2025-2026 Season — Page 696 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34751 | Team Ok 12-RED | 1369 | 11-16 | 41% | 12 | OK |
| 34752 | 501 Volley 12-Pink | 1369 | 10-14 | 42% | 12 | AR |
| 34753 | GMJO 14-1 | 1369 | 4-9 | 29% | 14 | MN |
| 34754 | SPVA 15-2 | 1369 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | MN |
| 34755 | Chicago Elite 13 National | 1369 | 16-35 | 31% | 13 | IL |
| 34756 | WC 14-Elite black | 1369 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | TX |
| 34757 | LA South 16-S | 1369 | 17-21 | 45% | 16 | LA |
| 34758 | Club Fusion 13-Spark spring | 1369 | 3-6 | 23% | 13 | IL |
| 34759 | Valor-AR 13 Elite | 1369 | 17-26 | 40% | 13 | AR |
| 34760 | CYVB 17-1 | 1369 | 10-15 | 40% | 17 | MA |
| 34761 | Vertical Thunder 16-S | 1369 | 11-7 | 61% | 16 | AZ |
| 34762 | CARDINAL CLUB 14 | 1369 | 1-5 | 17% | 14 | IA |
| 34763 | SVC 14-99 | 1369 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | FL |
| 34764 | RVA 16-Iglehart | 1369 | 15-23 | 39% | 16 | IA |
| 34765 | Hot Shots 14-1 | 1369 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 34766 | Madison-Grant Volleyball Club 14 MGVC Kats (HO) | 1369 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | IN |
| 34767 | NPJO 11-Red | 1369 | 4-8 | 33% | 11 | MN |
| 34768 | JAGS 11-1 | 1369 | 0-4 | 0% | 11 | MN |
| 34769 | NM Cactus VBC 15-1 | 1369 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | NM |
| 34770 | Mighty Mo 16-Saiers | 1369 | 2-16 | 10% | 16 | MT |
| 34771 | Centrasota 12-S | 1369 | 1-5 | 11% | 12 | MN |
| 34772 | PJVBC 16 Elite | 1369 | 21-31 | 40% | 16 | WA |
| 34773 | Hornet Elites 13 | 1369 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | IN |
| 34774 | HTA 16 | 1369 | 19-35 | 35% | 16 | HI |
| 34775 | NoDak Juniors 17-2 | 1369 | 0-4 | 0% | 17 | ND |
| 34776 | Lex United 17 National | 1369 | 25-37 | 40% | 17 | KY |
| 34777 | Mahoning Valley Premier VBC 14-Gold | 1368 | 6-12 | 33% | 14 | OH |
| 34778 | AVBC 16-Hybrid | 1368 | 4-6 | 40% | 16 | MI |
| 34779 | Midway Elite 14-Black | 1368 | 21-30 | 41% | 14 | IL |
| 34780 | Orono 13-Red | 1368 | 4-13 | 24% | 13 | MN |
| 34781 | Rocketfuel318 16-S shr | 1368 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | LA |
| 34782 | Atomic! 15-Maddie | 1368 | 3-6 | 27% | 15 | MI |
| 34783 | Falcon Fire 13-1 | 1368 | 0-4 | 0% | 13 | MN |
| 34784 | S-MAQ 15-1 silver | 1368 | 6-13 | 32% | 15 | OH |
| 34785 | Crossfire 13 Eddie | 1368 | 16-23 | 41% | 13 | SC |
| 34786 | The House 14-Black | 1368 | 28-32 | 47% | 14 | MI |
| 34787 | ACCEL 14-Black rangel | 1368 | 12-23 | 32% | 14 | TX |
| 34788 | 417 Juniors 16-4 | 1368 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | MO |
| 34789 | USA MI Momentum 14 | 1368 | 3-7 | 30% | 14 | MI |
| 34790 | Webo 12-3s rachel/nadia | 1368 | 2-9 | 18% | 12 | IN |
| 34791 | Ut Bounce 16-Blue | 1368 | 10-24 | 26% | 16 | UT |
| 34792 | Volleytech 14 | 1368 | 13-17 | 43% | 14 | FL |
| 34793 | Impact VB 16-Ignite | 1368 | 7-17 | 29% | 16 | SD |
| 34794 | EOVBC 14-Silver | 1368 | 7-9 | 44% | 14 | OR |
| 34795 | IBV 14-Gold | 1368 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | IN |
| 34796 | MVP 15-Yellow | 1368 | 1-5 | 17% | 15 | OH |
| 34797 | Dynamix 14-Black | 1368 | 16-22 | 42% | 14 | CA |
| 34798 | Sunshine 11-Tsunami | 1368 | 10-20 | 33% | 11 | CA |
| 34799 | Sunshine Volleyball Club 12-Valley | 1368 | 9-15 | 38% | 12 | CA |
| 34800 | St. George Aces 15-Tiana | 1368 | 4-9 | 29% | 15 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.