Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 691 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34501 Lawrence Landsharks 14-2 1371 5-5 45% 14 KS
34502 Tx ACES 15-1black 1371 9-9 50% 15 TX
34503 All In 15-Purple 1371 2-6 25% 15 IL
34504 St. Pete 11-Teal 1371 23-30 43% 11 FL
34505 FORZA1 NORTH 18-National black 1371 17-22 44% 18 CA
34506 FB Xpress 15-Elite 1371 9-11 45% 15 TX
34507 NWVBC 14-1 1371 5-9 36% 14 WI
34508 316VBC G15-2 1371 4-5 29% 15 KS
34509 UVC 11-Nicole 1371 1-4 20% 11 IL
34510 RAGE 12-Ashley 1371 9-11 45% 12 CA
34511 Tehachapi 16-Chris 1371 0-7 0% 16 CA
34512 Illinois Jr's 15-1 1371 30-36 45% 15 IL
34513 AYOSA 15-1 1371 1-6 14% 15 CO
34514 Tipton 15-S 1371 0-4 0% 15 IA
34515 FLIGHT 13-Lovely 1371 3-3 50% 13 MI
34516 513VB 16-2 1371 21-35 38% 16 OH
34517 NET 15-Force 1371 17-27 35% 15 NY
34518 Chargers 17-S 1371 0-4 0% 17 IA
34519 Inspired VB 16-Yellow 1371 6-11 32% 16 MN
34520 APEX 17 Avalanche 1371 12-23 34% 17 PA
34521 FVBC 14 Spires 1371 12-22 30% 14 MD
34522 Xtrema 18 XTR Xtrema 1371 3-9 25% 18 WY
34523 Fusion 14-White (NO) 1371 1-5 17% 14 MN
34524 ESO 17-Premier 1371 4-11 27% 17 OH
34525 FB Fierce 15-N1 1371 1-6 14% 15 GA
34526 CCJRS 15-2 1371 0-4 0% 15 GA
34527 A5 Regional 15-Andrew 1371 16-17 48% 15 GA
34528 TVA 15-Purple (WE) 1371 5-11 26% 15 NY
34529 PC Elite 13 1371 5-11 28% 13 TX
34530 Paris Crush 11 1371 3-6 33% 11 KY
34531 Belusa United 17-Hurricane 1371 23-21 52% 17 IL
34532 CI Spikers 14-1 1371 10-19 34% 14 MN
34533 NE Elite 12-Storm 1371 4-4 50% 12 NE
34534 Eastside 13-R martinez 1371 4-8 33% 13 OH
34535 OVA 11-G select 1371 12-26 32% 11 AZ
34536 Sideout 16-Red 1371 4-8 33% 16 WA
34537 DVC Elite 14-Blue 1371 25-26 49% 14 IN
34538 Eastside 14-R chadwick 1371 0-4 0% 14 OH
34539 MDJRS 17-Open yellow 1371 13-30 25% 17 MD
34540 NE Top Flight 13-Gold 1371 0-3 0% 13 NE
34541 Chaos Volleyball 13 13U Chaos 1371 10-15 40% 13 ND
34542 Integrity 14-Club red 1371 11-12 41% 14 TX
34543 513VB 14-2 1371 16-28 36% 14 OH
34544 MVP 12-Regional purple 1371 4-10 29% 12 TX
34545 GRIT 17-Elite 1371 10-21 32% 17 AL
34546 IVC 12-Tigers 1371 0-3 0% 12 AK
34547 EnERgy 14-2 1371 3-7 30% 14 MN
34548 WSRVC 14-Kayleigh deschenes 1371 7-15 29% 14 WY
34549 Team Pineapple 11-Green 1371 16-21 43% 11 IN
34550 Gators VBC 15 Elite 1371 15-24 38% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.