Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 678 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
33851 UBVBC 15-1 1378 4-12 17% 15 NY
33852 Tampa North 10-Black 1378 15-22 41% 10 FL
33853 Delta Patriots 13-blue 1378 7-8 47% 13 AR
33854 Madras Volleyball Club 14-S 1378 2-6 25% 14 WA
33855 Panther 14-3 1378 3-4 43% 14 CO
33856 All City 14-Thunder 1378 20-25 40% 14 MD
33857 AMBROSE ATHLETICS 14-Ublk 1378 1-3 25% 14 TX
33858 Downstate 16-Blazers 1378 8-9 47% 16 NY
33859 Renegades 13 Adidas 1378 11-21 33% 13 TX
33860 NorCal Volleyball Club 12 NorCal Juniors Carrie 5 1378 8-11 42% 12 CA
33861 CEV 18 1378 4-7 36% 18 FL
33862 Mountain Crush 16-Sl 1378 11-10 52% 16 AZ
33863 Sweets U12-Black 1378 4-7 36% 12 WA
33864 Envision 17-Black 1378 3-4 43% 17 NV
33865 Tamales Volleyball Club 13-1 1378 0-4 0% 13 MO
33866 Epic United 15-Prem2 1378 17-12 59% 15 IL
33867 Aura 18 1378 5-21 19% 18 CA
33868 Elevate Athletics 14-Black keilani 1378 5-20 17% 14 UT
33869 I AM VBC 16 Gold 1378 18-25 42% 16 WI
33870 Milwaukee Jr's 16-Premier 1378 50-46 52% 16 WI
33871 NLVA 14-2 mint 1378 2-4 33% 14 NC
33872 Allons 14-Caroline 1378 15-19 44% 14 LA
33873 Top Flight 15-Kappa 1378 1-4 20% 15 IL
33874 PRECISION ONE 13-Instate pink 1378 0-4 0% 13 IA
33875 Alliance 17-Black 1378 1-4 20% 17 PA
33876 Momentum 13-Black 1378 10-16 38% 13 FL
33877 MWP 18 Gold 1378 10-13 43% 18 MN
33878 LIV 12-Black emeri 1378 12-15 44% 12 LA
33879 MSVBC 12 Navy 1378 26-32 43% 12 AZ
33880 Mizuno CNVBC 11-Tarrin 1378 0-7 0% 11 MO
33881 LIV 18-Royal 1378 3-5 38% 18 CA
33882 TEAM Kiwi 14 Columbia 1378 36-26 58% 14 FL
33883 JJVA Club 14-H 1378 6-9 40% 14 FL
33884 Team Colorado 18-N1 1378 6-9 40% 18 CO
33885 SP2VC 15-White 1378 3-7 30% 15 NC
33886 Blues 16-1 gold 1378 15-17 47% 16 OR
33887 CinciVB Acad 14-4 1378 9-10 47% 14 OH
33888 Compete 17 Compete (2) 1378 3-7 30% 17
33889 VFVBC 16-1 1377 8-11 36% 16 VT
33890 ClubCENTRAL 15-Grey 1377 2-6 25% 15 SD
33891 RVBC 13-Red 1377 3-6 30% 13 PA
33892 TEJAS 14-Red leao 1377 1-4 20% 14 TX
33893 Morgan Volleyball Club 16 1377 0-0 0% 16 UT
33894 Sunset West 14-Echo 1377 0-3 0% 14 NE
33895 NXGVB 13 1377 5-10 33% 13 TN
33896 LVA 12-Regional 1377 3-7 21% 12 MA
33897 Legacy Volleyball 17-1 1377 13-18 34% 17 TN
33898 OC Lady Elite 15-Regional 1377 8-15 35% 15 NY
33899 SRJ 14-White 1377 4-6 40% 14 WA
33900 GHVBC 14 1377 8-12 40% 14 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.