2025-2026 Season — Page 679 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33901 | KC Force 17-Black | 1377 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | MO |
| 33902 | CSRA Heat 13-Black | 1377 | 15-18 | 45% | 13 | GA |
| 33903 | South Winn 14-2 | 1377 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | MN |
| 33904 | Eastview Lightning 14-2 | 1377 | 19-22 | 46% | 14 | MN |
| 33905 | Vibe VBC 12 Vibe, Jrs Walnut Creek 2 | 1377 | 7-9 | 44% | 12 | CA |
| 33906 | Diablo 12-1 black | 1377 | 7-17 | 29% | 12 | CA |
| 33907 | Weber Elite 15 | 1377 | 0-4 | 0% | 15 | UT |
| 33908 | TPV 15-Red | 1377 | 19-25 | 43% | 15 | TN |
| 33909 | LIVBC Girls 13-Gold | 1377 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | NY |
| 33910 | UPvbc 13-Adidas elite | 1377 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | OK |
| 33911 | MiElite 16-St west | 1377 | 18-22 | 43% | 16 | MI |
| 33912 | columbia sc starlings 13 | 1377 | 1-5 | 17% | 13 | SC |
| 33913 | SKC 16-Black | 1377 | 4-13 | 24% | 16 | KS |
| 33914 | LVA 16-1 | 1377 | 1-6 | 14% | 16 | HI |
| 33915 | PAC 11-Astro | 1377 | 5-14 | 22% | 11 | TX |
| 33916 | TUV 11-White | 1377 | 0-3 | 0% | 11 | TX |
| 33917 | Kanani A'o Ka'u 17 | 1377 | 2-8 | 20% | 17 | |
| 33918 | ATOMIC 12 Energy | 1377 | 24-30 | 44% | 12 | AZ |
| 33919 | Chaos 14-S black | 1377 | 3-7 | 30% | 14 | ND |
| 33920 | Trinity 14-Blaze | 1377 | 26-33 | 44% | 14 | FL |
| 33921 | Eclipse 14-Orange | 1377 | 6-9 | 40% | 14 | |
| 33922 | SEVA 15-Gold | 1377 | 6-7 | 46% | 15 | NC |
| 33923 | Next Level 13-Shaelie | 1377 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | MI |
| 33924 | CLUB ATTACK 17 | 1377 | 0-7 | 0% | 17 | NJ |
| 33925 | Chi City 16-2 regional | 1377 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | IL |
| 33926 | NORSE 13-1 | 1377 | 7-9 | 44% | 13 | IN |
| 33927 | RHVC 16-3 white | 1377 | 17-18 | 49% | 16 | KY |
| 33928 | Elevate 16-Spring | 1377 | 7-7 | 50% | 16 | IL |
| 33929 | Chicago Elite 16 National | 1377 | 27-35 | 44% | 16 | IL |
| 33930 | OTBCN 14 OTBCN (NO) (76) | 1377 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | |
| 33931 | GEV 16-1 dinah | 1377 | 7-25 | 22% | 16 | GA |
| 33932 | Floyd Chaos 15-Reasor | 1377 | 10-19 | 34% | 15 | VA |
| 33933 | FLIGHT 15-Smieska | 1377 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | MI |
| 33934 | Vibe 12-3 | 1377 | 0-5 | 0% | 12 | CA |
| 33935 | VLBR NC 14-Ariel | 1377 | 6-13 | 32% | 14 | NC |
| 33936 | St. Joe Storm 12-1 | 1377 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | MO |
| 33937 | STL Crossfire 12-Wl1 | 1377 | 9-13 | 39% | 12 | MO |
| 33938 | Freedom G12-1 | 1377 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | MO |
| 33939 | Rose City United VBC 14-1 | 1377 | 5-9 | 36% | 14 | MI |
| 33940 | Sunset West 12-Dash | 1377 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | NE |
| 33941 | Impact 14-Natalie w | 1377 | 6-9 | 40% | 14 | MI |
| 33942 | HPRIME 13-White | 1377 | 10-14 | 42% | 13 | TX |
| 33943 | TAV Houston 15 Silver | 1377 | 13-19 | 38% | 15 | TX |
| 33944 | LV 13 Tornado | 1377 | 6-13 | 27% | 13 | TX |
| 33945 | Intense 12-S - regional | 1377 | 2-6 | 25% | 12 | LA |
| 33946 | Texas Diamonds 15 Teal | 1377 | 11-13 | 42% | 15 | TX |
| 33947 | 501 Volley 12 Lime | 1377 | 9-13 | 41% | 12 | AR |
| 33948 | SEVC 14-2 | 1377 | 13-21 | 38% | 14 | AL |
| 33949 | NKJV 11-White | 1377 | 7-12 | 37% | 11 | KY |
| 33950 | MSV 16-1 | 1377 | 4-9 | 29% | 16 | MS |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.