2025-2026 Season — Page 695 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34701 | Allegiance 13-Blue | 1369 | 11-17 | 39% | 13 | TX |
| 34702 | DCC 17-2 | 1369 | 0-4 | 0% | 17 | NY |
| 34703 | TAV 15-Silver | 1369 | 16-21 | 41% | 15 | TX |
| 34704 | Madtown 15-1 regional | 1369 | 6-8 | 40% | 15 | WI |
| 34705 | Meraki Volleyball 14-2 | 1369 | 11-14 | 42% | 14 | NH |
| 34706 | Outbreak 15-Black | 1369 | 17-25 | 40% | 15 | VA |
| 34707 | Ridgeline 15-2 | 1369 | 11-20 | 32% | 15 | MT |
| 34708 | CVA 15 Navy | 1369 | 31-37 | 46% | 15 | CO |
| 34709 | MSVB 14-Festival | 1369 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | AK |
| 34710 | Chaos 12-Black | 1369 | 4-6 | 40% | 12 | ND |
| 34711 | JOMO G17-2 | 1369 | 9-6 | 56% | 17 | MO |
| 34712 | Maine Juniors Volleyball Club 15-Gold | 1369 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | MA |
| 34713 | Xcell 13-Pink | 1369 | 0-5 | 0% | 13 | NV |
| 34714 | Stingray Blue 13-2 | 1369 | 6-9 | 40% | 13 | CA |
| 34715 | Limitless Queens LQVC 15-1 | 1369 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | NV |
| 34716 | Next Level 15 Lehua | 1369 | 19-34 | 36% | 15 | NV |
| 34717 | Augusta 4:12 15-Arey | 1369 | 3-11 | 21% | 15 | VA |
| 34718 | Mass Premier 18-1 | 1369 | 22-21 | 51% | 18 | MA |
| 34719 | The Edge 17-White | 1369 | 22-25 | 47% | 17 | CO |
| 34720 | Maine Jrs 13-Navy | 1369 | 6-14 | 29% | 13 | ME |
| 34721 | Kyle Elite 16 | 1369 | 2-6 | 25% | 16 | TX |
| 34722 | LEGACY 16-Premier zack | 1369 | 31-30 | 51% | 16 | FL |
| 34723 | Goshen 12-Chupp | 1369 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | IN |
| 34724 | 360SA 14-Jet black | 1369 | 26-23 | 53% | 14 | IL |
| 34725 | Dynamite 13-Carlos | 1369 | 23-24 | 49% | 13 | FL |
| 34726 | BSE 13-1 | 1369 | 12-18 | 40% | 13 | FL |
| 34727 | Pillar 13-Black | 1369 | 18-21 | 46% | 13 | OH |
| 34728 | Aspire Volleyball Club 12-Black | 1369 | 13-24 | 35% | 12 | AZ |
| 34729 | Pearl City Power 17-White | 1369 | 0-3 | 0% | 17 | IA |
| 34730 | YAVBC 15-Green | 1369 | 0-4 | 0% | 15 | SD |
| 34731 | SKC 17-Black | 1369 | 3-8 | 27% | 17 | KS |
| 34732 | Tribe 15-Regional red | 1369 | 14-22 | 39% | 15 | FL |
| 34733 | Lancers 14-Scarlet | 1369 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | IA |
| 34734 | Illini Elite 11-Brandi | 1369 | 4-11 | 27% | 11 | IL |
| 34735 | NC GOLD VOLLEYBALL 14-3 | 1369 | 1-6 | 14% | 14 | GA |
| 34736 | TX Ultimate 16-Blue | 1369 | 3-7 | 27% | 16 | TX |
| 34737 | Tstreet 13-Fina | 1369 | 14-20 | 41% | 13 | CA |
| 34738 | Rainier 14-Peak cmms | 1369 | 13-24 | 35% | 14 | WA |
| 34739 | Rise 11-Anecia | 1369 | 6-20 | 23% | 11 | ID |
| 34740 | Sanford Sports 12-White | 1369 | 4-14 | 22% | 12 | SD |
| 34741 | Club North Volleyball KC 13-3 | 1369 | 4-3 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 34742 | RDE 13-Jay | 1369 | 5-8 | 38% | 13 | CO |
| 34743 | Club Cactus 13-Red | 1369 | 12-17 | 41% | 13 | AZ |
| 34744 | SLAM 17-P red | 1369 | 22-27 | 45% | 17 | MA |
| 34745 | P1VBC 18-1 - linnie | 1369 | 15-16 | 47% | 18 | GA |
| 34746 | Cowboys 14 | 1369 | 10-14 | 38% | 14 | UT |
| 34747 | Rochester Volleyball Club Minnesota 14-Black | 1369 | 4-10 | 29% | 14 | MN |
| 34748 | Legacy 16-Elite west | 1369 | 22-26 | 46% | 16 | MI |
| 34749 | IVBA SOAR 17-Black | 1369 | 8-17 | 32% | 17 | MS |
| 34750 | Milwaukee Jr's 13-Silver | 1369 | 13-17 | 43% | 13 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.