Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 650 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32451 EXCELL 16-3 paige yellow 1392 12-20 38% 16 SC
32452 Zoom Volleyball Club 16-1 1392 1-4 20% 16 KS
32453 Lake Cumberland Force Volleyball Club 13 LC Force 1392 8-11 42% 13 KY
32454 New Heights Volleyball Club 18 New Heights U17/18 (PS) 1392 17-23 43% 18 WA
32455 Thrive 17-Hybrid 1392 17-23 43% 17 CA
32456 RockCity 14 N3 1392 26-34 43% 14 OH
32457 Bubbles United 11-Gomez 1392 1-5 17% 11 FL
32458 Fusion 14-Silver 1392 1-5 17% 14 MN
32459 OVA 15-Blue 1392 24-39 38% 15 FL
32460 Big City M 15-Elite 1392 26-35 43% 15 NY
32461 PIRATAS ADN 18-2 1392 2-4 33% 18 PR
32462 CAVC 18 Elite 1392 10-20 33% 18 VA
32463 San Antonio Jaguars 17-Black 1392 15-31 33% 17 TX
32464 Raiders 14-Black 1392 3-6 33% 14 MN
32465 NC Coastal 14 Piper 1392 7-15 32% 14 NC
32466 BSVBC 15-Gray 1392 13-27 32% 15 IL
32467 OGVC 12-Aces 1392 4-6 31% 12 ND
32468 AVC Nebraska 17-White 1392 3-7 30% 17 NE
32469 Legacy Volleyball 15-1 1392 10-14 29% 15 TN
32470 MVP 60450 11 1392 4-9 29% 11 IL
32471 KW Club 14-1 1392 4-10 29% 14 MN
32472 AFVBC 14-Pinnacle 1392 11-22 33% 14 CA
32473 Midwest Blitz 14-1 1392 7-13 33% 14 KS
32474 PAO STL 16-Rda white 1392 11-21 34% 16 MO
32475 Mineral Area 14-Gold diggers 1392 4-7 29% 14 MO
32476 NEVA 13-Black stech 1392 6-11 29% 13 UT
32477 CHiX 18-PiNK 1392 11-28 28% 18 OH
32478 Monti Club JO 12-1 1392 3-8 27% 12 MN
32479 Slam VBC 11-White 1392 3-9 25% 11 WI
32480 Tx Legends 11-Gray 1392 2-5 25% 11 TX
32481 Power Volleyball Club 15 1392 2-6 25% 15 FL
32482 Club V South 15-Francisco 1392 8-34 19% 15 UT
32483 NC Intensity 16-Emily 1392 12-23 34% 16 NC
32484 COA 11-Rebels 1392 8-15 35% 11 IN
32485 Premier 14 Kokoro 1392 21-37 36% 14 OH
32486 Iowa Vibe 15-3 purple 1392 9-16 36% 15 IA
32487 Ark Jrs 12-Regionalplus white 1392 4-7 36% 12 AR
32488 Titanium 18-White 1392 7-9 37% 18 MO
32489 TX STORM 12-Minis 1392 7-22 22% 12 TX
32490 SBVC Girls 14-Elite william 1392 10-11 48% 14 CA
32491 Munciana In 16-R wolverines 1392 12-12 50% 16 IN
32492 High Tide 12-Mike 1392 21-25 46% 12 CA
32493 REVO 17 1392 23-15 61% 17 MI
32494 Matrix 12-Logan 2026 1392 4-5 44% 12 AZ
32495 307 Impact Impact 11-Paige 1392 11-11 50% 11 WY
32496 ACES BLUE 14-1 1392 16-20 44% 14 OK
32497 Real Volleyball Academy 12 RealVB Madi 1392 9-11 43% 12 GA
32498 PAVC - NC 14-White 1392 5-6 45% 14 NC
32499 Iowa United 14-3 premier 1392 7-9 44% 14 IA
32500 Eclipse 15 1392 10-14 42% 15 MD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.