-23 8% 18 MI
4260 630 Volleyball 12-Black 1126 1-16 6% 12 IL
4261 Idaho Strike 17-Black 1124 0-5 0% 17 ID
4262 Starlings GH 18-1 boys 1123 5-27 15% 18 MD
4263 OPVC 16-Black 1123 4-28 13% 16 OH
4264 Pipeline 14-Royal 1122 3-13 19% 14 IL
4265 Chicago Elite B 17-Swoosh 1121 3-31 9% 17 IL
4266 Mamba 15 Gold 1120 6-29 17% 15 WI
4267 Emerald Rain Boys 18 E 1119 2-30 6% 18 WA
4268 MVP Boys 13-Blue 1117 3-31 9% 13 WI
4269 New Haven Juniors 18-Club 1117 3-31 8% 18 CT
4270 HICVB 18-2 1115 0-14 0% 18 CA
4271 Mamba 15-Purple 1112 16-57 22% 15 WI
4272 CCVA 18 Steel 1112 1-24 4% 18 MD
4273 Stockton Ace 16-1 1112 3-29 9% 16 CA
4274 Legacy Boys 17-Black 1112 1-16 6% 17 MI
4275 K2 18-Local boys 1111 0-12 0% 18 TN
4276 CEV 18-2 diamond boys 1110 2-20 9% 18 OH
4277 Selected 18-S - black 1109 3-14 18% 18 NV
4278 Inferno 14-2 regional 1108 1-25 4% 14 WI
4279 SC Legends 13-Gold 1107 0-29 0% 13 CA
4280 Club Palatine Red 14 1105 3-12 20% 14 IL
4281 MOVA UA 16-Gold - boys 1100 2-18 10% 16 MO
4282 DuPage Elite B 17-United 1099 4-31 11% 17 IL
4283 Sidewinder 12-1 1098 0-23 0% 12 AZ
4284 Cincy Elite 13-1 1097 2-23 8% 13 OH
4285 Elevate 18-Boys 1096 0-13 0% 18 TX
4286 OCVC 13 Slunks 1095 3-40 7% 13 CA
4287 WPVC Boys 14-Elite orange 1095 1-20 5% 14 FL
4288 FORZA1 18-One black 1094 0-0 0% 18 CA
4289 DallasOne 15-Blue 1093 0-19 0% 15 TX
4290 GO Volley 16-1 b 1090 1-21 5% 16 VA
4291 Pipeline 14-White 1090 6-22 21% 14 IL
4292 Vantage Boys 18-Blue 1088 0-13 0% 18 WV
4293 UNO Boys 16 Regional 1088 5-39 11% 16 IL
4294 RockCity 18-2 1085 3-33 8% 18 OH
4295 MOD 12-Black 1083 1-19 5% 12 IL
4296 SPVB B15 Select 1082 1-16 6% 15 IL
4297 Inferno 15-3 select 1077 4-30 12% 15 WI
4298 Crossfire VBC 17-Fire 1077 1-17 6% 17 MN
4299 630 Volleyball 14-3 1077 7-34 17% 14 IL
4300 SMBC West 16 Elite 1075 2-30 6% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.