Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 731 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
36501 Premier Volleyball 14 Premier Spark 1349 6-17 24% 14 DE
36502 PV 12-Gray 1349 0-4 0% 12 IA
36503 PVC Girls 12-2 gold 1349 0-4 0% 12 NY
36504 NJTS 15-3 1349 0-4 0% 15 NJ
36505 TEV 14-Marley/madisonn 1349 13-20 39% 14 TN
36506 K2 14-Local boys 1349 1-4 20% 14 TN
36507 Mem Metro 14-Trvl red 1349 9-15 38% 14 TN
36508 Indiana South Volleyball Club 13 13U Orange 1349 18-25 42% 13 IN
36509 SVC 15 14-Luis 1349 4-7 36% 14 FL
36510 Momentum 14-Silver 1349 16-14 53% 14 FL
36511 Reign Volleyball 14-Boca 1349 0-4 0% 14 FL
36512 ARVC G-Unit 17 1349 3-8 23% 17 NM
36513 HW 17-Black travel 1349 6-12 33% 17 NJ
36514 NC Coastal 15 Caroline 1349 10-18 36% 15 NC
36515 Epic 16-Samba 1349 16-26 38% 16 WI
36516 Velocity 219 14-E jasmine 1349 19-22 46% 14 IN
36517 Sicangu 13-Teal 1349 1-4 20% 13 SD
36518 C1VB 14-State blue 1349 12-10 55% 14 SC
36519 C-Force VBC 13-Black 1349 11-19 37% 13 TN
36520 ECVBA 15-Crystal 1349 12-21 36% 15 CA
36521 SG Elite 15-Storm 1349 8-9 47% 15 CA
36522 Top Flight 18-Psi sp 1349 2-3 40% 18 IL
36523 Lancers 13-G silver 1349 0-4 0% 13 IA
36524 Renaissance 12-White 1349 0-4 0% 12 PA
36525 912 Volleyball Academy 13 1349 6-12 33% 13 GA
36526 ATHENAVB 15-Black select 1349 1-6 14% 15 MN
36527 BEVBC 14-White 1349 20-22 43% 14 MD
36528 CVBC 17-1 1349 1-6 14% 17 CA
36529 Ignite 13 Flame 1349 11-22 33% 13 TX
36530 Tamales 17-1 1349 2-8 20% 17 MO
36531 Supernova 16 Gold 1349 11-31 26% 16 CA
36532 Premier VBC 17-WHITE 1349 29-26 53% 17 CO
36533 Blitz 18 Maddie 1349 4-7 36% 18 NC
36534 OPV 14 National 1349 4-9 31% 14 OR
36535 Allegiant 18-Red 1349 3-11 20% 18 TX
36536 SSWolfpack 15-Greenwolves 1349 3-9 19% 15 MA
36537 BVC 13-Rennah 1349 8-19 30% 13 CA
36538 Goshen 14-Mcphail 1349 0-4 0% 14 IN
36539 Ark Valley 16 1349 3-7 30% 16 CO
36540 EVA 16-Blackshirts 1349 10-18 36% 16 CO
36541 Mission 14-Green 1349 3-8 27% 14 IL
36542 MCVC Blue 14-2 1349 2-6 25% 14 IN
36543 Grandview VBC 18 1349 2-7 22% 18 WA
36544 Ark Jrs 13-Regional 1349 6-9 40% 13 AR
36545 A5 Gwinnett 16-Odette 1349 11-12 48% 16 GA
36546 FVA 13-Ember - a1 1349 0-10 0% 13 AK
36547 Empire 15-1 1349 6-9 40% 15 KS
36548 CJ Heat 16-Black 3 1349 1-4 20% 16 NJ
36549 River City Jrs 15-Gray 1349 11-17 39% 15 IA
36550 Relentless 12-1 1349 6-9 33% 12 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.