Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 696 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34751 Team Ok 12-RED 1369 11-16 41% 12 OK
34752 501 Volley 12-Pink 1369 10-14 42% 12 AR
34753 GMJO 14-1 1369 4-9 29% 14 MN
34754 SPVA 15-2 1369 2-6 25% 15 MN
34755 Chicago Elite 13 National 1369 16-35 31% 13 IL
34756 WC 14-Elite black 1369 2-5 29% 14 TX
34757 LA South 16-S 1369 17-21 45% 16 LA
34758 Club Fusion 13-Spark spring 1369 3-6 23% 13 IL
34759 Valor-AR 13 Elite 1369 17-26 40% 13 AR
34760 CYVB 17-1 1369 10-15 40% 17 MA
34761 Vertical Thunder 16-S 1369 11-7 61% 16 AZ
34762 CARDINAL CLUB 14 1369 1-5 17% 14 IA
34763 SVC 14-99 1369 3-4 43% 14 FL
34764 RVA 16-Iglehart 1369 15-23 39% 16 IA
34765 Hot Shots 14-1 1369 3-4 43% 14 TX
34766 Madison-Grant Volleyball Club 14 MGVC Kats (HO) 1369 0-4 0% 14 IN
34767 NPJO 11-Red 1369 4-8 33% 11 MN
34768 JAGS 11-1 1369 0-4 0% 11 MN
34769 NM Cactus VBC 15-1 1369 3-5 38% 15 NM
34770 Mighty Mo 16-Saiers 1369 2-16 10% 16 MT
34771 Centrasota 12-S 1369 1-5 11% 12 MN
34772 PJVBC 16 Elite 1369 21-31 40% 16 WA
34773 Hornet Elites 13 1369 1-4 20% 13 IN
34774 HTA 16 1369 19-35 35% 16 HI
34775 NoDak Juniors 17-2 1369 0-4 0% 17 ND
34776 Lex United 17 National 1369 25-37 40% 17 KY
34777 Mahoning Valley Premier VBC 14-Gold 1368 6-12 33% 14 OH
34778 AVBC 16-Hybrid 1368 4-6 40% 16 MI
34779 Midway Elite 14-Black 1368 21-30 41% 14 IL
34780 Orono 13-Red 1368 4-13 24% 13 MN
34781 Rocketfuel318 16-S shr 1368 0-4 0% 16 LA
34782 Atomic! 15-Maddie 1368 3-6 27% 15 MI
34783 Falcon Fire 13-1 1368 0-4 0% 13 MN
34784 S-MAQ 15-1 silver 1368 6-13 32% 15 OH
34785 Crossfire 13 Eddie 1368 16-23 41% 13 SC
34786 The House 14-Black 1368 28-32 47% 14 MI
34787 ACCEL 14-Black rangel 1368 12-23 32% 14 TX
34788 417 Juniors 16-4 1368 0-4 0% 16 MO
34789 USA MI Momentum 14 1368 3-7 30% 14 MI
34790 Webo 12-3s rachel/nadia 1368 2-9 18% 12 IN
34791 Ut Bounce 16-Blue 1368 10-24 26% 16 UT
34792 Volleytech 14 1368 13-17 43% 14 FL
34793 Impact VB 16-Ignite 1368 7-17 29% 16 SD
34794 EOVBC 14-Silver 1368 7-9 44% 14 OR
34795 IBV 14-Gold 1368 0-3 0% 14 IN
34796 MVP 15-Yellow 1368 1-5 17% 15 OH
34797 Dynamix 14-Black 1368 16-22 42% 14 CA
34798 Sunshine 11-Tsunami 1368 10-20 33% 11 CA
34799 Sunshine Volleyball Club 12-Valley 1368 9-15 38% 12 CA
34800 St. George Aces 15-Tiana 1368 4-9 29% 15 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.