Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 709 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35401 UEPA 12-G 1362 4-8 33% 12 TX
35402 GENERATION NEXT 16-A 1362 2-8 20% 16 DE
35403 Madtown 15-4 select 1362 19-25 43% 15 WI
35404 IC Westside VBC 13 1362 0-4 0% 13 IA
35405 TVO 15-Tornadoes 1362 17-25 39% 15 MI
35406 RVC 12-White 1362 19-32 37% 12 KY
35407 Antietam Avengers 17 1362 27-44 38% 17 PA
35408 ATOMIC 15-Smack n2 1362 24-43 36% 15 AZ
35409 830 VBA 12 1362 6-11 32% 12 TX
35410 Precision Volleyball Academy 16 PVA Panthers 1362 1-5 17% 16 OH
35411 Woodbury Volleyball Club 18-Alex 1362 3-5 38% 18 MN
35412 Spartans 10-Black 1362 0-4 0% 10 IN
35413 JET 12 MOORE 1362 4-13 24% 12 TX
35414 Panther 18-2 1361 2-4 33% 18 CO
35415 CHOSEN SPOT 13 1361 0-4 0% 13 NY
35416 LI Surge Volleyball Club 18-Premier 1361 1-4 20% 18 NY
35417 Five Star 14-Pink 1361 16-30 35% 14 CO
35418 Greensburg VBC 15 1361 4-15 21% 15 PA
35419 NW Elite 16-4 white 1361 20-26 43% 16 OR
35420 LC Elite 16-2 white 1361 7-19 27% 16 OR
35421 Miami Wave 12-Black 1361 15-20 43% 12 FL
35422 adidas DYNASTY 10-3 1361 0-3 0% 10 KS
35423 HW 14-Gold 1361 9-21 30% 14 NJ
35424 KC Fire Volleyball 17-1 1361 10-11 43% 17 KS
35425 FC Elite 11-Blue 1361 7-15 32% 11 WI
35426 SEATTLE JRS 16 1361 21-42 33% 16 WA
35427 618 VBC 15 1361 10-14 37% 15 MO
35428 Shock 16-Sting 1361 10-16 38% 16 IL
35429 Bombers VC 15-JAGS 1361 12-13 41% 15 TX
35430 AV IMPACT 14-Jo 1361 9-17 35% 14 CA
35431 FORZA1 NORTH 15-Elite black 1361 15-18 45% 15 CA
35432 Vista 15-Garcia 1361 1-4 20% 15 CA
35433 Next Level 14-Nikki 1361 8-10 44% 14 MI
35434 MVA 14-Blue 1361 11-17 39% 14 MI
35435 ATHENA VB 15-8 opal regional 1361 16-23 41% 15 OR
35436 S STORM 14-Blue 1361 7-9 44% 14 MI
35437 A5 Chattanooga 13-2 1361 29-54 35% 13 GA
35438 Lone Star Legacy Volleyball Academy 12-1 1361 9-18 33% 12 TX
35439 HAVC 14-H white 1361 0-4 0% 14 SD
35440 FSVC 14U PREMIER 1361 17-21 45% 14 FL
35441 Premier 14-Gray 1361 0-5 0% 14 ND
35442 OneWay Volleyball Club 14 OneWay Faith over Fear 1361 1-4 20% 14 NM
35443 Waco Lightning 12-Blue 1361 7-13 33% 12 TX
35444 REFINE 14 Refine Noles (SO) 1361 4-7 31% 14 AL
35445 SR 15-2 1361 4-9 31% 15 MN
35446 BYVA 15-1 1361 7-12 37% 15 MN
35447 Loggers 15 1361 2-9 17% 15 MN
35448 CJ Heat 15-Black 4 1361 1-4 20% 15 NJ
35449 BVC 15-Blue 1361 10-10 50% 15 MN
35450 SVC NGV 14 Courtney 1361 8-25 24% 14 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.