2025-2026 Season — Page 650 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32451 | EXCELL 16-3 paige yellow | 1392 | 12-20 | 38% | 16 | SC |
| 32452 | Zoom Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1392 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | KS |
| 32453 | Lake Cumberland Force Volleyball Club 13 LC Force | 1392 | 8-11 | 42% | 13 | KY |
| 32454 | New Heights Volleyball Club 18 New Heights U17/18 (PS) | 1392 | 17-23 | 43% | 18 | WA |
| 32455 | Thrive 17-Hybrid | 1392 | 17-23 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 32456 | RockCity 14 N3 | 1392 | 26-34 | 43% | 14 | OH |
| 32457 | Bubbles United 11-Gomez | 1392 | 1-5 | 17% | 11 | FL |
| 32458 | Fusion 14-Silver | 1392 | 1-5 | 17% | 14 | MN |
| 32459 | OVA 15-Blue | 1392 | 24-39 | 38% | 15 | FL |
| 32460 | Big City M 15-Elite | 1392 | 26-35 | 43% | 15 | NY |
| 32461 | PIRATAS ADN 18-2 | 1392 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | PR |
| 32462 | CAVC 18 Elite | 1392 | 10-20 | 33% | 18 | VA |
| 32463 | San Antonio Jaguars 17-Black | 1392 | 15-31 | 33% | 17 | TX |
| 32464 | Raiders 14-Black | 1392 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | MN |
| 32465 | NC Coastal 14 Piper | 1392 | 7-15 | 32% | 14 | NC |
| 32466 | BSVBC 15-Gray | 1392 | 13-27 | 32% | 15 | IL |
| 32467 | OGVC 12-Aces | 1392 | 4-6 | 31% | 12 | ND |
| 32468 | AVC Nebraska 17-White | 1392 | 3-7 | 30% | 17 | NE |
| 32469 | Legacy Volleyball 15-1 | 1392 | 10-14 | 29% | 15 | TN |
| 32470 | MVP 60450 11 | 1392 | 4-9 | 29% | 11 | IL |
| 32471 | KW Club 14-1 | 1392 | 4-10 | 29% | 14 | MN |
| 32472 | AFVBC 14-Pinnacle | 1392 | 11-22 | 33% | 14 | CA |
| 32473 | Midwest Blitz 14-1 | 1392 | 7-13 | 33% | 14 | KS |
| 32474 | PAO STL 16-Rda white | 1392 | 11-21 | 34% | 16 | MO |
| 32475 | Mineral Area 14-Gold diggers | 1392 | 4-7 | 29% | 14 | MO |
| 32476 | NEVA 13-Black stech | 1392 | 6-11 | 29% | 13 | UT |
| 32477 | CHiX 18-PiNK | 1392 | 11-28 | 28% | 18 | OH |
| 32478 | Monti Club JO 12-1 | 1392 | 3-8 | 27% | 12 | MN |
| 32479 | Slam VBC 11-White | 1392 | 3-9 | 25% | 11 | WI |
| 32480 | Tx Legends 11-Gray | 1392 | 2-5 | 25% | 11 | TX |
| 32481 | Power Volleyball Club 15 | 1392 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | FL |
| 32482 | Club V South 15-Francisco | 1392 | 8-34 | 19% | 15 | UT |
| 32483 | NC Intensity 16-Emily | 1392 | 12-23 | 34% | 16 | NC |
| 32484 | COA 11-Rebels | 1392 | 8-15 | 35% | 11 | IN |
| 32485 | Premier 14 Kokoro | 1392 | 21-37 | 36% | 14 | OH |
| 32486 | Iowa Vibe 15-3 purple | 1392 | 9-16 | 36% | 15 | IA |
| 32487 | Ark Jrs 12-Regionalplus white | 1392 | 4-7 | 36% | 12 | AR |
| 32488 | Titanium 18-White | 1392 | 7-9 | 37% | 18 | MO |
| 32489 | TX STORM 12-Minis | 1392 | 7-22 | 22% | 12 | TX |
| 32490 | SBVC Girls 14-Elite william | 1392 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 32491 | Munciana In 16-R wolverines | 1392 | 12-12 | 50% | 16 | IN |
| 32492 | High Tide 12-Mike | 1392 | 21-25 | 46% | 12 | CA |
| 32493 | REVO 17 | 1392 | 23-15 | 61% | 17 | MI |
| 32494 | Matrix 12-Logan 2026 | 1392 | 4-5 | 44% | 12 | AZ |
| 32495 | 307 Impact Impact 11-Paige | 1392 | 11-11 | 50% | 11 | WY |
| 32496 | ACES BLUE 14-1 | 1392 | 16-20 | 44% | 14 | OK |
| 32497 | Real Volleyball Academy 12 RealVB Madi | 1392 | 9-11 | 43% | 12 | GA |
| 32498 | PAVC - NC 14-White | 1392 | 5-6 | 45% | 14 | NC |
| 32499 | Iowa United 14-3 premier | 1392 | 7-9 | 44% | 14 | IA |
| 32500 | Eclipse 15 | 1392 | 10-14 | 42% | 15 | MD |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.