Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 679 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
33901 KC Force 17-Black 1377 1-4 20% 17 MO
33902 CSRA Heat 13-Black 1377 15-18 45% 13 GA
33903 South Winn 14-2 1377 0-3 0% 14 MN
33904 Eastview Lightning 14-2 1377 19-22 46% 14 MN
33905 Vibe VBC 12 Vibe, Jrs Walnut Creek 2 1377 7-9 44% 12 CA
33906 Diablo 12-1 black 1377 7-17 29% 12 CA
33907 Weber Elite 15 1377 0-4 0% 15 UT
33908 TPV 15-Red 1377 19-25 43% 15 TN
33909 LIVBC Girls 13-Gold 1377 7-8 47% 13 NY
33910 UPvbc 13-Adidas elite 1377 1-4 20% 13 OK
33911 MiElite 16-St west 1377 18-22 43% 16 MI
33912 columbia sc starlings 13 1377 1-5 17% 13 SC
33913 SKC 16-Black 1377 4-13 24% 16 KS
33914 LVA 16-1 1377 1-6 14% 16 HI
33915 PAC 11-Astro 1377 5-14 22% 11 TX
33916 TUV 11-White 1377 0-3 0% 11 TX
33917 Kanani A'o Ka'u 17 1377 2-8 20% 17
33918 ATOMIC 12 Energy 1377 24-30 44% 12 AZ
33919 Chaos 14-S black 1377 3-7 30% 14 ND
33920 Trinity 14-Blaze 1377 26-33 44% 14 FL
33921 Eclipse 14-Orange 1377 6-9 40% 14
33922 SEVA 15-Gold 1377 6-7 46% 15 NC
33923 Next Level 13-Shaelie 1377 7-8 47% 13 MI
33924 CLUB ATTACK 17 1377 0-7 0% 17 NJ
33925 Chi City 16-2 regional 1377 2-3 40% 16 IL
33926 NORSE 13-1 1377 7-9 44% 13 IN
33927 RHVC 16-3 white 1377 17-18 49% 16 KY
33928 Elevate 16-Spring 1377 7-7 50% 16 IL
33929 Chicago Elite 16 National 1377 27-35 44% 16 IL
33930 OTBCN 14 OTBCN (NO) (76) 1377 5-5 50% 14
33931 GEV 16-1 dinah 1377 7-25 22% 16 GA
33932 Floyd Chaos 15-Reasor 1377 10-19 34% 15 VA
33933 FLIGHT 15-Smieska 1377 2-3 40% 15 MI
33934 Vibe 12-3 1377 0-5 0% 12 CA
33935 VLBR NC 14-Ariel 1377 6-13 32% 14 NC
33936 St. Joe Storm 12-1 1377 0-4 0% 12 MO
33937 STL Crossfire 12-Wl1 1377 9-13 39% 12 MO
33938 Freedom G12-1 1377 0-3 0% 12 MO
33939 Rose City United VBC 14-1 1377 5-9 36% 14 MI
33940 Sunset West 12-Dash 1377 0-3 0% 12 NE
33941 Impact 14-Natalie w 1377 6-9 40% 14 MI
33942 HPRIME 13-White 1377 10-14 42% 13 TX
33943 TAV Houston 15 Silver 1377 13-19 38% 15 TX
33944 LV 13 Tornado 1377 6-13 27% 13 TX
33945 Intense 12-S - regional 1377 2-6 25% 12 LA
33946 Texas Diamonds 15 Teal 1377 11-13 42% 15 TX
33947 501 Volley 12 Lime 1377 9-13 41% 12 AR
33948 SEVC 14-2 1377 13-21 38% 14 AL
33949 NKJV 11-White 1377 7-12 37% 11 KY
33950 MSV 16-1 1377 4-9 29% 16 MS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.