Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 692 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34551 Fusion 14-3 1371 10-12 45% 14 MN
34552 Oasis 15 Select 1371 18-26 41% 15 CA
34553 GJ 15 SELECT 1371 19-25 43% 15 FL
34554 LRJ 14-Premier black 1371 17-26 40% 14 AR
34555 MVP 14-National 1371 11-22 31% 14 TX
34556 Northern Spikers 13 Northern Spikers (NO) (18) 1371 0-6 0% 13 MN
34557 Crusader Juniors 14-2 1371 1-3 25% 14 MN
34558 Hana Hou 18-Ward 1371 5-7 42% 18 HI
34559 Voltage 15 1371 3-9 20% 15 PA
34560 Spiketown Reign 18-Purple 1371 6-9 40% 18 WI
34561 Ne Jrs 14-Black 1371 4-20 17% 14 NE
34562 MPV 12-National black 1371 3-26 9% 12 UT
34563 Millennium 10-Powers 1371 7-20 26% 10 OH
34564 Coastal 16-2 1371 6-13 27% 16 MA
34565 Vale 15-1 1371 0-10 0% 15 CT
34566 Carolina Pro Performance 11 1371 0-3 0% 11 PR
34567 Lancers 10-Silver 1371 0-4 0% 10 IA
34568 SELECT 13-Future 1371 3-8 27% 13 FL
34569 Village Juniors 16 1371 4-5 44% 16 AR
34570 AEV 18 Club 1371 9-16 36% 18 TX
34571 Premier 13-Royal 1371 1-4 20% 13 PA
34572 ENVY 15-Tidalwave 1371 19-24 44% 15 RI
34573 Maine Jrs 14-Bronze 1371 11-11 50% 14 ME
34574 MJVA 13-2 1371 1-7 13% 13 TN
34575 Carolina CHAOS 17-Black 1371 20-22 48% 17 NC
34576 Lancheras 15 1371 0-3 0% 15 PR
34577 Momentous VBC 14-Taylor 1371 9-20 31% 14 CA
34578 SEIVB 12 Little 1371 4-8 33% 12 IN
34579 Crank It 15-Ns 1371 15-15 50% 15 MI
34580 Thunder 15 1371 2-5 29% 15 MN
34581 Vision 13-Regional blue 1371 7-13 32% 13 TX
34582 W Pride 14-2 1371 5-10 33% 14 NY
34583 DE Eagles 14-White 1371 4-8 33% 14 MN
34584 NBVBC 14 1371 10-16 38% 14 MI
34585 LevelUp 14-Red 1371 11-14 44% 14 MI
34586 Surge 15-3 eb os 1371 10-15 40% 15 AL
34587 Salt City Smash VBC 18-1 1370 2-2 33% 18 KS
34588 Rhythm 13 Grace 1370 11-19 37% 13 TN
34589 SC Elite 14-White angelina 1370 11-28 28% 14 SC
34590 Jimtown 14-Daly jimmies 1370 0-4 0% 14 IN
34591 CSVB 12-White 1370 9-16 36% 12 MN
34592 LEH 18-2 1370 7-7 50% 18 MI
34593 EAST TEXAS ELITE - 15-1 1370 1-5 14% 15 TX
34594 Buckeye 14-Red 1370 3-7 30% 14 OH
34595 Wave 17 Tsunami 1370 18-25 42% 17 KY
34596 Top Flight 15-Kappa sp 1370 2-3 40% 15 IL
34597 Club Fusion 15-White 1370 13-14 48% 15 IL
34598 UP North Jr's DSN 11-Navy 1370 4-5 44% 11 WI
34599 SKC 17-1 1370 2-6 25% 17 KS
34600 Sunset West 13-Sharks 1370 0-4 0% 13 NE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.