Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 695 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34701 Allegiance 13-Blue 1369 11-17 39% 13 TX
34702 DCC 17-2 1369 0-4 0% 17 NY
34703 TAV 15-Silver 1369 16-21 41% 15 TX
34704 Madtown 15-1 regional 1369 6-8 40% 15 WI
34705 Meraki Volleyball 14-2 1369 11-14 42% 14 NH
34706 Outbreak 15-Black 1369 17-25 40% 15 VA
34707 Ridgeline 15-2 1369 11-20 32% 15 MT
34708 CVA 15 Navy 1369 31-37 46% 15 CO
34709 MSVB 14-Festival 1369 6-6 50% 14 AK
34710 Chaos 12-Black 1369 4-6 40% 12 ND
34711 JOMO G17-2 1369 9-6 56% 17 MO
34712 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club 15-Gold 1369 2-5 29% 15 MA
34713 Xcell 13-Pink 1369 0-5 0% 13 NV
34714 Stingray Blue 13-2 1369 6-9 40% 13 CA
34715 Limitless Queens LQVC 15-1 1369 2-6 25% 15 NV
34716 Next Level 15 Lehua 1369 19-34 36% 15 NV
34717 Augusta 4:12 15-Arey 1369 3-11 21% 15 VA
34718 Mass Premier 18-1 1369 22-21 51% 18 MA
34719 The Edge 17-White 1369 22-25 47% 17 CO
34720 Maine Jrs 13-Navy 1369 6-14 29% 13 ME
34721 Kyle Elite 16 1369 2-6 25% 16 TX
34722 LEGACY 16-Premier zack 1369 31-30 51% 16 FL
34723 Goshen 12-Chupp 1369 0-4 0% 12 IN
34724 360SA 14-Jet black 1369 26-23 53% 14 IL
34725 Dynamite 13-Carlos 1369 23-24 49% 13 FL
34726 BSE 13-1 1369 12-18 40% 13 FL
34727 Pillar 13-Black 1369 18-21 46% 13 OH
34728 Aspire Volleyball Club 12-Black 1369 13-24 35% 12 AZ
34729 Pearl City Power 17-White 1369 0-3 0% 17 IA
34730 YAVBC 15-Green 1369 0-4 0% 15 SD
34731 SKC 17-Black 1369 3-8 27% 17 KS
34732 Tribe 15-Regional red 1369 14-22 39% 15 FL
34733 Lancers 14-Scarlet 1369 0-4 0% 14 IA
34734 Illini Elite 11-Brandi 1369 4-11 27% 11 IL
34735 NC GOLD VOLLEYBALL 14-3 1369 1-6 14% 14 GA
34736 TX Ultimate 16-Blue 1369 3-7 27% 16 TX
34737 Tstreet 13-Fina 1369 14-20 41% 13 CA
34738 Rainier 14-Peak cmms 1369 13-24 35% 14 WA
34739 Rise 11-Anecia 1369 6-20 23% 11 ID
34740 Sanford Sports 12-White 1369 4-14 22% 12 SD
34741 Club North Volleyball KC 13-3 1369 4-3 50% 13 MO
34742 RDE 13-Jay 1369 5-8 38% 13 CO
34743 Club Cactus 13-Red 1369 12-17 41% 13 AZ
34744 SLAM 17-P red 1369 22-27 45% 17 MA
34745 P1VBC 18-1 - linnie 1369 15-16 47% 18 GA
34746 Cowboys 14 1369 10-14 38% 14 UT
34747 Rochester Volleyball Club Minnesota 14-Black 1369 4-10 29% 14 MN
34748 Legacy 16-Elite west 1369 22-26 46% 16 MI
34749 IVBA SOAR 17-Black 1369 8-17 32% 17 MS
34750 Milwaukee Jr's 13-Silver 1369 13-17 43% 13 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.