Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 732 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
36551 FB FIERCE 12-Dev- mykiah 1349 0-5 0% 12 TX
36552 Pulse 17-2 select 1349 12-19 39% 17 MI
36553 Academy Volleyball Club 16-Charlene 1349 8-22 27% 16 SC
36554 ENVY 16-Hurricane 1349 18-28 39% 16 RI
36555 NVPUR 16-Charles 1349 2-4 33% 16 PR
36556 Stars 16-S red 1349 0-5 0% 16 MN
36557 Junior Jays 10-Black 1348 0-4 0% 10 MN
36558 Cyclones 14-Athena 1348 8-19 30% 14 IL
36559 Wrecking Crew 14-6 1348 2-8 20% 14 TX
36560 South Florida Storm 16 1348 15-23 39% 16 FL
36561 SCENIC CITY 14-Semi nat 1348 8-19 30% 14 TN
36562 Rise MKE VBC 15 RiseMKEVBC15's Select 1348 1-4 20% 15 WI
36563 Mavericks Mini Mavs 12 1348 4-6 40% 12 MI
36564 NIVB 18-Black 1348 15-22 38% 18 MN
36565 C-Force VBC 18-1 1348 5-10 33% 18 TN
36566 Eau Claire Storm 18 1348 2-5 29% 18 WI
36567 Chi City 13-2 regional 1348 6-17 22% 13 IL
36568 GVG 14-Alondra 1348 1-5 17% 14 PR
36569 Hunters Creek Volleyball Academy 14 14 Hunters Creek (FL) 1348 4-7 36% 14 FL
36570 Wildfire 14-Corina 1348 11-21 34% 14 FL
36571 Elevate 17-Silver 1348 11-23 28% 17 TX
36572 Advancement Academy 16 16 Shamrock 1348 20-24 45% 16 OH
36573 South KC Juniors G14-3 1348 6-8 38% 14 KS
36574 Katy United 12-Fathom 1348 5-10 33% 12 TX
36575 EPVA 12-Black 1348 7-14 33% 12 MN
36576 InnovativeVC 11-2 miguel 1348 1-4 20% 11 PR
36577 Crush 14-2 miller 1348 11-16 41% 14 GA
36578 Maratonistas Volley 14-1 1348 1-5 17% 14 PR
36579 KMS SAINTS JO 12-Beyerl 1348 0-4 0% 12 MN
36580 CLUB STEEL 11 1348 3-6 33% 11 FL
36581 RUSH Y 16-Black 1348 59-79 43% 16 AZ
36582 PV 12-Aces 1348 1-7 13% 12 IA
36583 Aces 11-White 1348 1-6 14% 11 ND
36584 BVC 14-2 bash 1348 1-6 14% 14 DE
36585 adidas Legacy Jrs 17-1 1348 4-11 24% 17 MO
36586 Bootheel SMASH - Mayhem 17 1348 1-7 11% 17 MO
36587 Northland Static 15-1 1348 9-13 41% 15 MO
36588 Storm 11-2 1348 0-4 0% 11 CO
36589 ENCORE 11-Miles 1348 5-7 42% 11 CA
36590 Static Volleyball Club G15-2 1348 4-6 36% 15 MO
36591 SVBC Blazers 17 Parker 1348 26-36 42% 17 SC
36592 WMass 17-1 scar 1348 3-7 30% 17 MA
36593 Jellys 11-Black 1348 11-19 37% 11 FL
36594 Advantage 12-White 1348 4-13 24% 12 NC
36595 AVC CLE 13-Gray 1348 3-9 25% 13 OH
36596 EU 13-Ruby 1348 12-17 41% 13 IN
36597 BVA Davie 12-S yanet 1348 0-4 0% 12 FL
36598 Ignite Elite Volleyball 14-Elite 1348 14-29 33% 14 IN
36599 Knightmares 13-1 1348 23-28 45% 13 FL
36600 Heroes 15-Seal 1348 16-20 43% 15 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.