2025-2026 Season — Page 709 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35401 | UEPA 12-G | 1362 | 4-8 | 33% | 12 | TX |
| 35402 | GENERATION NEXT 16-A | 1362 | 2-8 | 20% | 16 | DE |
| 35403 | Madtown 15-4 select | 1362 | 19-25 | 43% | 15 | WI |
| 35404 | IC Westside VBC 13 | 1362 | 0-4 | 0% | 13 | IA |
| 35405 | TVO 15-Tornadoes | 1362 | 17-25 | 39% | 15 | MI |
| 35406 | RVC 12-White | 1362 | 19-32 | 37% | 12 | KY |
| 35407 | Antietam Avengers 17 | 1362 | 27-44 | 38% | 17 | PA |
| 35408 | ATOMIC 15-Smack n2 | 1362 | 24-43 | 36% | 15 | AZ |
| 35409 | 830 VBA 12 | 1362 | 6-11 | 32% | 12 | TX |
| 35410 | Precision Volleyball Academy 16 PVA Panthers | 1362 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | OH |
| 35411 | Woodbury Volleyball Club 18-Alex | 1362 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | MN |
| 35412 | Spartans 10-Black | 1362 | 0-4 | 0% | 10 | IN |
| 35413 | JET 12 MOORE | 1362 | 4-13 | 24% | 12 | TX |
| 35414 | Panther 18-2 | 1361 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | CO |
| 35415 | CHOSEN SPOT 13 | 1361 | 0-4 | 0% | 13 | NY |
| 35416 | LI Surge Volleyball Club 18-Premier | 1361 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | NY |
| 35417 | Five Star 14-Pink | 1361 | 16-30 | 35% | 14 | CO |
| 35418 | Greensburg VBC 15 | 1361 | 4-15 | 21% | 15 | PA |
| 35419 | NW Elite 16-4 white | 1361 | 20-26 | 43% | 16 | OR |
| 35420 | LC Elite 16-2 white | 1361 | 7-19 | 27% | 16 | OR |
| 35421 | Miami Wave 12-Black | 1361 | 15-20 | 43% | 12 | FL |
| 35422 | adidas DYNASTY 10-3 | 1361 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | KS |
| 35423 | HW 14-Gold | 1361 | 9-21 | 30% | 14 | NJ |
| 35424 | KC Fire Volleyball 17-1 | 1361 | 10-11 | 43% | 17 | KS |
| 35425 | FC Elite 11-Blue | 1361 | 7-15 | 32% | 11 | WI |
| 35426 | SEATTLE JRS 16 | 1361 | 21-42 | 33% | 16 | WA |
| 35427 | 618 VBC 15 | 1361 | 10-14 | 37% | 15 | MO |
| 35428 | Shock 16-Sting | 1361 | 10-16 | 38% | 16 | IL |
| 35429 | Bombers VC 15-JAGS | 1361 | 12-13 | 41% | 15 | TX |
| 35430 | AV IMPACT 14-Jo | 1361 | 9-17 | 35% | 14 | CA |
| 35431 | FORZA1 NORTH 15-Elite black | 1361 | 15-18 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 35432 | Vista 15-Garcia | 1361 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | CA |
| 35433 | Next Level 14-Nikki | 1361 | 8-10 | 44% | 14 | MI |
| 35434 | MVA 14-Blue | 1361 | 11-17 | 39% | 14 | MI |
| 35435 | ATHENA VB 15-8 opal regional | 1361 | 16-23 | 41% | 15 | OR |
| 35436 | S STORM 14-Blue | 1361 | 7-9 | 44% | 14 | MI |
| 35437 | A5 Chattanooga 13-2 | 1361 | 29-54 | 35% | 13 | GA |
| 35438 | Lone Star Legacy Volleyball Academy 12-1 | 1361 | 9-18 | 33% | 12 | TX |
| 35439 | HAVC 14-H white | 1361 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | SD |
| 35440 | FSVC 14U PREMIER | 1361 | 17-21 | 45% | 14 | FL |
| 35441 | Premier 14-Gray | 1361 | 0-5 | 0% | 14 | ND |
| 35442 | OneWay Volleyball Club 14 OneWay Faith over Fear | 1361 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | NM |
| 35443 | Waco Lightning 12-Blue | 1361 | 7-13 | 33% | 12 | TX |
| 35444 | REFINE 14 Refine Noles (SO) | 1361 | 4-7 | 31% | 14 | AL |
| 35445 | SR 15-2 | 1361 | 4-9 | 31% | 15 | MN |
| 35446 | BYVA 15-1 | 1361 | 7-12 | 37% | 15 | MN |
| 35447 | Loggers 15 | 1361 | 2-9 | 17% | 15 | MN |
| 35448 | CJ Heat 15-Black 4 | 1361 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | NJ |
| 35449 | BVC 15-Blue | 1361 | 10-10 | 50% | 15 | MN |
| 35450 | SVC NGV 14 Courtney | 1361 | 8-25 | 24% | 14 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.