Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 708 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
35351 Mem Metro 14-Gold 1362 0-5 0% 14 TN
35352 LVA 16 1362 21-69 23% 16 VA
35353 VBVC 16-1 1362 6-13 32% 16 CA
35354 Trinity 11-Fire 1362 14-12 54% 11 FL
35355 New WAVE 13-Lightning 1362 13-13 50% 13 IL
35356 Sandburg 16-Red 1362 13-17 43% 16 IL
35357 Apex VBTC 17-Apex white 1362 11-25 31% 17 OH
35358 ENG_VB 13-1 1362 11-14 44% 13 AR
35359 MiElite 15-Topaz west 1362 13-12 52% 15 MI
35360 MVP Club 13-2 1362 2-6 25% 13 WI
35361 Fairfield 12-Yellow 1362 0-4 0% 12 CT
35362 GLCYA L2 Elite 12 Gold 1362 31-47 39% 12 IL
35363 Premier EDGE 12 1362 15-28 33% 12 DE
35364 Whitefish Avalanche 17 1362 4-9 22% 17 MT
35365 SA Elite 17-American 1362 17-28 38% 17 MA
35366 Bubbles United 16-Deconda 1362 11-13 46% 16 FL
35367 UEPA 14-P 1362 13-19 33% 14 TX
35368 Cobra 14-Red 1362 6-13 30% 14 MA
35369 District VBC 17-Gold 1362 14-19 42% 17 CA
35370 VUVC 16-Local grey 1362 1-4 20% 16 NV
35371 TVA Smack 18-Power 1362 5-8 38% 18 CA
35372 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 12 Weber Elite Lance 1362 2-4 33% 12 UT
35373 SAND Waves 14-S 1362 0-4 0% 14 CA
35374 TORCH 14-Ameera 1362 18-27 40% 14 CA
35375 FAV 14-Black 1362 8-13 33% 14 CA
35376 Sparks 15 Rising 1362 12-16 43% 15 KY
35377 Peak VA 14-Blue 1362 15-26 31% 14 TX
35378 Sportime 11-Gold 1362 1-6 14% 11 NY
35379 Tribe 15-Schofield 1362 6-7 46% 15 OH
35380 SVCFL 15-White 1362 9-16 36% 15 FL
35381 Wildfire 16-Eric 1362 15-20 43% 16 FL
35382 T4 Volleyball Club (IL) 12 T4 Volleyball (IL) 12G Red (GL) 1362 3-8 25% 12 IL
35383 Big Cat 16-Black 1362 0-5 0% 16 IA
35384 MAVS Select 10-5 1362 0-5 0% 10 KS
35385 MN Select 10-1 1362 6-15 29% 10 MN
35386 NKYVC 17-4 thunder 1362 13-19 41% 17 KY
35387 E2 13-2 1362 3-6 33% 13 KY
35388 JCC JRs 11-S pink 1362 0-4 0% 11 MN
35389 Impact 15-Sophie 1362 2-4 33% 15 MI
35390 NNKVB 12-1 1362 1-5 14% 12 VA
35391 OCTANE BLACK 17-S 1362 3-8 27% 17 NY
35392 Club Hunters 14 Maroon 1362 1-3 25% 14 MN
35393 APVBC 12 1362 3-7 30% 12 IN
35394 Columbia 13-Red 1362 22-31 39% 13 MD
35395 Cuzins 14-1 1362 1-5 17% 14 HI
35396 AYOSA 14-1 1362 3-4 43% 14 CO
35397 PREVAIL Girls 16-Pink 1362 5-10 33% 16 PA
35398 Madras Volleyball Club 16-S 1362 3-5 38% 16 WA
35399 Midwest United 18-Navy 1362 1-6 14% 18 MN
35400 Hawks VBC 13-1 1362 4-9 31% 13 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.